ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AIMS: Although biologiocal ancillay materials (AMs) have specific risk associated with their derivations, it plays key role to manufature cell and gene therapy (CGT) products. It is important to understand the regulation relevant to AMs for developers. METHODS: The authors investigated the guidelines and pharmacopeia (hereinafter referred to as "guidelines") for biological AMs used for the manufacture of CGT products in Asia (China, India, Japan, Korea and Taiwan). In addition, the authors benchmarked the relevant guidelines in the United States (US) and European Union (EU). RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS: The guidelines could be classified into two types based on whether specific AMs are scoped: (i) general guidelines for risk assessment of AMs and (ii) guidelines for specific AMs. The authors compared the risk categories for each type of AM provided in the general guidelines between the US and China and the specific requirements for bovine serum and trypsin in the guidelines of China, Japan, Taiwan, US and EU. The authors further compiled in-depth descriptions of the respective regulations in China, India, Japan, Korea and Taiwan. There is limited availability of some guidelines for specific AMs. Moreover, there are no common requirements established across the surveyed countries and regions. Therefore, the authors suggest a risk assessment approach for AMs with consideration of their biological origin and traceability, production steps applied and ability to control or remove AMs from the final medicinal product over the CGT manufacturing process.
Subject(s)
European Union , United States , Asia , China , Japan , IndiaABSTRACT
The 4th Asia Partnership Conference of Regenerative Medicine (APACRM) was held online on April 15, 2021, to promote regulatory harmonization of regenerative medicine products throughout Asia. Recognizing domestic regulatory guidelines within each country and region, and their underpinning rationales, is an important initial step toward a convergence of regulations. The 4th APACRM consisted of an open dialog with regulatory agencies regarding nonclinical and quality settings for cell therapy products (CTPs) through industry presentations and panel discussions with regulatory agencies. The latest updates on regenerative medicine fields in each country and region, and specific regulatory schematics in Japan, were also introduced. The objective of this paper is to summarize the proceedings of the 4th APACRM for public dissemination and to foster further discussion in the future.
Subject(s)
Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy , Regenerative Medicine , Asia , JapanABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AIMS: Infrapatellar fat pad-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (IFP-MSCs) have not yet been used in a human clinical trial. In this open-label phase 1 study, patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) received a single intra-articular injection of autologous IFP-MSCs. Safety was assessed through physical examination of the knee joint, vital signs, laboratory tests and adverse events. Efficacy was evaluated with regard to pain and function using questionnaires, x-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) expression in IFP-MSCs primed with interferon gamma was used as an in vitro potency measurement in investigating the correlations of clinical outcomes. METHODS: Twelve patients with symptomatic knee OA were recruited. IFP adipose tissue was harvested from each patient's knee through surgical excision for IFP-MSC manufacturing. Cryopreserved IFP-MSCs (5 × 107 cells) were injected into the knee joint immediately after thawing. RESULTS: No significant adverse events were observed. Patients who received IFP-MSCs exhibited clinically significant pain and functional improvement at 48-week follow-up. The MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score average was also significantly reduced from 100.2 before injection to 85.0 at 48 weeks after injection. The IDO expression of the primed IFP-MSCs of the 12 patients was correlated with clinical outcomes after injection. CONCLUSIONS: A single intra-articular injection of IFP-MSCs appears to be a safe therapy for treating knee OA and may improve disease symptoms. IDO measurement of primed IFP-MSCs has potential as a potency marker of MSC products for immunomodulatory therapy.
Subject(s)
Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Adipose Tissue , Humans , Injections, Intra-Articular , Knee Joint , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapyABSTRACT
Working group 2 (WG2) of the Asia Partnership Conference of Regenerative Medicine has discussed eligibility of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) as starting cells for the manufacture of cell therapy products, and comparability before and after changes in their manufacturing process. Asian countries and regions have their own regulations on the quality of starting cells, and these regulations are not harmonized. As cell therapy products are being developed across countries and regions, we propose a risk-based approach based on donor location, window period of virus test, and additional virus tests on the master cell bank to fill the gaps in regulation while controlling the risk of viral contamination. Moreover, a standard procedure of comparability assessment after changes in the manufacturing process of MSC-based products does not exist. The WG2 discussed points of comparability assessment specifically for MSC-based products considering the similarities and differences with parallel assessments for protein and polypeptide products, which are within the scope of the International Council for Harmonization Q5E guideline. We also summarize possible characterization procedures for MSC-based products and report our discussion on stability evaluations under accelerated and stress conditions for comparability assessment of cell therapy products.
