Association between number of hyperbaric oxygen therapy sessions and neurocognitive outcomes of acute carbon monoxide poisoning.

Background: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO2) is recommended for symptomatic patients within 24 h of carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning. Currently, there is no consensus on the number of HBO2 sessions within 24 h after arrival at the hospital. Therefore, we evaluated differences in the therapeutic effects according to the number of HBO2 sessions in acute CO poisoning. Methods: This cohort study included data collected from our CO poisoning registry and prospective cohorts between January 2006 and August 2021 in a single academic medical center in South Korea. Based on the number of HBO2 sessions performed within 24 h, we classified patients into one- and multiple- (two or three) session groups. We also compared mild (non-invasive mechanical ventilation) and severe (invasive mechanical ventilation) groups. CO-related neurocognitive outcomes were measured using the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS; stages: 1-7) combined with neurological impairment at 1 month after poisoning. We classified GDS stages as favorable (1-3 stages) and poor (4-7 stages) neurocognitive outcomes. Patients belonging to a favorable group based on GDS assessment, but with observable neurological impairment, were assigned to the poor outcome group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for age, sex, and related variables to identify statistical differences between groups. Results: We analyzed the data of 537 patients between ages 16 and 70 years treated with HBO2. After PSM, there was no significant difference in neurocognitive outcomes at 1 month among the two groups of patients (p = 0.869). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in neurocognitive outcomes between invasive mechanical ventilation and non-invasive mechanical ventilation patients in the three groups (p = 0.389 and p = 0.295). Conclusion: There were no significant differences in the reduction of poor neurocognitive outcomes according to the number of HBO2 sessions implemented within 24 h of CO exposure.

International Normalized Ratio-to-Albumin Ratio as a Novel Marker of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Severity.

Introduction: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a potentially life-threatening gastrointestinal emergency, and effective management depends on early risk stratification. The Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scores are commonly used prognostic measures for UGIB, although these scoring systems are relatively difficult to apply in early emergency settings. AIMS65 with five items, albumin, international normalized ratio, mental status, systolic blood pressure, and age (>65 years), showed efficacy in predicting long-term hospitalization and mortality. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of the prothrombin time-international normalized ratio-to-albumin ratio (PTAR) in the emergency room for early UGIB risk stratification. Methods: We retrospectively examined patients who visited a tertiary academic hospital's emergency department (ED) with UGIB as the chief presentation between January 2019 and December 2020. The cutoff values and diagnostic accuracies of the PTAR, Glasgow-Blatchford score, AIMS65 score, pre-endoscopy, and complete Rockall score were analyzed, and the performance of the PTAR was compared with that of other risk stratification methods. In total, 519 patients were enrolled: 163 patients were admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) and 35 died during admission. Multiple logistic regression analyses confirmed the association of the PTAR with ICU admission and mortality. The adjusted odd ratio (aOR) of the PTAR for ICU admission care was 8.376 (2.722-25.774), and the aOR of the PTAR for mortality was 27.846 (8.701-89.116). Conclusions: The PTAR measured in the ED is an independent factor related to ICU admission and mortality in patients with UGIB. Using ED blood laboratory results, which are reported relatively quickly and are easy to acquire and calculate, the PTAR can be used as a risk stratification marker in the early emergency setting.

Usefulness of a modified poisoning severity score for predicting prognosis in acute carbon monoxide poisoning.

INTRODUCTION: The poisoning severity score (PSS) was developed to grade the severity of various types of poisoning. However, in its current form, it requires investigating many variables, some of which have been found not to be associated with carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning severity. Therefore, in this study, we modified the PSS for CO poisoning and compared its usefulness to that of the original PSS, as an early prognostic factor of short-term outcome in CO poisoning patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study conducted in patients with CO poisoning who visited the emergency department between January 2014 and December 2020. Patients' primary outcome was their Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale score at discharge, which classified those with CPC 1-2 as having a favorable outcome and those with CPC 3-5 as having a poor outcome. We calculated the patients' PSS and their CO-modified PSS by replacing blood and metabolic balance category in the original PSS with carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) and lactate levels, respectively. RESULTS: This study included 891 patients, of which 852 (95.6%) and 39 (4.4%) were classified into the favorable and poor outcome groups, respectively. Using multivariate analysis, the PSS (odds ratio [OR], 22.961; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.641-49.546; p < 0.001) and CO-modified PSS (OR, 28.856; 95% CI, 12.874-64.679; p < 0.001) were both found to be associated with poor outcomes at hospital discharge. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the PSS and CO-modified PSS were 0.874 (95% CI, 0.850-0.895) and 0.881 (95% CI, 0.858-0.901), respectively. CONCLUSION: The CO-modified PSS, with fewer variables than the original PSS, was not inferior to predict poor outcomes, and if COHb level is considered together with other parameters, then it can be used both for predicting prognosis and in diagnosis.

Changes in Diagnosis of Poisoning in Patients in the Emergency Room Using Systematic Toxicological Analysis with the National Forensic Service.

BACKGROUND: It is difficult to diagnose patients with poisoning and determine the causative agent in the emergency room. Usually, the diagnosis of such patients is based on their medical history and physical examination findings. We aimed to confirm clinical diagnoses using systematic toxicological analysis (STA) and investigate changes in the diagnosis of poisoning. METHODS: The Intoxication Analysis Service was launched in June 2017 at our hospital with the National Forensic Service to diagnose intoxication and identify toxic substances by conducting STA. Data were collected and compared between two time periods: before and after the initiation of the project, i.e., from June 2014 to May 2017 and from June 2017 to May 2020. RESULTS: A total of 492 and 588 patients were enrolled before and after the service, respectively. Among the 588 after-service patients, 446 underwent STA. Among the 492 before-service patients, 69.9% were diagnosed clinically, whereas the causative agent could not be identified in 35 patients. After starting the service, a diagnosis was confirmed in 84.4% of patients by performing a hospital-available toxicological analysis or STA. Among patients diagnosed with poisoning by toxins identified based on history taking, only 83.6% matched the STA results, whereas 8.4% did not report any toxin, including known substances. The substance that the emergency physician suspected after a physical examination was accurate in 49.3% of cases, and 12% of cases were not actually poisoned. In 13.4% of patients who visited the emergency room owing to poisoning of unknown cause, poisoning could be excluded after STA. Poisoning was determined to be the cause of altered mental status in 31.5% of patients for whom the cause could not be determined in the emergency room. CONCLUSION: A diagnosis may change depending on the STA results of intoxicated patients. Therefore, appropriate STA can increase the accuracy of diagnosis and help in making treatment decisions.

Application of a new hyperbaric oxygen therapy protocol in patients with arterial and venous gas embolism due to hydrogen peroxide poisoning.

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) ingestion can cause vascular gas embolism (GE). Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO2) is known to improve neurological abnormalities in patients with arterial gas embolism (AGE). Previously, HBO2 based on the U.S. Navy Table 6 diving protocol has been adopted for treating AGE and preventing the progression of portal venous GE, caused by H2O2 ingestion, to AGE. However, the indication and protocol for HBO2 have not been established for GE related to H2O2 ingestion. Herein, we describe a case in which GE caused by H2O2 ingestion was treated using HBO2 with a short protocol. A 69-year-old female patient presented with abdominal pain, vomiting, and transient loss of consciousness after ingesting 35% H2O2. Computed tomography revealed gastric wall and portal venous gas. She was administered an HBO2 protocol with 2.8-atmosphere absolute (ATA) compression for 45 minutes. This was followed by a 2.0-ATA treatment for 60 minutes with a five-minute air break, after which all gas bubbles disappeared. After HBO2 treatment, brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed focal cytotoxic edema lesions; however, the patient was discharged without additional symptoms.

Seizure during hyperbaric oxygen therapy: experience at a single academic hospital in Korea.

Background: Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy is a safe and well-tolerated treatment modality. Seizures, one of the most severe central nervous system side effects of HBO2 therapy, can occur. Episodes of seizures during HBO2 therapy have not yet been reported in countries such as Korea, where hyperbaric medicine is still in the developmental stage. Methods: The registry data of all patients treated with HBO2 therapy in a tertiary academic hospital in Korea were prospectively collected, and patients who developed seizures during HBO2 therapy between October 2016 and December 2019 were evaluated. In addition, we reviewed previous studies on occurrence of seizures during HBO2 therapy. Results: During the study period, a total of 10,425 treatments were provided to 1,308 patients. The most frequently treated indication was carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning ABSTRACT (n=547, 41.8%). During the HBO2 therapy sessions (total: 10,425), five seizure episodes occurred (patients with CO poisoning: n=4; patients with arterial gas embolism [AGE]: n=1). The frequency of seizures in patients with CO poisoning (0.148%) and AGE (3.448%) was significantly higher than that in patients with all indications (0.048%) (p=0.001). None of the patients had lasting effects due to the seizures. Conclusion: Our study revealed a similar frequency rate in terms of all indications and CO poisoning, and a slightly higher rate in AGE. Seizures were observed in patients with CO poisoning and AGE. Therefore, if clinicians plan to operate a hyperbaric center in a country like Korea, where there are several patients with acute CO poisoning, they should be prepared to handle seizures that may occur during HBO2 therapy.

Shorter defibrillation interval promotes successful defibrillation and resuscitation outcomes.

AIM: Current cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines recommend performing defibrillation every 2 min during resuscitation. This study aimed to compare the rate of successful defibrillation using 1- and 2-min defibrillation intervals. METHODS: Twenty-six pigs were randomly assigned to 1- or 2-min interval groups. After inducing ventricular fibrillation (VF), we observed pigs for 2 min. Thereafter, basic life support was initiated with a 30:2 compression-to-ventilation ratio for 8 min. Defibrillation was performed with an energy of 2 J/kg at 10 min after VF and was repeated every 1 or 2 min according to randomization. Advanced cardiac life support, including continuous chest compression with ventilation every 6 s and intravenous injection of 1 mg epinephrine every 3 min, was performed until the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or until 20 min after VF induction. Haemodynamic parameters and baseline arterial blood gas profiles were compared between groups. ROSC, 24 -h survival, and the neurologic deficit score (NDS) were evaluated at 24 h. RESULTS: Haemodynamic parameters during resuscitation and baseline arterial blood gas profiles did not differ between groups. ROSC was more frequently observed in the 1-min interval group (p = 0.047). Time to ROSC was not different between groups (p = 0.054). The 24 -h survival was higher (p = 0.047) and NDS at 24 h was lower (92 ±â€¯175) in the 1-min interval group than in the 2-min interval group (272 ±â€¯190) (p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Defibrillation success and resuscitation outcomes were superior when using a 1-min defibrillation interval in animal models of cardiac arrest.