Suicidality and Its Risk Factors in Korean People with Epilepsy: A MEPSY Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: People with epilepsy (PWE) are more likely to experience suicidality, with suicidal ideation and attempts, than people without epilepsy (PWoE). The aims of the present study were to determine 1) the characteristics of suicidality in Korean PWE, 2) whether PWE with suicidality receive psychiatric intervention, and 3) the risk factors for suicidality. METHODS: Patients who consecutively visited epilepsy clinics at secondary- and tertiary-care hospitals were recruited (n=684), along with age- and sex-matched PWoE (n=229). The presence of current major depressive disorder (MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and/or suicidality was established using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus Version 5.0.0. The Korean version of the Liverpool Adverse Events Profile (K-LAEP) was applied to detect adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). RESULTS: Suicidality was present in 208 (30.4%) of the 684 PWE. The rate of suicidality was 4.6 times higher among PWE than PWoE, and 108 (15.7%) PWE had suicidal ideation and had attempted suicide. Among those who had attempted suicide, 40.7% had made at least two attempts. The most common method of suicide attempt was drug overdose (34.9%). Unfortunately, of the 208 PWE with suicidality, 136 (65.4%) did not receive psychiatric intervention. The risk factors for suicidality were MDD [odds ratio (OR)=6.448, 95% confidence interval (CI)=3.739-11.120, p<0.001], GAD (OR=3.561, 95% CI=1.966-6.452, p<0.001), item scores of 3 or 4 on the K-LAEP (OR=2.688, 95% CI=1.647-4.387, p<0.001), and a history of febrile convulsion (OR= 2.188, 95% CI=1.318-3.632, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Suicidality is more prevalent in PWE than in PWoE. Clinicians should monitor psychiatric disorders and the adverse effects of AEDs in PWE in an attempt to reduce the incidence of suicidal ideation or suicide attempts in this patient population.

Predictors of quality of life and their interrelations in Korean people with epilepsy: a MEPSY study.

PURPOSE: People with epilepsy (PWE) are more likely to have impaired quality of life (QOL) than the general population. We studied predictors of QOL and their interrelations in Korean PWE. METHODS: Subjects who consecutively visited outpatient clinics in four tertiary hospitals and one secondary care hospital were enrolled. These subjects completed the Korean version of the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (K-NDDI-E), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-10 (QOLIE-10), and the Korean version of Liverpool Adverse Event Profile (K-LAEP). We evaluated the predictors of QOL by multiple regression analyses and verified the interrelations between the variables using a structural equation model. RESULTS: A total of 702 PWE were eligible for the study. The strongest predictor of the overall QOLIE-10 score was the K-LAEP score (ß=-0.375, p<0.001), followed by the K-NDDI-E score (ß=-0.316, p<0.001), seizure control (ß=-0.152, p<0.001), household income (ß=-0.375, p<0.001), and GAD-7 score (ß=-0.119, p=0.005). These variables explained 68.7% of the variance in the overall QOLIE-31 score. Depression and seizure control had a bidirectional relationship and exerted direct effects on QOL. These factors also exerted indirect effects on QOL by provoking adverse effects of AEDs. Anxiety did not have a direct effect on QOL; it had only indirect effect through the adverse effects of AEDs. CONCLUSION: Depression, anxiety, seizure control, and adverse effects of AEDs have complex interrelations that determine the QOL of PWE.

Validation of the generalized anxiety disorder-7 in people with epilepsy: a MEPSY study.

The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) is a valuable instrument to screen for anxiety in primary care patients. However, it has not been validated in people with epilepsy (PWE). Therefore, we validated the GAD-7 and examined its differential effect from adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on the detection of anxiety in Korean PWE. Eligible patients who visited outpatient clinics in 4 tertiary care hospitals and 1 secondary care hospital underwent several instruments including the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus Version 5.0.0 (MINI-Plus 5.0.0), the Korean version of the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (K-NDDI-E), the Korean version of the Liverpool Adverse Event Profile (K-LAEP), and the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-10 (QOLIE-10). Two hundred forty-three patients were enrolled in the study, and 51 (21.0%) patients had GAD by the MINI-Plus 5.0.0. Cronbach's α coefficient for the GAD-7 was 0.924. At a cutoff score of 6, the GAD-7 had a sensitivity of 92.2%, a specificity of 89.1%, a positive predictive value of 69.1%, and a negative predictive value of 97.7%. The GAD-7 score was well correlated with the K-NDDI-E score, the K-LAEP score, and the QOLIE-10 overall and subscale scores. The impact of adverse effects of AEDs on the GAD-7 was less than that on the K-NDDI-E. In conclusion, the GAD-7 is a reliable and valid screening tool for detecting GAD in PWE.

Psychiatric symptoms and quality of life in patients with drug-refractory epilepsy receiving adjunctive levetiracetam therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Levetiracetam (LEV) is a new antiepileptic drug that has been found to be effective as an adjunctive therapy for uncontrolled partial seizures. However, the results of several studies suggested that LEV has negative psychotropic effects, including irritability, aggressiveness, suicidality, and mood disorders. We investigated the impact of adjunctive LEV on psychiatric symptoms and quality of life (QOL) in patients with drug-refractory epilepsy (DRE) and determined the risk factors provoking psychiatric adverse events. METHODS: A 24-week, prospective, open-label study was conducted. At enrollment, we interviewed patients and reviewed their medical charts to collect demographic and clinical information. They were asked to complete self-report health questionnaires designed to measure various psychiatric symptoms and QOL at enrollment and 24 weeks later. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were included in the study, 12 patients (16.9%) of whom discontinued LEV therapy due to serious adverse events including suicidality. The risk factor for premature withdrawal was a previous history of psychiatric diseases (odds ratio 4.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-17.32). LEV intake resulted in significant improvements in Beck Anxiety Inventory score (p<0.01) and some domains of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised, such as somatization (p<0.05), obsessive-compulsiveness (p<0.05), depression (p<0.05), and anxiety (p<0.05). These improvements were not related to the occurrence of seizure freedom. The Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-31 overall score and subscale scores, such as seizure worry (p<0.01), overall QOL (p<0.05), emotional well-being (p<0.05), energy-fatigue (p<0.05), and social function (p<0.05), also improved. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive LEV in patients with DRE is likely to improve psychiatric symptoms and QOL. Clinicians should be well aware of the psychiatric histories of patients to prevent them from developing serious adverse events related to LEV.