Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 75(4): 1399-1407, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34952809

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Virtual surgical planning (VSP) is increasingly used in maxillomandibular osseous free flap reconstruction. Non-commercial ('in-house') VSP may offer the same level of accuracy and other benefits, without the inflated costs and time delays inherent in using commercial providers. Comparisons between commercial and in-house methods are lacking. This study aims to determine the accuracy of VSP, compare in-house and commercially planned cases, and explore predictors of the reconstruction error. METHODS: Seventy-six patients who had a virtually planned maxillomandibular reconstruction between January 2012 and July 2020 were retrospectively identified. The preoperative digital plan was compared to the postoperative CT scan in terms of length of bone segments, angle between adjacent segments and intercondylar, and intergonial angle distances (mandibular reconstructions only). RESULTS: Forty-four patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mean intergonial and intercondylar distances error was 1.7 ± 1.01 mm, mean segment length error was 1.3 ± 1.40 mm, and mean angles error was 1.9 ± 2.32°. The difference in error of in-house VSP compared to commercial VSP was not statistically significant for intercondylar and intergonial distance (p = 0.76), segment length (p = 0.15), or angle between segments (p = 0.92). The increased error was associated with osteoradionecrosis as the indication for surgery, greater number of segments, and secondary reconstructions. CONCLUSION: VSP is an accurate method of maxillary and mandibular reconstruction. In-house VSP may be similar in accuracy to commercial VSP options. Higher levels of inaccuracy are likely to occur in more complex reconstructions, particularly secondary reconstructions, and in the setting of osteoradionecrosis.


Subject(s)
Free Tissue Flaps , Mandibular Reconstruction , Osteoradionecrosis , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , Free Tissue Flaps/surgery , Humans , Mandibular Reconstruction/methods , Retrospective Studies , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods
2.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 50(5): 615-618, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33069518

ABSTRACT

The Sydney Modification of the Alberta Mandibular Reconstruction technique (SM-ART) is a hybrid of the Rohner method and the Alberta Reconstructive Technique (ART). SM-ART differs from ART in three ways, notably the use of custom plates, intraoral placement of implants via three-dimensionally printed guides and a skin graft buried deep into the skin paddle of the fibula flap in the first stage of the reconstruction.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Free Tissue Flaps , Mandibular Reconstruction , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Alberta , Bone Transplantation , Fibula/surgery , Mandibular Osteotomy
3.
Aust Dent J ; 60(4): 532-5, 2015 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25484130

ABSTRACT

A brain abscess that originates from an odontogenic infection, although rare, can at times be difficult to diagnose, especially in the context of pain and trismus. We report a rare case of odontogenic infection as a result of an infected maxillary third molar, causing an infratemporal and temporalis collection, resulting in a brain abscess with concurrent cerebritis. This is a clinical case review documenting an uncommon but potentially fatal complication.


Subject(s)
Brain Abscess/etiology , Focal Infection, Dental/complications , Tooth Diseases/complications , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Brain Abscess/diagnostic imaging , Brain Abscess/drug therapy , Focal Infection, Dental/diagnostic imaging , Focal Infection, Dental/drug therapy , Humans , Male , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Tooth Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Tooth Diseases/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...