HBV reactivation risk factors in patients with chronic HBV infection with low replicative state and resolved HBV infection undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Korea.

PURPOSE: To elucidate the rate and risk factors of HBV reactivation in patients with chronic HBV infection with low replicative state and resolved HBV infection undergoing allogenic/autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in Korea. METHODS: The medical charts of 506 patients who underwent allogenic/autologous HSCT from January 2008 to December 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. We examined the reactivation rate and variables related to the risk of HBV reactivation, with a median follow-up period of 41.8 (1-245) months. Univariate analysis was used to identify any factors associated with HBV reactivation. Factors that were significant in the univariate analysis were entered into a stepwise multivariate analysis to find the most significant risk factors associated with HBV reactivation. RESULTS: The reactivation rate of HBV in patients who underwent HSCT was 4.2 % (21/506). In subgroup analysis, the HBV reactivation rate (14.3 %) was the highest among HBsAg(+) patients (5/35). The reactivation rate of HBV in patients with resolved HBV infection [HBsAg(-)/HBcAb(+) with or without anti-HBs antibody] was 5.9 % (10/171). In univariate analysis for risk factors of HBV reactivation in patients who underwent HSCT, initial detectable HBV DNA (p = 0.004), age (≥60 years) (p = 0.012), recipient hepatitis B surface antigen-positive (HbsAg)(+) before HSCT (p = 0.004), recipient hepatitis B surface antibody-negative (HBsAb)(-) before HSCT (p = 0.005), recipient hepatitis B core antibody-positive (HbcAb)(+) before HSCT (p = 0.013), and donor HBsAg(+) (p < 0.001) were associated with reactivation of HBV. In multivariate analysis, significant risk factors of HBV reactivation in patients who underwent HSCT were old age (≥60 years) (p = 0.032) and donor HBsAg(+) (p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Old age (≥60 years) and donor HBsAg(+) were risk factors for HBV reactivation in HSCT patients. Preemptive antiviral treatment should be considered in these patients.

Comparison of intraductal ultrasonography-directed and cholangiography-directed endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage in patients with a biliary obstruction.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) has become a standard procedure in patients with a biliary obstruction. Intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) has emerged as a new tool for managing extrahepatic biliary diseases. IDUS-directed ERBD can be performed without conventional cholangiography (CC). The goal of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of IDUS-directed ERBD compared to CC-directed ERBD in patients with an extrahepatic biliary obstruction. METHODS: A total of 210 patients who had undergone IDUS-directed ERBD (IDUS-ERBD, n = 105) and CC-directed ERBD (CC-ERBD, n = 105) between October 2013 and April 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome measure was the procedural success rate. Secondary outcome measures included clinical outcomes, total procedure time, radiation exposure time, and overall complication rates. RESULTS: The total technical success rate of ERBD was 100% (105/105) in the IDUS-ERBD and CC-ERBD groups. Mean procedure time was slightly prolonged in the IDUS-ERBD group than that in the CC-ERBD group (32.1 ± 9.9 minutes vs. 28.4 ± 11.6 minutes, p = 0.023). Mean radiation exposure time was one-third less in the IDUS-ERBD group than that in the CC-ERBD group (28.0 ± 49.3 seconds vs. 94.2 ± 57.3 seconds, p < 0.001). No significant differences in complication rates were detected between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: IDUS-ERBD was equally effective and safe as CC-ERBD in patients with an extrahepatic biliary obstruction. Although IDUS-ERBD increased total procedure time, it significantly decreased radiation exposure.

Predictors of Rebleeding in Upper Gastrointestinal Dieulafoy Lesions.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Dieulafoy lesions (DLs) are a rare but significant cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. We aimed to define the clinical significance of rebleeding and identify the predictors of rebleeding and mortality in upper gastrointestinal Dieulafoy lesions (UGIDLs). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with UGIDLs between January 2004 and June 2013 were retrospectively evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to define the predictors of rebleeding and mortality in patients with UGIDLs. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 81 male and 36 female patients. Primary hemostasis was achieved in 115 out of 117 patients (98.3%) with various endoscopic therapies. Rebleeding occurred in 10 patients (8.5%). The mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with rebleeding than in those without rebleeding (30.0% vs. 4.7%, p=0.020). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that kidney disease (p=0.006) and infection (p=0.005) were significant predictors of rebleeding in UGIDLs and that kidney disease (p=0.004) and platelet count (p=0.013) were significant predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Rebleeding has an important prognostic significance in patients with UGIDLs. Kidney disease and infection are major predictors of rebleeding and mortality in patients with UGIDLs.

Intraductal US-directed management of bile duct stones without radiocontrast cholangiography.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Intraductal US (IDUS) is an examination of the bile duct by using a thin-caliber ultrasonic probe, yielding real-time, high-quality cross-sectional images. We prospectively evaluated the feasibility and safety of IDUS-directed stone removal without radiocontrast cholangiography (RC) in naïve patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones. METHODS: A total of 38 naïve patients with suspected CBD stones (<20 mm) were enrolled in this study. If IDUS showed CBD stones, we performed endoscopic sphincterotomy and removed the identified CBD stones without RC. The primary outcome was success rate of CBD stone removal without RC. The secondary outcomes were conversion rate to conventional ERCP with RC, fluoroscopy time, clinical responses, and adverse events. RESULTS: IDUS was successfully performed in all enrolled patients (38/38, 100%). No echogenic material was observed in 3 patients (1 Mirizzi syndrome, 2 spontaneous passages of CBD stones). After endoscopic sphincterotomy, IDUS-directed stone removal was successfully performed without RC in 26 patients (74.3%) in the first session. In the 9 patients, after deployment of plastic stents, IDUS-directed stone removal was successfully completed without RC in a second session. There was no conversion to conventional ERCP with RC. Median fluoroscopy time was 10 seconds. There were no immediate and delayed adverse events related to the IDUS-directed stone removal. However, asymptomatic hyperamylasemia developed in 3 patients (7.9%), who recovered without adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: IDUS-directed stone removal without RC is feasible and safe for patients with CBD stones. We anticipate a potentially important role of IDUS in the field of various therapeutic interventions.

An unusual case of duodenal perforation caused by a lollipop stick: a case report.

Most ingested foreign bodies often pass through the gastrointestinal tract uneventfully; however, complications such as perforation do occur. Most cases of perforation are caused by thin, pointed objects such as needles, toothpicks, or fish and chicken bones. Herein, we report an unusual case of duodenal perforation caused by a lollipop stick with blunt ends. A 23-year-old woman was admitted to the emergency department complaining of epigastric and right upper quadrant pain for the last 2 days. Abdominal computed tomography scans confirmed the presence of a foreign body in the duodenum, with signs of duodenal perforation and inflammation. The patient was not aware of ingesting the foreign body. Endoscopy revealed the presence of a lollipop stick in the duodenum, which was removed with forceps. The duodenal perforation was successfully managed by using hemoclips and a detachable snare.

Comparison of Endoscopic Variceal Ligation and Endoscopic Variceal Obliteration in Patients with GOV1 Bleeding.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, rebleeding rates, survival, and complications of endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) with those of endoscopic variceal obliteration (EVO) in patients with acute type 1 gastroesophageal variceal (GOV1) bleeding. Data were collected retrospectively at a single center. A total of 84 patients were selected (20 patients underwent EVL; 64 patients underwent EVO) from February 2004 to September 2011. Their clinical characteristics, laboratory results, vital signs, Child-Pugh score, Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, and overall mortality were evaluated. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The success rate in initial control of active bleeding was not significantly different between the EVL and EVO groups (18/20 EVL, or 90.0%, compared with 62/64 EVO, or 96.9%; p=0.239). The early rebleeding rate was also not significantly different between the groups (3/18 EVL, or 16.7% compared with 17/62 EVO, or 27.4%; p=0.422). The late rebleeding rate of the EVL group was lower than that of the EVO group (3/18 EVL, or 16.7%, compared with 26/59 EVO, or 44.1%; p=0.042). The time-to-rebleeding was 594 days for the EVL group and 326 days for the EVO group (p=0.054). In the multivariate analysis, portal vein thrombosis (PVT) was a significant risk factor for early rebleeding. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and previous history of bleeding were significant risk factors for very late rebleeding. In conclusion, EVL is better than EVO in reducing late rebleeding in acute GOV1 bleeding. HCC, PVT, and previous bleeding history were significant risk factors for rebleeding.

Body mass index and nonresponse to antiviral treatment in korean patients with genotype 2 and 3 chronic hepatitis C.

Pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin is the standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C. Sustained virological response (SVR) rates of up to 80% are reported in genotype 2 and 3 chronic hepatitis C cases. Obesity, a modifiable risk factor, may have a deleterious effect on antiviral treatment. We performed this study to examine the efficacy and safety of pegylated-interferon and ribavirin therapy in Korean patients with genotype 2 and 3 chronic hepatitis C and to investigate the risk factors for nonresponse to antiviral treatment. A total of 121 patients were treated with peginterferon alpha-2a 180 mcg/week plus ribavirin 800 mg/day for 24 weeks. The end-of-treatment virologic response (ETVR), the SVR, the end-of-treatment biochemical response (ETBR), the sustained biochemical response (SBR), and the adverse events were analyzed. The ETVR and SVR were 94.1% and 89.1%, respectively. The ETBR was 80.2% and the SBR was 96%. Multivariate analysis showed that a body mass index of 25 and over was the only independent factor that affected the SVR (odds ratio=10.5, 95% confidence interval: 2.006-54.948, p=0.005). Twenty patients (16.5%) dropped out at the end of treatment, and 7 (5.8%) patients discontinued treatment because of treatment-related adverse events. Our study showed that combination therapy with pegylated-interferon and ribavirin as an initial treatment for genotype 2 and 3 chronic hepatitis C is very effective and safe, and that body mass index is an independent risk factor for nonresponse to antiviral treatment in patients with genotype 2 and 3 chronic hepatitis C.