Effect of different electrical stimulation systems on beef quality and palatability: Constant current compared to constant voltage.

This study examined the effects of constant current electrical stimulation (CCES) compared to constant voltage electrical stimulation (CVES), when applied within the same beef carcass (n = 79), on longissimus thoracis et lumborum (LTL) quality and palatability. There was a stimulation method × time interaction for pH, with CCES reducing the 3 h post-mortem pH, but increasing the 72 h post-mortem pH compared to CVES (P < 0.001). The CCES decreased the meat subjective Japanese Meat Grading Agency (JMGA) colour scores (P < 0.05) and increased the objective L⁎ (P < 0.01), a⁎ (P < 0.05) and b⁎ (P < 0.05) colour values at 3 d post-mortem and L⁎ and b⁎ values (P < 0.05) during retail display compared to CVES, although the objective values from both stimulation methods were above established consumer acceptability thresholds. Additionally, CCES reduced the purge (P < 0.05) and drip (P < 0.01) losses, and tended to reduce shear force values (P = 0.089) compared to CVES, although these did not translate into differences in juiciness or tenderness evaluated by trained panelists (P > 0.1). Regarding flavour, the CCES meat had greater bloody/serumy flavour (P < 0.05) and corn aroma (P < 0.05), less unidentified aroma (P < 0.05), and tended to have greater corn flavour (P = 0.077) and less barnyard aroma (P = 0.079) than CVES meat. There were also increased concentrations of flavour-related volatile compounds including 2-methyl-butanal, 3-methyl-butanal and 2-5-dimethyl pyrazine levels (P < 0.05) with CCES. Overall, the CCES system slightly improved meat quality and flavour compared to CVES when applied to the same beef carcasses. Further consumer studies would be warranted to determine whether these differences translate into more acceptable meat.

Effect of a novel steak fabrication method by trimming subcutaneous and intermuscular fats on palatability and calorie content of beef ribeye steaks.

This study investigated the effects of a novel steak fabrication method, involving removal of both subcutaneous and intermuscular fats between the longissimus thoracis (LT) and spinalis dorsi (SD) muscles before cooking, on beef ribeye steak palatability and calorie content. Canada AA (n = 10) and AAA (n = 10) ribeyes were fabricated into steaks either with (fat-on) or without (fat-off) subcutaneous and intermuscular fats. Fat-on steaks had shorter cooking times and lower cooking losses than fat-off steaks (P < 0.001), regardless of quality grade. There were treatment × quality grade interactions for initial (P < 0.01) and sustainable juiciness (P < 0.05) of the LT samples and initial juiciness (P < 0.05) of the SD samples, with the fat-on AA samples being more juicy than the fat-off AA samples, but the AAA treatments were not different from each other. Regardless of quality grade, fewer panelist responses indicated livery flavour (P < 0.05) for fat-on compared to fat-off LT samples. Regardless of fat-on/fat-off treatment, AA compared to AAA samples had more responses for bloody/serumy (P < 0.01) and unidentified off-flavours (P < 0.05) in LT samples. However, AAA samples had more responses for metallic off-flavour in LT (P = 0.059) and SD (P < 0.05). There were no differences in calorie content between fat-on compared to fat-off steaks (P > 0.1) regardless of quality grade and muscle type, or between AA and AAA steaks regardless of cooking with fat-on or off (P > 0.1). Maintaining the subcutaneous and intermuscular fats while cooking will improve ribeye steak palatability without increasing calorie content, especially for leaner steaks.

Impact of a constant current electrical stimulation (CCES) system and hormonal growth-promoting (HGP) implants on meat quality and palatability of finished steers.

This study evaluated the effects of a constant current electrical stimulation (CCES) system and hormonal growth-promoting (HGP) implants on the quality and palatability of the longissimus thoracis et lumborum (LTL) from yearling-finished steers. The experiment used a total of 46 Angus cross steers, which were either non-implanted (n = 20) or implanted with trenbolone acetate and estradiol benzoate (n = 26). The CCES was applied to one side of each carcass during the slaughter process, whereas the other side remained unstimulated. Regardless of the application of HGP implants, the CCES reduced pH at 3 and 72 h post-mortem and shear force at all ageing times (P < 0.05), improved colour at 72 h post-mortem and during the retail display (P < 0.05), increased initial and overall tenderness (P < 0.01), and decreased the amount of perceived connective tissue and the proportion of trained panelists detecting spongy texture (P < 0.05) compared to meat from unstimulated carcass sides. Although CCES increased meat purge losses and reduced moisture content (P < 0.05), this did not affect meat juiciness (P > 0.10). CCES interacted with HGP to prevent increase in drip loss (P > 0.10), increase frequency of panelists detecting bloody/serumy flavour and typical texture, and reduce the proportion of panelists detecting rubbery texture in meat (P < 0.05). Regardless of stimulation treatment, meat from implanted animals had a more pronounced pH decline at 72 h post-mortem (P < 0.05) and a higher proportion of panelists finding no off-flavours (P < 0.05) or bloody/serumy flavour (P < 0.01) than non-implanted cattle. The CCES system tested in this study improved LTL quality and palatability of heavier beef carcasses.

Effects of in-the-bag dry-ageing on meat quality, palatability and volatile compounds of low-value beef cuts.

This study evaluated the effects of in-the-bag dry-ageing (BDA) (21 and 42 d) on meat quality, palatability, and volatile compounds of clod heart, brisket, and flat iron cuts from steers. In all cuts, BDA increased moisture losses (P < 0.05), but this did not reduce the juiciness of 21 d BDA versus wet-aged (WA) steaks. In clod heart, BDA increased overall tenderness at 21 d compared to 21 d WA (P < 0.01). Regardless of ageing period, BDA of clod heart increased beef flavour and salty taste and decreased sour-dairy and stale/cardboard flavours and concentrations of volatile compounds derived from lipid oxidation compared to WA (P < 0.05). In brisket, BDA increased salty taste and fatty aroma and reduced bloody/serumy flavour, whereas decreased beef and buttery flavours and intensified some unpleasant aromas/flavours (P < 0.05) for both ageing periods. The BDA of flat iron increased several undesirable aromas/flavours and decreased sweet taste and beef and buttery flavours (P < 0.05), regardless of ageing period. Overall, BDA for 42 d decreased meat quality and palatability and increased concentrations of volatile compounds from lipid oxidation, especially in flat iron cuts. Value could be recovered by customizing BDA periods by cut.

Effect of in-the-bag dry-ageing on meat palatability and volatile compounds of cull cows and youthful steers.

This study evaluated the effects of in-the-bag dry-ageing on eating quality and volatile compounds of longissimus lumborum from cows and steers. Compared to wet-ageing, in-the-bag dry-ageing increased purge loss (P < 0.0001), cooking time (P < 0.0001), salty taste (P < 0.05) and sour-dairy flavour (P < 0.01), whereas decreased cooking loss (P < 0.0001), amount of perceptible connective tissue (P < 0.05) and livery flavour (P < 0.05) in both cow and steer meat. This dry-ageing technology also increased juiciness (P < 0.01) and brown-roasted aroma (P < 0.05) in steer meat, whereas decreased the juiciness (P < 0.01) of cow meat. Regardless of the ageing method, cow meat was tougher (P < 0.0001), less juicy (P < 0.001) and sweeter (P < 0.05) and presented higher amount of perceived connective tissue (P < 0.0001) than steer meat, whereas steer meat had higher ratings for beef (P < 0.05) and brown-roasted (P < 0.01) flavours. Volatile compounds were largely affected (P < 0.05) by animal-type, most of them being higher in cow than steer meat. In contrast, in-the-bag dry-ageing affected a few volatile compounds such as alcohols, aldehydes and ketones.