The influence of intensity and duration of a painful conditioning stimulation on conditioned pain modulation in volunteers.

BACKGROUND AND METHOD: The aim was to investigate influence from variations in intensity of a painful conditioning stimulation (CS) on early (0-6 min) and prolonged (6-12 min) conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in volunteers during concurrent exposure to test stimuli (TS). CS was applied to either forearm using painful heat with an intensity of 2/10 and 5/10, respectively, rated on a 0-10 numerical pain rating scale. At a second session, CS with an intensity of 7/10 was applied to the arm using a tourniquet. Threshold and suprathreshold painful heat and pressure as well as painful repeated monofilament pricking (RMP) were assessed as TS. RESULTS: Regardless of TS, there was no significant difference in the magnitude of CPM within the same stimulus modality during the various intensities and phases of the CS. Significant modulation of heat pain thresholds (HPTs) was found during the early phase at 5/10 and 7/10, but not at 2/10. Only at 5/10 the prolonged CS resulted in a significant additional increase in HPT. During the early CS phase, CPM of suprathreshold heat pain was found at 2/10 and 5/10. The prolonged CS resulted in a significant additional temperature increase at 5/10. Only during the early phase significant CPM of pressure pain thresholds were found for all three pain intensities in conjunction with a significant CPM of suprathreshold pressure pain at 5/10. There was no CPM of RMP. CONCLUSION: The CS intensity and the duration of CPM modulated pain sensitivity differentially across TS modalities.

The influence of pain intensity on somatosensory perception in patients suffering from subacute/chronic lateral epicondylalgia.

A confounding factor in the analysis of chronic pain patients is the finding of signs of somatosensory disturbances not only in neuropathic pain patients but also in a subgroup of patients with musculoskeletal pain. The purpose was to investigate if patients suffering from subacute/chronic lateral epicondylalgia demonstrated altered sensibility, and if this was affected by pain intensity. At the start of the experiment, quantitative sensory testing (QST) (thermal, pressure pain, touch) was performed in the local pain area and in the area of pain referral. QST was repeated following pain provocation (weight lifting). A local anaesthetic was then injected into the lateral epicondyle and QST was repeated in the area of pain referral. The contralateral arm was assessed, treated and injected in the same way. At the baseline assessment there was no difference in sensibility between sides, with the exception of a significantly lowered threshold to noxious heat (p<0.04) in the area of pain referral, present during the whole experiment. In the affected arm only, weight lifting resulted in significantly increased pain intensity in the local (p<0.01) and referred (p<0.01) pain areas, respectively. Repeated muscle contractions resulted in altered somatosensory functions in both the affected arm and the unaffected arm, consequently not dependent on ongoing pain in the assessed area. Tactile perception thresholds increased significantly following pain provocation in the area of pain referral (p<0.04) only and normalized following injection of local anaesthetic (p<0.02), indicating that the sensitivity to light touch was altered by the nociceptive input from the affected arm.

Injection of hypertonic saline into musculus infraspinatus resulted in referred pain and sensory disturbances in the ipsilateral upper arm.

A confounding factor in the analysis of chronic pain patients is the finding of somatosensory disturbances not only in neuropathic pain patients, but also in a subgroup of patients with musculoskeletal pain. The purpose of the study was to examine if referred pain, induced by intramuscular injections of hypertonic saline (5% NaCl) into the left musculus infraspinatus, resulted in somatosensory alterations. Thermal sensitivity, pressure pain sensitivity, as well as low threshold mechanoreceptive function, were assessed in the referred pain area and the homologous contralateral site before, during and following the injections. In 10 out of 12 subjects the procedure induced only referred pain localized in the dorsolateral part of the ipsilateral proximal upper arm. In this referred pain area there was a significantly decreased sensitivity to light touch, as tested with von Frey filaments, during the pain period and the post-injection period compared to the contralateral side (p<0.004 and p<0.009, respectively). A trend for thermal hypoaesthesia, which was only demonstrable in the sum of warm and cold thresholds, was found in the referred pain area, but not contralaterally, during the pain period compared to the pre-injection period. Significantly increased sensitivity to threshold and suprathreshold heat pain was found bilaterally during post-injection assessments (p<0.02 and p<0.006, respectively). There were no statistically significant changes in sensitivity to innocuous thermal stimuli when assessing the two percepts separately, or to pressure pain or brush-evoked touch. In conclusion, intramuscular injections of hypertonic saline resulted in referred pain and tactile hypoaesthesia in the referred pain area.