The beneficial effect of prophylactic hydrocortisone treatment in extremely preterm infants improves upon adjustment of the baseline characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic low-dose hydrocortisone (HC) was found to improve survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in extremely preterm infants. However, appropriately adjusting for baseline risks of BPD or death might substantially increase the precision of the HC effect size. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of the PREMILOC trial. The treatment effect was evaluated on the primary endpoint through a covariance analysis ANCOVA, adjusting for the baseline covariates using a mixed linear model. Several sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the potential heterogeneity of the treatment effect across centers and subpopulations. RESULTS: The interaction between treatment group and baseline risk for BPD or death was not statistically significant (p = 0.498). After adjusting for the patient's probability of BPD-free survival using baseline predictors alone, the HC treatment exhibited a highly significant effect (OR [95% CI] = 2.053 [1.602-2.501], p = 0.002), with a number needed to treat NNT [95% CI] = 5.8 [4.1-23.0]. Despite a weak interaction with sex, we found a lack of heterogeneity in the treatment effect across specific subpopulations. CONCLUSIONS: In the PREMILOC trial, the beneficial effect of prophylactic HC versus placebo on BPD-free survival in extremely preterm neonates was found to be greater when adjusted to baseline risks of BPD or death. REGISTRATION NUMBERS: EudraCT number 2007-002041-20, ClinicalTrial.gov number NCT00623740. IMPACT: Prophylactic low-dose hydrocortisone (HC) provided past evidence of a beneficial effect in improving survival without BPD in infants born extremely preterm. Adjustment for baseline risks of BPD or death might substantially increase the precision of the HC effect size. The beneficial effect of prophylactic HC vs placebo on BPD-free survival in extremely preterm neonates was found to be greater when adjusted to baseline risks of BPD or death. We evidenced a lack of heterogeneity in the treatment effect in specific subpopulations despite some weak interaction with sex.

Predicting the ovarian response: towards a determinant model and implications for practice.

OBJECTIVE: To improve the reliability of prediction models for ovarian response to stimulation in ART. DESIGN: A multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Twelve reproductive centers. PATIENTS: A total of 25,854 controlled ovarian stimulations between 2005 and 2016, including cycles cancelled for inadequate response, were included. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Precision of the prediction of the number of oocytes at ovarian pickup and of cancellation rate for poor ovarian response. RESULTS: Both AMH and antral follicle count exhibit a non-linear effect on the oocyte yield, with a linear relationship after log-transformation. After adjustment for age, BMI, and center, ovarian response observed in a previous stimulation was found to be the best predictor, followed by AMH and AFC. The zero-inflated binomial negative model showed that predictors of cycle cancellation and number of oocytes at retrieval were different, and assimilating cancellation to zero oocyte greatly reduces the determination of the model. Our model was characterized by the best ever reached determination (R2=0.505 for non-naïve women, 0.313 for all the women) and provided evidence of a very strong difference among centers. The results can be easily converted in the prediction of response levels (poor-medium-good-high). Finally, in case of partial report of the above predictors, we show that the univariate prediction based on the best predictor provides a good approximation. CONCLUSION(S): A substantial improvement of the ovarian response prediction is possible in modelling the possible cancellation decision, followed by the oocyte retrieval itself, according to an appropriate model based on previous stimulation and non-linear effects of AMH and AFC.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Pitolisant for Residual Sleepiness Due to OSA.

BACKGROUND: In people with OSA, excessive daytime sleepiness is a prominent symptom and can persist despite adherence to CPAP, the first-line therapy for OSA. Pitolisant was effective in reducing daytime sleepiness in two 12-week randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one in patients adherent to CPAP (BF2.649 in Patients With OSA and Treated by CPAP But Still Complaining of EDS [HAROSA 1]) and the other in patients refusing or not tolerating CPAP (BF2.649 in Patients With OSA, Still Complaining of EDS and Refusing to be Treated by CPAP [HAROSA 2]). RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the efficacy and safety of pitolisant persist when these patients take it long-term? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All adults included in the HAROSA 1 and HAROSA 2 RCTs (both pitolisant and placebo arms) were offered pitolisant (up to 20 mg/d) after completion of the short-term double-anonymized phase (ie, from week 13) in an open-label cohort study. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score between baseline and week 52. Safety outcomes were treatment-emergent adverse event(s) (TEAE[s]), serious TEAEs, and special interest TEAEs. RESULTS: Out of 512 adults included in the two RCTs, 376 completed the 1-year follow-up. The pooled mean difference in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score from baseline to 1 year for the intention-to-treat sample was -8.0 (95% CI, -8.3 to -7.5). The overall proportions of TEAEs, serious TEAEs, and TEAEs of special interest were 35.1%, 2.0%, and 11.1%, respectively, without any significant difference between patients in the initial pitolisant and placebo arms. No cardiovascular safety issues were reported. INTERPRETATION: Pitolisant is effective in reducing daytime sleepiness over 1 year in adults with OSA, with or without CPAP treatment. Taken for 1 year, it has a good safety profile (including cardiovascular). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; Nos.: NCT01071876 and NCT01072968; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Single-Donor and Pooling Strategies for Fecal Microbiota Transfer Product Preparation in Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have a less diverse microbiome than healthy subjects. Multiple studies have evaluated fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) in these patients using different methods of product preparation, doses, and routes of administration. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy of single-donor (SDN) and multidonor (MDN) strategies for product preparation. METHODS: Systematic searches were performed in Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Orbit Intelligence for studies comparing FMT products manufactured using SDN or MDN strategies to placebo in patients with UC. Fourteen controlled studies were selected for meta-analysis (10 randomized and 4 nonrandomized). The treatment response was assessed by using fixed- and random-effects models, and the significance of the indirect difference between the interventions was assessed using a network approach. RESULTS: Considering all 14 studies, MDN and SDN were superior to placebo in terms of treatment response (risk ratios [RRs]: 4.41 and 1.57, respectively [P ≤ 0.001 for both]), and MDN was superior to SDN (RR: 2.81, P = 0.005). Meta-analysis of the 10 studies with high quality of evidence showed that MDN was superior to SDN in terms of treatment response (RR: 2.31, P = 0.042). Results were identical for both models. DISCUSSION: There was a significant clinical benefit (remission) for patients with UC who received FMT with products manufactured by MDN strategies. Reduction of donor effect may lead to a gain in microbial diversity that could improve response to treatment. These results may have implications in the treatment approach of other diseases amenable to microbiome manipulation.JOURNAL/cltg/04.03/01720094-202305000-00002/2FFU1/v/2023-05-23T220055Z/r/image-tiff.

Safety and efficacy of pitolisant in children aged 6 years or older with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Narcolepsy is a life-long disorder characterised by excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy, often arising in childhood or adolescence. Pitolisant, a selective histamine H3 receptor inverse agonist, has been approved in Europe and USA for adults with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy, with a favourable safety profile. This phase 3 study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of pitolisant in children with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy. METHODS: For this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multisite study, we recruited patients aged 6-17 years with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy in 11 sleep centres in five countries (Italy, France, Netherlands, Russia, and Finland). Participants were required to have a Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale score of 15 or greater and to have not received psychostimulants for at least 14 days before enrolment; participants who needed anticataplectics (including sodium oxybate) were required to have been on a stable dose for at least 1 month. Participants were randomly assigned to treatment with pitolisant or placebo in a 2:1 ratio at the end of screening. Randomisation was stratified by study centre and treatment was allocated using an interactive web response system. After a 4-week screening period including a 2-week baseline period, patients entered in a 4-week individual up-titration scheme from 5 mg a day to a maximum of 40 mg a day of pitolisant or placebo; treatment was administered at a stable dose for 4 weeks, followed by a 1-week placebo period. For the primary analysis, we assessed pitolisant versus placebo using change in the Ullanlinna Narcolepsy Scale (UNS) total score from baseline to the end of double-blind period in the full analysis set, defined as all randomly allocated patients who received at least one dose of treatment and who had at least one baseline UNS value. A decrease in the UNS total score reflects a reduction in both excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy. All adverse events were assessed in the safety population, defined as all participants who took at least one dose of study medication. An open-label follow-up is ongoing. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02611687. FINDINGS: Between June 6, 2016, and April 3, 2021, we screened 115 participants and 110 were randomly assigned (mean age 12·9 [SD 3·0] years, 61 [55%] male, and 90 [82%] with cataplexy; 72 assigned to pitolisant and 38 to placebo); 107 (70 receiving pitolisant and 37 receiving placebo) completed the double-blind period. The mean adjusted difference in UNS total score from baseline to the end of the double-blind period was -6·3 (SE 1·1) in the pitolisant group and -2·6 (1·4) in the placebo group (least squares mean difference -3·7; 95% CI -6·4 to -1·0, p=0·007). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 22 (31%) of 72 patients in the pitolisant group and 13 (34%) of 38 patients in the placebo group. The most frequently reported adverse events (affecting ≥5% of patients) in either group were headache (14 [19%] in the pitolisant group and three [8%] in the placebo group) and insomnia (five [7%] in the pitolisant group and one [3%] in the placebo group). INTERPRETATION: Pitolisant treatment resulted in an improvement in narcolepsy symptoms in children, although the UNS was not validated for use in children with narcolepsy when our study began. The safety profile was similar to that reported in adults but further studies are needed to confirm long-term safety. FUNDING: Bioprojet.

Bioavailability and cardiovascular effects of adrenaline administered by Anapen 500 µg auto-injector in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: Anaphylaxis guidelines recommend intramuscular adrenaline, commonly 300 µg administered using an auto-injector device. However, overweight/obese patients may require a higher adrenaline dose for adequate cardiovascular (CV) response. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) CV profiles after a single 500 µg adrenaline injection via Anapen auto-injector in healthy normal weight males and otherwise healthy, overweight or obese females. METHODS: In this exploratory open-label, single-centre study, 54 healthy volunteers aged 18-50 years received a single 500 µg adrenaline injection (Anapen auto-injector) in the thigh (antero-lateral middle third [18 males] or antero-inferior third [36 females]). Assessments included depot depth (ultrasonography), plasma adrenaline levels (liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry) and heart rate (HR; ECG Holter monitor). RESULTS: Ultrasonography showed that 82.4% of normal weight males received intramuscular injections; all overweight and obese females received subcutaneous injections. Anapen injection produced rapid increases in circulating adrenaline levels and significant increases in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and HR. Second peak plasma adrenaline concentrations (Cmax2 ) were reduced, and time to Cmax2 increased in overweight and obese females compared with males with normal body mass index; area under the curve (0-240 min) (AUC(0-240) ) was increased in overweight and obese females. Obese females had reduced maximal SBP values compared with normal weight males or overweight females; overweight and obese females had markedly different HR time courses compared with normal weight males. CONCLUSION: A 500 µg adrenaline injection via Anapen produced rapid PK/PD changes in normal weight, overweight and obese subjects, irrespective of intramuscular or subcutaneous injection, and was well tolerated.

Effect of metformin on arginine and dimethylarginines in patients with advanced type 2 diabetes: A post hoc analysis of a randomized trial.

AIM: To study the effect of metformin on plasma levels of arginine, asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA), indicators of the nitric oxide pathway. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of the HOME trial, we analysed plasma levels of arginine, ADMA and SDMA during the 4.3-year follow-up (comparing the effects of metformin versus placebo on top of insulin therapy). Statistical analysis was performed with a mixed model approach, in which simultaneously constant treatment effects were estimated, as well as time-dependent treatment effects. RESULTS: We found that metformin compared with placebo did not affect ADMA or SDMA plasma levels but rapidly decreased arginine plasma levels and hence the arginine to ADMA ratio. The constant treatment effect on ADMA was 0.99 (95% CI 0.97, 1.00) relative to placebo and the time-dependent treatment effect was 1.00 (95% CI 1.00, 1.01). By contrast, the constant treatment effect on arginine was 0.86 (95% CI 0.84, 0.88), with only a minimal time-dependent change of 1.01 (95% CI 1.00, 1.01). CONCLUSIONS: The potential benefits of metformin on endothelial function cannot be explained by a decrease in ADMA or by improved global arginine availability. The clinical significance of the decreased arginine plasma levels is not clear and can be harmful or beneficial, depending on the mechanism involved. However, a potential effect of metformin on the nitric oxide pathway is not restricted to the studied metabolites.

Metformin and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I and T trajectories in type 2 diabetes patients: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Metformin has favorable effects on cardiovascular outcomes in both newly onset and advanced type 2 diabetes, as previously reported findings from the UK Prospective Diabetes Study and the HOME trial have demonstrated. Patients with type 2 diabetes present with chronically elevated circulating cardiac troponin levels, an established predictor of cardiovascular endpoints and prognostic marker of subclinical myocardial injury. It is unknown whether metformin affects cardiac troponin levels. The study aimed to evaluate cardiac troponin I and T trajectories in patients with diabetes treated either with metformin or placebo. METHODS: This study is a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial (HOME trial) that included 390 patients with advanced type 2 diabetes randomized to 850 mg metformin or placebo up to three times daily concomitant to continued insulin treatment. Cardiac troponin I and T concentrations were measured at baseline and after 4, 17, 30, 43 and 52 months. We evaluated cardiac troponin trajectories by linear mixed-effects modeling, correcting for age, sex, smoking status and history of cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: This study enrolled 390 subjects, of which 196 received metformin and 194 received placebo. In the treatment and placebo groups, mean age was 64 and 59 years; with 50% and 58% of subjects of the female sex, respectively. Despite the previously reported reduction of macrovascular disease risk in this cohort by metformin, linear mixed-effects regression modelling did not reveal evidence for an effect on cardiac troponin I and cardiac troponin T levels [- 8.4% (- 18.6, 3.2), p = 0.150, and - 4.6% (- 12, 3.2), p = 0.242, respectively]. A statistically significant time-treatment interaction was found for troponin T [- 1.6% (- 2.9, - 0.2), p = 0.021] but not troponin I concentrations [- 1.5% (- 4.2, 1.2), p = 0.263]. CONCLUSIONS: In this post-hoc analysis of a 4.3-year randomized controlled trial, metformin did not exert a clinically relevant effect on cardiac troponin I and cardiac troponin T levels when compared to placebo. Cardioprotective effects of the drug observed in clinical studies are not reflected by a reduction in these biomarkers of subclinical myocardial injury. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00375388.

Reliability of AMH and AFC measurements and their correlation: a large multicenter study.

PURPOSE: Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) are correlated with the ovarian response, but their reliability and reproducibility are questionable. This large multicenter study describes their distribution, inter-cycle and inter-center variability, and their correlation. METHODS: A total of 25,854 IVF cycles among 15,219 patients were selected in 12 ART centers. Statistical distribution of AMH and AFC was studied by using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Shapiro goodness of fit test. The reproducibility of AFC and AMH was measured using a mixed model regressing the logarithmic transformation of AFC with age. RESULTS: The distribution of AMH and AFC was characterized by a wide dispersion of values, twice more important for AFC, and a logarithmic distribution. The faster decline in AMH than in AFC with age suggests that their correlation changes with age. AMH and AFC showed a very low proportion of concordance in the range of expected poor responders according to Bologna cutoffs. The heterogeneity for AMH and AFC across centers was small, but much larger across patients within each center. Concerning the patients with several successive cycles, the reproducibility for AMH seemed much better than for AFC. Comparing respective performances of AMH and AFC for the prediction of ovarian response depended on the local conditions for measuring these indicators and on the reproducibility of results improved over time. CONCLUSION: Distribution of AMH and AFC was characterized by the wide dispersion of values, and a logarithmic distribution. Establishing cutoffs or a direct relationship AMH/AFC without considering age seems hazardous. Correlation between AMH and AFC was very poor in the range of poor responders.

Efficacy of Pitolisant 20 mg in Reducing Excessive Daytime Sleepiness and Fatigue in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Syndrome: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and fatigue are major complaints in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) syndrome. Pitolisant is an orally active selective histamine H3 receptor (H3R) antagonist/inverse agonist, which enhances histaminergic transmissions in the brain and thereby elicits strong wake-promoting effects. This article assesses the efficacy and safety of pitolisant 20 mg in patients with OSA, based on existing randomised controlled studies. METHODS: An individual patient data (IPD) meta-analytical two-level (study-patient) hierarchical model was used assuming a random treatment effect. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and Oxford Sleep Resistance (OSleR) tests were co-primary endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 512 patients, including 384 treated with pitolisant and 128 with placebo, were included in the analysis. Compared with placebo, pitolisant reduced mean ESS by - 3.1 (95% CI [- 4.1; - 2.1]; p < 0.001) and improved OSleR by 1.18 (1.02; 1.35, p = 0.022); 30% more patients had reduced fatigue (risk ratio [RR] = 1.3, [1.11; 1.53]), p = 0.001) and 46% more patients had improved Clinical Global Impression (CGI) (RR = 1.46 [1.12; 1.89], p = 0.005). No significant differences in safety endpoints were found. These results proved homogeneous across studies and subgroups of the population. CONCLUSION: The results provide evidence of a significant benefit of pitolisant in improving EDS and fatigue, irrespective of baseline conditions.

Efficacy of pinaverium bromide in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Spasmolytic agents are an attractive first line treatment option for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Pinaverium bromide (pinaverium) has antispasmodic effects on gastrointestinal smooth muscle and can relieve major IBS symptoms, but an up-to-date meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of pinaverium with placebo is lacking. The aim is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of pinaverium compared with placebo for IBS treatment. METHODS: All placebo-controlled trials evaluating pinaverium for IBS treatment were included, up to October 2019. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by overall patient IBS symptoms. Individual symptoms were also evaluated. The effect of pinaverium versus placebo was expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR). Odds ratio (OR) and number needed to treat (NNT) were also calculated. RESULTS: Eight studies were included for analysis. Pinaverium treatment had a beneficial effect on overall IBS symptom relief with a positive SMD of 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.82, p < 0.0001] and a positive RR of 1.75 (1.26-2.43, p < 0.0008). No significant difference was found by publication year, gender, age, methodological quality score (MQS), or sample size. No publication bias was detected. OR was 3.43 (2.00-5.88, p < 0.0001), and NNT was 4. Pinaverium also demonstrated a beneficial treatment effect for abdominal pain, stool change, and bloating improvement or resolution. CONCLUSION: Pinaverium is superior to placebo for the treatment of IBS symptoms, irrespective of patient age or gender, study publication year, sample size, or MQS. The NNT in this meta-analysis is amongst the lowest for studies and meta-analyses of antispasmodics versus placebo in IBS.

Survival without Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia of Extremely Preterm Infants: A Predictive Model at Birth.

INTRODUCTION: Early prediction of survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age remains challenging for infants born extremely preterm. We aimed to provide a new predictive model including variables available only at or soon after birth based on the literature and existing models. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to identify all variables considered to be significant predictors of BPD and survival at birth in extremely preterm infants. We then assessed the external validity of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Neonatal Research Network BPD estimator on the PREMILOC cohort, a recent French study with a large sample of extremely preterm infants and a vast number of variables at baseline. Finally, we attempted to improve this model by testing the added value of other early predictors reported in previous studies. RESULTS: Restricted to baseline predictors, the NICHD Neonatal Research Network BPD estimator confirmed its calibration and fair discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic [auROC] [95% CI] = 0.73 [0.68-0.77] when used with a published model and auROC [95% CI] = 0.77 [0.73-0.81] when fitted to the PREMILOC dataset). We were able to improve the discriminatory power by adding candidate variables at birth associated with BPD in previous studies. The modified best predicting model included gestational age at birth, birthweight, respiratory support at baseline, gender, center effect, and multiple pregnancy as baseline predictors. This model showed significantly better discrimination (auROC [95% CI] = 0.85 [0.82-0.88]) and better confirmed calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, p = 0.45). CONCLUSION: This new model, based on 6 early predictors, appears to improve the prediction soon after birth of BPD-free survival in extremely preterm infants.

Metformin and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide in type 2 diabetes patients, a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Beyond antihyperglycemic effects, metformin may improve cardiovascular outcomes. Patients with type 2 diabetes often have an elevated plasma level of N-terminal pro B-type as a marker of (sub) clinical cardiovascular disease. We studied whether metformin was associated with a reduction in the serum level of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in these patients. METHODS: In the HOME trial 390 insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to 850 mg metformin or placebo three times daily. Plasma samples were drawn at baseline, 4, 17, 30, 43 and 52 months. In a post-hoc analysis we analyzed the change in NT-proBNP in both groups. We used a longitudinal mixed model analysis adjusting for age, sex and prior cardiovascular disease. In a secondary analysis we assessed a possible immediate treatment effect post baseline. RESULTS: Metformin did not affect NT-proBNP levels over time in the primary analysis (-1% [95%CI -4;3, p = 0.62]). In the secondary analysis there was also no sustained time independent immediate treatment effect (initial increase of 17% [95%CI 4;30, p = 0.006] followed by yearly decrease of -4% [95%CI -7;0, p = 0.07]). CONCLUSIONS: Metformin as compared to placebo did not affect NT-proBNP plasma levels in this 4.3-year placebo-controlled trial. Potential cardioprotective effects of metformin cannot be explained by changes in cardiac pressures or volumes to the extent reflected by NT-proBNP.

Effect of recombinant LH supplementation on cumulative live birth rate compared with FSH alone in poor ovarian responders: a large, real-world study.

RESEARCH QUESTION: The benefit of LH supplementation (LHS) over sole use of FSH during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) remains controversial. Meta-analyses have provided some evidence that the benefit of LHS is limited to women with poor ovarian response (POR). This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of LHS on cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) in POR using a large controlled study in a real-world context. DESIGN: This retrospective multicentre controlled study used data from registries at 12 French ART centres. All instances of POR undergoing ovarian stimulation and treated with follitrophin-alfa (FSH-α) with or without lutrophin-α were selected following an intention-to-treat principle. POR was defined according to the ESHRE Bologna criteria, and classified into three categories (Mild, Moderate and Severe) according to the Poor Responder Outcome Prediction (PROsPeR) score. The primary end-point was the CLBR associated with fresh and frozen embryos originating from the same ovarian stimulation. RESULTS: A total of 9787 instances of ovarian stimulation (5218 LHS, 4569 FSH-α only) were analysed, 33.0%, 52.4% and 14.6% being allocated to the Mild, Moderate and Severe PROsPeR categories, respectively. Using a mixed logistic model and adjusting for matched subclasses and baseline POR severity, it was found that the benefit of LHS compared with use of FSH alone differed between baseline severity categories (interaction test, P = 0.007): a significant benefit of LHS for CLBR was found for patients in the Moderate (14.3% versus 11.3%, odds ratio [OR] = 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.75, risk ratio [RR] = 1.29, P = 0.013) and Severe (9.8% versus 4.4%, OR = 2.40, 95% CI- 1.48-3.89, RR = 1.89, P < 0.001) categories, but not for the Mild category (18.8% versus 19.6%, OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.78-1.15, RR = 0.95, P = 0.60). CONCLUSION: LHS has a significant effect on increasing CLBR in moderately and severely poor ovarian responders.

Comparison of modafinil and pitolisant in narcolepsy: a non-inferiority meta-analytical approach.

AIM: To assess the non-inferiority of pitolisant, a new compound for the relief of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and cataplexy in narcolepsy, compared with modafinil. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in narcolepsy were searched systematically. Network meta-analysis (NMA) compared the efficacy and safety of pitolisant and modafinil. The main endpoints are Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT), the number of cataplexies, and overall safety. RESULTS: Of 312 articles after removing duplicates, 10 RCTs were eligible for NMA. For ESS, a non-significant superior beneficial decrease (-0.69, [-2.18, 0.79]) showed non-inferiority of pitolisant (non-inferiority margin [NIM]=1, p=0.015). An MWT beneficial increase (2.12 minutes [-0.95, 5.19]; p=0.18) showed non-inferiority of pitolisant (NIM=-1). For cataplexy, the mean beneficial effect of pitolisant was significant, providing evidence of pitolisant superiority in addition to non-inferiority. The risk ratio (RR) of treatment-suspected adverse events for pitolisant/modafinil was 0.86 [0.44, 1.24] favoring pitolisant, confirming non-inferiority considering a safety margin of RR=1.25 (tolerance of 25%). CONCLUSIONS: Pitolisant is non-inferior to modafinil in relieving EDS, but superior to modafinil in reducing cataplexy, outranking modafinil in narcolepsy type-1 patients. Despite a slight superiority of pitolisant in EDS relief, both drugs perform equally in narcolepsy type-2 patients.

Evaluation of emotional disorders before and during treatment with interferon beta in patients with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Domains encompassing emotional disorders in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients are still unclear. METHODS: We performed a 24-month, multicenter, single-arm, prospective study. RRMS patients started IFN-ß treatment at baseline. The primary endpoint was lack of emotional control, measured using the "Echelle d'HumeurDépressive" (EHD) scale three times at baseline and at 10 post-treatment visits. Secondary endpoints were emotional blunting, irritability, fatigue, depression and anxiety. A linear mixed covariance model assessed change from baseline on an intention-to-treat basis, under the assumption of no mood disorder effect (one-sided 97.5% level), in which autoregressive type of autocorrelation was tested. RESULTS: Out of 79 recruited patients, 70 were analyzed: 80% female; mean (SD) age, 37.0 (11.5) years. Mean (SD) lack of emotional control score at baseline and Month 24 was 12.7 (4.4) and 12.6 (5.5), respectively, versus 10.1 (3.2) in a healthy control population matched for age and sex. Stepwise analysis identified younger age, male sex and antidepressant use as significant predictors of higher lack of emotional control values. CONCLUSIONS: Based on 24 months of prospective follow-up, the results of this study highlights a broad spectrum of emotional disorders in the MS population at the time of disease modifying drugs initiation but no major IFN-ß-related emotional disorders (mood dyscontrol, anxiety, depression) were observed. However, sporadic occurrences of severe mood disorders and suicidality cannot be excluded.

Both high and low HCG day progesterone concentrations negatively affect live birth rates in IVF/ICSI cycles.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Can previous reports of a decreased probability of success in stimulated IVF cycles with premature rise of progesterone, as determined by progesterone concentration on HCG day (PHCG), be confirmed? DESIGN: Retrospective, observational, single-centre cohort study conducted on 5447 IVF and intracytoplasmic (ICSI) cycles carried out among 2192 patients between 2009 and 2015, with conventional ovarian stimulation. This large database was used to develop a non-linear mixed prognosis model of live birth rate (LBR) incorporating PHCG as a predictor. RESULTS: In addition to known predictors (age, body mass index, anti-Müllerian hormone, type of infertility), PHCG was associated with a linear effect (OR 0.78 per Log[PHCG]ng/ml, 95% CI 0.611 to 0.997, P = 0.047) combined with a strong quadratic effect (OR 0.585 per Log2(PHCG)ng/ml, 95% CI 0.444 to 0.775, P < 0.001) resulting into a parabolic reverse-U curve. A significant interaction (P = 0.038) was found between PHCG and number of oocytes if three or less, but the effect of PHCG remains modest. For higher oocyte numbers, LBR rapidly increases with number of retrieved oocytes; however, LBR becomes more sensitive to PHCG as the number of oocytes increases. Higher live birth prognoses occur for optimal PHCG but are sharply reduced for lower or higher PHCG. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence is provided of an important negative effect of PHCG at lower and higher values, independent of oocyte number, thus defining appropriate ranges for fresh embryo transfer or freeze-all strategy. In poor responders, premature progesterone rise may be ignored, thus avoiding unnecessary cancellations or embryo freezing. Conversely, in higher responders, the negative effect of progesterone elevation is more pronounced, suggesting that freeze-all policy should be applied more widely.

Cholecalciferol in relapsing-remitting MS: A randomized clinical trial (CHOLINE).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cholecalciferol in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group, 2-year study, 181 patients with RRMS were randomized 1:1. Key inclusion criteria were a low serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25OHD) concentration (<75 nmol/L), a treatment with interferon beta-1a 44 µg (SC 3 times per week) 4 months ± 2 months before randomization, and at least one documented relapse during the previous 2 years. Patients received high-dose oral cholecalciferol 100,000 IU or placebo every other week for 96 weeks. Primary outcome measure was the change in the annualized relapse rate (ARR) at 96 weeks. Secondary objectives included safety and tolerability of cholecalciferol and efficacy assessments (ARR, MRI parameters, and Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS]). RESULTS: The primary end point was not met. In patients who completed the 2-year follow-up (45 with cholecalciferol and 45 with placebo), all efficacy parameters favored cholecalciferol with an ARR reduction (p = 0.012), less new hypointense T1-weighted lesions (p = 0.025), a lower volume of hypointense T1-weighted lesions (p = 0.031), and a lower progression of EDSS (p = 0.026). The overall rate of adverse events was well balanced between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary end point was not met, these data suggest a potential treatment effect of cholecalciferol in patients with RRMS already treated with interferon beta-1a and low serum 25OHD concentration. Together with the good safety profile, these data support the exploration of cholecalciferol treatment in such patients with RRMS. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01198132. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with RRMS and low serum 25OHD, cholecalciferol did not significantly affect ARRs.

Clinical pregnancy following GnRH agonist administration in the luteal phase of fresh or frozen assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To study if the GnRH agonist administration in luteal phase improves clinical pregnancy rate of fresh and frozen embryo transfer. Also, this meta-analysis compares the treatment effect of luteal GnRH agonist administration between long agonist and antagonist protocols of fresh cycles, and between two types of treatment: fresh and frozen embryo transfers. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis (registration number CRD42017059152). RESULTS: For the overall 20 studies (5497 patients), clinical pregnancy rate significantly increased in group of GnRH agonist administration compared to control group (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.14-1.34, p < 0.0001). Regarding the treatment effect of luteal GnRH agonist administration between long agonist and antagonist protocol fresh cycles, no significant difference was observed (RR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.98-1.67, p = 0.07). Also, in comparison between fresh and frozen embryo transfer, similar effect of GnRH agonist administration was found (RR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.74-1.16, p = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence that GnRH agonist administration in luteal phase improve clinical pregnancy rate in both fresh and frozen cycles. Within fresh cycles, no significant difference of clinical pregnancy rate is found between two protocols. In frozen cycles, the effect of GnRH agonist administration in enhancing clinical pregnancy rate is similar to fresh cycles.