Utilizing a composite citation index for evaluating clinical ophthalmology research: insights into gender, nationality, and self-citation among top ophthalmology researchers.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of a composite citation score (c-score) and its six constituent citation indices, including H-index, in predicting winners of the Weisenfeld Award in ophthalmologic research. Secondary objectives were to explore career and demographic characteristics of the most highly cited researchers in ophthalmology. METHODS: A publicly available database was accessed to compile a set of top researchers in the field of clinical ophthalmology and optometry based on Scopus data from 1996 to 2021. Each citation index was used to construct a multivariable model adjusted for author demographic characteristics. Using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) analysis, each index's model was evaluated for its ability to predict winners of the Weisenfeld Award in Ophthalmology, a research distinction presented by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO). Secondary analyses investigated authors' self-citation rates, career length, gender, and country affiliation over time. RESULTS: Approximately one thousand unique authors publishing primarily in clinical ophthalmology/optometry were analyzed. The c-score outperformed all other citation indices at predicting Weisenfeld Awardees, with an AUC of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97-1.0). The H-index had an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.83-0.96). Authors with higher c-scores tended to have longer career lengths and similar self-citation rates compared to other authors. Sixteen percent of authors in the database were identified as female, and 64% were affiliated with the United States of America. CONCLUSION: The c-score is an effective metric for assessing research impact in ophthalmology, as seen through its ability to predict Weisenfeld Awardees.

Adopting and expanding ethical principles for generative artificial intelligence from military to healthcare.

In 2020, the U.S. Department of Defense officially disclosed a set of ethical principles to guide the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies on future battlefields. Despite stark differences, there are core similarities between the military and medical service. Warriors on battlefields often face life-altering circumstances that require quick decision-making. Medical providers experience similar challenges in a rapidly changing healthcare environment, such as in the emergency department or during surgery treating a life-threatening condition. Generative AI, an emerging technology designed to efficiently generate valuable information, holds great promise. As computing power becomes more accessible and the abundance of health data, such as electronic health records, electrocardiograms, and medical images, increases, it is inevitable that healthcare will be revolutionized by this technology. Recently, generative AI has garnered a lot of attention in the medical research community, leading to debates about its application in the healthcare sector, mainly due to concerns about transparency and related issues. Meanwhile, questions around the potential exacerbation of health disparities due to modeling biases have raised notable ethical concerns regarding the use of this technology in healthcare. However, the ethical principles for generative AI in healthcare have been understudied. As a result, there are no clear solutions to address ethical concerns, and decision-makers often neglect to consider the significance of ethical principles before implementing generative AI in clinical practice. In an attempt to address these issues, we explore ethical principles from the military perspective and propose the "GREAT PLEA" ethical principles, namely Governability, Reliability, Equity, Accountability, Traceability, Privacy, Lawfulness, Empathy, and Eutonomy, for generative AI in healthcare. Furthermore, we introduce a framework for adopting and expanding these ethical principles in a practical way that has been useful in the military and can be applied to healthcare for generative AI, based on contrasting their ethical concerns and risks. Ultimately, we aim to proactively address the ethical dilemmas and challenges posed by the integration of generative AI into healthcare practice.

Perspectives of Resident and Attending Ophthalmologists on Common Ethical Dilemmas in Research.

Purpose To assess how resident and attending ophthalmologists perceive and evaluate ethically controversial scenarios regarding mentorship, authorship, and ethics compliance that may occur during research involving residents. Methods An online survey was developed and contained 14 controversial vignettes based on common research scenarios that can occur when conducting research with trainees. The scenarios were designed to capture issues regarding three themes: mentorship, authorship, and compliance with ethical guidelines. Resident and attending ophthalmologists at eight military and civilian academic residency programs in the United States were invited to participate. Respondents used a Likert scale to assess the ethicality of the situations in addition to self-reported demographic characteristics. Results The response rate was 35.6% (77/216), consisting of 37.7% ( n = 29) residents and 62.3% ( n = 48) attendings. More attending ophthalmologists responded than residents ( p = 0.004). Many respondents identified controversies around compliance (67.3%) and authorship (57.1%) as unethical, whereas situations regarding mentorship were largely viewed as neutral to ethical (68.0%). Responses to two scenarios, one regarding mentorship and one regarding authorship, significantly differed between residents and attendings ( p = 0.001 and p = 0.022, respectively). Conclusion Academic ophthalmologists' perceptions of the ethicality of common research scenarios varied. There is a need for more prescriptive guidelines for authorship and mentorship ethics at all training levels to ensure consistency, fairness, and integrity of research.

Teleophthalmology in the United States Army: A Review From 2004 Through 2018.

INTRODUCTION: We describe results of the U.S. Army Ocular Teleconsultation program from 2004 through 2018 as well as the current condition, benefits, barriers, and future opportunities for teleophthalmology in the clinical settings and disease areas specific to the U.S. Military. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, noncomparative, consecutive case series. A total of 653 ocular teleconsultations were reviewed; 76 concerned general policy questions and underwent initial screening to determine the year each request was received, the average and median initial consultant response time, the number of participating consultants, the country from which the request originated, the military status and branch of each U.S. patient for which a request was submitted, and the nationality, age, and military status of foreign patients for whom consults were requested. The remaining 577 requests were further analyzed to determine the diagnostic category of the request, whether or not an evacuation recommendation was provided by a consultant, the relationship of the request to trauma, if and what type of nonocular specialty consultant(s) participated in the consultation request, and if and what type of ancillary imaging accompanied the request. RESULTS: The number of requests was 13 in 2004, compared to 80 in 2011 and 11 in 2018. The average response time in 2018 was 2.27 hours compared to 9. 73 hours in 2004. The number of participating ocular specialists was 5 in 2004, compared to 39 in 2013 and 13 in 2018. Requests originating from Iraq and Afghanistan comprised 61.1% (399/653) of requests. The U.S. Army personnel comprised the largest percentage of consults at 38.6% (252/653). Nonmilitary patients from the USA accounted for 18.5% (121/653) of consults. Non-U.S. patients including coalition forces, contractors, detainees, and noncombatants accounted for 14.4% (94/653) of consults, of which 22% (21/94) were children. Anterior segment consults accounted for 45.1% (260/577) of consults, with corneal surface disease being the largest subset within this diagnostic category. Evacuation was recommended in 22.7% (131/577) of overall cases and 41.1% (39/95) of trauma cases. Requests were associated with either combat-related or accidental trauma in 16.5% (95/577) of cases. Dermatology and neurology were the most commonly co-consulted specialties, representing 40.0% (32/80) and 33.75% (27/80) of consults, respectively. Photographs of suspected ocular pathology accompanied 37.4% of consults, with the likelihood requesters included photographs being greatest in cases involving pediatric ophthalmology (7/9, 77.8%) and oculoplastics (86/120, 71.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Army teleophthalmology has been an indispensable resource in supporting and advancing military medicine, helping to optimize the quality, efficiency, and accessibility of ophthalmic care for U.S. Military personnel, beneficiaries, allied forces, and local nationals worldwide. A dedicated ophthalmic care and coordination system which utilizes new advances in teleconsultation technology could further enhance our current capability to care for the ophthalmic needs of patients abroad, with opportunity for improving domestic care as well.

Applying a Military Teleophthalmology Mobile App in a Noncombat Emergent Care Setting.

INTRODUCTION: Teleophthalmology has a natural role in the military due to the inherent organization of its medical system, which provides care to patients in remote locations around the world. Improving access to ophthalmic care enhances force readiness because ocular trauma and disease can cause vision impairment or blindness and can occur anywhere service members are located. Recently, a secure, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant mobile phone application (app) for teleophthalmology called Forward Operating Base Expert Telemedicine Resource Utilizing Mobile Application for Trauma (FOXTROT) was beta tested in Afghanistan and demonstrated that this solution can improve and extend ophthalmic care in a deployed environment. There are few civilian or military teleophthalmology solutions for ocular trauma and disease in an urgent or emergent ophthalmic care setting. Civilian teleophthalmology solutions have largely been developed for disease-specific models of care. In this work, we address this gap by testing the FOXTROT app in a non-deployed, emergent care setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the use of the teleophthalmology mobile phone app (FOXTROT) in a non-deployed military setting at the Malcolm Grow Medical Clinics and Surgery Center at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland. Consults from the emergent care center were placed by providers using the app, and the on-call ophthalmologist responded with treatment and management recommendations. The primary outcomes were response within the requested time, visual acuity tested in both eyes, agreement between the teleophthalmology and the final diagnosis, and the number of communication or technical errors that prevented the completion of consults. The secondary outcomes were average response time and the number of consults uploaded to the medical record. RESULTS: From October 2020 to January 2022, 109 consults were received. Ten consults had communication or technical errors that prevented the completion of consults within the app and were excluded from the analysis of completed consults. Of the 99 completed consults, responses were given within the requested time in 95 (96.0%), with the average response time in 11 minutes 48 seconds (95% confidence interval, 8 minutes 57 seconds to 14 minutes 41 seconds). Visual acuity was tested in both eyes in 56 (56.6%). There was agreement between the teleophthalmology diagnosis and the final diagnosisin 40 of 50 (80.0%) consults with both a teleophthalmology and final diagnosis. Ninety-eight (99.0%) consults were uploaded to the patient's medical record. CONCLUSIONS: Beta testing of a teleophthalmology mobile phone app (FOXTROT) in a noncombat emergent care setting demonstrated that this solution can extend ophthalmic care in this environment at a military treatment facility. However, improvements in the reliability of the platform are needed in future developments to reduce communication and technical errors.

Job Satisfaction, Well-Being, and Burnout among Ophthalmology Educators.

Purpose This article assesses the prevalence of burnout among ophthalmology educators and identifies opportunities to improve well-being in this population. Methods The research team conducted a cross-sectional study using an institutional review board-exempt survey addressing the domains of the Maslach Burnout Inventory, intent to leave, and interest in wellness activities. Survey participants included ophthalmology residency program directors (PDs) and associate PDs (APDs) who are members of the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology (AUPO). Analysis involved a top-box approach. Results Surveys were sent to 175 members with a response rate of 38.9%. Percentages of survey respondents reporting either (1) "never" or (2) "less than a few times per year" when asked to self-assess for certain manifestations of burnout are as follows: "considering residents as impersonal objects" (95.2%), "becoming more callous towards people" (90.3%), and "becoming emotionally hardened" (80.6%). Approximately 65% of ophthalmology educators reported never considering or rarely considering leaving their position in the year prior to completing the survey. For wellness promotion among AUPO educators, the greatest interest was in small group mentoring sessions (85%) and webinars on wellness-related topics (70%). Conclusion The prevalence of burnout symptoms among ophthalmology educators compares favorably to educators from other specialties. Ophthalmology PDs and APDs demonstrate a greater degree of personal accomplishment than do their cohorts within other specialties, suggesting a decreased likelihood of burnout onset among ophthalmology educators. Furthermore, our study's job satisfaction data reveal a high degree of satisfaction among ophthalmology PDs and APDs.

Data Sources for Evaluating Health Disparities in Ophthalmology: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go.

Data provide an opportunity to discover disparities and inequities that may otherwise be unrecognized. Within the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) Task Force on Disparities in Eye Care, the Leveraging Data Sub-task Force was charged with identifying data sources to study health disparities in eye care and to leverage data to advance health equity. We evaluated large data sources to determine their strengths, deficiencies, and relative accessibility in relation to the likelihood of identifying eye care disparities. We highlight the current challenges with these data sources and review key recommendations for improving future sources for studying health disparities in eye care.

Ghost and Honorary Authorship in Ophthalmology: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the rates of ghost and honorary authorship in ophthalmology and to determine risk factors associated with ghost and honorary authorship. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: Corresponding authors of articles published in Ophthalmology, JAMA Ophthalmology, and the American Journal of Ophthalmology from June 2019 to December 2020 were emailed an electronic survey. The rates of ghost and honorary authorship, demographic characteristics of the corresponding authors with and without ghost and honorary authorship, and risk factors for ghost and honorary authorship were evaluated. RESULTS: Corresponding authors (n = 830) were emailed a survey and 278 total responses (34.1%) were received; 227 responses (27.9%) were complete and included for analysis. Most respondents (n = 206, 90.7%) believed that the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) guidelines for authorship adequately address criteria for authorship. Twenty-seven corresponding authors (11.9%) reported characteristics of their articles that indicated the presence of both ghost and honorary authorship (95% CI, 7.7%-16.1%). One hundred fifteen (50.7%) reported honorary authorship (44.2%-57.2%), and 37 (16.3%) indicated ghost authorship (11.5%-21.1%). Being a resident or fellow corresponding author increased the risk of honorary authorship (OR 11.75; 1.91-231.57; P = .03). There were no factors that predicted articles having ghost authors. CONCLUSIONS: While many authors believe the ICMJE guidelines for authorship comprehensively delineate fair authorship practices, listing authors on scientific publications honorarily and excluding authors who qualify for authorship are relatively common practices in ophthalmological research. Further investigation into the drivers of honorary and ghost authorship practices in ophthalmology, and the effectiveness of preventive measures are needed to ensure fair authorship attributions.

A Sub-Analysis of U.S. Africa Command Area of Operations Transportations for Ophthalmic Concerns, 2008-2018.

INTRODUCTION: American military personnel in U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) operate in a continent triple the size of the USA without mature medical facilities, requiring a substantial transportation network for medical evacuation. We describe medical transportation based on ophthalmic complaints analyzed from the U.S. Transportation Command Regulating and Command and Control Evacuation System (TRAC2ES) database from 2008 to 2018. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all TRAC2ES records for medical evacuations for ophthalmic complaints from the AFRICOM theater of operations conducted between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2018. We analyzed free-text data in TRAC2ES for ophthalmic diagnostic and therapeutic interventions performed before established patient movement requests. An expert panel analyzed evacuations for their indications and interventions. RESULTS: Nine hundred and sixty-one total records originating within AFRICOM were identified in TRAC2ES. Forty-three cases (4%) had ophthalmic complaints. The majority of transports were routine (72%) and originated in Djibouti (83%), and all were transported to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center. The majority of patients were evacuated without a definitive diagnosis (60%). Leading ophthalmic diagnoses were chalazion (14%), corneal abrasion/ulcer (14%), and posterior vitreous detachment (12%). More than one-quarter of patients were transported without recorded evaluation and approximately half (51%) did not receive any intervention before evacuation. Consultation with an ophthalmologist occurred in only 16 (37%) cases. By majority, the expert panel deemed 12 evacuations (28%) potentially unnecessary. CONCLUSION: Evacuations were primarily routine often for disease etiology and further diagnostic evaluation. These findings support opportunities for telemedicine consultation to avoid potentially unnecessary transportation. Increased ophthalmic care and enhanced data collection on transports would support process improvement, optimize ophthalmic care by ensuring proper disposition of patients thus limiting unnecessary evacuations, and ultimately strengthen the entire fighting force.

Pain Control Following Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Prospective Clinical Trial Comparing Codeine Versus Oxycodone for the Management of Postoperative Pain.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of oral codeine plus acetaminophen versus oxycodone plus acetaminophen for severe pain control following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: This single-center trial randomized 200 patients to receive codeine 30 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg (codeine group) or oxycodone 5 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg (oxycodone group)every 4 hours as needed for severe pain for 4 days following PRK. Patients recorded postoperative pain, tablet consumption, and tetracaine use. Patients were monitored at postoperative 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, and 6 months for visual acuity and follow-up. Study outcomes were mean postoperative pain, treatment and tetracaine use, and visual acuity. RESULTS: Analysis of 197 patients who completed the trial (97 codeine group and 100 oxycodone group) showed mean pain scores were lower in the codeine group throughout the intervention period. Mean pain scores were higher in the oxycodone group than the codeine group on postoperative days 2 and 4 (P = .017 and P = .034, respectively). The oxycodone group consumed more tablets than the codeine group, with a difference on postoperative day 2 (P = .019), and used a greater number of tetracaine drops (P = .015). Repeated measures analysis of variance showed significant improvement in visual acuity in both groups with no difference in visual outcomes (P = .81). CONCLUSIONS: Codeine/acetaminophen is as effective and safe as oxycodone/acetaminophen for pain control following PRK, with no clinical difference in overall pain control and long-term visual outcomes. This implies that treating postoperative pain after PRK with a Schedule III opioid (codeine) is effective and potentially decreases the risk of misuse by a higher regulated Schedule II opioid (oxycodone), lowering the potential for abuse and dependence. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(9):582-589.].

Dexamethasone-Eluting Contact Lens for the Prevention of Postphotorefractive Keratectomy Scar in a New Zealand White Rabbit Model.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of an experimental dexamethasone-eluting contact lens (DCL) for the prevention of postphotorefractive keratectomy (PRK) corneal haze in a New Zealand White (NZW) rabbit model. METHODS: Both eyes of 29 NZW rabbits underwent PRK. The rabbits were randomized to one of the 5 study arms for 4 weeks: tarsorrhaphy only, tarsorrhaphy and bandage contact lens (BCL) replaced weekly, tarsorrhaphy and BCL for 1 week plus topical 0.1% dexamethasone ophthalmic solution (drops) for 4 weeks, tarsorrhaphy and BCL replaced weekly plus topical dexamethasone for 4 weeks, and tarsorrhaphy and DCL changed weekly for 4 weeks. Each week for 4 consecutive weeks postoperatively, the tarsorrhaphies were opened, the eyes underwent evaluation and imaging, and the tarsorrhaphies were replaced. Contact lenses were cultured on removal. Central corneal haze was assessed weekly with corneal densitometry. After 4 weeks, the animals were killed, and the eyes were enucleated for histopathologic analysis. RESULTS: The tarsorrhaphy only group displayed more haze with a greater change in optical densitometry from pre-op compared with the other treatment groups. There was no difference between the DCL group and the groups receiving a BCL and dexamethasone drops in densitometry or histopathology. No NZW rabbits developed clinical signs of infection, and cultures from DCLs and BCLs grew similar organisms. CONCLUSIONS: In the post-PRK rabbit model, DCLs worn weekly for 4 weeks were safe and as effective at preventing corneal haze as 0.1% dexamethasone drops applied 4 times a day for 4 weeks.

Prevalence, Patterns, and Characteristics of Eye Injuries in Professional Mixed Martial Arts.

PURPOSE: To describe the frequency and type of eye injuries in fighters in mixed martial arts (MMA) competition. METHODS: Fight result data were collected from the Nevada Athletic Commission database from 2001 to 2020. Any fighters in a professional mixed martial arts (MMA) contest with an eye injury were included. Main outcome measures included frequency and rate of eye injuries per fight and the types of eye injuries. Secondary outcome measures were gender, laterality, decision type, and length of no-contact recommended. RESULTS: Of the 256 MMA events in the database, 187 events (73.3%) had at least one eye injury. Of a total 2208 fights at these events, there were 363 fighters who sustained 369 eye injuries, with the yearly rate of eye injuries per 100 fighters ranging from 2.56 to 12.22. The most common injuries were eyebrow and eyelid lacerations (n=160, 43%), lacerations around the eye (n=98, 27%), and orbital fractures (n=62, 17%). Most eye injuries were right sided (n=197, 53.3%) and the majority of fighters with eye injuries lost their match (n=228, 62.8%). Fifty-seven fighters were recommended for further ophthalmology clearance after the match. The most common reasons for recommended ophthalmology follow-up was orbital fracture (n=25, 44%) and retinal injury (n=7, 12%). Forty-three fighters received no-contact requirements relating to their injury for an average of 8.9 weeks (range 1-24 weeks). CONCLUSION: Ophthalmic injuries in professional MMA were prevalent, were most often lacerations surrounding the eye, and often accompanied the fighter losing their match.

Patient Perception of Physician Attire in a Military Ophthalmology Clinic.

Introduction The purpose of this study is to investigate patient preferences of physician attire in an outpatient military ophthalmology clinic to determine how these preferences affect patients' perceptions of physician competence and their overall clinical experience. Materials and methods This study is a prospective survey administered to patients at the ophthalmology clinic at Brooke Army Medical Center. USA. Patients who were willing to participate in a volunteer survey were included in this study. Demographic information and survey questions were utilized in this study along with words and pictures for patients to select a preference in physician attire in the clinic setting (scrubs, military uniform, or civilian professional attire) and surgical setting (surgical cap or a surgical bouffant). The survey asks patients if physician attire impacts patient confidence in physician abilities (yes or no) and if surgeon attire impacts the likelihood of the patient taking the surgeon's advice (yes or no). Results The demographic distribution includes 57-77 years old participants (53%), females (61%), retirees (49%), and dependent spouses (40%). The racial distribution includes 46% - Caucasian, 20% - African American, 22% - Hispanic, 6 - % Asian, and 6% - other. Most patient appointment types were established follow-up (77%) with only 12% new and 11% walk-in. The survey results (N=308) indicate that most patients (64%) did not have a preference in physician clinical attire, while 22% preferred scrubs, 11% preferred military uniform, and 3% preferred civilian attire. Most patients (66%) did not have a preference for surgical headwear, while 27% preferred the surgical cap, and 7% preferred the surgical bouffant. Only 9% of the patients surveyed indicated that physician attire impacted their confidence in their physician's ability, and 12% reported that attire impacted the likelihood of taking advice. Conclusions Most patients in an outpatient military ophthalmology clinic do not have a preference for physician attire or surgical headwear when surveyed. The majority of patients did not feel physician attire impacted their perception of physician's ability or their likelihood of taking advice. When indicating a preference, patients tended to prefer scrubs to outpatient civilian attire or military attire and trended towards preferring surgical cap over surgical bouffant for headwear.

Retrospective review of Duke men's basketball eye care: annual screenings and traumatic injuries.

OBJECTIVES: 1) To assess the utility of performing eye screenings for healthy basketball players. 2) To describe the traumatic injuries sustained by competitive college basketball players. METHODS: The eye screening examinations of the Duke University Men's Basketball players over six seasons were reviewed retrospectively. Traumatic basketball-related eye injuries amongst Duke University Men's Basketball players over 16 seasons were also reviewed and described. RESULTS: Forty-four total players underwent screening examinations. Thirteen (29.5%) of athletes had uncorrected or under-corrected refractive errors. One athlete was found to have a severe monocular visual deficit secondary to a traumatic injury in childhood, which was significantly mitigated by a contact lens referral. Eight traumatic ocular injuries in eight different athletes, 8.6% of the total roster players in this interval, required ophthalmologic consultation. Most injuries, 7/8, resulted in no permanent visual impairment. However, two severe episodes of injury required operative intervention, and one episode involving a giant retinal dialysis and traumatic optic nerve head avulsion caused severe, permanent visual loss. Most injuries did not result in significant competition time loss, with a median time loss of 5 days (range 0 to 240 days). CONCLUSION: Screening eye examinations in healthy athletes are beneficial for the identification and treatment of refractive errors. Traumatic basketball-related eye injuries are common and result in a wide array of injuries. Although most basketball-related eye injuries do no result in permanent visual loss, given the potential for severe injury, many basketball-related eye injuries require expert ophthalmic consultation.

Bridging the Gap: A Novel Application of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Treating Recurrent Corneal Erosions Secondary to Wound Gaping After Astigmatic Keratotomy.

Corneal collagen cross-linking is a minimally invasive therapeutic technique indicated for the treatment of keratoectasia. Recently, it has also been utilized for a variety of other ophthalmologic conditions ranging from infectious keratitis to corneal edema. We report the novel application of corneal collagen cross-linking in the treatment of recurrent corneal erosions secondary to wound gaping after astigmatic keratotomy (AK).

Military Teleophthalmology in Afghanistan Using Mobile Phone Application.

IMPORTANCE: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has highlighted the need to expand telemedicine solutions. OBJECTIVE: To beta test a secure teleophthalmology mobile app at military treatment facilities in Afghanistan. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective case series included 16 military treatment facilities at diverse roles of care including forward operating bases in Afghanistan and 1 location outside of Afghanistan. Thirty point-of-care medics and medical professionals were included from September to November 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Users placed teleophthalmology consults on their mobile phone using the mobile eye care app, and an expeditionary ophthalmologist stationed at a military hospital in Afghanistan responded. Users graded the mobile app using a rating scale from 1 to 5, with 1 being very dissatisfied and 5 being very satisfied. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mean initial response time, agreement between the teleophthalmology diagnosis and final diagnosis, treatment and management following recommendations outlined in the Joint Trauma System clinical practice guidelines, prevention of the need for aeromedical evacuation, user satisfaction, and security and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliance of consult. RESULTS: There were 28 consults placed over 6 weeks by 18 different users that were received by the expeditionary ophthalmologist. The mean (SD) patient age was 30.3 (9.8) years. Most patients were male (26 [93%]) and active duty US military (22 [78%]). The mean initial response time was 3 minutes 58 seconds (95% CI, 2 minutes 30 seconds to 5 minutes 26 seconds). There was agreement between the teleophthalmology diagnosis and final diagnosis in 24 consults (86%; 95% CI, 72%-100%). The treatment and management followed recommendations outlined in the Joint Trauma System Clinical Practice Guidelines for Eye Trauma: Initial Care in 28 consults (100%). Teleophthalmology consultation prevented the need for aeromedical evacuation in 4 consults (14%; 95% CI, 0.7%-28%). The patient returned to duty in 15 consults (54%; 95% CI, 34%-73%). Median overall satisfaction was 5 (minimum, 3; maximum, 5). All 28 consults (100%) were secure and compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: While only a limited number of consults were evaluated, this study suggests that teleophthalmology mobile phone apps may improve and extend ophthalmic care in combat zones.