Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure to assess activities and participation in people with systemic sclerosis: the Cochin 17-item Scleroderma Functional scale.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) aimed at assessing people with systemic sclerosis (SSc) have rarely involved the target population in the item- and domain-generation stage of the instrument construction. OBJECTIVES: To develop a new PROM assessing activities and participation in people with SSc. METHODS: A provisional International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-based 65-item questionnaire previously developed from interviews of people with SSc was sent by email to all patients followed in the internal medicine department of Cochin hospital (n = 184) and enrolled in the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort. Items were reduced according to their metric properties. Dimensional structure of the questionnaire was assessed by principal component analysis, convergent and divergent validities by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, internal consistency by Cronbach's α, and reliability by a test-retest method using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 113 of 184 patients (61·4%) completed the provisional questionnaire. The item-reduction process resulted in a 17-item questionnaire, the Cochin 17-item Scleroderma Functional scale (CSF-17). Principal component analysis extracted two dimensions: 10 items related to mobility (CSF-17 section A) and seven items related to general tasks (CSF-17 section B). We observed convergent validity of the CSF-17 total score with global activity limitation, pain, depression and aesthetic burden, and divergent validity with anxiety. Cronbach's α was 0·94 for section A and 0·95 for section B. ICC (n = 25 patients) was 0·92 for the CSF-17 total score. Bland-Altman analysis did not reveal a systematic trend for the test-retest. CONCLUSIONS: The CSF-17 is a new PROM assessing activities and participation specifically in people with SSc. Its content and construct validities are very high. What is already known about this topic? In the earliest stages of construction patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) for people with systemic sclerosis (SSc) rarely involve the target population. Instruments able to capture the specific needs of people with SSc in terms of activities and participation are lacking. What does this study add? The Cochin 17-item Scleroderma Functional Scale (CSF-17) is a new PROM assessing global activities and participation specifically in people with SSc. Patients' perspectives were prioritized at all stages of construction. What are the clinical implications of this work? The CSF-17 could be used in clinical practice and research to assess the efficacy of complex multidisciplinary interventions targeting activity limitations and participation restriction in people with SSc. Linked Comment: Clark and Denton. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:610.

Validation of an educational booklet targeted to patients candidate for total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis is a highly prevalent condition and the leading reason for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). No consensus exists about the optimal content of preoperative patient information and, to the best of our knowledge, no validated information document is available. Our objective here was to obtain validation by healthcare professionals and patients of an educational booklet for patients awaiting TKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The booklet was developed and validated in six phases: systematic literature review, drafting of the first version, critical revision by a panel of experts, modification of the booklet, validation by a multidisciplinary panel of experts, and validation by two groups of patients, one composed of patients awaiting TKA and the other of patients in the immediate post-TKA period. We assessed the impact of the booklet based on knowledge and belief scores before and 2 days after receiving the booklet. RESULTS: Critical revision of the first draft led to changes to meet the concerns voiced by the experts. Knowledge improved only in the patient group given the booklet preoperatively (from 6/10 to 9/10, P=0.005). The booklet did not modify beliefs in either patient group. DISCUSSION: We used a rigorous methodology to develop and validate the contents of an educational booklet. Receiving this document before TKA resulted in improved patient knowledge but had no impact on beliefs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Impact of self-care programs for lower limb osteoarthritis and influence of patients' beliefs.

OBJECTIVE: To assess therapeutic education program impact for lower limb osteoarthritis (OA) at both the medical and surgical stage. Factors limiting efficiency and implementation of these programs such as patients' beliefs will be highlighted. METHOD: A non systematic literature review on Medline and Cochrane Library databases from 1966 to 2009 using following key words "knee/hip osteoarthritis", "self-care/therapeutic education", "total hip/knee replacement/arthroplasty", "patients' beliefs" is conducted. Clinical trials and randomized clinical trials, as well as literature reviews and practice guidelines, published in English and French will be analysed. RESULTS: Therapeutic education is part of the non-pharmacological management of chronic illnesses such as OA. The aim of education at an early stage of OA is to change patients' lifestyle, especially the regular practice of physical activity and weight reduction. Fears and avoidance assessment is necessary before patients' education process. When a surgical option is considered, the aim of education is to hasten patient recovery, improve autonomy after surgery, facilitate the return home and reduce the rate of transfer to a rehabilitation unit. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of therapeutic education could be optimised for the management of OA with use of standardized rules and methods to deliver information and education. One way to improve therapeutic education in the management of OA could be to propose dedicated continuing medical education programs supported by specific economic sources for health care professionals.

Translation and French cultural adaptation of a decision making tool for patients orientation after total hip or knee arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: To translate and culturally adapt to the French Health care system a decision making tool for patient orientation after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) or Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), to inpatient rehabilitation or a direct return home. METHOD: A translation/back translation procedure, with cultural and linguistic adaptation, a validated methodology for self-report measures and patients' information leaflets was used. RESULTS: The standardized translation/back-translation procedure enabled the creation of a French Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT), which is suitable to the French Health care system. The F-RAPT is a decision making tool that helps to better define patients' preoperative needs, and expectations concerning rehabilitation after lower limb arthroplasty, and to deliver a patient tailored preoperative education. It could also help to improve preoperative preparations by anticipating postoperative community support and carers' needs. CONCLUSION: The F-RAPT is a validated decision making tool for orientating patients after THA or TKA to either inpatient rehabilitation or a direct return home. The utilisation of the RAPT could permit better screening of those patients for whom it is appropriate to go back home directly after the operation, and give the opportunity for the most complex patients to be transferred to inpatient rehabilitation services. Complementary studies are needed to validate the F-RAPT from a daily practice perspective.

Immediate mobilization compared with conventional immobilization for the impacted nonoperatively treated proximal humeral fracture. A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There have been few randomized controlled trials evaluating nonoperative treatment of proximal humeral fractures. To investigate shortening the period of dependence, we assessed the feasibility and efficacy of early mobilization of the shoulder (within three days after the fracture) in comparison with those of conventional three-week immobilization followed by physiotherapy. METHODS: We randomly assigned seventy-four patients with an impacted proximal humeral fracture to receive early passive mobilization or conventional treatment. The primary outcome was the overall shoulder functional status (as measured with the Constant score) at three months. The secondary outcomes were the Constant score at six weeks and at six months, the change in pain (on a visual analog scale), and the active and passive range of motion. RESULTS: At three months and at six weeks, the early mobilization group had a significantly better Constant score than did the conventional-treatment group (between-group difference, 9.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 17.8] [p = 0.02] and 10.1 [95% confidence interval, 2.0 to 18.1] [p = 0.02], respectively) and better active mobility in forward elevation (between-group difference, 12.0 [95% confidence interval, 1.7 to 22.4] [p = 0.02] and 28.1 [95% confidence interval, 7.1 to 49.1] [p = 0.01], respectively). At three months, the early mobilization group had significantly reduced pain compared with the conventional-treatment group (between-group difference, 15.7 [95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 30.8] [p = 0.04]). No complications in displacement or nonhealing were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Early mobilization for impacted nonoperatively treated proximal humeral fractures is safe and is more effective for quickly restoring the physical capability and performance of the injured arm than is conventional immobilization followed by physiotherapy.

The value of individual or collective group exercise programs for knee or hip osteoarthritis. Clinical practice recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: To develop clinical practice guidelines concerning individual and group exercise therapy for knee and/or hip osteoarthritis (OA). METHOD: We used the SOFMER (French Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Society) methodology, combining systematic literature review, collection of everyday clinical practice, and external review by a multidisciplinary expert panel, to develop the guidelines. RESULTS: Physical exercises are proposed for knee and hip OA. The benefit of individual exercises is low to moderate for pain, strength and ability to walk. The effectiveness is not maintained over time if the individual exercise program is not continued. The benefit of group exercise is also low to moderate for pain, strength, balance and ability to walk. There is no evidence of the superiority of one modality over the other (individual or group). CONCLUSION: More randomised controlled trials with good methodology are needed to compare the effectiveness of individual versus group exercise therapy for knee and hip OA.

Is there predictive criteria for transfer of patients to a rehabilitation ward after hip and knee total arthroplasty? Elaboration of French clinical practice guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: To develop clinical practice guidelines concerning predictive criteria for transfer of patients to a rehabilitation ward after hip and knee total arthroplasty. METHOD: The SOFMER (French Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Society) methodology, associating a systematic literature review, collection of everyday clinical practice, and external review by a multidisciplinary expert panel, was used. RESULTS: From systematic literature review and collection of French professional practice, we cannot distinguish the patients undergoing THA and TKA who can transfer to a rehabilitation ward. For both types of patients, the main criteria determining transfer are demographic criteria such as older age or female sex; psychosocial and environmental criteria such as living alone, feeling unable to return home directly (pre-operative education could modify this criterion); and surgeon advice based on the pre and post-operative clinical and functional status. CONCLUSION: Studies with good methodological quality are urgently needed to evaluate the use of predictive tools such as the RAPT, separating THA and TKA, and using as parameters of assessment functional status and handicap reduction.

3-D scapular kinematics during arm elevation: effect of motion velocity.

BACKGROUND: No three-dimensional (3-D) data exist on the influence of motion velocity on scapular kinematics. The effect of arm elevation velocity has been studied only in a two-dimensional setting. METHODS: Thirty healthy subjects performed dominant (right) arm elevation in two planes, sagittal and frontal, and at slow and fast self-selected arm speed. Scapular orientation and humeral elevation were measured at 30 Hz recording frequency with use of a 6-degree-of-freedom electromagnetic system (Polhemus Fastraka). Motion was computed according to the International Society of Biomechanics standards. Scapular orientation was also determined with the arm held in different static positions. FINDINGS: We obtained a full 3-D kinematic description of scapula achieving a reliable, complex 3-D motion during humeral elevation and lowering. The maximal sagittal arm elevation showed a characteristic "M"-shape pattern of protraction/retraction curve. Scapular rotations did not differ significantly between slow and fast movements. Moreover, protraction/retraction and tilt angular values did not differ significantly between static and dynamic tasks. However, scapular lateral rotation values differed between static and dynamic measurements during sagittal and frontal arm elevation. Lateral scapular rotation appears to be less in static than in dynamic measurement, particularly in the sagittal plane. INTERPRETATION: Interpolation of statically recorded positions of the bones cannot reflect the kinematics of the scapula.

[Shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review]. / Les échelles d'incapacité fonctionnelle de l'épaule: revue systématique.

OBJECTIVES: To identify all available shoulder disability questionnaires designed to measure physical functioning and to examine those with satisfactory clinimetric quality. METHODS: We used the Medline database and the "Guide des outils de mesure de l'évaluation en médecine physique et de réadaptation" textbook to search for questionnaires. Analysis took into account the development methodology, clinimetric quality of the instruments and frequency of their utilization. We classified the instruments according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. RESULTS: Thirty-eight instruments have been developed to measure disease-, shoulder- or upper extremity-specific outcome. Four scales assess upper-extremity disability and 3 others shoulder disability. We found 6 scales evaluating disability and shoulder pain, 7 scales measuring the quality of life in patients with various conditions of the shoulder, 14 scales combining objective and subjective measures, 2 pain scales and 2 unclassified scales. Older instruments developed before the advent of modern measurement development methodology usually combine objective and subjective measures. Recent instruments were designed with appropriate methodology. Most are self-administered questionnaires. CONCLUSION: Numerous shoulder outcome measure instruments are available. There is no "gold standard" for assessing shoulder function outcome in the general population.

[Value of intensive rehabilitation in fixed dropped head syndrome]. / Tête tombante fixée: efficacité d'une rééducation intensive.

OBJECTIVES: To point out the diagnostic and etiologic context of neck extensor weakness and to consider orthopedic and rehabilitation treatment of dropped head syndrome. METHODS: We report a case of a 68-year-old hospitalized woman with atypical and serious idiopathic neck extensor weakness who was treated by orthopedic measurements and intensive rehabilitation. RESULTS: Our patient had progressive neck extensor weakness and total inflection of the cervico-cephalic axis over two years. Fixed and permanent contact of the chin and the sternum severely affected her ability to eat, and mandibular and sternal pressure ulcers developed. Cervical spine radiography revealed degenerative lesions. Other clinical and biological parameters were normal. Atypical idiopathic head drop was diagnosed because of painful and fixed head position. Rehabilitation consisted of cervical traction with a halo apparatus during eight weeks and an exercise programme based on cervical proprioception and muscular work. Orthopedic management consisted of cervical collar immobilization after cutaneous cicatrization. After ten weeks of treatment, the patient was able to raise her head and maintain it horizontally. Two years later, clinical results were stable. DISCUSSION: Neck extensor weakness may be the presenting feature of several neuromuscular disorders. Generally, idiopathic dropped head syndrome appears to be the most likely diagnosis in patients with isolated neck extensor involvement. For our patient, clinical findings and cervical computed tomography showed important muscular weakness. However, painful passive extension and progressive stiffness of the neck do not represent the typical clinical course of idiopathic head drop. Neither degenerative lesions of the cervical spine nor other joint diseases can cause head drop. This case may result from the combined effects of idiopathic dropped head syndrome and cervical arthrosis. Orthopedic treatment and intensive rehabilitation had spectacular effects. Clinical management of head drop syndrome should always consist of orthopedic and rehabilitation treatment.

[Intradiscal injection of acetate of prednisolone in severe low back pain: complications and patients' assessment of effectiveness]. / Infiltrations intradiscales d'acétate de prednisolone dans les lombalgies sévères. Recherche de complications radiologiques.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate complications (calcification and/or disc collapse) as seen on radiography and patient-assessed effectiveness after intradiscal injections of acetate of prednisolone (Hydrocortancyl). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of medical records of 67 patients (68 injected discs) given an intradiscal injection of acetate of prednisolone for low back pain with endplate signal changes on magnetic resonance imaging and/or evidence of fast destructive discopathy, as well as records of 85 patients (55 women, mean age 49 +/-9 years) to assess the effectiveness of intradiscal injection: the global appreciation of the patient (excellent, good, mild, none, worse) concerning the result of the intradiscal injection at one, three and six months. Two physicians were blinded during analysis of images. RESULTS: The mean period of follow up for radiographics was 10.25 +/-5.99 months. A total of 44.8% of the patients had control at six months and 38.8% at 12 months or more. No calcification was found, but two discs showed a collapse of 20 and 25% at six and 12 months, respectively, after the injection. For effectiveness of intradiscal injection, 71.8% the patients considered the result good or excellent at one month, 55.3% at three months and 43.5 % at six months. CONCLUSION: The benefit-to-risk ratio of use of acetate of prednisolone intradiscal injection seems good in selected patients with low back pain.

[Measurement of shoulder disability in the athlete: a systematic review]. / Mesure de l'incapacité fonctionnelle de l'épaule chez le sportif: revue systématique.

OBJECTIVES: To identify all available shoulder disability questionnaires and to examine those that could be used for athlete. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the literature in Medline using the keywords shoulder, function, scale, index, score, questionnaire, disability, quality of life, assessment, and evaluation. We searched for scales used for athletes with the keywords scale name AND (sport OR athlete). Data were completed by using the "Guide des Outils de Mesure et d'Evaluation en Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation" textbook. Analysis took into account the clinimetric quality of the instruments and the number of items specifically related to sports. RESULTS: A total of 37 instruments have been developed to measure disease-, shoulder-specific or upper extremity specific outcome. Older instruments were developed before the advent of modern measurement methods. They usually combined objective and subjective measures. Recent instruments were designed with use of more advanced methods. Most are self-administered questionnaires. Fourteen scales included items assessing sport activity. Four of these scales have been used to assess shoulder disability in athlete. Six scales have been used to assess such disability but do not have specific items related to sports. CONCLUSION: There is no gold standard for assessing shoulder outcome in the general population and no validated outcome instruments specifically for athletes. We suggest the use of ASES, WOSI and WORC scales for evaluating shoulder function in the recreational athletes. The DASH scale should be evaluated in this population. The principal criterion in evaluating shoulder function in the high level athlete is a return to the same level of sport performance. Further studies are required to identify measurement tools for shoulder disability that have a high predictive value for return to sport.

[Chronicity, recurrence, and return to work in low back pain: common prognostic factors]. / Chronicité, récidive et reprise du travail dans la lombalgie: facteurs communs de pronostic.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the common risk factors of recurrence, chronicity and non return to work in low back pain. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was done by searches of Medline, Embase, Pascal, the Cochrane database and also in the unindexed literature. Keywords used were low back pain, chronic, risk factors, recurrence, predictive value of tests, prognosis, confounding factors. Studies were assessed by two readers using the ANAES (French Agency for Health Assessment) scale allowing classification into high-, moderate- and low-quality trials. The scientific evidence level of the identified risk factors depend on the methodological quality of the studies, the number of studies in agreement, the coherence of their results and their clinical relevance. RESULTS: Fifty-four high quality studies were included. Several prognostic factors are common to the three described clinical situations. A history of low back pain (including the concept of pain severity, duration, disability, leg pain, related sickness leave and a history of spinal surgery), low level of job satisfaction and poor general health are highlighted with a strong level of evidence. Socioprofessionel and psychological factors including employment status, amount of wage, workers' compensation, and depression were found but with moderate level of evidence. Physical factors including lifting time per day and work postures were also found with moderate level of evidence. CONCLUSION: This study confirm that several prognostic factors are commun to recurrence, chronicity and non return to work in low back pain. Early identification of these factors is important in understanding, and hopefully preventing, the recurrence or the progression to chronicity and disability in low back trouble.

[Development of rheumatoid arthritis functional handicap assessment questionnaire: preliminary study]. / Elaboration d'un questionnaire pour évaluer le handicap dans la polyarthrite rhumatoïde: étude préliminaire.

OBJECTIVE: To construct a handicap assessment questionnaire for rheumatoid arthritis and to determine if the concept of "participation" can replace the one of "handicap". METHODS: Selection of daily life domains and items was based on the International Classification of Impairment Disability and Handicap "ICIDH" and on some others handicap epidemiological studies. The questionnaire was tested among rheumatoid arthritis patients. The relation between handicap and participation was investigated. Statistics analysis was performed with Systat.9 program. Spearman's correlation coefficient between 2 quantitative variables was examined. RESULTS: Six among the 7 "ICIDH" domains were included in the questionnaire. Each of them was explored with many items. Forty-six items were included; each item was explored in 4 chapters:participation assessment with VAS (Visual Analogical Scale) before rheumatoid arthritis and during the study; difficulties: need of help, environment accessibility, patient's satisfaction, feeling of devalorization; patient's propositions;handicap assessment with VAS; other questions were added in some particular items. Thirty patients were included in the study (23 women), the average age was 51 years. Five patients didn't understand the meaning of "Handicap".This study allows us to eliminate 2 items, to add 2 others and to ameliorate 1 of them. Correlation between handicap and participation was moderate to bad. CONCLUSION: This questionnaire allows to explore rheumatoid arthritis handicap. Each domain of the daily life can be assessed separately. The main difficulties are the length and the impossibility to be self-administered. Handicap and participation probably assess different concepts or are differently understood by patients.

Algo-functional assessment of knee osteoarthritis: comparison of the test-retest reliability and construct validity of the WOMAC and Lequesne indexes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the test-retest reliability and the construct validity of the Lequesne and the French-Canadian version of the WOMAC indexes. DESIGN: Patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) fulfilling the revised criteria of the American College of Rheumatology completed both the Lequesne and the French-Canadian version of the WOMAC indexes twice at a 3-h interval. Impairment outcome measures, patients' perceived discomfort in walking and handicap were recorded. For both questionnaires, an analysis was performed item by item. Repeatability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Construct validity was investigated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and a factor analysis was performed. RESULTS: 88 patients were included. Eight questions of the WOMAC section C and one question of the Lequesne index had insufficient psychometric properties. Although repeatability of questionnaires was fair to excellent (0.82, 0.68, 0.74, 0.95 for the WOMAC sections A, B, C and Lequesne index respectively), construct validity could not be demonstrated. Factor analysis of the WOMAC extracted five factors which differed from the a priori triple stratification. Factor analysis of the WOMAC section C extracted two factors explaining 71% of the variance which could not be clinically characterized. For the Lequesne index, expected convergent correlations were not always achieved. Three factors were extracted by factor analysis explaining 58% of the variance. CONCLUSION: Despite their good test-retest reliability, the two composite indexes evaluated are not valid to assess the concept of functional disability induced by knee OA in a French population.

Responsiveness of the Cochin rheumatoid hand disability scale after surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the responsiveness of the Cochin functional disability scale for the rheumatoid hand after surgery. METHOD: In a prospective study, patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) scheduled for surgery of the wrist and/or fingers were evaluated within 48 h before surgery and at least 6 months after surgery. Clinical outcome measures included duration of morning stiffness, total score for tenderness, total score for swelling, visual analogue scale score for pain in the hands and wrists, a score for overall mobility of the wrist and the fingers, grip and pinch strength, the Hand Functional Index (HFI), the Kapandji index and the Cochin scale. Responsiveness was assessed with the paired t-test, the effect size (ES), the standardized response mean (SRM) and the non-parametric Spearman rank correlation coefficient (r(S)). RESULTS: Fifty patients (42 women) were evaluated twice at an interval of 7.16 +/- 2.10 months (mean +/- s.d.) (range 6-15 months). Thirty-six patients (72%) were very satisfied or satisfied with the results of surgery, seven (14%) were not satisfied or dissatisfied and seven (14%) were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. The Cochin scale score improved at the second visit (P < 0.0001), with SRM and ES values of 0.66 and 0.58 respectively. The correlation of the change in Cochin score with patient overall satisfaction was r(S) = 0.40. Among the impairment measures, grip strength showed the best responsiveness (SRM = - 0.43, ES = - 0.36, correlation with patient overall satisfaction r(S) = 0.46). The change in Kapandji index had the best correlation (r(S) = 0.51) with patient overall satisfaction but its SRM and ES values were low (- 0.19 and - 0.10 respectively). CONCLUSION: The Cochin scale is responsive and appropriate for the assessment of the effects of surgical treatments on disability in RA hands.

Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Cochin hand functional disability scale in hand osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability, validity and sensitivity to change of the Cochin hand functional scale in hand osteoarthritis (OA). BACKGROUND: The Cochin hand functional disability scale has been validated in rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: Patients with hand OA according to Altman's criteria were included. Impairment outcome measures (VAS of pain, hand score of tenderness, clinical hand score of impairment, Kallman's radiographic scale), functional disability measures [Cochin scale, Revel's functional index (RFI), Dreiser's functional index (DFI)] and patients' perceived handicap (VAS) were recorded twice, at baseline and at a 6-month follow-up visit. Interobserver reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Construct (convergent and divergent) validity was investigated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and a factor analysis was performed. Sensitivity to change was assessed using the effect size (ES) and the standardized response mean (SRM), and the non-parametric Spearman rank correlation coefficient (r) was used to assess the correlation between quantitative variable changes and patient's overall opinion. RESULTS: 89 patients (8 males, mean age 63 years) were included. Interobserver reliability was excellent (ICC=0.96). The Bland and Altman method showed no systematic trend. Correlations of the Cochin scale score with RFI (r=0.86), DFI (r=0.87), VAS of handicap (r=0.67), VAS of pain (r=0.54), tenderness (r=0.51), clinical impairment (r=0.32), and Kallman's radiographic scale (r=0.13) indicated a good construct validity. Factor analysis extracted four main factors, accounting for 65% of the total variance. 51 patients were evaluated at the 6-month visit. The Cochin scale score had worsened with SRM and ES values of -0.26 and -0.17 respectively. Changes in the score had one of the highest correlation (r=0.47) with the patient's overall opinion. CONCLUSION: The Cochin hand functional disability scale which was first developed to assess the rheumatoid hand can be used to evaluate functional disability in hand OA.

Value of the bell test and the hyperextension test for diagnosis in sciatica associated with disc herniation: comparison with Lasègue's sign and the crossed Lasègue's sign.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability, sensitivity, specificity and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values for the diagnosis of sciatica associated with disc herniation of the bell test (BT) and the hyperextension test (HT). METHODS: According to magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography scanning or myelography findings, patients were classified as having sciatica associated with disc herniation (group A) or sciatica without disc herniation or sciatica of other mechanical origin (group B). Four clinical manoeuvres [bell test (BT), hyperextension test (HT), Lasègue's sign (LS) and the crossed Lasègue's sign (CL)] were tested by three investigators. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were calculated using the kappa correlation coefficient or the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the four manoeuvres were calculated. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the best set of variables predicting sciatica caused by disc herniation. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (43 in group A, 35 in group B; 33 males) with a mean age of 50+/-16 yr were included. Interobserver reliabilities ranged from 0.58 to 0.64 for the BT, 0.35 to 0.50 for the HT, 0.27 to 0.47 for LS and 0.43 to 0.72 for CL. LS had the best sensitivity (0.77-0.83) and CL the best specificity (0.74-0.89), while PPV and NPV were equivalent for the four manoeuvres (0.55-0.75 for PPV and 0.45-0.59 for NPV). The best PPV was observed for the association of HT with CL (0.67-0.85). Stepwise logistic regression analysis did not allow us to propose a set of variables predicting sciatica caused by disc herniation. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that clinical values of the BT and HT are of interest, and are similar to those of LS and CL.

[Which rehabilitation for which low back pain?]. / Quelle rééducation pour quel lombalgique?

Many rehabilitation technics for low back pain are available. Their aims are short time pain decrease, muscular strengthening in flexion or extension, increased hip and lumbar spine mobility, improved lumbar and pelvic proprioceptive sensibility, improved general fitness. During the past ten years, studies meeting widely accepted validity and applicability for therapeutic trials have addressed the clinical efficacy of rehabilitation in low back pain patients. Most studies assessing the back school approach have found no benefit. Spinal extension and flexion programs have yielded short-time improvements, without difference between the two methods. There is now strong evidence that functional restoration programs provide long-term benefits including better social and occupational outcomes.