Antibiotic Prescribing Practices for Upper Respiratory Tract Infections Among Primary Care Providers: A Descriptive Study.

Background: Most antibiotics are prescribed in the ambulatory setting with estimates that up to 50% of use is inappropriate. Understanding factors associated with antibiotic misuse is essential to advancing better stewardship in this setting. We sought to assess the frequency of unnecessary antibiotic use for upper respiratory infections (URIs) among primary care providers and identify patient and provider characteristics associated with misuse. Methods: Unnecessary antibiotic prescribing was assessed in a descriptive study by using adults ≥18 years seen for common URIs in a large, Upper Midwest, integrated health system, electronic medical records from June 2017 through May 2018. Individual provider rates of unnecessary prescribing were compared for primary care providers practicing in the departments of internal medicine, family medicine, or urgent care. Patient and provider characteristics associated with unnecessary prescribing were identified with a logistic regression model. Results: A total of 49 463 patient encounters were included. Overall, antibiotics were prescribed unnecessarily for 42.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41.7-42.6) of the encounters. Patients with acute bronchitis received unnecessary antibiotics most frequently (74.2%; 95% CI, 73.4-75.0). Males and older patients were more likely to have an unnecessary antibiotic prescription. Provider characteristics associated with higher rates of unnecessary prescribing included being in a rural practice, having more years in practice, and being in higher volume practices such as an urgent care setting. Fifteen percent of providers accounted for half of all unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions. Conclusions: Although higher-volume practices, a rural setting, or longer time in practice were predictors, unnecessary prescribing was common among all providers.

Clinical and Financial Impact of Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in Blood Cultures.

The rapid identification of pathogens that cause bloodstream infections plays a vital role in the modern clinical microbiology laboratory. Despite demonstrating a significant reduction in turnaround time and a significant effect on clinical decisions, most methods do not provide complete antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) information. We employed rapid identification (ID) and AST using the Accelerate PhenoTest on positive blood cultures containing Gram-negative bacilli. The length of stay (LOS) significantly decreased from an average of 12.1 days prior to implementation to 6.6 days post-implementation (p = 0.02), representing potential total savings of USD 666,208.00. All-cause mortality did not differ significantly, 27 (19%) versus 18 (12%), p = 0.11. We also observed an associated decrease in the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, including meropenem and quinolones. The implementation of a rapid ID and AST method, along with a well-established antimicrobial stewardship program, has the potential to decrease LOS, broad-spectrum antibiotic use, and costs to the healthcare system, with no observable impact on mortality.

Outcomes Associated With Standardized Ideal Body Weight Dosing of Intravenous Immune Globulin in Hospitalized Patients: A Multicenter Study.

Background: There are limited outcomes data for ideal body weight (IBW)-based dosing of intravenous immune globulin (human, IVIG) in hospitalized patients. Objective: To investigate clinical outcomes associated with a standardized change from total body weight to IBW-based dosing of IVIG. Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter, pre-post sequential period analysis. Data from pre-implementation and post-implementation of an IBW-based dosing strategy for IVIG were collected in 2-year periods (October 1, 2012, to August 31, 2014, and October 2, 2014, to October 1, 2016, respectively). The primary outcome was incidence of 30-day hospital readmission. Length of stay (LOS) was analyzed as a secondary outcome. Results: For the 2 study periods, 297 patients were included for analysis. Both groups had similar demographics, IVIG indications, and body weight measurements, but the post-implementation period had a lower median grams per dose as compared with the pre-implementation period (40 vs 30 g, P ≤ 0.01). 30-Day hospital readmission rates were not significantly different (4% vs 9%, P = 0.07). In-hospital all-cause mortality was also not statistically significant (7.7% vs 3.4%, P = 0.11). The 2 study groups had a similar median hospital LOS (8 vs 7.6 days, P = 0.27). Conclusion and Relevance: The implementation of a standardized IBW IVIG dosing strategy was not associated with a statistically significant increase in 30-day hospital readmission or LOS but was associated with significantly fewer grams per dose given. Application of these data may aid in decreasing institutional drug spend without affecting patient outcomes. However, the study was underpowered, and further investigation is necessary to validate these findings.

Impact of a Comprehensive COPD Therapeutic Interchange Program on 30-Day Readmission Rates in Hospitalized Patients.

PURPOSE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death in the United States. The economic effect of COPD management is substantial, and the prevalence of the disease continues to rise with the growth of older populations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and financial impact of a comprehensive therapeutic interchange program (CTIP) in hospitalized patients with COPD. The primary outcome was a 30-day readmission rate, with the following secondary outcomes: 30-day mortality and pharmacy-inhaled medication cost per patient. METHODS: This study was a multi-center, retrospective, electronic chart review of patients with a diagnosis of COPD admitted to two hospitals from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017. Our intervention group was admitted to a 550-bed tertiary care hospital and was managed with a pharmacist-led CTIP for inhaled products used in COPD. Our control group was admitted to a 545-bed tertiary care hospital, which did not have a CTIP in place. RESULTS: 2,885 hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of COPD were included in the analysis (1,350 in the intervention group and 1,535 in the control group). Univariable analysis demonstrated that the intervention group was associated with a lower 30-day readmission rate (5.8% vs. 8.3%; P = 0.012) and a lower average pharmacy-inhaled medication cost ($221 vs. $311; P = < 0.01). There was no statistical difference in 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the use of a pharmacist-led CTIP of COPD inhalers does not worsen patient outcomes and may provide pharmacy cost savings. The cohort managed with a CTIP was statistically associated with a lower 30-day readmission rate and lower pharmacy-inhaled medication costs without any difference in 30-day mortality.

Failure of a Best Practice Alert to Reduce Antibiotic Prescribing Rates for Acute Sinusitis Across an Integrated Health System in the Midwest.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance is a growing concern, and in recent years, there has been increased interest in ambulatory antimicrobial stewardship. Acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) is one of the most common outpatient diagnoses that results in an antibiotic prescription. OBJECTIVE: To determine if a best practice alert (BPA) will affect the percentage of oral antibiotic prescriptions for adults with ARS. METHODS: A prospective, pre/post study was initiated to evaluate the percentage of oral antibiotic prescriptions for ARS in 117 primary care clinics in the Midwest. Included in the study results were 16,570 adults who had an office visit for ARS: 8,106 patients from December 1, 2015, to February 28, 2016, were in the pre-intervention group without an active BPA, and 8,464 patients from December 1, 2016, to February 28, 2017, were in the post-intervention group when the BPA was active. The primary outcome was the number of oral antibiotic prescriptions for ARS compared with the number of office visits for ARS in the pre- and postintervention groups. RESULTS: The percentage of oral antibiotics prescribed for the pre- and postintervention groups were 94.8% and 94.3%, respectively (P = 0.152). The BPA displayed for 7,780 visits, prompting discontinuation of an antibiotic for 10 (0.1%) visits in the postintervention group. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that, although an electronic alert may be attractive to facilitate antimicrobial stewardship, it may be ineffective. These results warrant alternative measures to facilitate ambulatory antimicrobial stewardship. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Study concept and design were contributed by Hansen, D. Leedahl, and N. Leedahl. Hansen and N. Leedahl took the lead in data collection, with assistance from Carson and D. Leedahl. Data interpretation was performed by all the authors. The manuscript was written by Hansen, along with the other authors, and revised by all the authors.

A Pilot Study for Antimicrobial Stewardship Post-Discharge: Avoiding Pitfalls at the Transitions of Care.

PURPOSE: Lack of patient follow-up is a major concern during care transitions, and the role of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) in assessing antimicrobial regimens after hospital discharge is not well described. We implemented an expanded ASP to include patients recently discharged from the hospital and measured its impact on inappropriate antimicrobial therapy 72 hours after inpatient culture data were finalized. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted at a 583-bed tertiary care center in the Upper Midwest of America. All patients discharged from our facility on antimicrobial therapy with pending culture results between February 3, 2016, and March 2, 2016, were included for review. If a pathogen nonsusceptible to all prescribed antimicrobials was identified post-discharge, a recommendation for therapy modification was communicated to the prescriber. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients discharged from our hospital on antimicrobial therapy with pending culture results were evaluated for intervention. When final culture susceptibilities were considered, 5 of 38 patients had been prescribed an inappropriate antimicrobial agent. An ASP pharmacist intervened on 4 of 5 patients, resulting in 3 of 5 patients transitioning to appropriate antimicrobial therapy. When compared to a historical cohort, our transitions-of-care ASP yielded a 3.6-fold increase in antimicrobial-related interventions among discharged patients while reducing inappropriate outpatient antimicrobial therapy by 39%. CONCLUSION: We believe this is the first pharmacist-driven ASP represented in the medical literature which evaluated all available inpatient culture data to serve patients discharged from the hospital. Antimicrobial stewardship for patients in care transitions may provide an opportunity to increase ASP interventions and reduce inappropriate antimicrobial therapy.

A Case Series of 18 Patients Receiving Ticagrelor After Carotid Stenting.

PURPOSE: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor antagonist is often used to prevent thrombotic complications after endovascular stent placement. Most of the published experience surrounding DAPT after carotid stenting is with clopidogrel. Ticagrelor may be a promising alternative, especially in patients who may be considered nonresponders to clopidogrel. However, clinical outcomes utilizing DAPT with ticagrelor in a cohort with carotid stenting is lacking. In this case series, we describe our experience with systematic prescribing of ticagrelor after carotid stent placement in 18 patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of 18 patients prescribed ticagrelor who underwent carotid stenting between November 2015 and January 2017 was performed. All eligible patients were included in the review. The primary end point of interest was any ischemic stroke or death within 30 days following the procedure. Intracranial hemorrhage was a secondary end point. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: No patients experienced the primary end point of ischemic stroke or death within 30 days. No intracranial hemorrhages were observed. The use of ticagrelor after carotid stenting may be a reasonable alternative to clopidogrel after carotid stent placement. Randomized trials to support our findings are needed.

Ticagrelor and Acetylsalicylic Acid after Placement of Pipeline Embolization Device for Cerebral Aneurysm: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and a P2Y12-receptor antagonist is often used to prevent thrombotic complications after placement of a Pipeline embolization device (PED) for cerebral aneurysm. Although clopidogrel is common in this setting, high rates of nonresponse to this drug have made ticagrelor a potentially attractive alternative. OBJECTIVE: To describe safety and efficacy outcomes for ticagrelor following PED placement, including measurement of platelet function. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data was completed for patients who underwent PED placement for cerebral aneurysm at a single centre between November 2015 and March 2017, with subsequent prescription of ticagrelor and ASA as dual antiplatelet therapy. The primary end point was any ischemic stroke or death within 1 year after the procedure. Intracranial hemorrhage was a secondary end point. Additionally, measurement of and values for platelet reactivity units (PRUs) during receipt of ticagrelor and ASA were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients were included in this retrospective study. One patient experienced ischemic stroke 226 days after placement of the PED. In addition, 3 patients died during the 1-year follow-up period for causes unrelated to stroke or bleeding complications. No cases of intracranial hemorrhage were observed. Samples for measurement of P2Y12 levels were drawn at the discretion of the neurointerventionalists, and the PRU value was measured at least once for 28 (97%) of the 29 patients. The mean number of PRU measurements per patient after initiation of ticagrelor was 2.1 (standard deviation [SD] 1). Mean PRU value after initiation of ticagrelor was 65 (SD 57). CONCLUSIONS: In this case series describing the use of ticagrelor and ASA as dual antiplatelet therapy after PED placement for cerebral aneurysm, there was just one ischemic stroke, which occurred after the dual antiplatelet therapy had been discontinued. Further prospective trials are needed to describe the utility of ticagrelor use after PED placement, as well as its dosing and monitoring.

CONTEXTE: Une bithérapie antiplaquettaire composée d'acide acétylsalicylique (AAS) et d'un inhibiteur du récepteur P2Y12 est fréquemment utilisée pour prévenir les complications thrombotiques après la mise en place d'un dispositif d'embolisation Pipeline pour traiter un anévrisme cérébral. Quoique le clopidogrel soit souvent utilisé dans ce contexte, des taux élevés d'absence de réponse à ce médicament ont fait du ticagrélor une solution de rechange potentiellement intéressante. OBJECTIF: Décrire les résultats relatifs à la sécurité et à l'efficacité du ticagrélor après la mise en place d'un dispositif d'embolisation, y compris l'analyse de la fonction plaquettaire. MÉTHODES: Une analyse rétrospective de données a été réalisée dans un seul centre entre novembre 2015 et mars 2017 à l'aide des dossiers médicaux de patients chez qui a été posé un dispositif d'embolisation Pipeline comme traitement pour un anévrisme cérébral et à qui a ensuite été prescrite une bithérapie antiplaquettaire de ticagrélor et d'AAS. Le critère d'évaluation principal était les cas d'infarctus cérébral ou de décès durant l'année suivant l'opération. Les cas d'hémorragie intracrânienne ont servi de critère d'évaluation secondaire. De plus, l'analyse a porté sur l'évaluation de la réactivité plaquettaire et sa quantification en unités de réaction au P2Y12 pendant la prise de ticagrélor et d'AAS. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 29 patients ont été admis à la présente étude rétrospective. Un patient a subi un infarctus cérébral 226 jours après la mise en place d'un dispositif d'embolisation Pipeline. De plus, 3 patients sont décédés au cours de la période de suivi d'un an en raison de causes sans lien avec des complications liées à un accident vasculaire cérébral ou à une hémorragie. Aucun cas d'hémorragie intracrânienne n'a été observé. Les échantillons destinés à la mesure des unités de réaction au P2Y12 ont été prélevés selon le jugement des neuro-intervenants et l'évaluation de la réactivité plaquettaire a été réalisée au moins une fois chez 28 (97 %) des 29 patients. Le nombre moyen de mesures des unités de réaction au P2Y12 par patient était de 2,1 (écart-type de 1). Après l'amorce d'un traitement par ticagrélor, le résultat moyen en unités de réaction au P2Y12 était de 65 (écart-type de 57). CONCLUSIONS: Dans la présente série de cas décrivant l'utilisation d'une bithérapie antiplaquettaire composée de ticagrélor et d'AAS après la mise en place d'un dispositif d'embolisation Pipeline comme traitement pour un anévrisme cérébral, seul un cas d'infarctus cérébral a été observé et il s'est produit après l'arrêt de la bithérapie antiplaquettaire. De plus amples études prospectives sont nécessaires pour décrire l'utilité et la posologie du ticagrélor ainsi que le suivi du traitement après la mise en place d'un dispositif d'embolisation Pipeline.