Early change in apparent diffusion coefficient as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and external beam radiation therapy for intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer.

AIM: To determine the role of serial apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a biomarker for response to neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (nADT) followed by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS: This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant, institutional review board (IRB)-approved prospective study included 12 patients with intermediate- to high-risk PCa patients prior to nADT and EBRT, who underwent serial serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) at baseline (BL), 8-weeks after nADT initiation (time point [TP]1), 6-weeks into EBRT delivery (TP2), and 6-months after nADT initiation (TP3). Tumour volume (tVOL) and tumour and normal tissue ADC (tADC and nlADC) were determined at all TPs. tADC and nlADC dynamics were correlated with post-treatment PSA using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Paired t-tests compared pre/post-treatment ADC. RESULTS: There was a sequential decrease in PSA at all TPs, reaching their lowest values at TP3 post-treatment completion. Mean tADC increased significantly from baseline to TP1 (917.8 ± 107.7 × 10-6 versus 1033.8 ± 139.3 × 10-6 mm2/s; p<0.01), with no subsequent change at TP2 or TP3. Both percentage and absolute change in tADC from BL to TP1 correlated with post-treatment PSA (r=-0.666, r=-0.674; p=0.02). Post-treatment PSA in good responders (<0.1 ng/ml) versus poor responders (≥ 0.1 ng/ml) was associated with a greater increase in tADC from BL to TP1 (169.2 ± 122.4 × 10-6 versus 22.9 ± 75.5 × 10-6 mm2/s, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrates the potential for early ADC metrics as a biomarker of response to nADT and EBRT in intermediate to high-risk PCA.

Second Malignancy Probabilities in Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Conventional Versus Hypofractionated External Beam Radiation Therapy in the Adjuvant Setting.

AIMS: For women with breast cancer, seminal studies have shown that adjuvant hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy (hEBRT) maintains similar outcomes and may reduce overall costs compared with conventionally fractionated external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT). However, it is unclear whether hEBRT may be associated with differential risk of development of radiation-induced second malignancies compared with cEBRT. Because the occurrence of second malignancies is small, large databases may improve our understanding of the relative risk of second malignancies between hEBRT and cEBRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, we carried out a retrospective cohort analysis of women diagnosed with non-metastatic, stage 0-III breast cancer from 2004 to 2017. All patients had a lumpectomy or mastectomy and a follow-up time of at least 60 months after diagnosis. The probability of second malignancies in women receiving adjuvant cEBRT or hEBRT was compared using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for sociodemographic, geographical, clinical and treatment factors, allowing for relative (but not absolute) comparison of second malignancy risk. Temporal sensitivity analyses stratified by year of diagnosis and length of follow-up time were also conducted. RESULTS: Of the 125 228 women in our study, 115 576 (92.3%) received cEBRT and 9652 (7.71%) received hEBRT. The median age of the cohort was 60 (interquartile range 51-68) years at diagnosis and the median follow-up time was 99.61 (interquartile range 77.5-128.49) months. Upon adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors, patients who received hEBRT had no difference in relative risk than patients who received cEBRT (odds ratio 0.937, 95% confidence interval 0.869-1.010, P = 0.091). In analyses stratified by year of diagnosis, and stratified by length of follow-up, there was no difference in second malignancy probability between patients who completed hEBRT and patients who completed cEBRT. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of over 120 000 women with non-metastatic breast cancer, hEBRT was not associated with different odds of developing second malignancies compared with cEBRT. Our findings may inform patient counselling in the choice of radiation regimens for breast cancer and further support the safety of hypofractionated regimens for breast cancer.

Biological Features of Human Papillomavirus-related Head and Neck Cancers Contributing to Improved Response.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are the sixth most common malignancy globally, and an increasing proportion of oropharyngeal HNSCCs are associated with the human papillomavirus (HPV). Patients with HPV-associated tumours have markedly improved overall and disease-specific survival compared with their HPV-negative counterparts when treated with chemoradiation. Although the difference in outcomes between these two groups is clearly established, the mechanism underlying these differences remains an area of investigation. Data from preclinical, clinical and genomics studies have started to suggest that an increase in radio-sensitivity of HPV-positive HNSCC may be responsible for improved outcomes, the putative mechanisms of which we will review here. The Cancer Genome Atlas and others have recently documented a multitude of molecular differences between HPV-positive and HPV-negative tumours. Preclinical investigations by multiple groups have explored possible mechanisms of increased sensitivity to therapy, including examining differences in DNA repair, hypoxia and the immune response. In addition to differences in the response to therapy, some groups have started to investigate phenotypic differences between the two diseases, such as tumour invasiveness. Finally, we will conclude with a brief review of ongoing clinical trials that are attempting to de-escalate treatment to minimise long-term toxicity while maintaining cure rates. New insights from preclinical and genomic studies may eventually lead to personalised treatment paradigms for HPV-positive patients.