Comparison of CT versus MRI measurements of transverse atlantal ligament integrity in craniovertebral junction injuries. Part 2: A new CT-based alternative for assessing transverse ligament integrity.

OBJECTIVE The rule of Spence is inaccurate for assessing integrity of the transverse atlantal ligament (TAL). Because CT is quick and easy to perform at most trauma centers, the authors propose a novel sequence of obtaining 2 CT scans to improve the diagnosis of TAL impairment. The sensitivity of a new CT-based method for diagnosing a TAL injury in a cadaveric model was assessed. METHODS Ten human cadaveric occipitocervical specimens were mounted horizontally in a supine posture with wooden inserts attached to the back of the skull to maintain a neutral or flexed (10°) posture. Specimens were scanned in neutral and flexed postures in a total of 4 conditions (3 conditions in each specimen): 1) intact (n = 10); either 2A) after a simulated Jefferson fracture with an intact TAL (n = 5) or 2B) after a TAL disruption with no Jefferson fracture (n = 5); and 3) after TAL disruption and a simulated Jefferson fracture (n = 10). The atlantodental interval (ADI) and cross-sectional canal area were measured. RESULTS From the neutral to the flexed posture, ADI increased an average of 2.5% in intact spines, 6.25% after a Jefferson fracture without TAL disruption, 34% after a TAL disruption without fracture, and 25% after TAL disruption with fracture. The increase in ADI was significant with both TAL disruption and TAL disruption and fracture (p < 0.005) but not in the other 2 conditions (p > 0.6). Changes in spinal canal area were not significant (p > 0.70). CONCLUSIONS This novel method was more sensitive than the rule of Spence for evaluating the integrity of the TAL on CT and does not increase the risk of further neurological damage.

Biomechanical evaluation of the craniovertebral junction after anterior unilateral condylectomy: implications for endoscopic endonasal approaches to the cranial base.

BACKGROUND: : Endoscopic endonasal approaches to the craniovertebral junction and clivus, which are increasingly performed for ventral skull base pathology, may require disruption of the occipitocondylar joint. OBJECTIVE: : To study the biomechanical implications at the craniovertebral junction of progressive unilateral condylectomy as would be performed through an endonasal exposure. METHODS: : Seven upper cervical human cadaveric specimens (C0-C2) underwent nondestructive biomechanical flexibility testing during flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending at C0-C1 and C1-C2. Each specimen was tested intact, after an inferior one-third clivectomy, and after stepwise unilateral condylectomy with an anterior approach. Angular range of motion (ROM), lax zone, and stiff zone were determined and compared with the intact state. RESULTS: : At C0-C1, mobility during flexion-extension and axial rotation increased significantly with progressive condylectomy. ROM increased from 14.3 ± 2.7° to 20.4 ± 5.2° during flexion and from 6.7 ± 3.5° to 10.8 ± 3.0° during right axial rotation after 75% condyle resection (P < .01). At C1-C2, condylectomy had less effect, with ROM increasing from 10.7 ± 2.0° to 11.7 ± 2.0° during flexion, 36.9 ± 4.8° to 37.1 ± 5.1° during right axial rotation, and 4.3 ± 1.9° to 4.8 ± 3.3° during right lateral bending (P = NS). Because of marked instability, the 100% condylectomy condition was untestable. Changes in ROM were a result of changes more in the lax zone than in the stiff zone. CONCLUSION: : Lower-third clivectomy and unilateral anterior condylectomy as would be performed in an endonasal approach cause progressive hypermobility at the craniovertebral junction. On the basis of biomechanical criteria, craniocervical fusion is indicated for patients who undergo > 75% anterior condylectomy.