Vaginal birth after cesarean section: Experience from a regional hospital.

OBJECTIVE: Trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC) is an option for women with previous cesarean section. However, few women choose this option because of safety concerns. We evaluate the safety and risks associated with TOLAC and the success rate of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed all patients with a history of previous cesarean section that underwent elective repeat cesarean section (ERCS) or TOLAC in a regional teaching hospital from Nov, 2013 to May, 2018. Maternal basic clinical information, intrapartum management, postpartum complications, and neonatal outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: 199 pregnant women with a history of at least one previous cesarean section were enrolled. 156 women received ERCS and 43 women (21.6%) underwent TOLAC, with 37 (86.0%) who underwent successful VBAC. The VBAC rate was 18.6%. Higher success rate was found in women with previous vaginal birth than in women without vaginal birth (100% vs. 81.8%). One case (2.3%) in the VBAC group was complicated with uterine rupture and inevitable neonatal death during second stage of labor. The uterus was repaired without maternal complications. In another case, the newborn's condition was complicated with low APGAR score (<7) at birth due to maternal chorioamnionitis. Among indications for previous cesarean section, cephalo-pelvic disproportion (CPD) was associated with TOLAC failure and uterine rupture after VBAC. CONCLUSION: VBAC is a feasible and safe option. Modes of delivery should be thoroughly discussed when considering TOLAC for women with history of previous cesarean section due to CPD, considering its association with TOLAC failure in second stage of labor.

Experience in different modes of delivery in twin pregnancy.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Vaginal delivery, compared with Cesarean delivery, remains a less chosen mode of delivery for twin pregnancy. We studied the maternal and perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancy with different modes of delivery. METHODS: A retrospective study with data collected from a regional hospital, including vital twin pregnancies delivered at gestational age of 32 weeks and above. Medical charts were reviewed for prenatal conditions and postpartum outcomes. RESULTS: Ninety-eight pairs of twins were included and 44.9% were delivered via vaginal delivery. Women in the vaginal delivery group were significantly younger (32.5 ±4.3 years versus 34.8 ±4.6 years, p < 0.01), multiparous (34.1% versus 18.5%) and with more twins in vertex-vertex presentation (70.5% versus 33.3%) compared with women in the Cesarean delivery group. There were no differences between maternal postpartum complications and neonatal outcomes in both groups. The outcomes showed longer inter-twin delivery time interval (5.7 ± 5.6 versus 1.5 ± 0.9 min, p < 0.01), less estimated blood loss (198.7 ± 144.1 versus 763.2 ± 332.3 mL, p < 0.01), and shorter maternal hospital stay (3.0 ± 0.5 versus 5.7 ± 0.5 days, p< 0.01) in the vaginal delivery group. Twenty newborns had Apgar score below seven at birth. Logistic regression analysis revealed that low Apgar score was independently related to younger maternal age, maternal obstetric diseases and fetal non-vertex presentation. Gestational weeks and mode of delivery were not related to low Apgar score. CONCLUSION: With careful case selection, vaginal delivery could be safely performed in twin pregnancies with less estimated blood loss and better recovery than Cesarean delivery.

Diagnosis of Peritoneal Tuberculosis from Primary Peritoneal Cancer.

Peritoneal tuberculosis (PTB) is an uncommon extrapulmonary infection mimickng primary peritoneal cancer (PPC). We retrospectively included 23 women with PTB and 47 women with PPC treated in a medical center to study the clinical and radiological features that differentiate PTB from PPC. Body temperature above 38 °C was a unique feature of PTB (34.7% versus 0%, p < 0.001). Body Mass Index (BMI) was lower (21.9 ± 3.7 versus 25.2 ± 4.1, p = 0.003), white blood cell (WBC) count was lower (5179.6 ± 1502.2 versus 7716.2 ± 2741.8, p < 0.001), and CA-125 level was lower (508.0 ± 266.1 versus 2130.1 ± 2367.2 U/mL, p < 0.001) in PTB compared with PPC. Imaging detected more pulmonary infiltration and consolidation (52.2% versus 6.4%, p < 0.001), and less omental/mesentery changes (52% versus 83%, p < 0.001) in PTB compared with PPC. The operated patients received earlier treatment compared to patients without operation (7.9 ± 5.3 days versus 17.2 ± 11.0 days, p = 0.010). In conclusion, fever above 38 °C, lower BMI, lower WBC count, less elevated CA-125 level, and imaging of less omental involvement were features of PTB differentiated from PPC.