Use of Homeopathy in Integrative Oncology in Strasbourg, France: Multi-center Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study of Patients Undergoing Cancer Treatment.

CONTEXT: The use of homeopathy in oncological supportive care seems to be progressing. The first French prevalence study, performed in 2005 in Strasbourg, showed that only 17% of the subjects were using it. What is the situation 12 years later? MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a descriptive study, using a questionnaire identical to that used in 2005, on 633 patients undergoing treatment in three anti-cancer centers in Strasbourg. The results of the "homeopathy" sub-group were extracted and studied. RESULTS: Of the 535 patients included, 164 used homeopathy: that is 30.7%. The main purpose of its use was to reduce the side effects of cancer treatments (75%). Among the users, 82.6% were "somewhat" or "very" satisfied, against "quite" satisfied for 15.5%, and "not at all" satisfied for 1.9%. The homeopathic treatment was prescribed by a doctor in 75.6% of the cases; the general practitioner was kept informed in 87% of the cases and the oncologist in 82%. Fatigue, pain, nausea, anxiety, sadness and diarrhea were improved in 80% of the cases. However, alopecia, weight disorders and loss of libido were the least improved symptoms. The use of homeopathy was significantly associated with the female sex. CONCLUSION: With a prevalence of 30.7%, homeopathy is the most used complementary medicine in integrative oncology in Strasbourg. Over 12 years, we have witnessed an increase of 83% in its use in the same city. Almost all respondents declare themselves satisfied and tell their doctors more readily than in 2005.

Facilitators of and obstacles to consultation in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma: a French pilot study.

Basal cell carcinoma is the most common skin cancer for which surgery is usually the unique and definitive treatment. Advanced basal cell carcinoma is not eligible to surgery when underlying structures are destroyed. Delayed consultation is the principal cause of advanced basal cell carcinoma. It is questionable why some patients seek care only when the tumour is advanced. The objective of this study was to identify the psychosocial factors involved in delayed consultation. We used a qualitative approach, conducting semi-structured interviews with advanced basal cell carcinoma patients and the healthcare staff of a dermatology unit to explore why some patients consult only when basal cell carcinoma is advanced. We then put our findings into perspective and created a logical model for change. We interviewed 14 patients and 12 healthcare staff. The first lesion was associated with banalization. Then, denial and fear of diagnosis or treatment were post common. Finally, the advanced basal cell carcinoma's symptoms, along with social pressure, created the intention to seek medical help and improved disease awareness. We developed a logical model that summarizes these findings. In this pilot study, we modelled factors that delayed consultation. This will aid future research and targeted interventions reducing delay, in particular by improving knowledge and by using social pressure as facilitators. Trial registration: NCT04124796.