WITHDRAWN: Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth.

BACKGROUND: The foundation for the reconstruction of endodontically-treated teeth can be provided by a metal or a non-metal post and core system but no guidelines exist for choosing one or the other in particular clinical cases. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of different post and core systems for the restoration of endodontically-treated teeth. The primary objective of this review was to compare the clinical failure rates of the different types of posts. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2005, Issue 3), MEDLINE (from 1966 to September 2005), Scopus (from January 1985 to December 2004) and EMBASE (until December 2004). We looked through reference lists of articles and dental conference proceedings. We contacted researchers in the field and manufacturers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised clinical trials (RCTs) comparing failures on endodontically-treated permanent teeth with different types of post. The outcomes were loss of retention, post fracture and root fracture. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed the quality of trials and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: Two trials involving 317 participants were included but only one of them, involving 200 participants, compared metal to non-metal posts. The other answered to the secondary objective. The risk of failure was greater with metal-cast posts (9/98) compared to carbon fibre posts (0/97) (risk ratio (RR) = 0.05 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.00 to 0.90)) but the study was at high risk of bias. Thus fewer failures occurred when using non-metal posts but the evidence is unreliable. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review could not specify which type of post and core system should be used when two or three dentine walls remain. More RCTs are needed to confirm whether fibre-reinforced post and core systems are superior and to clarify the influence of the remaining tooth structure on the treatment outcome of the different post and core systems available. Well-defined inclusion criteria focusing on the number of dentine walls (two or three) should be used.

Shear bond strength of self-etching adhesive systems to Er:YAG-laser-prepared dentin.

This study was conducted to compare the shear bond strengths of composite resin bonded to Er:YAG laser or bur-prepared dentin surfaces using three self-etching adhesive systems. The occlusal surfaces of 120 human third molars were ground flat to expose dentin. The dentin was prepared using either a carbide bur or an Er:YAG laser at 350 mJ/pulse and 10 Hz (fluence, 44.5 J/cm(2)). Three different self-etching adhesive systems were applied: iBond, Xeno III and Clearfil SE Bond. Rods of composite resin were bonded to dentin surfaces and shear bond tests were carried out. Both dentin surfaces after debonding and resin rods were observed using a scanning electron microscope. When the Xeno III was used, no difference was observed on shear bond strength values when bur and Er:YAG laser were compared. When using iBond and Clearfil SE Bond, bond strength values measured on Er:YAG-laser-prepared surfaces were lower than those observed on bur-prepared surfaces. The absence of smear layer formation during the preparation of the dentin by the Er:YAG laser did not improve the adhesion values of self-etching adhesive systems.

Shear bond strength of self-etching adhesive systems to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentine with and without pulpal pressure simulation.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to study the role of pulpal pressure on the shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared or bur-prepared dentine surfaces using a self-etching adhesive system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The occlusal surfaces of 80 human third molars were ground flat to expose the dentine. The dentine was prepared using either a carbide bur or an Er:YAG laser at 350 mJ/pulse and 10 Hz (fluence 44.5 J/cm(2)). Clearfil SE Bond was then applied with or without pressure. Rods of composite resin were bonded to dentine surfaces and shear bond tests were carried out. RESULTS: When the Clearfil SE Bond was used without pressure, the difference between the shear bond strength values of bur-prepared and laser-prepared dentine surfaces was significant. When the Clearfil SE Bond was used with pressure, the difference of shear bond strength values was not significant between the two types of surface preparation. CONCLUSION: The absence of smear layer formation during the preparation of the dentine by the Er:YAG laser did not improve the adhesion values of self-etching adhesive systems.

Er:YAG laser cavity preparation and composite resin bonding with a single-component adhesive system: relationship between shear bond strength and microleakage.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the performances of a single-component adhesive system when an Er:YAG laser was used to prepare cavities. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Shear bond strength tests were performed on composite rods bonded with a single-component adhesive system to dentin surfaces prepared using either bur+acid, Er:YAG laser (fluence = 44 J/cm2), or Er:YAG laser+acid. Class V cavities were prepared differently according to the molar surface: buccal surfaces were prepared using a diamond bur, and lingual surfaces using the Er:YAG laser. In group 1, cavity walls were not acid treated after Er:YAG laser preparation. In group 2, only the enamel walls were acid treated. In group 3, all the enamel and dentin walls were acid treated. Microleakage was assessed using a methylene blue dye penetration method. RESULTS: Bond strength values did not differ significantly between the three groups (P = 0.162). Better marginal adaptation was obtained between the composite resin and cavity walls when Er:YAG laser preparation was followed by a total acid etching (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Our results supported the use of single-component adhesive systems in cavities prepared using Er:YAG laser. The step of acid etching must be maintained for the whole cavity walls in regard of the microleakage values.