Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Gerontol Geriatr Educ ; 39(4): 433-444, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27379507

ABSTRACT

With the growing older adult population, there will also be more informal caregivers assisting friends and family with their health care. With the increasing complexity of health care, improved caregiver communication skills have the potential to reduce caregiver burden and frustration and improve care recipient health. The primary goal of this project was to develop and refine the content and teaching methods of a small-group behavioral change program to improve communication between caregivers of older adults and health care professionals. The authors developed the Care Talks program for improving communication between caregivers and health care professionals. They conducted a prospective cohort feasibility study of the intervention to assess caregiver communication confidence at baseline and one month postintervention. Six participants were enrolled. Of the 15 participants who answered the question, 15 (100%) would recommend this program to a friend. There was significant improvement in a 10-question composite of communication confidence pre/post scores from 74.1 to 79.6 p = .03. This small-group behavioral change intervention significantly improved communication confidence for this sample of caregivers. Further research is needed to determine the long-term effects of this program on caregivers and care recipients.


Subject(s)
Caregivers , Geriatrics/education , Health Literacy/methods , Quality of Life , Aged , Caregivers/education , Caregivers/psychology , Emotional Adjustment , Female , Health Communication/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Quality Improvement , Self Efficacy , Teaching
2.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 28(5): 639-48, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26355136

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The success of practice-based research (PBR) depends on the willingness of clinicians and staff to incorporate meaningful and useful research protocols into already demanding clinic schedules. The impact of participation on those who implement multiple projects and how to address the issues that arise during this complex process remain incompletely described. This article reports a qualitative evaluation of the experiences of primary care clinicians and clinic staff who participated in multiple PBR projects with the Wisconsin Research and Education Network (WREN). Also included are their suggestions to researchers and clinicians for future collaborations. METHODS: For program evaluation purposes, WREN conducted 4 focus groups at its 2014 annual meeting. The main focus group question was, "How has participation in PBR affected you and your clinic?" A total of 27 project members from 13 clinics participated in 4 groups (physicians, nurses, managers, and other clinical staff). The 2-hour sessions were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to identify recurring themes. RESULTS: Five major focus group themes emerged: receptivity to research, outcomes as a result of participation, barriers to implementation, facilitators of success, and advice to researchers and colleagues. Focus group members find research valuable and enjoy participating in projects that are relevant to their practice, even though many barriers exist. They indicated that research participation produces clinical changes that they believe result in improved patient care. They offered ways to improve the research process, with particular emphasis on collaborative early planning, project development, and communication before, during, and after a project. CONCLUSIONS: Clinics that participate in WREN projects remain willing to risk potential work constraints because of immediate or impending benefits to their clinical practice and/or patient population. Including a broader array of clinic personnel in the communication processes, especially in the development of relevant research ideas and planning for clinic implementation and ongoing participation in research projects, would address many of the barriers identified in implementing PBR. The themes and supporting quotes identified in this evaluation of WREN projects may inform researchers planning to collaborate with primary care clinics and clinicians and staff considering participating in research endeavors.


Subject(s)
Focus Groups/methods , Health Services Research/organization & administration , Physicians , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Program Evaluation , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Research Personnel/organization & administration , Cooperative Behavior , Humans , Wisconsin
3.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 135(5): 1171-8.e1, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25458910

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis in infancy is a major risk factor for recurrent wheezing and asthma. Because azithromycin attenuated neutrophilic airway inflammation in a murine viral bronchiolitis model, demonstration of similar effects in human subjects might provide a strategy for the prevention of postbronchiolitis recurrent wheezing. OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate whether azithromycin treatment during RSV bronchiolitis reduces serum and nasal lavage IL-8 levels and the occurrence of postbronchiolitis recurrent wheezing. METHOD: We performed a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled proof-of-concept trial in 40 otherwise healthy infants hospitalized with RSV bronchiolitis who were treated with azithromycin or placebo for 14 days. IL-8 levels were measured in nasal lavage fluid and serum on randomization, day 8, and day 15 (nasal lavage only). The occurrence of wheezing episodes was assessed monthly over the ensuing 50 weeks. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, azithromycin treatment did not reduce serum IL-8 levels at day 8 (P = .6) but resulted in a greater decrease in nasal lavage fluid IL-8 levels by day 15 (P = .03). Twenty-two percent of azithromycin-treated participants experienced at least 3 wheezing episodes compared with 50% of participants in the placebo group (P = .07). Azithromycin treatment resulted in prolonged time to the third wheezing episode (P = .048) and in fewer days with respiratory symptoms over the subsequent year in comparison with placebo (36.7 vs 70.1 days, P = .01). CONCLUSION: In this proof-of-concept study azithromycin treatment during RSV bronchiolitis reduced upper airway IL-8 levels, prolonged the time to the third wheezing episode, and reduced overall respiratory morbidity over the subsequent year.


Subject(s)
Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Bronchiolitis, Viral/drug therapy , Bronchiolitis, Viral/metabolism , Interleukin-8/metabolism , Respiratory Sounds/drug effects , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/metabolism , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human , Azithromycin/administration & dosage , Bronchiolitis, Viral/blood , Bronchiolitis, Viral/complications , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Interleukin-8/blood , Male , Nasal Lavage Fluid , Respiratory Sounds/etiology , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/blood , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/complications , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 53(8): 758-63, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24803628

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe parents' experience with their child's allergic rhinitis (AR) to inform management by the primary care provider (PCP). STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred parents with a child 7 to 15 years old with AR symptoms within the past 12 months completed a paper survey. RESULTS: The child's AR was identified as a significant problem in spring (89.3%), fall (63.4%), summer (50.3%), and winter (21.4%); 51.3% had persistent disease. AR symptoms most commonly interfered with the child's outdoor activities and sleeping, and frequently bothered the parent and other family members. Most parents (88.3%) wanted to know what their child was allergic to and had many concerns about treatment options. A total of 62.9% had sought AR care from the PCP in the past 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Many families experience significant morbidity from their child's AR and turn to their PCP for help. We identified opportunities for the PCP to reduce AR morbidity.


Subject(s)
Help-Seeking Behavior , Parent-Child Relations , Parents , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Rhinitis, Allergic/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Patient Outcome Assessment , Perception , Professional-Family Relations , Rhinitis, Allergic/drug therapy , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
5.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 52(11): 1014-21, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24092872

ABSTRACT

Background. Although common practice, evidence to support treatment of croup with prednisolone is scant. Methods. We conducted a community-based randomized trial to compare the effectiveness of prednisolone (2 mg/kg/d for 3 days, n = 41) versus 1 dose of dexamethasone (0.6 mg/kg) and 2 doses of placebo (n = 46). Participants were children 1 to 8 years old with croup symptoms ≤48 hours, categorized as mild (42%) or moderate (58%). Results. There were no differences for those treated with dexamethasone or prednisolone for additional health care for croup (2% vs 7%, P = .34), duration of croup symptoms (2.8 vs 2.2 days, P = .63), nonbarky cough (6.1 vs 5.9 days, P = .81), nights with disturbed sleep for the parent (0.68 vs 1.21 nights, P = .55), and days with stress (1.39 vs 1.56 days, P = .51). Conclusion. There were no detected differences in outcomes between the 2 croup treatments for either child or parent.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Croup/drug therapy , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Prednisolone/administration & dosage , Child, Preschool , Comparative Effectiveness Research , Humans , Infant , Treatment Outcome
6.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 51(9): 840-7, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22843294

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Patient-centered care requires pediatricians to address parents' health concerns, but their willingness to solicit parental concerns may be limited by uncertainty about which topics will be raised. The authors conducted surveys of parents to identify current health-related issues of concern. METHODS: Participants rated 30 items as health problems for children in their community (large, medium, small, or no problem) and volunteered concerns for their own children. RESULTS: A total of 1119 parents completed the survey. Allergies (69%), lack of exercise (68%), asthma (65%), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (65%), Internet safety (63%), obesity (59%), smoking (58%), and bullying (57%) were identified as important problems (large or medium) with variation among demographic subgroups. Concerns for their own children included healthy nutrition; obesity; lack of exercise, healthy growth and development; safety and injury prevention; and mental health issues. CONCLUSION: Parents' health concerns for children are varied and may differ from those routinely addressed during well-child care.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Parents , Adolescent , Child , Child Health Services , Child Welfare , Child, Preschool , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Needs Assessment , Pediatrics , Preventive Health Services
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...