Evaluation of the interest to combine a CD4 Th1-inducer cancer vaccine derived from telomerase and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized non-comparative phase II study (TERTIO - PRODIGE 82).

BACKGROUND: Several cancer immunotherapies that target the PD-L1/PD-1 pathway show promising clinical activity in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the standard of care in first-line treatment with atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1 therapy) in combination with bevacizumab is associated with a limited objective response rate. Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) activation meets the criteria of oncogenic addiction in HCC and could be actionable therapeutic target and a relevant tumor antigen. Therefore we hypothesized that combining anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy with an anti-telomerase vaccine might be an attractive therapy in HCC. UCPVax is a therapeutic cancer vaccine composed of two separate peptides derived from telomerase (human TERT). UCPVax has been evaluated in a multicenter phase I/II study in non-small cell lung cancers and has demonstrated to be safe and immunogenic, and is under evaluation in combination with atezolizumab in a phase II clinical trial in tumors where telomerase reactivation contributes to an oncogene addiction (HPV+ cancers). The aim of the TERTIO study is to determine the clinical interest and immunological efficacy of a treatment combining the CD4 helper T-inducer cancer anti-telomerase vaccine (UCPVax) with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in unresectable HCC in a multicenter randomized phase II study. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced, metastatic or unresectable HCC who have not previously received systemic anti-cancer treatment are eligible. The primary end point is the objective response rate at 6 months. Patients will be allocated to a treatment arm with a randomization 2:1. In both arms, patients will receive atezolizumab at fixed dose of 1200 mg IV infusion and bevacizumab at fixed dose of 15 mg/kg IV infusion, every 3 weeks, according to the standard of care. In the experimental arm, these treatments will be combined with the UCPVax vaccine at 0.5 mg subcutaneously. DISCUSSION: Combining anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy with an anti-telomerase vaccine gains serious consideration in HCC, in order to extend the clinical efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1. Indeed, anti-cancer vaccines can induce tumor-specific T cell expansion and activation and therefore restore the cancer-immunity cycle in patients lacking pre-existing anti-tumor responses. Thus, there is a strong rational to combine immune checkpoint blockade therapy and anticancer vaccine (UCPVax) in order to activate antitumor T cell immunity and bypass the immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment in HCC. This pivotal proof of concept study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of a CD4 Th1-inducer cancer vaccine derived from telomerase (UCPVax) and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable HCC, as well as confirming their synergic mechanism, and settling the basis for a new combination for future clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05528952.

Performance evaluation of the HPLC diode array and evaporative light scattering detection for the implementation of dose-banded gemcitabine infusion bags.

BACKGROUND: Dose banding (DB) was used to optimise the individualisation of patient treatments with gemcitabine (Gem) in order to improve workload planning at the pharmacy of the University Hospital Centre of Besançon (UHCB). A new simple and fast high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method was also developed for the quantification of Gem without dilution of the infusion bags. METHODS: Individual doses of Gem preparations were retrospectively analysed over a 1-year period to determine the frequency of prepared doses. Using a maximum gap of 7.5% around the doses chosen, the selected Gem standard doses were 1400 mg, 1600 mg, 1800 mg and 2000 mg. Following the DB scheme, the frequency of prescription of standard and individualised Gem doses was analysed over a period of 10 months. The four selected Gem standard doses were aseptically prepared in polyolefin infusion bags. Each series of 20 bags was stocked under refrigerated storage conditions (4°C) for up to 84 days. The quantification of Gem without dilution of the infusion bags was obtained by the development of a HPLC method coupled to a diode array detector (DAD) or an evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD). RESULTS: During the 10-month period following implementation of the DB, 75.6% of the 1266 prescribed doses were covered by the four standardised preparations. The number of different Gem doses was reduced from 183 to 55. Concerning the Gem quantification, both heteroscedasticity and non-linearity were observed with DAD. Using an ELSD, the trueness values were between 98.59% and 101.52% with excellent repeatability values between 0.66% and 1.42%. CONCLUSION: A new HPLC method has been developed for the quantification of Gem without dilution of the infusion bags prepared in advance as a result of a target DB scheme successfully implemented in our pharmacy department.

Safety, Immunogenicity, and 1-Year Efficacy of Universal Cancer Peptide-Based Vaccine in Patients With Refractory Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase Ib/Phase IIa De-Escalation Study.

PURPOSE: Universal cancer peptide-based vaccine (UCPVax) is a therapeutic vaccine composed of two highly selected helper peptides to induce CD4+ T helper-1 response directed against telomerase. This phase Ib/IIa trial was designed to test the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of a three-dose schedule in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with refractory NSCLC were assigned to receive three vaccination doses of UCPVax (0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, and 1 mg) using a Bayesian-based phase Ib followed by phase IIa de-escalating design. The primary end points were dose-limiting toxicity and immune response after three first doses of vaccine. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients received UCPVax; 95% had three prior lines of systemic therapy. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 15 patients treated in phase Ib. The maximum tolerated dose was 1 mg. Fifty-one patients were eligible for phase IIa. The third and sixth dose of UCPVax induced specific CD4+ T helper 1 response in 56% and 87.2% of patients, respectively, with no difference between three dose levels. Twenty-one (39%) patients achieved disease control (stable disease, n = 20; complete response, n = 1). The 1-year OS was 34.1% (95% CI, 23.1 to 50.4), and the median OS was 9.7 months, with no significant difference between dose levels. The 1-year progression-free survival and the median OS were 17.2% (95% CI, 7.8 to 38.3) and 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.7 to 16.7) in immune responders (P = .015) and 4.5% (95% CI, 0.7 to 30.8) and 5.6 months (95% CI, 2.5 to 10) in nonresponders (P = .005), respectively. CONCLUSION: UCPVax was highly immunogenic and safe and provide interesting 1-year OS rate in heavily pretreated advanced NSCLC.

A Phase II Study Evaluating the Interest to Combine UCPVax, a Telomerase CD4 TH1-Inducer Cancer Vaccine, and Atezolizumab for the Treatment of HPV Positive Cancers: VolATIL Study.

Background: There is a strong rational of using anti-programmed cell death protein-1 and its ligand (anti-PD-1/L1) antibodies in human papillomavirus (HPV)-induced cancers. However, anti-PD-1/L1 as monotherapy induces a limited number of objective responses. The development of novel combinations in order to improve the clinical efficacy of an anti-PD-1/L1 is therefore of interest. Combining anti-PD-1/L1 therapy with an antitumor vaccine seems promising in HPV-positive (+) cancers. UCPVax is a therapeutic cancer vaccine composed of two separate peptides derived from telomerase (hTERT, human telomerase reverse transcriptase). UCPVax is being evaluated in a multicenter phase I/II study in NSCLC (non-small cell lung cancer) and has demonstrated to be safe and immunogenic. The aim of the VolATIL study is to evaluate the combination of atezolizumab (an anti-PD-L1) and UCPVax vaccine in a multicenter phase II study in patients with HPV+ cancers. Methods: Patients with HPV+ cancer (anal canal, head and neck, and cervical or vulvar), at locally advanced or metastatic stage, and refractory to at least one line of systemic chemotherapy are eligible. The primary end point is the objective response rate (ORR) at 4 months. Patients will receive atezolizumab every 3 weeks at a fixed dose of 1,200 mg in combination with the UCPVax vaccine at 1 mg subcutaneously. Discussion: Anti-cancer vaccines can restore cancer-immunity via the expansion and activation of tumor-specific T cells in patients lacking pre-existing anti-tumor responses. Moreover, preclinical data showed that specific TH1 CD4 T cells sustain the quality and homing of an antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell immunity. In previous clinical studies, the induction of anti-hTERT immunity was significantly correlated to survival in patients with advanced squamous anal cell carcinoma. Thus, there is a strong rational to combine an anti-cancer hTERT vaccine and an immune checkpoint inhibitor to activate and promote antitumor T-cell immunity. This pivotal proof of concept study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of a telomerase-based TH1 inducing vaccine (UCPVax) and an anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab) immunotherapy in HPV+ cancers, as well as confirming their synergic mechanism, and settling the basis for a new combination for future clinical trials. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT03946358.

ATMP Environmental Exposure Assessment in European Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Since 2007, a new class of biologic products for human use called "advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP)" have been legally integrated in the European Medical Agency. They consist of recombinant nucleic acid, engineered cells, cells, or tissues. In the United States, ATMP fall under the regulatory framework of biological products and the term "cell and gene therapy product" is used in the legislative and regulatory documents. Potential clinical applications are broad, particularly, in the field of cancer, inherited genetic disease, and regenerative medicine. Indeed, the benefit conferred by CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells led to the first engineered cell therapy products to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2017. Gene therapy products to treat orphan diseases are also extensively developed with many clinical trials ongoing in the world. Nevertheless, the use of these therapeutic products is complex and requires careful considerations in the terms of regulatory and hospital setting requirements, such as storage, handling, administration, and disposal which justify the implementation of a secured medication circuit. Through this systematic review of the literature, the authors wanted to compile data on the assessment of environmental exposure related to the use of ATMP in healthcare setting to secure their medication circuit. A literature search was conducted on PubMed and Web of Science, and 32 publications dealing with environmental exposure assessment and ATMP were selected. In addition, marketed ATMPs were identified and data regarding the environmental concerns were extracted from product information sections from European Public Assessment Reports (EPAR). The environmental contamination assessments were mainly addressed in the reviews rather than in original articles related to the use of ATMP. Most of the product information sections from EPAR suggested precautions rather than requirements when dealing with environmental consideration following ATMP handling. Nevertheless, these precautions usually remain elusive especially concerning waste disposal and the detection of biological material on the work surfaces, and mainly relate to the genetically modified organisms (GMO) over non-GMO cellular products. Pharmaceutical oversight and adherence to the good preparation practices and good clinical practices are essential to ensure the safe use in term of environmental concern of these new therapeutic products in healthcare setting.

Enhanced emergence of antibiotic-resistant pathogenic bacteria after in vitro induction with cancer chemotherapy drugs.

BACKGROUND: Infections with antibiotic-resistant pathogens in cancer patients are a leading cause of mortality. Cancer patients are treated with compounds that can damage bacterial DNA, potentially triggering the SOS response, which in turn enhances the bacterial mutation rate. Antibiotic resistance readily occurs after mutation of bacterial core genes. Thus, we tested whether cancer chemotherapy drugs enhance the emergence of resistant mutants in commensal bacteria. METHODS: Induction of the SOS response was tested after the incubation of Escherichia coli biosensors with 39 chemotherapeutic drugs at therapeutic concentrations. The mutation frequency was assessed after induction with the SOS-inducing chemotherapeutic drugs. We then tested the ability of the three most highly inducing drugs to drive the emergence of resistant mutants of major bacterial pathogens to first-line antibiotics. RESULTS: Ten chemotherapeutic drugs activated the SOS response. Among them, eight accelerated the evolution of the major commensal E. coli, mostly through activation of the SOS response, with dacarbazine, azacitidine and streptozotocin enhancing the mutation rate 21.3-fold (P < 0.001), 101.7-fold (P = 0.01) and 1158.7-fold (P = 0.02), respectively. These three compounds also spurred the emergence of imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (up to 6.21-fold; P = 0.05), ciprofloxacin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (up to 57.72-fold; P = 0.016) and cefotaxime-resistant Enterobacteria cloacae (up to 4.57-fold; P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that chemotherapy could accelerate evolution of the microbiota and drive the emergence of antibiotic-resistant mutants from bacterial commensals in patients. This reveals an additional level of complexity of the interactions between cancer, chemotherapy and the gut microbiota.

Efficacy of trabectedin in metastatic solitary fibrous tumor.

Solitary fibrous tumor is a rare tumor type and has an unpredictable course. Local recurrence rate varies between 9 and 19%, and rate of metastatic involvement between 0 and 36 %. It is characterized by a typical architecture and immuno-histochemistry tests. The most important prognostic factor is the complete resection of primary tumor. Treatment of recurrences is not clearly established. If a solitary fibrous tumor is too advanced to allow surgical resection, radiotherapy and chemotherapy may be used. The most often used drugs are doxorubicine and\or ifosfamide. We report the case of man with metastatic solitary fibrous tumor treated with trabectedin, administered at a dose of 1.5 mg/m² every 3 weeks. After 3 cycles, metastases had significantly decreased. Recurrence of the disease was demonstrated 8 months after the start of trabectedin. This case shows that trabectedin is a possible treatment option.

A retrospective study of bifractionated CPT-11 with LF5FU infusion (FOLFIRI-3) in colorectal cancer patients pretreated with oxaliplatin and CPT-11 containing chemotherapies.

OBJECTIVE: The chemotherapy regimen suitable for advanced colorectal cancer patients previously treated with 5 fluorouracil (5FU); oxaliplatin and irinotecan remains an unresolved issue. The poor response rates and progression-free survival achieved with FOLFIRI in the second-line of therapy and the schedule-dependent activity of irinotecan, prompted us to assess the efficacy and tolerability of FOLFIRI3 regimen in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) previously exposed to irinotecan and oxaliplatin. METHODS: Twenty-seven metastatic CRC patients previously exposed to irinotecan and/or oxaliplatin were treated with the FOLFIRI3 regimen. They received an irinotecan injection at 100 mg/m(2) before and at the end of a 2400 mg/m(2) 5FU continuous infusion. Two hundred and six cycles of chemotherapy were delivered in an outpatient basis. RESULTS: FOLFIRI3 regimen was well tolerated. Grade 3 of 4 adverse events included nausea and vomiting (18%), diarrhea (11%), anemia (7%), and neutropenia (7%). Partial responses were observed in 2 patients and 10 patients achieved stable diseases. From the start of FOLFIRI3, time to progression was 4.47 months (0-11 months) and median overall survival was 8.9 months (0.72-21.4 months). Interestingly, FOLFIRI3 treatment was associated to a clinical benefit in 7 out of 17 patients who previously progressed "on-therapy" or less than 3 months after the completion of a previous FOLFIRI chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that fractionated irinotecan administration might restore the clinical benefit of this molecule in patients resistant to FOLFIRI.

[Prevention of preparation errors of cytotoxic drugs in centralized units: from epidemiology to quality assurance]. / Maîtrise des erreurs de préparation des médicaments anticancéreux en unité centralisée: de l'épidémiologie à l'assurance qualité.

The centralized preparation of cytotoxic drugs is supposed to help preventing medication errors. Nevertheless, the residual risk of preparation errors has been demonstrated. Above all, prevention is based on the quality assurance policy. Following a previous work, this study valuates the effectiveness of a quality assurance policy and the impact of corrective actions. The study compares the rates of preparation errors observed before and after the corrective actions. The risk factors have also been studied. The study included 84,017 consecutive preparations. The results showed a significant reduction of overall (0.2% versus 0.4%) and major (0.1% versus 0.2%) errors between the two periods. This period impact has been validated by a multivariate analysis (OR were respectively 0.49 and 0.6, p < 10(-3)). The daily workload (> 60 preparations) appeared to be the most important risk factor (OR were respectively 2.4 and 3.2, p < or = 10(-3)). These results demonstrated the effectiveness of simple corrective actions. The follow-up on preparation errors appeared to be useful to raise technicians' awareness and to motivate them. An epidemiological approach allows to identify risk factors, and to definite relevant corrective actions.