Comparison of Nonimage- and Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Block: A Matched Paired Analysis in the Same Individuals.

Background: Although fluoroscopic guidance is recommended highly for more accurate lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection (L-ESI), many physicians still use a nonimage-guided approach for L-ESIs. However, because of its associated risk of radiation and increased medical expense, the cost-effectiveness and safety of fluoroscopy-guided ESI have been called into question. The goal of this retrospective matched paired analysis in the same individuals was to assess the effectiveness and prevalence of complications of nonimage-guided L-ESI compared to those of fluoroscopy-guided L-ESI. Methods. Between 2015 and 2016, 94 patients who received both nonimage- and fluoroscopy-guided L-ESIs were analyzed retrospectively. The changes of the numeric rating scale (NRS) in pain intensity and functional outcome and the differences in the number of complications between blind and fluoroscopy-guided L-ESIs in the same individuals were evaluated by a matched paired analysis. Results: Of the 94 patients, the differences in NRS before and after the procedure were 1.29 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.94-1.65) for the nonimage-guided group and 1.64 (95% CI = 1.28-2.01) for the fluoroscopy-guided group (p=0.16). More subjective functional improvement was observed in fluoroscopy-guided L-ESI (57, 60.6%) than in nonimage-guided L-ESI (47, 50.0%) without statistical significance (p=0.16). Nine (9.6%) patients in the nonimage-guided group experienced complications related to the procedure overall compared to 4 (4.3%) in the fluoroscopy-guided group (p=0.27). Conclusions: In this study, both blind and image-guided L-ESI techniques included similar extents of postprocedural outcomes and complications. Physicians should consider the risks associated with the two different techniques overall and develop ways to individualize the procedure to decrease the risk of complications and improve the positive outcomes of lumbar epidural steroid injections.

Predictors of Response to a Medial Branch Block: MRI Analysis of the Lumbar Spine.

The aim of this study was to determine the association between radiologic spinal pathology and the response to medial branches block (MBB). This retrospective observational study compared 165 patients. A successful response was defined as ≥30% or a 2-point reduction in the numeric rating scale (NRS) compared with the baseline at the 1-month follow-up. The facet angle, facet angle difference, facet joint degeneration, disc height and spondylolisthesis grade were analyzed from an MRI at the L3 to S1 levels. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate independent factors associated with a successful response of MBB. In the univariate analysis, the disc height at L5-S1 and facet angle difference at L3-4 were lower in the positive responders (p = 0.022 and p = 0.087, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, the facet angle difference at L3-4 and disc height at L5-S1 were independent factors associated with a successful response (odds ratio = 0.948; p = 0.038 and odds ratio = 0.864; p = 0.038, respectively). In patients with a degenerative disc at L5-S1, MBB can lead to a good response for at least one month. In patients with facet tropism at L3-4 level, the response to MBB after one month is likely to be poor.

Effectiveness of lumbar epidural injection in patients with chronic spinal stenosis accompanying redundant nerve roots.

Redundant nerve root syndrome (RNRS) is a phenomenon characterized by the presence of elongated, enlarged, tortuous nerve roots in the lumbar subarachnoid space. It is unclear whether RNRS is caused by spinal stenosis or causes these symptoms.This study evaluated the effects of lumbar epidural steroid injection (LESI) on patients with RNRS and assessed factors associated with RNRS. This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at a single pain clinic of a university hospital.The medical records of 172 outpatients presenting with low back and/or leg pain from July to December 2014 were analyzed. Pain intensity (numeric rating scale [NRS]) and functional status were assessed at baseline and 2, 4, and 12 weeks after the LESI. Patients were considered moderate responders if they showed a 3-point or >30% reduction in baseline NRS, or said "better than 30%," "a little better," or "I feel an effect." Patients were considered substantial responders if they showed a 5-point or >50% reduction in baseline NRS, or said "better than 50%," "very good," or "much better." Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with moderate response to LESI. Factors associated with RNRS were also determined by logistic regression analysis.The proportions of both moderate and substantial responders at 2, 4, and 12 weeks were significantly lower in patients with than without RNRS. GEE analysis showed that RNRS were the only factor significantly associated with moderate response to LESI (OR = 0.400; 95% CI, 0.253-0.632; P < .001). The distance from the conus medullaris to the closest level of stenosis was shorter in patients with than without RNRS (P < .001) and was the only independent factor associated with RNRS on multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR = 0.972; P < .001).LESI was less effective in patients with than without RNRS. The only independent factor significantly associated with RNRS was the distance from the conus medullaris to the nearest moderate stenosis.

Retrodiscal epidural balloon adhesiolysis through Kambin's triangle in chronic lumbar spinal stenosis: A retrospective analysis and technical considerations.

A previous study showed that transforaminal balloon adhesiolysis via the safe triangle was effective in lumbar spinal stenosis. However, retrodiscal pathology is difficult to treat with this method. Therefore we attempted retrodiscal balloon adhesiolysis via Kambin's triangle. The design of our study is a retrospective analysis. The setting of our study is a tertiary, interventional pain management practice, speciality referral center.The primary indication for this procedure is radicular pain arising from ipsilateral retrodiscal pathology. Medical records were reviewed of patients who received retrodiscal decompression with a transforaminal balloon inflatable catheter between January 1, 2016 and July 31, 2017. The intervention was conducted by 2 well-trained pain specialists. The introducer needle was positioned at Kambin's triangle. Adhesiolysis was performed using a balloon filled with radiocontrast media. After balloon adhesiolysis, an agent containing lidocaine and dexamethasone was injected through the introducer sheath. Numeric rating scale pain scores were obtained 1 and 3 months after the procedure.The mean pre-procedure numeric rating scale score was 7.05 ±â€Š1.40. After 1 and 3 months, the mean scores were 3.91 ±â€Š2.20 and 3.77 ±â€Š2.11, respectively. No patient had significant complications. Also, technical considerations were discussed.Chronic pain due to lumbar central stenosis, especially ipsilateral retrodiscal pathology, can be reduced by retrodiscal balloon adhesiolysis through Kambin's triangle. Although this study is limited by its retrospective design, the results suggest that this procedure is a useful treatment due to its ease of performance and cost-effectiveness.

A novel balloon-inflatable catheter for percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis and decompression.

Epidural adhesions cause pain by interfering with the free movement of the spinal nerves and increasing neural sensitivity as a consequence of neural compression. To remove adhesions and deliver injected drugs to target sites, percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis (PEA) is performed in patients who are unresponsive to conservative treatments. We describe four patients who were treated with a newly developed inflatable balloon catheter for more effective PEA and relief of stenosis. In the present patients, treatments with repetitive epidural steroid injection and/or PEA with the Racz catheter or the NaviCath did not yield long-lasting effects or functional improvements. However, PEA and decompression with the inflatable balloon catheter led to maintenance of pain relief for more than seven months and improvements in the functional status with increases in the walking distance. The present case series suggests that the inflatable balloon catheter may be an effective alternative to performing PEA when conventional methods fail to remove adhesions or sufficiently relieve stenosis.

An awake double lumen endotracheal tube intubation using the Clarus Video System in a patient with an epiglottic cyst: a case report.

A 54-year-old male patient was scheduled for an elective pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with video-assisted thoracic surgery at our hospital. This patient had a history of intubation failure in other institutions due to an epiglottic cyst. An airway assessment of the patient was normal. A preoperative laryngoscopy revealed a bulging epiglottic mass covering most of the epiglottis and occupying most of the pharyngeal space. The patient was administered intravenous midazolam 1 mg, fentanyl 50 µg, and glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg. A bilateral superior laryngeal nerve block was then performed with 2% lidocaine 2 ml on each side. A 10% lidocaine spray was applied on to the oropharynx. After preoxygenation with 100% oxygen over 10 minutes, a rigid fiberscope with an optical stylet loaded with a 37 Fr double lumen endotracheal tube was inserted orally and passed into the glottic aperture. The patient was fully awakened after surgical procedure and was transferred to the recovery room after extubation.

The effects of the Trendelenburg position and intrathoracic pressure on the subclavian cross-sectional area and distance from the subclavian vein to pleura in anesthetized patients.

BACKGROUND: The effects of maneuvers to increase intrathoracic pressure and of Trendelenburg position on the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the subclavian vein (SCV) and the relationship between the SCV and adjacent structures have not been investigated. METHODS: In ultrasonography-guided SCV catheterization (N = 30), the CSA of the SCV and the distance between the SCV and pleura (DSCV-pleura) were determined during 10-second airway opening, and 10-second positive inspiratory hold with 20 cm H2O in the supine position (S-0, and S-20) and the 10° Trendelenburg position (T-0, and T-20). In addition to a statistical significance of P < 0.05, CSA and DSCV-pleura differences of ≥15% were defined as clinically relevant changes. RESULTS: CSA (mean [95% confidence interval]) in S-20, T-0, and T-20 (1.02 [0.95-1.14] cm(2), 1.04 [0.95-1.15] cm(2), and 1.14 [1.04-1.24] cm(2), respectively) was significantly larger than a CSA in S-0 (0.93 [0.86-1.00] cm(2), all P < 0.001). However, only the increase of CSA in T-20 vs S-0 (0.21 cm(2), 23.2%) was clinically meaningful (≥15%). The number of patients who showed CSA increase ≥15% was more in S-0 to T-20 (57%) compared with those in S-0 to S-20 (23%) and S-0 to T-0 (27%). DSCV-pleura measurements (mean) in S-20 and T-20 (0.61 and 0.60 cm) were significantly shorter than those in S-0 (0.70 cm, all P < 0.001), but the reductions of DSCV-pleura were not clinically meaningful (≥15%). CONCLUSIONS: The combined application of inspiratory hold and Trendelenburg position provided a greater and more relevant degree of CSA increase without compromising DSCV-pleura, which may facilitate SCV catheterization. Further investigations are needed to determine whether these results affect the success rate of catheterization and the risk of procedural injury.