A phase II study of irinotecan with biweekly, low dose leucovorin and bolus and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (modified FOLFIRI) as first line therapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: To determine the activity and toxicities of a low-dose leucovorin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) regimen, combined with irinotecan and administered every 2 weeks (modified FOLFIRI), as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer. METHOD: Patients were treated with cycles of 150 mg/m irinotecan on day 1 plus 50 mg of LV, followed by a 400 mg/m 5-FU bolus and a 22-hour continuous infusion of 600 mg/m 5-FU on days 1 and 2. RESULTS: The median patient age was 55 years (range, 29-75 years), and 77% (34/44) of the patients had a performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) of 0 or 1. Of the 44 patients evaluated for their tumor response, 3 patients (6.8%) and 14 patients (31.8%) achieved a complete and partial response, respectively, with an overall response rate of 38.6% (95% confidence interval, 23.7%-53.6%). 13 patients (29.6%) evidenced a stable disease, and 14 patients (31.8%) progressed during the course of the treatment. The median time to progression and overall survival time were 4.9 months (range, 0.9-22.8 months) and 10.3 months (range, 1.2-29.0 months) from the start of the chemotherapy, respectively. A total of 293 cycles were assessed for toxicity. The major hematologic toxicities included grade 1 to 2 anemia (27.6%), neutropenia (48.8%), and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (12.6%). There were 7 cycles of neutropenic fever. Nonhematological toxicities were observed grade 3 vomiting (6.8%), grade 3 diarrhea (4.5%), and grade 3 mucositis (2.3%). We noted no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The modified FOLFIRI regimen-lowering of irinotecan and LV doses-is a safe and feasible regimen as a first-line therapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer.

Prognostic value of ERCC1, thymidylate synthase, and glutathione S-transferase pi for 5-FU/oxaliplatin chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether the expression of the excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1), thymidylate synthase (TS) and glutathione S-transferase pi (GSTpi) predict clinical outcome in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with fluorouracil (5-FU)/oxaliplatin chemotherapy. METHODS: The study population consisted of 70 patients with advanced colorectal cancer (median age, 54 years). Patients were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m as a 2-hour infusion on days 1 plus leucovorin (LV) 20 mg/m over 10 minutes, followed by 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m and a 22-hour continuous infusion of 600 mg/m from day 1 to 2. Treatment was repeated at 2-week intervals. The expression of ERCC1, TS, and GSTpi in primary tumors was examined using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: ERCC1, TS, and GSTpi were positive in 55.7%, 68.6%, and 71.4% of cases, respectively. Patients without TS expression were more likely to respond to chemotherapy (P = 0.009). There were no significant differences between response to treatment and the ERCC1 or GSTpi expression pattern (P = 0.768, P = 0.589, respectively). The median overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in patients without ERCC1 expression (P = 0.0474). Patients who were ERCC1 positive combined with TS positive, or those with ERCC1 positive combined with TS positive and GSTpi positive had a poor OS (P = 0.0017, P = 0.0323, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that both ERCC1 and TS expression significantly impacted OS (hazard ratio 1.72, P = 0.023). CONCLUSION: Immunohistochemical study of ERCC1 and TS may be useful for the prediction of clinical outcome in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with 5-FU and oxaliplatin.

Primary penile diffuse large B cell lymphoma treated by local excision followed by rituximab-containing chemotherapy.

Primary penile lymphoma is rarely observed in cases of extranodal malignant lymphoma. Owing principally to its rarity, no definite treatment modality has been established. We report the case of a 42-year-old man who presented with hematuria and a painless palpable mass on the penis which had persisted for 2 months. A 1.5 x 1.4 cm round mass was detected in the shaft of the penis. Histopathological examination of the excisional biopsy revealed CD20+ diffuse large B cell lymphoma. The patient was classified as having a stage I(AE) lymphoma. Because radiation often causes considerable early morbidity and later loss of function of the penis, 6 cycles of combination chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone) with rituximab were administered at 3-week intervals. After treatment, the patient showed a complete response and has maintained this status for the past 7 months. Multiple options, such as surgical amputation, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, are available for treatment of this condition. However, in order to minimize treatment-related morbidity and to maintain quality of life after treatment, combination chemotherapy including rituximab could be considered the treatment of choice after local excision.

Gemcitabine versus gemcitabine combined with cisplatin treatment locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: Gemcitabine is the most active agent to treat unresectable pancreatic cancer. The superiority of combining other drugs with cisplatin is still controversial; therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine combined with cisplatin to determine the treatment outcomes for patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2001 to 2007, we enrolled 60 patients who were treated with gemcitabine or gemcitabine combined with cisplatin for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine 1, 000 mg/m(2) (G) was administrated at day 1 and day 8 every 3 weeks. Cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) was added at day 1 every 3 weeks to the gemcitabine schedule (GP). RESULTS: NUMBER OF G: GP was 34: 26, locally advanced to metastatic ratio was 35% to 65% in group G and 46% to 54% in group GP. Median follow up duration was 29 months. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 4 (range: 2 approximately 11) for the G group, and 4 (range: 1 approximately 11) for the GP group. The response rate of the G and GP groups was 17% and 11%, respectively. The progression free survival (PFS) was 4.5 months and 2.8 months, respectively, for the G and GP groups. The overall survival (OS) was 10.7 and 8.7 months respectively, for the G and GP groups, but there is no statistically significant difference of the PFS (p=0.2396) and OS (p=0.4643) between the 2 groups. The hematological toxicity profile was similar (the grade III neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was 4.4% and 3.1%, respectively, in G group, and 7.5% and 2.8%, respectively, in the GP group). But non-hematological toxicities such as skin rash, abnormal liver function and nausea/vomiting were observed in 3 patients of the GP group. On the prognostic factor analysis, no factors predicted a longer PFS and OS for both the G and GP groups. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine single treatment might be more tolerable and it had the same efficacy compared to cisplatin combination treatment in this retrospective study.

A Phase II study of oxaliplatin with low-dose leucovorin and bolus and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (modified FOLFOX-4) for gastric cancer patients with malignant ascites.

BACKGROUND: Clinical studies regarding chemotherapy for gastric cancer patients with malignant ascites have been classically rather limited in scope, largely because peritoneal seeding produces no measurable lesions, and patients generally exhibited poor performance status. Herein, we have evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of a fortnightly modified FOLFOX-4 (m-FOLFOX) regimen. METHODS: Gastric cancer patients with cytologically confirmed malignant ascites were treated with cycles of oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m(2) plus leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) on the first day of treatment, followed by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) via a 400 mg/m(2) bolus and a 22 h continuous infusion of 600 mg/m(2) 5-FU on Days 1-2 at 2-week intervals. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients participated in this study. Twenty-two patients (45.8%) were treated with m-FOLFOX-4 as a first line palliative treatment. Twenty-one patients (43.8%) were adjudged to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2. Thirty-six patients were assessable and exhibited measurable lesions. Twelve (33.3%) patients evidenced partial responses. Decreases or disappearances of ascites levels were observed in 17 (35.4%) patients. The median time to progression and overall survival time were 3.5 (95% CI: 2.9-4.1) months and 8.4 (95% CI: 4.9-11.9) months, respectively. Major hematologic toxicities included Grades 1-2 anemia (53.9%), neutropenia (41.6%) and, Grades 3-4 neutropenia (15.8%). The most frequently detected non-hematological toxicities were Grades 2 and 3 nausea/vomiting (17%). We noted no deaths related to treatment. CONCLUSION: The m-FOLFOX-4 regimen utilized herein was determined to be both safe and feasible even for gastric cancer patients with malignant ascites in poor performance status.

A phase II study of paclitaxel and cisplatin as salvage therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the therapeutic activity and safety of paclitaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancers that are unresponsive to primary chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients unresponsive to first line chemotherapy were entered into this trial. The treatment regimen consisted of paclitaxel, 175 mg/m(2) by 3-hour infusion on day 1, and cisplatin, 60 mg/m(2) by 1 hour infusion on day 1, with the treatment repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: 37 patients were entered in this study, with 32 fully evaluable for response. 4 (13%), 13 (40%) and 15 (47%) patients achieved a partial response, stable disease and progressed, respectively. The median time to progression was 4.0 months (95% CI: 2.0 approximately 6.0 months), and the median overall survival was 12.6 months (95% CI: 5.5 approximately 19.7 months), with a 1-year survival rate of 54%. Of a total of 135 cycles of chemotherapy, grades 3 and 4 hematological toxicities were neutropenia (14%) and anemia (3%). Grade >or=2 neuropathy was observed in 6 patients (17%). CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin is an effective and tolerable salvage treatment modality for advanced gastric cancer.

Oxaliplatin with biweekly low dose leucovorin and bolus and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (modified FOLFOX 4) as a salvage therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the activity and the toxicity associated with a low dose regimen of leucovorin (LV) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with oxaliplatin every two weeks (modified FOLFOX 4) as a salvage therapy for advanced gastric cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 2003 and December 2004, 33 patients were enrolled in this study. The patients were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on the first day plus LV 20 mg/m(2) over 10 minutes. Subsequently, the patients were given a 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2) followed by a 22-hour continuous infusion of 600 mg/m(2) on days 1 approximately 2. The treatment was repeated at 2 week intervals. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 50 years (range: 31 approximately 74), 82% (27/33) had the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 and 1. Of the 30 patients who could be evaluated for their tumor response, 8 achieved a partial response, with an overall response rate of 26.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 20.5 approximately 32.7%). Fifteen patients (50%) showed stable disease and 7 patients (23.3%) progressed during the course of treatment. The median time from the start of chemotherapy to progression was 3.5 months (95% CI: 2.6 approximately 4.4 months) and the median overall survival time was 7.9 months (95% CI: 5.9 approximately 9.9 months). The major grade 3/4 hematological toxicity encountered included neutropenia (45.4%) and thrombocytopenia (3.0%). Neutropenic fever occurred during only 2 of the 178 cycles. The most common non-hematological toxicity encountered was grade 1/2 nausea/vomiting, which occurred in 18.2% of patients, diarrhea in 12.1% and neuropathy in 15.2%. There were no treatment related deaths. CONCLUSION: The modified FOLFOX 4 regimen appears to be a safe and effective salvage therapy for advanced gastric cancer patients.