Bioequivalence Study of a New Fixed-dose Combination Tablet Containing S-Amlodipine Nicotinate and Olmesartan Medoxomil in Healthy Korean Male Subjects.

PURPOSE: A fixed-dose combination (FDC) pill of amlodipine (relatively old calcium channel blocker as dihydropyridine) and olmesartan (relatively new angiotensin II receptor blocker) is used for hypertension that is not adequately controlled with a single-formulation drug. Because the FDC is a one-pill formulation, and amlodipine and olmesartan have different mechanisms of action, it is expected to improve patients' medication compliance and have an increased blood pressure-lowering efficacy. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety profile and the bioequivalence of two different FDC formulations [amlodipine besylate/olmesartan medoxomil 10/40 mg (reference product) and S-amlodipine nicotinate/olmesartan medoxomil 5/40 mg (test product)]. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-treatment, 2-way, and 2-period crossover study, including a 3-week washout period, was performed in 32 healthy Korean male volunteers. To analyze the concentration of S-amlodipine or olmesartan, plasma samples were collected up to 144 hours after the dose for S-amlodipine and 48 hours after the dose for olmesartan. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including the Cmax and the area under the curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-last) for the time versus concentration plot, were calculated. Analysis of variance for bioequivalence was conducted using Cmax and AUC0-last converted to log scale, and the mean ratios and 90% CIs were determined. Safety data included analysis of adverse events (AEs), vital signs, physical examinations, clinical laboratory test, and 12-lead ECGs. FINDINGS: Of the 32 enrolled participants, 29 healthy volunteers completed the study. For both S-amlodipine and olmesartan, the main pharmacokinetic parameters were all within the acceptable range for regulatory bioequivalence. The 90% CIs for the geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC0-last were 0.8766 to 0.9760 and 0.8288 to 0.9224, respectively, for S-amlodipine and 0.9097 to 1.1229 and 0.8904 to 1.0407, respectively, for olmesartan. Hypotension was the most frequent AE, and it was observed in 4 volunteers with the test product and 7 volunteers with the reference product. Both the test and reference formulations were well tolerated. IMPLICATIONS: The present study demonstrates that the newly developed FDC product (test drug) and the conventional FDC product (reference drug) have comparable pharmacokinetic characteristics in healthy adult male volunteers. Both the test and reference products indicated good tolerance in this population, and no serious AEs were observed.

HL-217, a new topical anti-angiogenic agent, inhibits retinal vascular leakage and pathogenic subretinal neovascularization in Vldlr⁻/⁻ mice.

HL-217 is a new synthetic angiogenesis inhibitor. Platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) is a vasoactive factor and has been implicated in proliferative retinopathies. In this study, we examined the mechanism of action and efficacy of topical application of HL-217 on subretinal neovascularization in very low-density lipoprotein receptor knockout (Vldlr(-/-)) mice. In three-week-old male Vldlr(-/-) mice, HL-217 (1.5 or 3mg/ml) was administered twice per day for 4 weeks by topical eye drop instillation. Neovascular areas were then measured. We used a protein array to evaluate the expression levels of angiogenic factors. The inhibitory effect of HL-217 on the PDGF-BB/PDGFRß interaction was evaluated in vitro. The neovascular area in the Vldlr(-/-) mice was significantly reduced by HL-217. Additionally, HL-217 decreased the expression levels of PDGF-BB protein and VEGF mRNA. Moreover, HL-217 dose-dependently inhibited the PDGF-BB/PDGFRß interaction (IC50=38.9 ± 0.7 µM). These results suggest that HL-217 is a potent inhibitor of PDGF-BB. HL-217, when applied topically, is an effective inhibitor of subretinal neovascularization due to its ability to inhibit the pro-angiogenic effects of PDGF-BB.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of a new S-amlodipine formulation in healthy Korean male subjects: a randomized, open-label, two-period, comparative, crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Amlodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist, is prescribed for the management of angina and hypertension. It is used therapeutically as a racemic mixture, composed of S- and R-enantiomers, but its calcium channel-blocking effect is confined to S-amlodipine; R-amlodipine has 1000-fold less activity than its S-enantiomer. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and safety profiles of a newly developed amlodipine formulation, composed wholly of S-amlodipine, with those of the conventionally prescribed racemic formulation. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, 2-period, comparative, crossover study was conducted with healthy volunteers at the Gil Medical Center and Gachon Medical School, Incheon, Korea. Male subjects, aged 20 to 50 years, were eligible to participate if their weight was within 20% of ideal body weight and if they were judged by physicians to be healthy. All subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to 1 of 2 treatment sequences: (1) a single dose of the test amlodipine formulation (S-enantiomer amlodipine 5 mg p.o.) (Lodien [Hanlim Pharmaceutical Co., Seoul, Korea]) in the first study period, followed by a single dose of the reference amlodipine formulation (racemate 10 mg p.o.) (Norvasc [Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Korea Ltd., Seoul, Korea]) in the second study period, or (2) a single dose of the reference formulation in the first study period, followed by a single dose of the test formulation in the second period. A 3-week washout occurred between study periods. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis of S-amlodipine were collected at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours after drug administration. Pharmacodynamic variables (ie, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate) were measured at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after administration. Safety profiles were also assessed. Hematology, biochemistry, electrocardiography, and urinalysis were performed at baseline and end of study. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study period. Pharmacokinetic characteristics were compared using noncompartmental analysis. Pharmacokinetic equivalence was concluded if the geometric mean ratios of the plasma Cmax and AUC were within the predetermined range of 80% to 125%. RESULTS: Twenty-six healthy Korean male volunteers were screened and 18 subjects (mean [SD] age, 23.4 [1.5] years [range, 21-26 years]; mean [SD] weight, 69.3 [6.8] kg [range, 60-88 kg]) were enrolled and completed the study. The plasma concentration-time profiles of S-amlodipine were comparable after administration of both formulations. The mean (SD) values for Cmax AUC from time 0 to the last available measurement (AUC(last)), and AUC from 0 to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) for the reference formulation (3.0 [0.6] ng/mL, 151.4 [35.7] ng x h/mL, and 175.3 [45.1] ng x h/mL, respectively) did not differ significantly from those for the test formulation (3.1 [0.6] ng/mL, 139.7 [40.3] ng x h/mL, and 161.7 [43.8] ng x h/mL, respectively). The calculated 90% Cls for the corresponding ratios of log-transformed Cmax, AUCO(0-infinity), and AUC(last) were 97.56% to 112.51%, 86.31% to 98.74%, and 83.46% to 100.04%, respectively, which met the predetermined criteria for pharmacokinetic equivalence. Despite the single administration, significant changes in maximal blood pressure and heart rate were observed after drug administration for both formulations, compared with baseline values (all, P < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed between the 2 formulations in terms of pharmacodynamic profiles, and no clinically relevant changes were observed for either formulation with respect to physical examination, hematology, biochemistry, electrocardiography, or urinalysis. Neither formulation caused any serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Two amlodipine formulations were found to be equivalent in terms of the pharmacokinetics of S-amlodipine. The newly developed formulation, comprised of only S-amlodipine, had pharmacodynamic profiles comparable to those of the conventional racemic amlodipine formulation in these healthy Korean male subjects. Both formulations were well tolerated.