Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Diagn Interv Radiol ; 27(3): 323-328, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34003120

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Neck ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) are all known to be useful imaging modalities for detecting supraclavicular lymph node (SCN) metastasis in breast cancer. The authors compared the diagnostic values of neck US, CT, and PET/CT in the detection of SCN metastasis in breast cancer. METHODS: SCN metastases identified in neck US, CT, or PET/CT during follow-up visits of patients with breast cancer were pathologically confirmed with the use of US-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology. The clinicopathological factors of the patients were analyzed, and the statistical parameters including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, false-positive and false-negative rates, and accuracy of neck US, CT, and PET/CT were compared. RESULTS: Among 32 cases of suspicious SCNs, 24 were pathologically confirmed as metastasis of breast cancer. The sensitivity of US + CT was 91.7%, which was the same as that of PET/CT, while the sensitivity rates of US alone and CT alone were 87.5% and 83.3%, respectively. Accuracy was 99.8% in PET/CT alone and 98.1% in US + CT. The false-negative rate was 0.1% in US + PET/CT, while it was 0.2% in PET/CT and US + CT, 0.3% in US alone and 0.4% in CT alone. CONCLUSION: PET/CT can be the first choice for detecting SCN metastases in breast cancer. However, if PET/CT is unavailable for any reason, US + CT could be a good second option to avoid false-negative results.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Positron-Emission Tomography , Radiopharmaceuticals , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ultrasonography
2.
BMC Cancer ; 20(1): 934, 2020 Sep 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32993586

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides more information than mammography and ultrasonography for determining the surgical plan for patients with breast cancer. This study aimed to determine whether breast MRI is more useful for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions than for those with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). METHODS: A total of 1113 patients with breast cancer underwent mammography, ultrasonography, and additional breast MRI before surgery. The patients were divided into 2 groups: DCIS (n = 199) and IDC (n = 914), and their clinicopathological characteristics and oncological outcomes were compared. Breast surgery was classified as follows: conventional breast-conserving surgery (Group 1), partial mastectomy with volume displacement (Group 2), partial mastectomy with volume replacement (Group 3), and total mastectomy with or without reconstruction (Group 4). The initial surgical plan (based on routine mammography and ultrasonography) and final surgical plan (after additional breast MRI) were compared between the 2 groups. The change in surgical plan was defined as group shifting between the initial and final surgical plans. RESULTS: Changes (both increasing and decreasing) in surgical plans were more common in the DCIS group than in the IDC group (P <  0.001). These changes may be attributed to the increased extent of suspicious lesions on breast MRI, detection of additional daughter nodules, multifocality or multicentricity, and suspicious findings on mammography or ultrasonography but benign findings on breast MRI. Furthermore, the positive margin incidence in frozen biopsy was not different (P = 0.138). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative breast MRI may provide more information for determining the surgical plan for patients with DCIS than for those with IDC.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Mammography/methods , Margins of Excision , Mastectomy, Segmental/methods , Middle Aged
3.
BMC Surg ; 20(1): 192, 2020 Aug 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32854673

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Using the Latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle flap is one of the popular surgical technique for breast reconstruction. However, usually, long postoperative scar was remained on donor site which does not have disease. The authors applied the endoscopy-assisted surgery to harvest the LD muscle flap for breast reconstruction. METHODS: From July 2018 to July 2019, five consecutive patients with breast cancer underwent partial mastectomy with endoscopy-assisted LD muscle flap reconstruction. The clinic-pathologic factors were analyzed and the cosmetic outcomes were assessed with breast shape, scarring of breast and back. A 4-6 cm of lateral incision (donor site scar) was designed and LD muscle was harvested under endoscopic surgery without gas inflation. And the harvested LD muscle was inserted for partial breast reconstruction after the cancer surgery was done. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 116.4 min (range, 92-134) and there was no major postoperative complication. The satisfactory degree of cosmetic outcomes were shown better in patient's survey than that of surgeon's. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopy-assisted LD muscle flap harvesting would be useful technique to eliminate a large donor site incision in partial breast reconstruction.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mammaplasty , Superficial Back Muscles , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Endoscopy , Female , Humans , Mammaplasty/methods , Mastectomy , Middle Aged , Superficial Back Muscles/transplantation , Surgical Flaps , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/methods
4.
Asian J Surg ; 43(3): 467-475, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31204155

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard treatment for locally advanced breast cancer, especially for HER2-positive or triple negative breast cancer which shows good response to chemotherapy. However, because a result of biomarkers is, occasionally, changed after NAC, the treatment strategy should be differently applied for patients with locally advanced breast cancer. We compared the results of biomarkers before and after NAC to evaluate the association with disease prognosis and oncologic results. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with locally advanced breast cancer underwent NAC and the immunohistochemical (IHC) staining results were compared between before and after NAC. And the association between oncologic outcomes and biomarkers was analyzed. RESULTS: Negative status of estrogen receptor (ER) was associated with locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis both before and after NAC (p = 0.021, 0.019; p = 0.018, 0.036). And the negative status of progesterone receptor (PR) and triple negative status before neoadjuvant chemotherapy were also associated with death and distant metastasis, respectively. However, the changes of biomarkers after NAC in breast cancer were not directly associated with any oncologic outcomes. CONCLUSION: The absence of ER in breast cancer before and after NAC would be a significant prognostic factor for local recurrence and distant metastasis. Therefore, the absence of ER should be considered as important factor in determining the treatment strategy.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(51): e18511, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31861038

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Peri-prosthetic seroma after implant insertion for breast reconstruction is a common but difficult-to-manage complication. This study aimed to compare peri-prosthetic seroma duration and the number of aspirations associated with intravenous cannula with those associated with conventional needle. METHODS: Seventy-one patients who underwent skin- or nipple-sparing mastectomy and implant insertion were treated for peri-prosthetic seroma. When peri-prosthetic seroma was detected, ultrasound-guided aspiration was performed either by using an intravenous cannula (n = 35) or a conventional needle (n = 36); however, the method adopted was randomly selected. We analyzed the participants' clinicopathologic factors after medical record review. RESULTS: There were no significant intergroup differences in mean age (P = .052), mean body mass index (P = .601), total clinical tumor size (P = .107), pathologic tumor size (P = .269), specimen weight (P = .147), implant size (P = .313), or operation time (P = .595). However, the mean total peri-prosthetic seroma volume was significantly higher (105.80 vs 88.58, P = .015) but the number of aspirations was lower (4.48 vs 5.80, P = .043) in the intravenous cannula group than in the conventional needle group. Mean peri-prosthetic seroma volume per aspiration was nonsignificantly higher in the intravenous cannula group (26.92 vs 19.14, P = .291). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided aspiration performed using an intravenous cannula was comparable to the procedure performed using a conventional needle. Furthermore, the former method can be safer and effective alternative to manage peri-prosthetic seroma.


Subject(s)
Breast Diseases/surgery , Breast Implantation/adverse effects , Seroma/surgery , Ultrasonography, Interventional/instrumentation , Adult , Breast Diseases/etiology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Seroma/etiology , Suction/instrumentation , Suction/methods
6.
In Vivo ; 33(6): 2133-2139, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31662548

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Multigene profiling assays provide strong evidence for predicting the prognosis of breast cancer. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical validation of the BCT score with various prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 133 cases of hormone receptor-positive, cT1N0 breast cancers were analyzed. Risk stratification using the BCT score (Low, n=105; High, n=28) was analyzed with Ki67 index, p53 mutation, Immunohistochemistry 4 (IHC4) score, Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) and online PREDICT. RESULTS: Ki67 index and NPI showed strong correlations with risk stratification based on BCT scores. Although the IHC4 score and online PREDICT were not associated with BCT score, there was a significant tendency of association with the online PREDICT results as the time of overall survival was increasing. CONCLUSION: Risk classification based on BCT scores might have a clinical significance as a prognostic marker in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, early breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Receptors, Estrogen/genetics , Receptors, Progesterone/genetics
7.
BMC Cancer ; 19(1): 388, 2019 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31023265

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gene expression profiling provides key information for prognosis of breast cancer to establish treatment strategy. However, the genetic assessment should be available before induction of treatment to be useful for clinical practice. To evaluate the reliability of using needle biopsy samples for gene assays, we compared gene-expression profiling results between core needle biopsy (CNB) samples and surgical specimens in breast cancer. METHODS: Thirty-one paired, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded CNB and surgical specimen samples were selected from patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Total RNA was extracted from the samples and the risk classifications based on GenesWell BCT scores were compared. RESULTS: The BCT scores correlated between CNB samples and surgical specimens of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (Pearson r = 0.66). The overall concordance rate of risk classification (high/low risk) was 83.9%. However, when the breast cancer does not contain intratumoral microcalcification, the concordance rate increased as 92.0%. And, when the breast cancer formed a solitary nodule (non-multifocal), the concordance rate increased up to 95.8%. CONCLUSION: Risk classification using the GenesWell BCT multigene kit with CNB samples could be considered reliable, when the breast cancer is a solitary nodule without intratumoral microcalcification. Such genetic profiling results should be helpful for establishing a treatment plan for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer before treatment induction.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast/metabolism , Risk Assessment , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle , Breast/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Multigene Family/genetics , RNA , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Receptors, Estrogen/genetics , Receptors, Progesterone/genetics
8.
Asian J Surg ; 42(6): 681-687, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30470459

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: axillary lymph nodes dissection (ALND) has been a standard treatment in breast cancer with positive sentinel LNs. However, various short- and long-term postoperative morbidities have been reported after conventional ALND. To define the concept of targeted axillary sampling (AS) and to assess its oncological feasibility for breast cancer. We compared the oncological outcomes in the axillary area between conventional ALND and targeted AS with or without radiotherapy. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine female patients with cT1-2N1 breast cancer underwent breast and axillary surgery. We defined the concept of targeted AS in clinical and pathological terms, and the oncological outcomes were compared between ALND and AS, and between AS with and without radiotherapy. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in oncological outcomes in the axilla between conventional ALND and AS, or between AS with radiotherapy and AS alone. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year oncological outcomes of targeted AS were not inferior to those of conventional ALND, regardless of whether radiotherapy was added.


Subject(s)
Axilla , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Mastectomy, Segmental , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
9.
Asian J Surg ; 41(3): 279-284, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28286021

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a useful screening modality in detecting suspicious lesions in patients with a history of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of breast MR imaging in detecting remnant LCIS lesions after initial excision. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2015, 29 patients with LCIS who underwent initial excision were enrolled. Breast ultrasonography and breast MR imaging was conducted after initial excision. Imaging findings were compared with pathologic results. RESULTS: There were nine (31.0%) cases with positive margins after initial excision; they were LCIS (n=8) and atypical lobular hyperplasia (n=1). Residual lesions were identified in 12 cases; they were invasive lobular carcinoma (n=1; 3.4%), LCIS (n=9; 31.0%), atypical lobular hyperplasia (n=1; 3.4%), and papillary carcinoma in situ (n=1; 3.4%). Prior to the second operation, these lesions could be detected in seven cases using ultrasonography (sensitivity, 53.3%; specificity, 100%) and in 10 cases using breast MR imaging (sensitivity, 83.3%; specificity, 100%). CONCLUSIONS: Breast MR imaging showed higher sensitivity than breast ultrasonography in detecting remnant LCIS lesions. If a suspicious lesion was found using breast MR imaging, a second operation should be considered because of the possibility of multifocality, even if LCIS was confirmed at the initial operation.


Subject(s)
Breast Carcinoma In Situ/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Lobular/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Mastectomy , Postoperative Care/methods , Adult , Aged , Breast Carcinoma In Situ/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Lobular/surgery , Female , Humans , Margins of Excision , Middle Aged , Neoplasm, Residual , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ultrasonography, Mammary
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...