Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Phys Ther ; 103(6)2023 Jun 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37115808

ABSTRACT

A clinical practice guideline on glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis was developed by an American Physical Therapy Association volunteer guideline development group that consisted of physical therapists, an occupational therapist, and a physician. The guideline was based on systematic reviews of current scientific and clinical information and accepted approaches for physical therapist management of glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis. This clinical practice guideline is available in Spanish; see Supplementary Appendix 8.


Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis , Physical Therapists , Shoulder Joint , Humans , Osteoarthritis/therapy , Physical Therapy Modalities
2.
Int J Sports Phys Ther ; 17(4): 669-676, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35693865

ABSTRACT

Background: Currently available hand-held dynamometers (HHD) offer a more objective and reliable assessment of muscle force production as compared to a manual muscle test (MMT). Yet, their clinical utility is limited due to high cost. The ActivForce (AF) digital dynamometer is a new low-cost HHD with unknown psychometric properties, and its utilization may benefit clinical practice. Hypothesis/Purpose: This study aimed to determine the AF intra- and inter-tester reliabilities, standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), and criterion validity for assessing shoulder isometric force as compared to the microFET2 (MF2) across testers with different experiences. Design: Descriptive observational study. Methods: A convenience sample of 29 healthy adults were assessed twice by each of three testers (two experienced clinicians and a novice PT student) on shoulder external rotation (ER), internal rotation (IR), and forward elevation (FE) using both the AF and MF2 devices. Tester, HHD, and shoulder motion assignment orders were randomized. All testing was performed in a standardized seated position. ER and IR were tested with the shoulder fully adducted. FE was tested at 45° at the scapular plane. All testing and rest periods between testers and tested motions were standardized and monitored via a stopwatch. Results: Both devices had high intra- [ ER (.95-.98), IR (.97 - .99), FE (.96 - .99)] and inter-tester [ ER (.85-.96), IR (.95 - .97), FE (.88 - .95)] intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with comparable intra- (1.68-1.80) and inter-tester (2.36-2.98) SEM, and intra- (4.64-4.97) and inter-tester (6.50-8.24) MDC values across all motions. Tester experience did not affect these values. High (.89-.93) statistically significant Pearson correlations were found between HHDs for all shoulder motions. Conclusion: Both the AF and MF2 HHDs were found to have high reliability levels across all shoulder motions regardless of tester clinical experience. The AF was also found to be valid for measuring shoulder isometric force production compared to the criterion standard device, the MF2. Its low-cost and electronic accessibility features may promote better compliance for clinicians using dynamometry to objectively assess and store muscle force data in a cost-effective manner. Level of Evidence: 3.

3.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 25(4): 521-35, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26995456

ABSTRACT

This is a consensus statement on rehabilitation developed by the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists. The purpose of this statement is to aid clinical decision making during the rehabilitation of patients after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The overarching philosophy of rehabilitation is centered on the principle of the gradual application of controlled stresses to the healing rotator cuff repair with consideration of rotator cuff tear size, tissue quality, and patient variables. This statement describes a rehabilitation framework that includes a 2-week period of strict immobilization and a staged introduction of protected, passive range of motion during weeks 2-6 postoperatively, followed by restoration of active range of motion, and then progressive strengthening beginning at postoperative week 12. When appropriate, rehabilitation continues with a functional progression for return to athletic or demanding work activities. This document represents the first consensus rehabilitation statement developed by a multidisciplinary society of international rehabilitation professionals specifically for the postoperative care of patients after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy/rehabilitation , Rotator Cuff/surgery , Humans , Range of Motion, Articular , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Wound Healing
4.
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev ; 20(1): 49-55, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22311293

ABSTRACT

The overhead throwing motion is a complex and coordinated movement pattern involving the lower extremities, the trunk, and the upper extremity. Because of these tremendous demands on the shoulder, various shoulder injuries may occur. Two of the more common injuries to throwers are shoulder instability and superior labrum anterior-posterior lesions. Although nonoperative treatment is frequently successful in treating these conditions, surgical management may be necessary for the athlete to return to their sport. The purpose of this article is to review the first 3 phases of rehabilitation after arthroscopic capsular stabilization and superior labrum anterior-posterior debridement or repair. The fourth phase, return to throwing, will be covered in the final section.


Subject(s)
Baseball/injuries , Glenoid Cavity/injuries , Joint Instability/rehabilitation , Shoulder Injuries , Athletic Injuries/rehabilitation , Humans , Joint Instability/surgery , Kinetics , Muscle Strength , Range of Motion, Articular , Resistance Training , Shoulder Joint/surgery
5.
J Sport Rehabil ; 20(1): 115-28, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21411827

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is commonly used to assess pain. Change in the NPRS across time can be interpreted with responsiveness indices. OBJECTIVE: To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the NPRS. DESIGN: Single-group repeated measures. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation clinics. PATIENTS: Patients with shoulder pain (N = 136). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At the initial evaluation patients completed the Penn Shoulder Score (PSS), which includes pain, satisfaction, and function sections. Pain was measured using an 11-point NPRS for 3 conditions of pain: at rest, with normal daily activities, and with strenuous activities. The NPRS average was calculated by averaging the NPRS scores for 3 conditions of pain. The final PSS was completed after 3-4 wk of rehabilitation. To determine the MCID for the NPRS average, the minimal detectible change of 8.6 points for the PSS function scale (0-60 points) was used as an external criterion anchor to classify patients as meaningfully improved (≥8.6 point change) or not improved (<8.6-point change). The MCID for the NPRS average was also determined for subgroups of surgical and nonsurgical patients. Cohen's effect sizes were calculated as a measure of group responsiveness for the NPRS average. RESULTS: Using a receiver-operating-characteristic analysis, the MCID for the average NPRS for all patients was 2.17, and it was 2.17 for both the surgical and nonsurgical subgroup: area-under-the-curve range .74-.76 (95%CI: .55-.95). The effect size for all patients was 1.84, and it was 1.51 and 1.94 for the surgical and nonsurgical groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The NPRS average of 3 pain questions demonstrated responsiveness with an MCID of 2.17 in patients with shoulder pain receiving rehabilitation for 3-4 wk. The effect sizes indicated a large effect. However, responsiveness values are not static. Further research is indicated to assess responsiveness of the NPRS average in different types of patients with shoulder pain.


Subject(s)
Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Pain Measurement/methods , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Shoulder Pain/surgery , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Aged , Area Under Curve , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Self Report , Shoulder Joint/physiopathology , Shoulder Pain/diagnosis , Shoulder Pain/rehabilitation , Treatment Outcome
6.
Phys Ther ; 89(7): 643-52, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19482902

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS) is a painful condition resulting from the entrapment of anatomical structures between the anteroinferior corner of the acromion and the greater tuberosity of the humerus. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) versus ultrasound (US) therapy in the treatment of SAIS. DESIGN: The study was designed as a randomized clinical trial. SETTING: The study was conducted in a university hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy patients with SAIS were randomly assigned to a HILT group or a US therapy group. INTERVENTION: Study participants received 10 treatment sessions of HILT or US therapy over a period of 2 consecutive weeks. MEASUREMENTS: Outcome measures were the Constant-Murley Scale (CMS), a visual analog scale (VAS), and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST). RESULTS: For the 70 study participants (42 women and 28 men; mean [SD] age=54.1 years [9.0]; mean [SD] VAS score at baseline=6.4 [1.7]), there were no between-group differences at baseline in VAS, CMS, and SST scores. At the end of the 2-week intervention, participants in the HILT group showed a significantly greater decrease in pain than participants in the US therapy group. Statistically significant differences in change in pain, articular movement, functionality, and muscle strength (force-generating capacity) (VAS, CMS, and SST scores) were observed after 10 treatment sessions from the baseline for participants in the HILT group compared with participants in the US therapy group. In particular, only the difference in change of VAS score between groups (1.65 points) surpassed the accepted minimal clinically important difference for this tool. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by sample size, lack of a control or placebo group, and follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Participants diagnosed with SAIS showed greater reduction in pain and improvement in articular movement functionality and muscle strength of the affected shoulder after 10 treatment sessions of HILT than did participants receiving US therapy over a period of 2 consecutive weeks.


Subject(s)
Laser Therapy/methods , Muscle Strength , Range of Motion, Articular , Shoulder Impingement Syndrome/therapy , Ultrasonic Therapy/methods , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement/methods , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther ; 39(2): 135-48, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19194024

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Frozen shoulder or adhesive capsulitis describes the common shoulder condition characterized by painful and limited active and passive range of motion. The etiology of frozen shoulder remains unclear; however, patients typically demonstrate a characteristic history, clinical presentation, and recovery. A classification schema is described, in which primary frozen shoulder and idiopathic adhesive capsulitis are considered identical and not associated with a systemic condition or history of injury. Secondary frozen shoulder is defined by 3 subcategories: systemic, extrinsic, and intrinsic. We also propose another classification system based on the patient's irritability level (low, moderate, and high), that we believe is helpful when making clinical decisions regarding rehabilitation intervention. Nonoperative interventions include patient education, modalities, stretching exercises, joint mobilization, and corticosteroid injections. Glenohumeral intra-articular corticosteroid injections, exercise, and joint mobilization all result in improved short- and long-term outcomes. However, there is strong evidence that glenohumeral intra-articular corticosteroid injections have a significantly greater 4- to 6-week beneficial effect compared to other forms of treatment. A rehabilitation model based on evidence and intervention strategies matched with irritability levels is proposed. Exercise and manual techniques are progressed as the patient's irritability reduces. Response to treatment is based on significant pain relief, improved satisfaction, and return of functional motion. Patients who do not respond or worsen should be referred for an intra-articular corticosteroid injection. Patients who have recalcitrant symptoms and disabling pain may respond to either standard or translational manipulation under anesthesia or arthroscopic release. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5.


Subject(s)
Physical Therapy Modalities/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Shoulder Impingement Syndrome/rehabilitation , Humans
8.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther ; 38(2): 78-86, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18560187

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. BACKGROUND: Spinal accessory nerve palsy (SANP) is common following neck dissection surgery and can occur with blunt or penetrating trauma to the lateral neck region and cervical stretch injuries. Early detection of SANP remains a clinical challenge and the condition is often misdiagnosed. The purpose of this case series is to describe the associated history, signs, and symptoms related to SANP and increase awareness of the scapular flip sign as a clinical sign associated with SANP. CASE SERIES DESCRIPTION: Twenty subjects (13 male, 7 female) presented with pain and decreased shoulder function following head and neck surgery or posttrauma. All patients were thoroughly examined and the scapular flip sign was assessed. All patients presented with a cluster of signs and symptoms including trapezius atrophy, shoulder girdle depression, limited active shoulder abduction to less than 90 degrees , shoulder pain, and shoulder weakness. A positive scapular flip sign was present in all cases. The middle and lower trapezius were rated as 0/5, based on manual muscle testing, indicating no identifiable muscle activation against resistance. DISCUSSION: A typical history and consistent signs and symptoms were found related to SANP. A strong relationship appeared between the presence of the scapular flip sign and SANP. The suspected mechanism for the scapular flip sign is the unopposed pull of the humeral external rotators by the inactive middle and lower trapezius. Early identification of SANP can assist with the prognosis, explain persistent impairments and functional deficits, motivate appropriate diagnostic testing and interventions, and help maximize outcome. Further research to validate the scapular flip sign and establish a clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of SANP should be performed.


Subject(s)
Accessory Nerve Diseases/diagnosis , Neuralgia/diagnosis , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Shoulder Injuries , Wounds and Injuries/complications , Accessory Nerve Diseases/etiology , Accessory Nerve Diseases/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuralgia/etiology , Neuralgia/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications , Prognosis , Range of Motion, Articular , Retrospective Studies , Shoulder Joint/pathology
9.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 89 Suppl 2 Pt.1: 1-9, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17332121

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of latissimus dorsi tendon transfer in patients with an irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear to help determine which patient and anatomic factors affect clinical outcome. METHODS: Fourteen patients with a latissimus dorsi tendon transfer were clinically evaluated with use of the PENN (University of Pennsylvania) shoulder score as well as with quantitative measurement of isometric muscle strength and the range of motion of both shoulders at a minimum of twenty-four months postoperatively. The anatomic results were evaluated with postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and electromyography. RESULTS: Nine patients were satisfied with the outcome, had significant clinical improvement, and reported that they would have the operation again under similar circumstances. The other five patients were dissatisfied with the result and had significantly worse PENN scores, active elevation, and objective measures of strength. Eight of the nine patients with a good clinical result were male, and four of the five with a poor result were female. Patients with a good clinical result had had significantly better preoperative function in active forward flexion and active external rotation compared with the patients with a poor result. The magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated healing of the tendon to the greater tuberosity in twelve patients and equivocal healing in two. There was no significant atrophy of any of the transferred muscles. Electromyography demonstrated clear activity in the transferred latissimus muscle during humeral adduction in all fourteen patients, some electrical activity with active forward elevation in only one patient, and some electrical activity with active external rotation in six of the nine patients with a good clinical result. None of the patients with a poor clinical result demonstrated electrical activity of the transferred muscle with active forward flexion or external rotation. CONCLUSIONS: Synchronous in-phase contraction of the transferred latissimus dorsi is a variable finding following the surgical treatment of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears, but when it is present it is associated with a better clinical result. Preoperative shoulder function and general strength influence the clinical result. Female patients with poor shoulder function and generalized muscle weakness prior to surgery have a greater likelihood of having a poor clinical result.


Subject(s)
Rotator Cuff Injuries , Rotator Cuff/surgery , Tendon Transfer/methods , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Postoperative Care , Range of Motion, Articular , Shoulder Joint/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
10.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther ; 36(3): 138-51, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16596890

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Psychometric evaluation of a cross-sectional survey. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of reliability and validity of the Penn Shoulder Score (PSS). BACKGROUND: Shoulder outcome measures are used to assess patient self-report levels of pain, satisfaction, and function. The PSS is a 100-point shoulder-specific self-report questionnaire consisting of 3 subscales of pain, satisfaction, and function. This scale has been utilized in the literature. However, the measurement properties of reliability and validity, including responsiveness, of the PSS subscales and overall scale need to be established. METHODS AND MEASURES: Patients (n = 40) with shoulder disorders undergoing a course of outpatient physical therapy completed the PSS at initial visit and again within 72 hours to assess test-retest reliability. The Constant Shoulder Score (CSS) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES) were also completed at the initial visit and compared to the PSS to assess convergent construct validity. A separate cohort of patients (n = 109) completed the PSS at initial visit and 4 weeks later. These scores were used to assess internal consistency and responsiveness. RESULTS: Reliability analysis revealed a test-retest ICC2,1 of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.97). Internal consistency analysis revealed a Cronbach alpha of 0.93. The standard error of measurement (SEM) was +/- 8.5 scale points (based on a 90% CI) and the minimal detectable change (MDC) was +/- 12.1 scale points (based on a 90% CI). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for improvement was 11.4 points. Pearson product moment correlation coefficients between the PSS and the CSS and ASES were 0.85 and 0.87, respectively. Responsiveness analysis revealed an effect size of 1.01 and a standardized response mean of 1.27. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that the PSS is a reliable and valid measure for reporting outcome of patients with various shoulder disorders.


Subject(s)
Shoulder/physiology , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results
11.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 88(2): 342-8, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16452746

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of latissimus dorsi tendon transfer in patients with an irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear to help determine which patient and anatomic factors affect clinical outcome. METHODS: Fourteen patients with a latissimus dorsi tendon transfer were clinically evaluated with use of the PENN (University of Pennsylvania) shoulder score as well as with quantitative measurement of isometric muscle strength and the range of motion of both shoulders at a minimum of twenty-four months postoperatively. The anatomic results were evaluated with postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and electromyography. RESULTS: Nine patients were satisfied with the outcome, had significant clinical improvement, and reported that they would have the operation again under similar circumstances. The other five patients were dissatisfied with the result and had significantly worse PENN scores, active elevation, and objective measures of strength. Eight of the nine patients with a good clinical result were male, and four of the five with a poor result were female. Patients with a good clinical result had had significantly better preoperative function in active forward flexion and active external rotation compared with the patients with a poor result. The magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated healing of the tendon to the greater tuberosity in twelve patients and equivocal healing in two. There was no significant atrophy of any of the transferred muscles. Electromyography demonstrated clear activity in the transferred latissimus muscle during humeral adduction in all fourteen patients, some electrical activity with active forward elevation in only one patient, and some electrical activity with active external rotation in six of the nine patients with a good clinical result. None of the patients with a poor clinical result demonstrated electrical activity of the transferred muscle with active forward flexion or external rotation. CONCLUSIONS: Synchronous in-phase contraction of the transferred latissimus dorsi is a variable finding following the surgical treatment of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears, but when it is present it is associated with a better clinical result. Preoperative shoulder function and general strength influence the clinical result. Female patients with poor shoulder function and generalized muscle weakness prior to surgery have a greater likelihood of having a poor clinical result.


Subject(s)
Rotator Cuff Injuries , Rotator Cuff/surgery , Tendon Transfer , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL