Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Surg Oncol ; 127(1): 119-131, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36169163

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite the standard interval of 6-8 weeks between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and surgery, it is debated whether an interval of >8 weeks increases the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. We investigated the interval between nCRT and surgery, and its impact on oncological outcomes and postoperative complications in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with rectal cancer who underwent total mesorectal excision after long-course nCRT between 2000 and 2020. They were divided into two groups-those who underwent surgery at 6-8 and >8 weeks after nCRT. Surgical outcomes (stoma rate and postoperative complications), pCR, tumor regression grade (TRG), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared. RESULTS: We selected 770/1153 patients with rectal cancer, including 502 and 268 patients surgically treated at 6-8 and >8 weeks after nCRT, respectively. The pCR rates were similar between the two groups (14.7% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.836), while the TRG was significantly better in the >8 weeks group (p = 0.267). Additionally, the postoperative complications, recurrence, 5-year RFS, and OS rates were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although tumor regression increased in the >8 weeks group, the oncological benefits of surgery >8 weeks after nCRT remain uncertain.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Second Primary , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasm Staging , Treatment Outcome , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Chemoradiotherapy , Neoplasms, Second Primary/pathology , Postoperative Complications/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...