Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus conventional medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding in the Asia-Pacific region.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes, including cumulative continuation rate (CCR), in the treatment of idiopathic heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and with conventional medical therapies (CMTs), including combined oral contraceptives, oral progestins, and antifibrinolytics, either alone or in combination, in the Asia-Pacific region. METHODS: In a prospective observational cohort study conducted between September 2008 and December 2010, 647 women (LNG-IUS, n=483; CMTs, n=164), aged 18-45 years and diagnosed with HMB, were recruited from 8 countries and followed for up to 1 year. The primary outcome was the CCR at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included bleeding pattern, an assessment of treatment efficacy by the treating physician, and safety. RESULTS: The CCR at 12 months was significantly higher for LNG-IUS than for CMTs (87.6% vs 56.3% P<0.05). Compared with CMTs, LNG-IUS offered a better reduction in both subjectively assessed menstrual blood loss and the number of bleeding days, and had better efficacy for HMB, as determined by the physician's final evaluation. CONCLUSION: The present study provides information on the real-life patterns of treatment of HMB in the Asia-Pacific region. The efficacy of CMTs was inferior compared with LNG-IUS in the clinical outcomes measured. ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00864136.

Attitudes of Korean clinicians to postmenopausal hormone therapy after the Women's Health Initiative study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the attitudes of Korean physicians toward hormone therapy (HT) after publication of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study. DESIGN: Self-administered questionnaires, consisting of 22 items, were sent by mail to the members of the Korean Society of Menopause. RESULTS: More than 95% of Korean physicians were aware of the WHI study. The HT prescription rate decreased by 16% after publication of the WHI report; approximately half of the physicians who continued prescribing HT changed their prescriptions. The largest decreases occurred in regimens using conjugated equine estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate, for which prescriptions of sequential and continuous-combined regimens decreased by 20.7% and 22.7%, respectively. In contrast, the prescription rate for tibolone increased by 3.6%. Approximately 30% of physicians changed from standard to low doses, and 67.8% shortened the duration of HT. After publication of the WHI report, the main reasons for not prescribing or discontinuing HT were patient refusal and increased risk of cardiovascular disease, rather than breast cancer risk. After publication of the WHI report, the number of physicians who prescribed alternative or complementary medicines increased, the rate of HT prescription for the prevention of osteoporosis decreased, and the number of postmenopausal outpatients decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the results of the WHI report, most Korean physicians who participated in this study continued prescribing HT; however, approximately half of those who continued prescribing HT changed their prescriptions. The greatest change occurred in regimens using conjugated equine estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate.