Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Phys Med Biol ; 58(9): 2823-40, 2013 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23563165

ABSTRACT

The spatial resolution from Compton cameras suffers from measurement uncertainties in interaction positions and energies. The degree of degradation in spatial resolution is shift-variant (SV) over the field-of-view (FOV) because the imaging principle is based on the conical surface integration. In our study, the shift-variant point spread function (SV-PSF) is derived from point source measurements at various positions in the FOV and is incorporated into the system matrix of a fully three-dimensional, accelerated reconstruction, i.e. the listmode ordered subset expectation maximization (LMOSEM) algorithm, for resolution recovery. Simulation data from point sources were used to estimate SV and asymmetric parameters for Gaussian, Cauchy, and general parametric PSFs. Although little difference in the fitness accuracy between Gaussian and general parametric PSFs was observed, the general parametric model showed greater flexibility over the FOV in shaping the curve between that for Gaussian and Cauchy functions. The estimated asymmetric SV-PSFs were incorporated into the LMOSEM for resolution recovery. For simulation data from a single point source at the origin, all LMOSEM-SV-PSFs improved the spatial resolution by 2.6 times over the standard LMOSEM. For two point-source simulations, reconstructions also gave a two-fold improvement in spatial resolution and resulted in a greater recovered activity ratio at different positions in the FOV.


Subject(s)
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Scattering, Radiation , Monte Carlo Method
2.
Phys Med Biol ; 55(17): 5007-27, 2010 Sep 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20702926

ABSTRACT

Although the ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm does not converge to a true maximum likelihood solution, it is known to provide a good solution if the projections that constitute each subset are reasonably balanced. The Compton scattered data can be allocated to subsets using scattering angles (SA) or detected positions (DP) or a combination of the two (AP (angles and positions)). To construct balanced subsets, the data were first arranged using three ordering schemes: the random ordering scheme (ROS), the multilevel ordering scheme (MLS) and the weighted-distance ordering scheme (WDS). The arranged data were then split into J subsets. To compare the three ordering schemes, we calculated the coefficients of variation (CVs) of angular and positional differences between the arranged data and the percentage errors between mathematical phantoms and reconstructed images. All ordering schemes showed an order-of-magnitude acceleration over the standard EM, and their computation times were similar. The SA-based MLS and the DP-based WDS led to the best-balanced subsets (they provided the largest angular and positional differences for SA- and DP-based arrangements, respectively). The WDS exhibited minimum CVs for both the SA- and DP-based arrangements (the deviation in mean angular and positional differences between the ordered subsets was smallest). The combination of AP and WDS yielded the best results with the lowest percentage errors by providing larger and more uniform angular and positional differences for the SA and DP arrangements, and thus, is probably optimal Compton camera reconstruction using OSEM.


Subject(s)
Gamma Cameras , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/instrumentation , Positron-Emission Tomography/instrumentation , Algorithms , Artifacts , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Phantoms, Imaging , Positron-Emission Tomography/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Appl Radiat Isot ; 67(7-8): 1412-5, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19321352

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we propose a combined Compton camera/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. For this, the table-top Compton camera currently under development in our laboratory is suitable, considering that it is not very large (i.e., a table-top size) and that it uses semiconductor detectors (for both the scatterer and absorber detectors), which in principle are not very sensitive to a magnetic field. The Compton camera takes three-dimensional images from a fixed position and, therefore, does not require a large ring-type structure, making it possible to fit it into an existing MRI system, without requiring major modifications to the system. In the present study, the potential of combining the table-top Compton camera and an MRI scanner for real simultaneous imaging was demonstrated by fusing a Compton camera image of an instance of multi-tracing, generated by using Geant4 Monte Carlo simulations, with an MR image.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Imaging/instrumentation , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/instrumentation , Radiography/instrumentation , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Equipment Design , Feasibility Studies , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Monte Carlo Method , Radiography/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...