Development of a novel rapid response event review process for quality improvement.

INTRODUCTION: Rapid response team (RRT) and code activation events occur relatively commonly in inpatient settings. RRT systems have been the subject of a significant amount of analysis, although this has been largely focused on the impact of RRT system implementation and RRT events on patient outcomes. There is reason to believe that the structured assessment of RRT and code events may be an effective way to identify opportunities for system improvement, although no standardised approach to event analysis is widely accepted. We developed and refined a protocolised system of RRT and code event review, focused on sustainable, timely and high value event analysis meant to inform ongoing improvement activities. METHODS: A group of clinicians with expertise in process and quality improvement created a protocolised analytic plan for rapid response event review, piloted and then iteratively optimised a systematic process which was applied to all subsequent cases to be reviewed. RESULTS: Hospitalist reviewers were recruited and trained in a methodical approach. Each reviewer performed a chart review to summarise RRT events, and collect specific variables for each case (coding). Coding was then reviewed for concordance, at monthly interdisciplinary group meetings and 'Action Items' were identified and considered for implementation. In any 12-month period starting in 2021, approximately 12-15 distinct cases per month were reviewed and coded, offering ample opportunities to identify trends and patterns. CONCLUSION: We have developed an innovative process for ongoing review of RRT-Code events. The review process is easy to implement and has allowed for the timely identification of high value improvement opportunities.

Technological Intervention to Improve Alarm Management in Acute Care Telemetry Units.

Background: Telemetry monitoring is intended to improve patient safety and reduce harm. However, excessive monitor alarms may have the undesired effect of staff ignoring, silencing, or delaying a response due to alarm fatigue. Outlier patients, or those patients who are responsible for generating the most monitor alarms, contribute to excessive monitor alarms. Methods: Daily alarm data reports at a large academic medical center indicated that one or two patient outliers generated the most alarms daily. A technological intervention aimed at reminding registered nurses (RNs) to adjust alarm thresholds for patients who triggered excessive alarms was implemented. The notification was sent to the assigned RN's mobile phone when a patient exceeded the unit's seven-day average of alarms per day by greater than 400%. Results: A reduction in average alarm duration was observed across the four acute care telemetry units (P < 0.001), with an overall decrease of 8.07 seconds in the postintervention versus preintervention period. However, alarm frequency increased significantly (χ23 = 34.83, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Implementing a technological intervention to notify RNs to adjust alarm parameters may reduce alarm duration. Reducing alarm duration may improve RN telemetry management, alarm fatigue, and awareness. More research is needed to support this conclusion, as well as to determine the cause of the observed increase in alarm frequency.