Selection Criteria for Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy With Special Emphasis on Laparoscopy as an Efficient Tool.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of the study was to assess diagnostic tools implemented in selecting candidates for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with special emphasis on diagnostic laparoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 229 patients underwent laparoscopy between January 2011 and December 2015 with peritoneal carcinomatosis and were analyzed retrospectively to study the role of laparoscopy in selecting patients for CRS and HIPEC. RESULTS: After initial laparoscopy, 101 (44%) of patients underwent CRS and HIPEC with 128 (56%) being aborted. The most prevalent overall exclusion criterion was extensive small bowel disease with a prevalence of 107 (47%) patients. The rate of complete cytoreduction (CCR0 and CCR1) in patients who were deemed initially operable during laparoscopy was 96%. The most prevalent primary tumor site was the stomach with a prevalence of 36,7%. The overall median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score of the excluded patients were 16.8 and 4.6 in the CRS and HIPEC group. Port-site metastasis was 3.1% and bowel perforation rate 3.0%. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy is a proper selection tool in patients with peritoneal metastases for multimodal treatment. Sensitivity for detecting non-resectable patients is high and the morbidity and mortality low.

Extraperitoneal Approach During Peritonectomy in the Right Upper Quadrant for Peritoneal Metastases from Ovarian Malignancies.

AIM: To present the extraperitoneal approach for the removal of peritoneal metastases in the right upper abdomen in patients with ovarian cancer and to evaluate safety and potential advantages with comparison with the traditional approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Detailed description of the right upper quadrant peritonectomy as extraperitoneal approach. Procedure-specific short-term complications were retrospectively analyzed in a cohort of patients. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were included. Full-thickness diaphragmatic resection was performed in 17% of primary cases, and in 44% of the patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma. The rate of complete cytoreduction (CC-0) was 70%. The most common postoperative complication was pleural effusion (32%). CONCLUSION: The extraperitoneal approach for peritonectomy of the right upper quadrant in patients with ovarian cancer is feasible, with improved access to the right subdiaphragmatic area. This enables a high rate of complete cytoreduction, and simplified and safe surgical dissection in an uncontaminated area under secured vascular structures. The early postoperative outcomes are comparable to those of the traditional transperitoneal approach.

[Management of intra-abdominal dysgerminoma During pregnancy - A Case Report and Literature Review]. / Management Unterbauchraumforderungen in der Schwangerschaft ­ Fallbeschreibung eines extraovariell-intraabdominalen Dysgerminoms mit Überblick über die Literatur.

INTRODUCTION: Dysgerminomas are rare malignant germ cell tumors. They usually arise from the ovary, but case reports describing extraovarian dysgerminomas do exist. When treated adequately the disease has a good prognosis. Dysgerminomas diagnosed during pregnancy are very rare. METHODOLOGY: Report of extraovarian intra-abdominal dysgerminoma during pregnancy. Systematic literature review. CASE REPORT: A 35-year-old second gravida was diagnosed with a suspected intra-abdominal mass at 20 gestational weeks. During an exploratory laparotomy, a tumor infiltrating the transverse colon and histologically identified as a dysgerminoma was resected. Ovaries were clinically unremarkable. The induction of chemotherapy was postponed until after delivery. At 34 gestational weeks the patient underwent cesarean section and tumor debulking. Four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin were administered. After 12 months, cystic ovaries were found. Hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy was performed but no malignancy found. After 16 months, the patient was still in complete remission. CONCLUSION: We describe the first-ever published dysgerminoma in gravida primarily evolving intraabdominally and not affecting the ovaries. The decision for cytoreductive surgery, prolongation of pregnancy and postponing chemotherapy until after delivery combined the best benefit for the baby with a good maternal prognosis. Due to limited data regarding dysgerminomas in pregnancy, individual interdisciplinary concepts are mandatory.

Re-operations for early postoperative complications after CRS and HIPEC: indication, timing, procedure, and outcome.

PURPOSE: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have become standard of care for many peritoneal malignancies in selected patients. Nevertheless, this aggressive treatment strategy is associated with significant major morbidity. The aim of the present study is to analyze the re-operation rate and clinical outcome following CRS and HIPEC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the present study, prospectively documented data of 474 consecutive patients treated with CRS and HIPEC between February 2011 and December 2015 in a high-volume certified reference center for peritoneal malignancies in Germany have been retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The re-operation rate was 14.5%. The most frequent reasons for revisional surgery were fascial dehiscence, intraabdominal hemorrhage, and anastomotic leak. Most complications occurred between postoperative day 7 and 9. However, postoperative bleeding was more common within the first 5 days after surgery. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 2.1% for all patients and 10% after revisional surgery. CONCLUSIONS: CRS and HIPEC are associated with an acceptable re-operation rate and low mortality rate. Most frequently, re-operations are performed on 7-9 days after initial surgery due to fascial dehiscence, pancreatitis, or anastomotic leak. Postoperative bleedings are more common within the first 5 days after surgery.

Multimodality treatment strategies have changed prognosis of peritoneal metastases.

For a long time, treatment of peritoneal metastases (PM) was mostly palliative and thus, this status was link with "terminal status/despair". The current multimodal treatment strategy, consisting of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), has been strenuously achieved over time, but seems to be the best treatment option for PM patients. As we reviewed the literature data, we could emphasize some milestones and also, controversies in the history of proposed multimodal treatment and thus, outline the philosophy of this approach, which seems to be an unusual one indeed. Initially marked by nihilism and fear, but benefiting from a remarkable joint effort of human and material resources (multi-center and -institutional research), over a period of 30 years, CRS and HIPEC found their place in the treatment of PM. The next 4 years were dedicated to the refinement of the multimodal treatment, by launching research pathways. In selected patients, with requires training, it demonstrated a significant survival results (similar to the Hepatic Metastases treatment), with acceptable risks and costs. The main debates regarding CRS and HIPEC treatment were based on the oncologists' perspective and the small number of randomized clinical trials. It is important to statement the PM patient has the right to be informed of the existence of CRS and HIPEC, as a real treatment resource, the decision being made by multidisciplinary teams.

Rare diaphragmatic complications following cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC: report of two cases.

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been proven to be an effective treatment modality for selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. The most common surgical complications after CRS and HIPEC are anastomotic leakage, intestinal obstruction and peripancreatitis. This case report presents two patients with early and late postoperative diaphragmatic hernia after CRS and HIPEC. One patient that initially had pseudomyxoma peritonei complained of persistent chest pain and dyspeptic disorder after peritonectomy and HIPEC and underwent reoperation due to a left diaphragmatic hernia containing the splenocolic flexure. The other patient had gastric cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis and developed anastomotic leakage of the transverse colon anastomosis and pleural empyema. Stripping of the diaphragm is often performed during CRS, sometimes combined with diaphragmatic resection. A herniation through a diaphragmatic defect is rarely diagnosed during either the early or late postoperative period. Direct suture of the defect or closure with synthetic or biological tissue are possible surgical techniques for repair with a good prognosis.