Withdrawal of Denosumab in Patients With Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Follow-up Report of the DENOCINA Study.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the development in the primary outcomes: changes in bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck after 2 years. METHODS: In patients with primary hyperparathyroidism, we investigated the effects of 30-mg cinacalcet per day plus 60 denosumab every 6 months for 1 year (Deno group), versus denosumab plus placebo for 1 year (DenoPlacebo-group), versus placebo plus placebo injection for 1 year (Placebo group). After the study's termination, most patients receiving denosumab were switched to bisphosphonate treatment. RESULTS: Forty-three out of 45 participants were subject to follow-up. A total of 35 patients completed a 2-year follow-up dual x-ray absorptiometry-scan (Deno: n = 13; DenoPlacebo: n = 12; and Placebo: n = 10). None of the groups showed statistically significant changes in BMD or experienced decreases in mean BMD below the study's baseline level. Overall, the changes in T-scores from the final study measurement to follow-up were similar among the groups (P = .38 for lumbar spine T-score, .63 for total hip, and .97 for femoral neck by 1-way ANOVA). P-calcium was not different over time (P = .20 for change over time and P = .08 for the difference between the groups by repeated measures ANOVA). A total of 5 participants suffered a fracture during the study or follow-up periods, all but one was in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Evidence suggests that it is possible to at least maintain BMD, and thus potentially lower the fracture risk by a short course of denosumab followed by antiresorptive therapy, where applicable in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.

Effects of bendroflumethiazide on bone mineral density; results from the BONATHIAD randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cohort study.

PURPOSE: Thiazide diuretics (TD) may play a role in preventing osteoporosis. The objective was to investigate the effects of bendroflumethiazide in combination with bisphosphonates on bone mineral density, selected blood parameters, blood pressure, pulse, and muscle function. METHODS: Double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled interventional study in postmenopausal osteoporotic women over the age of 50 years consisting of four arms: 1) 24 weeks with bendroflumethiazide +24 weeks of washout, 2) 24 weeks with placebo +24 weeks of washout, 3) 48 weeks with bendroflumethiazide, or 4) 48 weeks with placebo. At inclusion, participants were on oral bisphosphonates. Intervention consisted of either bendroflumethiazide or placebo. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), vertebral fracture assessment (VFA), quantitative CT (QCT) and selected blood parameters were acquired at baseline and at 48 weeks and Timed-Up-and-Go, handgrip strength, blood pressure, pulse and balance additionally at 24 weeks. RESULTS: 139 postmenopausal Caucasian women over 50 years were randomized (mean age 64.7 years (SEM 0.6, range 51-79)). 109 (78%) completed the study. No difference in the effect of bendroflumethiazide on DXA, VFA, QCT, biochemistry or muscle function were found between the treatment arms. CONCLUSION: Bendroflumethiazide for 24- or 48 weeks in combination with bisphosphonates does not improve bone mineral density, selected blood parameters or muscle function compared to placebo combined with bisphosphonates. Studies with longer treatment periods and more patients are needed to further characterize the effects of bendroflumethiazide on bone and subpopulations that might benefit from the treatment.

Denosumab and cinacalcet for primary hyperparathyroidism (DENOCINA): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Medical treatment options for primary hyperparathyroidism are scarce. We aimed to assess the efficacy of denosumab and combined with cinacalcet in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. METHODS: In this randomised, single-centre, proof-of-concept, double-blind trial, patients aged at least 18 years with primary hyperparathyroidism were recruited from the Department of Endocrinology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. Key eligibility criteria were a T-score between -1·0 and -3·5 at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, or total hip. Patients were assigned (1:1:1) via permuted block randomisation to receive 30 mg cinacalcet per day plus 60 mg denosumab subcutaneously every 6 months (n=14; combination group) for 1 year, denosumab plus placebo (n=16; denosumab group) for 1 year, or placebo plus placebo injection (n=15; placebo group) for 1 year. Primary outcomes were changes in bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and distal forearm after 1 year. Additionally, effects on bone-metabolic biochemistry were explored. Patients and investigators were masked. All enrolled patients were included in efficacy analyses. The trial was done in an outpatient setting and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03027557, and has been completed. FINDINGS: Between March 14, 2017, and March 16, 2018 we recruited 285 participants. 16 patients were randomly allocated to the denosumab group, 15 to the combination group, and 15 to the placebo group. Dropout was limited to one patient in the combination group. Compared with placebo, BMD improved in groups receiving denosumab: lumbar spine (combination group 5·4% [95% CI 2·7-8·1], denosumab group 6·9% [95% CI 4·2-9·6]; p<0·0001), total hip (combination group 5·0% [3·0-6·9], denosumab group 4·1% [2·5-5·8]; p<0·0001), and femoral neck (combination group 4·5% [1·9-7·9]; p=0·0008, denosumab group 3·8% [1·4-6·3]; p=0·0022]). Changes in BMD at the third distal forearm were borderline significant. Six non-fatal serious adverse events occurred (combination group [n=2], denosumab group [n=1], placebo group [n=3]). The overall prevalence of adverse events did not differ between treatment groups, and no fatal adverse events occurred. INTERPRETATION: Evidence suggested denosumab was effective in improving BMD and lowering bone turnover in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism irrespective of cinacalcet treatment and might be a valid option for patients in which surgery is undesirable. FUNDING: Aalborg University Hospital and Aalborg University, Denmark.

Calcium Metabolic Disorders in Pregnancy: Primary Hyperparathyroidism, Pregnancy-Induced Osteoporosis, and Vitamin D Deficiency in Pregnancy.

Physiologic changes during pregnancy include calcium, phosphate, and calciotropic hormone status. Calcium metabolic disorders are rare in pregnancy and management with close calcium and vitamin D control and supplementation. Primary hyperparathyroidism is mostly asymptomatic and does not affect conception or pregnancy. It requires control of plasma calcium levels. Surgical intervention may be indicated. Data on severe cases are missing. Osteoporosis in or before pregnancy is rare but usually diagnosed from fractures. Medical treatment other than supplementation is contraindicated. Vitamin D deficiency is common and may affect conception and increase complications. Current evidence does not prove vitamin D supplements effective in improving outcomes.

Associations between trabecular bone score and biochemistry in surgically vs conservatively treated outpatients with primary hyperparathyroidism: A retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) is a software-based method for indirect assessment of trabecular bone structure of the spine, based on analysis of pixels in dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images. Few studies describe the use of TBS in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). This study aimed at further describing this relationship, investigating possible correlations between biochemistry, body mass index (BMI), fracture incidence and TBS. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 195 patients with verified PHPT, surgically (27) or conservatively (168) treated at the Department of Endocrinology, Aalborg University Hospital. TBS was acquired by reanalyzing DXA-images of the included subjects from the outpatient clinic. Biochemical variables were obtained from clinical routine blood samples taken in relation to the DXA-scans. History of fractures and medical history was obtained from radiology reports and medical charts. RESULTS: Patients with active PHPT had a TBS-score signifying a partly degraded bone structure, whereas surgically treated patients had a normal bone structure as judged by TBS, though the difference in TBS-score was not statistically significant. Use of antiresorptive treatment was negatively associated with BMD but not TBS. No correlations between the biochemical variables and TBS were found. A negative correlation between TBS and BMI in patients with PHPT was present. Patients experiencing a fragility fracture had a significantly lowered TBS, BMD and T-Score. CONCLUSION: Biochemistry does not seem to predict bone status in terms of TBS in patients with PHPT. TBS is negatively correlated to BMI, which is also seen in patients not suffering from PHPT. The lack of a predictive value for antiresorptive treatment for TBS may raise concern. TBS appears to have a predictive value when assessing risk of fracture in patients with PHPT. MINI ABSTRACT: This cross-sectional study investigates possible correlations between biochemical variables, body mass index (BMI) and trabecular bone score (TBS) in 195 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. It finds no correlation between biochemical variables and TBS, but finds a negative correlation between TBS and BMI and a clear association between fracture incidence and low TBS-score.

Corrigendum: Contemporary Medical Management of Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Systematic Review.

[This corrects the article on p. 79 in vol. 8, PMID: 28473803.].

Contemporary Medical Management of Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Primary hyperparathyroidism is increasingly an asymptomatic disease at diagnosis, but the recognized guidelines for management are based on evidence obtained from studies on patients with symptomatic disease, and surgery is not always indicated. Other patients are unable to undergo surgery, and thus a medical treatment is warranted. This systematic review provides an overview of the existing literature on contemporary pharmaceutical options available for the medical management of primary hyperparathyroidism. METHODS: Databases of medical literature were searched for articles including terms for primary hyperparathyroidism and each of the included drugs. Data on s-calcium, s-parathyroid hormone, bone turnover markers, bone mineral density (BMD) and hard endpoints were extracted and tabulated, and level of evidence was determined. Changes in s-calcium were estimated and a meta-regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: The 1,999 articles were screened for eligibility and 54 were included in the review. Weighted mean changes calculated for each drug in s-total calcium (mean change from baseline ± SEM) were pamidronate (0.31 ± 0.034 mmol/l); alendronate (0.07 ± 0.05 mmol/l); clodronate (0.20 ± 0.040 mmol/l); mixed bisphosphonates (0.16 ± 0.049 mmol/l); and cinacalcet (0.37 ± 0.013 mmol/l). The meta-analysis revealed a significant decrease of effect on s-calcium with time for the bisphosphonates (Coef. -0.049 ± 0.023, p = 0.035), while cinacalcet proved to maintain its effect on s-calcium over time. Bisphosphonates improved BMD while cinacalcet had no effect. DISCUSSION: The included studies demonstrate advantages and drawbacks of the available pharmaceutical options that can prove helpful in the clinical setting. The great variation in how primary hyperparathyroidism is manifested requires that management should rely on an individual evaluation when counseling patients. Combining resorptive agents with calcimimetics could prove rewarding, but more studies are warranted.