Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 88
Filter
1.
J Biosci ; 482023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37671533

ABSTRACT

An important preventive measure to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic is vaccine implementation. In creating vaccines, evoking neutralizing antibody (NAb) production is the main objective. This review determines and compares the NAb titers produced by COVID-19 vaccine recipients based on the vaccine type and the manner of administration. This review includes published articles on studies with healthy participants with a minimum age of 18 years, without previous infections, and those who were given Emergency Use License (EUL) vaccines from WHO. Bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias and the Newcastle- Ottawa Scale. In all the studies, 40.82% of the primary doses were viral vector platforms. For booster doses, 50% were mRNA platforms. Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines have higher titers as homologous than as heterologous vaccines. However, inactivated vaccines and viral vector vaccines have lower titers as homologous than as heterologous vaccines. Meanwhile, subunit vaccines lack data for their titers. Based on the antibody titers, homologous mRNA vaccines are more viral-protective than their heterologous counterparts. Heterologous inactivated and viral vector vaccines are more protective than homologous combinations, mainly when mRNA is the other type in those heterologous combinations. This is because mRNA vaccines elicit higher immunogenicity compared to other types.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Viral Vaccines , Humans , Adolescent , COVID-19 Vaccines , Pandemics , RNA, Messenger , mRNA Vaccines
2.
Neurologia (Engl Ed) ; 37(5): 390-402, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35672126

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: It has been observed in recent years that levels of such molecules as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and, to a lesser extent, the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide are elevated during migraine attacks and in chronic migraine, both in the cerebrospinal fluid and in the serum. Pharmacological reduction of these proteins is clinically significant, with an improvement in patients' migraines. It therefore seems logical that one of the main lines of migraine research should be based on the role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of this entity. DEVELOPMENT: The Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group decided to draft this document in order to address the evidence on such important issues as the role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of migraine and the mechanism of action of monoclonal antibodies and gepants; and to critically analyse the results of different studies and the profile of patients eligible for treatment with monoclonal antibodies, and the impact in terms of pharmacoeconomics. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical development of gepants, which are CGRP antagonists, for the acute treatment of migraine attacks, and CGRP ligand and receptor monoclonal antibodies offer promising results for these patients.


Subject(s)
Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide , Migraine Disorders , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide/metabolism , Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Headache/drug therapy , Humans , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy
3.
Rev Neurol ; 72(s02): S1-S19, 2021 06 30.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34180043

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: After the European Headache Federation (EHF) Congress, renowned Spanish neurologists specialised in migraine presented the most significant latest developments in research in this field at the Post-EHF Meeting. DEVELOPMENT: The main data presented concerning the treatment of chronic and episodic migraine were addressed, with attention paid more specifically to those related to preventive treatments and real-life experience in the management of the disease. An important review was carried out of the new therapeutic targets and the possibilities they offer in terms of understanding the pathophysiology of migraine and its treatment. An update was also presented of the latest developments in the treatment of migraine with fremanezumab, a monoclonal antibody recently authorised by the European Medicines Agency. Participants were also given an update on the latest developments in basic research on the pathology, as well as an overview of the symptoms of migraine and COVID-19. Finally, the repercussions of migraine in terms of its burden on the care and economic resources of the health system were addressed, along with its impact on society. CONCLUSIONS: The meeting summarised the content presented at the 14th EHF Congress, which took place in late June/early July 2020.


TITLE: I Reunión Post-European Headache Federation: revisión de las novedades presentadas en el Congreso de la European Headache Federation de 2020.Introducción. Tras la celebración del congreso de la European Headache Federation (EHF), reconocidos neurólogos españoles expertos en el tratamiento de la migraña expusieron en la Reunión Post-EHF las principales novedades presentadas en el congreso y relacionadas con ese ámbito. Desarrollo. Se abordan los principales datos presentados relacionados con el tratamiento de la migraña crónica y episódica; concretamente, los relacionados con los tratamientos preventivos y la experiencia en vida real en el manejo de la enfermedad. Se hizo una importante revisión de las nuevas dianas terapéuticas y las posibilidades que ofrecen en cuanto al conocimiento de la fisiopatología de la migraña y su tratamiento. Asimismo, se hizo una actualización de las novedades presentadas en el tratamiento de la migraña con fremanezumab, anticuerpo monoclonal recientemente autorizado por la Agencia Europea de Medicamentos. Se hizo una actualización de las novedades en investigación básica en la patología, así como una relación de los síntomas de migraña y COVID-19. Finalmente, se abordaron las implicaciones de la migraña en la carga sanitaria asistencial y económica, y su impacto en la sociedad. Conclusiones. En la reunión se hizo un resumen del contenido presentado en el 14 Congreso de la EHF, que tuvo lugar a finales de junio y principios de julio de 2020.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders/therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Congresses as Topic , Europe , Humans , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Migraine Disorders/etiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic
4.
Neurología (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 36(3): 229-240, abril 2021. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-219735

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La cefalea con uso excesivo de medicación es una cefalea secundaria en la que el uso regular o frecuente de medicación analgésica produce un aumento de la frecuencia de una cefalea de base, pasando de episódica a crónica. La prevalencia de esta entidad está en torno al 1-2%, siendo más frecuente en mujeres entre 30 y 50 años con comorbilidades psiquiátricas como depresión o ansiedad y otros procesos de dolor crónico. Es importante conocer el manejo de esta entidad. Por este motivo, el Grupo de Estudios de Cefaleas de la Sociedad Española de Neurología ha pretendido realizar este documento de consenso sobre esta patología.DesarrolloEsta guía ha sido redactada por un grupo de expertos a partir de la revisión de la evidencia científica publicada y estableciendo recomendaciones prácticas para su adecuado manejo y tratamiento. El tratamiento de la cefalea con uso excesivo de medicación tiene varios pilares fundamentales y suele ser complejo: información y educación sobre el desarrollo de la cefalea con uso excesivo de medicación, tratamiento preventivo, suspensión del fármaco de uso frecuente y tratamiento de deshabituación. Es importante el seguimiento de pacientes con riesgo de recurrencias.ConclusionesEsperamos que este documento resulte de utilidad y permita su aplicación práctica en la consulta diaria y que sirva para actualizar y mejorar el conocimiento del manejo de esta patología. (AU)


Introduction: Medication overuse headache is a secondary headache in which the regular or frequent use of analgesics can increase the frequency of the episodes, causing the transition from episodic to chronic headache. The prevalence of medication overuse headache is approximately 1-2%, with higher rates among women aged 30-50 years and with comorbid psychiatric disorders such as depression or anxiety, or other chronic pain disorders. It is important to be familiar with the management of this disease. To this end, the Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group has prepared a consensus document addressing this disorder.DevelopmentThese guidelines were prepared by a group of neurologists specialising in headache after a systematic literature review and provides consensus recommendations on the proper management and treatment of medication overuse headache. The treatment of medication overuse headache is often complex, and is based on 4 fundamental pillars: education and information about the condition, preventive treatment, discontinuation of the drug being overused, and treatment for withdrawal symptoms. Follow-up of patients at risk of recurrence is important.ConclusionsWe hope that this document will be useful in daily clinical practice and that it will update and improve understanding of medication overuse headache management. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Analgesics/adverse effects , Headache/drug therapy , Headache/therapy , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/drug therapy
5.
Neurologia (Engl Ed) ; 36(3): 229-240, 2021 Apr.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32917437

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Medication overuse headache is a secondary headache in which the regular or frequent use of analgesics can increase the frequency of the episodes, causing the transition from episodic to chronic headache. The prevalence of medication overuse headache is approximately 1-2%, with higher rates among women aged 30-50 years and with comorbid psychiatric disorders such as depression or anxiety, or other chronic pain disorders. It is important to be familiar with the management of this disease. To this end, the Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group has prepared a consensus document addressing this disorder. DEVELOPMENT: These guidelines were prepared by a group of neurologists specialising in headache after a systematic literature review and provides consensus recommendations on the proper management and treatment of medication overuse headache. The treatment of medication overuse headache is often complex, and is based on 4 fundamental pillars: education and information about the condition, preventive treatment, discontinuation of the drug being overused, and treatment for withdrawal symptoms. Follow-up of patients at risk of recurrence is important. CONCLUSIONS: We hope that this document will be useful in daily clinical practice and that it will update and improve understanding of medication overuse headache management.


Subject(s)
Headache Disorders, Secondary , Analgesics/adverse effects , Female , Headache/drug therapy , Headache Disorders/drug therapy , Headache Disorders, Secondary/epidemiology , Humans , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/drug therapy
6.
Neurología (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 35(8): 568-578, oct. 2020. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-202171

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: En el campo de las cefaleas, onabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA) tiene indicación bien establecida en la migraña crónica (MC). Además, en los últimos años su uso se está extendiendo a otras cefaleas primarias (migraña episódica de alta frecuencia, cefaleas trigémino-autonómicas, cefalea numular) y a la neuralgia del trigémino. Al ser una opción terapéutica que se va a ir incorporando de forma progresiva en el manejo de estas entidades, creemos que es necesario reflejar con un carácter eminentemente práctico cuáles son las posibles indicaciones de onabotA, más allá de la MC, así como su protocolo de administración, que diferirá en función del tipo de cefalea y/o neuralgia. DESARROLLO: A partir de una revisión de la bibliografía existente y de nuestra propia experiencia clínica, se ha elaborado este documento de consenso cuyo objetivo es servir de guía a aquellos profesionales que quieran aplicar estas técnicas en su actividad asistencial. En la primera parte se abordará el mecanismo de acción de onabotA y la razón de su utilización en diversas cefaleas distintas de la MC desde un punto de vista fisiopatológico y clínico. En la segunda parte se hará una revisión de la evidencia disponible y los estudios publicados en los últimos años. Para cada una de estas entidades, se añadirá una «recomendación de experto», basada en la propia experiencia clínica, que refleje el perfil de paciente que puede ser candidato a este tratamiento, las dosis y el protocolo de administración de onabotA. CONCLUSIÓN: El tratamiento con onabotA en entidades distintas a la MC debe ser siempre individualizado y se planteará en pacientes seleccionados que no hayan respondido a la terapia convencional


INTRODUCTION: In the field of headaches, onabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA) is well established as a treatment for chronic migraine (CM). In recent years, it has been used increasingly to treat other primary headaches (high-frequency episodic migraine, trigeminal-autonomic cephalalgias, nummular headache) and trigeminal neuralgia. As this treatment will progressively be incorporated in the management of these patients, we consider it necessary to reflect, with a fundamentally practical approach, on the possible indications of onabotA, beyond CM, as well as its administration protocol, which will differ according to the type of headache and/or neuralgia. DEVELOPMENT: This consensus document was drafted based on a thorough review and analysis of the existing literature and our own clinical experience. The aim of the document is to serve as guidelines for professionals administering onabotA treatment. The first part will address onabotA's mechanism of action, and reasons for its use in other types of headache, from a physiopathological and clinical perspective. In the second part, we will review the available evidence and studies published in recent years. We will add an "expert recommendation" based on our own clinical experience, showing the best patient profile for this treatment and the most adequate dose and administration protocol. CONCLUSION: Treatment with onabotA should always be individualised and considered in selected patients who have not responded to conventional therapy


Subject(s)
Humans , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/administration & dosage , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/pharmacology , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Headache/drug therapy , Trigeminal Neuralgia/drug therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Diagnosis, Differential , Guidelines as Topic , Headache/diagnosis , Trigeminal Neuralgia/diagnosis
7.
Neurologia (Engl Ed) ; 35(8): 568-578, 2020 Oct.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29169811

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In the field of headaches, onabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA) is well established as a treatment for chronic migraine (CM). In recent years, it has been used increasingly to treat other primary headaches (high-frequency episodic migraine, trigeminal-autonomic cephalalgias, nummular headache) and trigeminal neuralgia. As this treatment will progressively be incorporated in the management of these patients, we consider it necessary to reflect, with a fundamentally practical approach, on the possible indications of onabotA, beyond CM, as well as its administration protocol, which will differ according to the type of headache and/or neuralgia. DEVELOPMENT: This consensus document was drafted based on a thorough review and analysis of the existing literature and our own clinical experience. The aim of the document is to serve as guidelines for professionals administering onabotA treatment. The first part will address onabotA's mechanism of action, and reasons for its use in other types of headache, from a physiopathological and clinical perspective. In the second part, we will review the available evidence and studies published in recent years. We will add an "expert recommendation" based on our own clinical experience, showing the best patient profile for this treatment and the most adequate dose and administration protocol. CONCLUSION: Treatment with onabotA should always be individualised and considered in selected patients who have not responded to conventional therapy.


Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A/administration & dosage , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/pharmacology , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Headache/drug therapy , Trigeminal Neuralgia/drug therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Diagnosis, Differential , Guidelines as Topic , Headache/diagnosis , Humans , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Trigeminal Neuralgia/diagnosis
8.
Neurología (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 34(6): 408-417, jul.-ago. 2019. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-185458

ABSTRACT

OnabotulinumtoxinA ha demostrado ser eficaz como tratamiento preventivo en pacientes con migraña crónica (MC). El Grupo de Estudio de Cefalea de la Sociedad Española de Neurología ha considerado que sería de interés, a los 5 años de la aprobación en España de la onabotulinumtoxinA, reunir a un grupo de expertos en el tratamiento de pacientes con MC para elaborar con la evidencia actual y nuestra experiencia unas recomendaciones dirigidas a facilitar su uso en la práctica clínica diaria. Con este fin planteamos 12 preguntas que nos hacemos como médicos y que también nos realizan nuestros pacientes. Cada autor ha contestado una pregunta y luego el documento ha sido revisado por todos. Esperamos que esta revisión constituya una herramienta práctica para ayudar a los neurólogos que tratan a pacientes con MC


OnabotulinumtoxinA has been demonstrated to be effective as a preventive treatment in patients with chronic migraine (CM). Five years after the approval of onabotulinumtoxinA in Spain, the Headache Study Group of the Spanish Society of Neurology considered it worthwhile to gather a group of experts in treating patients with CM in order to draw up, based on current evidence and our own experience, a series of guidelines aimed at facilitating the use of the drug in daily clinical practice. For this purpose, we posed 12 questions that we ask ourselves as doctors, and which we are also asked by our patients. Each author responded to one question, and the document was then reviewed by everyone. We hope that this review will constitute a practical tool to help neurologists treating patients with CM


Subject(s)
Humans , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/pharmacology , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Guidelines as Topic/standards , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Neurologists
9.
Neurologia (Engl Ed) ; 2019 Jul 17.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31326215

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: It has been observed in recent years that levels of such molecules as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and, to a lesser extent, the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide are elevated during migraine attacks and in chronic migraine, both in the cerebrospinal fluid and in the serum. Pharmacological reduction of these proteins is clinically significant, with an improvement in patients' migraines. It therefore seems logical that one of the main lines of migraine research should be based on the role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of this entity. DEVELOPMENT: The Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group decided to draft this document in order to address the evidence on such important issues as the role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of migraine and the mechanism of action of monoclonal antibodies and gepants; and to critically analyse the results of different studies and the profile of patients eligible for treatment with monoclonal antibodies, and the impact in terms of pharmacoeconomics. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical development of gepants, which are CGRP antagonists, for the acute treatment of migraine attacks, and CGRP ligand and receptor monoclonal antibodies offer promising results for these patients.

10.
Neurologia (Engl Ed) ; 34(6): 408-417, 2019.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29169810

ABSTRACT

OnabotulinumtoxinA has been demonstrated to be effective as a preventive treatment in patients with chronic migraine (CM). Five years after the approval of onabotulinumtoxinA in Spain, the Headache Study Group of the Spanish Society of Neurology considered it worthwhile to gather a group of experts in treating patients with CM in order to draw up, based on current evidence and our own experience, a series of guidelines aimed at facilitating the use of the drug in daily clinical practice. For this purpose, we posed 12 questions that we ask ourselves as doctors, and which we are also asked by our patients. Each author responded to one question, and the document was then reviewed by everyone. We hope that this review will constitute a practical tool to help neurologists treating patients with CM.


Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A/pharmacology , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Guidelines as Topic/standards , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Humans , Neurologists , Spain
12.
Eur J Neurol ; 25(2): 411-416, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29171146

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: OnabotulinumtoxinA is a treatment specifically approved for the prophylaxis of chronic migraine in adults. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of OnabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine after 1 year of treatment in a real-life setting and to identify clinical predictors of outcome. METHODS: We designed a prospective multicentre study performed in 13 hospitals in Spain. Patients underwent a complete medical history and examination. They were treated with OnabotulinumtoxinA every 12 weeks for 1 year. Data about outcome, adverse events, abortive medication use, emergency room use and disability were collected at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 725 subjects completed the study. At 12 months, 79.3% showed >50% reduction in number of headaches per month and 94.9% reported no adverse events. Unilaterality of pain, fewer days of disability per month and milder headache at baseline were correlated with good outcome. Duration of disease <12 months increased the chances of response to treatment with OnabotulinumtoxinA (odds ratio, 1.470; 95% confidence interval, 1.123-2.174; P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the effectiveness of treatment with OnabotulinumtoxinA after 1 year of treatment. The chances of a good outcome may be increased by starting treatment in the first 12 months after chronic migraine diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A/pharmacology , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Neuromuscular Agents/pharmacology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Adult , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/administration & dosage , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuromuscular Agents/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies
13.
Eur J Neurol ; 23(10): 1572-9, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27418418

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chronic periodontitis (ChP) and lacunar infarct (LI) are two common diseases amongst the elderly. Although several studies have shown an association between ischaemic stroke and ChP, little is known about the relationship between ChP and LI. The study aims to investigate whether ChP is associated with the presence of lacunar stroke. METHODS: An age- and gender-matched case-control study of 62 cases (subjects diagnosed with LI) and 60 controls is reported. Clinical periodontal measures (probing pocket depth, recession, clinical attachment level, full mouth plaque score and full mouth gingival bleeding on probing score) were assessed, and associated risk factors for periodontitis and lacunar stroke were ascertained by means of a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: Chronic periodontitis showed a strong association with LI after adjusting for common vascular risk factors (odds ratio 4.20; 95% confidence interval 1.81-10.20; P = 0.001). Likewise, severe ChP and LI also tended to be significantly associated, independent of other vascular covariates (odds ratio 3.53; 95% confidence interval 1.07-12.77; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic periodontitis was independently associated with the presence of LI after adjusting for well-known vascular risk factors for lacunar stroke. Further observational studies are necessary to investigate the pathophysiological mechanisms that can explain this relationship.


Subject(s)
Chronic Periodontitis/epidemiology , Stroke, Lacunar/epidemiology , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Chronic Periodontitis/diagnosis , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Spain/epidemiology , Stroke, Lacunar/diagnosis
14.
Rev Neurol ; 61 Suppl 1: S9-S12, 2015.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26337645

ABSTRACT

Headache is the most common reason for visiting in neurology. Almost a third of all patients surveyed in this specialty visit for this reason. The gradual increase in the complexity of the care afforded to patients with headaches requires neurologists to become more specialised and leads to the creation of specialised units where this more complex care can be implemented. The heads of the neurology department are responsible for structuring and coordinating the different care units. This article shows the findings of a survey carried out on a group of heads of neurology departments in order to determine the current state of headache units, that is, their opinion regarding the creation, functioning and development of headache units in Spanish hospitals, and the parameters of their efficacy and effectiveness.


TITLE: Creacion y potenciacion de las unidades de cefalea: vision de los neurologos y jefes de servicio de neurologia.La cefalea constituye el motivo de consulta mas frecuente en neurologia. Casi la tercera parte de pacientes consultados en esta especialidad lo hace por este motivo. El gradual incremento en la complejidad de asistencia a pacientes con cefalea hace necesaria una mayor especializacion por parte de los neurologos y propicia la creacion de unidades especializadas donde desarrollar esta actividad asistencial mas compleja. La estructuracion y coordinacion de las distintas unidades asistenciales corresponde a los jefes de servicio de neurologia. En este articulo se recogen los resultados de una encuesta realizado a un grupo de jefes de servicio de neurologia para conocer el estado actual de las unidades de cefalea: su opinion sobre la creacion, funcion y desarrollo de unidades de cefalea en los hospitales españoles, y los parametros de eficacia y eficiencia de estas.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Headache/therapy , Health Services Needs and Demand , Hospital Administrators/psychology , Hospital Units , Neurology/organization & administration , Physicians/psychology , Acetylcholine Release Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Electric Stimulation Therapy , Headache/drug therapy , Hospital Departments/organization & administration , Hospital Units/organization & administration , Hospital Units/supply & distribution , Humans , Nerve Block , Surveys and Questionnaires
16.
Rev Neurol ; 56(3): 143-51, 2013 Feb 01.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23359075

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: This study was aimed determining the effectiveness, tolerance and satisfaction of patients with migraine as regards different triptans, according to the characteristics of their attacks. At the same time it sought to establish a predictive model that can be used to recommend one or another, depending on those characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective observation-based study conducted in headache units in a number of different centres. Patients included in the study were those with migraine who used the same triptan to treat their attacks. Data concerning preference, effectiveness, speed and tolerance were analysed. RESULTS: The analysis included 160 patients (88 females), with a mean age of 42.92 years. The most commonly used triptans were eletriptan, almotriptan and rizatriptan. Both patients and doctors reported a high degree of satisfaction (88% and 65%) with the triptan that was used. In the surveys on preference, patients preferred their current triptan to the previous one (83%) or to non-specific drugs. The overall score on a visual analogue scale was above 7 for all the triptans, without any differences from one to another. On analysing the use of a particular triptan depending on the characteristics of the attacks, no statistically significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: In this selected group of patients, triptans are a treatment that patients claim to be very satisfied with. Although there are no overall differences in the scores among different triptans, the fact that certain triptans are used more by patients after previous experiences with others suggests that they are more effective. We did not find any parameter that predicts the use of a particular triptan.


Subject(s)
Patient Satisfaction , Tryptamines/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Evaluation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Pain Measurement , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
17.
J Thromb Haemost ; 8(7): 1567-74, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20456746

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY BACKGROUND: Growth factors (GF) such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) have been associated with greater efficacy of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in experimental studies. OBJECTIVES: To study the association of these GF with arterial recanalization and clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with tPA. METHODS: We prospectively studied 79 patients with ischemic stroke attributable to MCA occlusion treated with i.v. tPA within the first 3 h from onset of symptoms. Continuous transcranial color-coded sonography (TCCS) was performed during the first 2 h after tPA bolus to assess early MCA recanalization. Hemorrhagic transformation (HT) was classified according to ECASS II definitions. Good functional outcome was defined as a Rankin scale score of 0-2 at 90 days. GF levels were determined by ELISA. RESULTS: Mean serum levels of VEGF, G-CSF and Ang-1 at baseline were significantly higher in patients with early MCA recanalization (n = 30) (all P < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, serum levels of VEGF (OR, 1.03), G-CSF (OR, 1.02) and Ang-1 (OR, 1.07) were independently associated with early MCA recanalization (all P < 0.0001). On the other hand, patients with parenchymal hematoma (PH) (n = 20) showed higher levels of Ang-1 (P < 0.0001). Ang-1 (OR, 1.12; P < 0.0001) was independently associated with PH, whereas patients with good outcome (n = 38) had higher levels of G-CSF (P < 0.0001). G-CSF was independently associated with good outcome (OR, 1.12; P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that GF may enhance arterial recanalization in patients with ischemic stroke treated with t-PA, although they might increase the HT.


Subject(s)
Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/blood , Stroke/drug therapy , Tissue Plasminogen Activator/pharmacology , Aged , Angiopoietin-1/agonists , Angiopoietin-1/blood , Female , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/agonists , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/blood , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Humans , Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery/drug therapy , Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/agonists , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Tissue Plasminogen Activator/administration & dosage , Tissue Plasminogen Activator/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/agonists , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/blood
18.
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet ; 153B(1): 177-84, 2010 Jan 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19455600

ABSTRACT

In order to evaluate the contribution of 19 serotonin-related genes to the susceptibility to migraine in a Spanish population we performed a case-control association study of 122 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), selected according to genetic coverage parameters, in 528 migraine patients -308 with migraine without aura (MO) and 220 with migraine with aura (MA)- and 528 sex-matched migraine-free controls. The single-marker analysis identified nominal associations with the migraine phenotype or with the MO or MA subtypes. The multiple-marker analysis revealed risk haplotypes in three genes that remained significantly associated with migraine after correction by permutations. Two-marker risk haplotypes were identified in the HTR2B (rs16827801T-rs10194776G) and MAOA (rs3027400G-rs2072743C) genes conferring susceptibility to MO, and a four-marker haplotype in DDC was specific of MA (rs2329340A-rs11974297C-rs2044859T-rs11761683G). The present study supports the involvement of HTR2B and MAOA genes in the genetic predisposition to MO, while DDC might confer susceptibility to MA. These results suggest a differential involvement of serotonin-related genes in the genetic background of MO and MA.


Subject(s)
Genome-Wide Association Study , Migraine Disorders/genetics , Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2B/genetics , Serotonin/genetics , Case-Control Studies , Dopa Decarboxylase/genetics , Epistasis, Genetic , Humans , Monoamine Oxidase/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Spain
19.
Psychol Med ; 39(7): 1201-9, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19356259

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Depression is a frequent mood disorder that affects around 33% of stroke patients and has been associated with both poorer outcome and increased mortality. Our aim was to test the possible association between inflammatory and neurotrophic molecular markers and the development of post-stroke depression. METHOD: We studied 134 patients with a first episode of ischemic stroke without previous history of depression or speech disorders. We screened for the existence of major depression symptoms in accordance with DSM-IV criteria and a Yesavage Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) score >11 at discharge and 1 month after stroke. At these times, serum levels of molecular markers of inflammation [interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6, intracellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, leptin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)] and neurotrophic factors [brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)] were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (18.7%) were diagnosed as having major depression at discharge. Out of 104 patients who completed the follow-up period, 23 were depressed at 1 month (22.1%). Patients with major depression showed higher serum leptin levels at discharge [43.4 (23.4-60.2) v. 6.4 (3.7-16.8) ng/ml, p<0.001] and at 1 month after stroke [46.2 (34.0-117.7) v. 6.4 (3.4-12.2) ng/ml, p<0.001). Serum levels of leptin >20.7 ng/ml were independently associated with post-stroke depression [odds ratio (OR) 16.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.2-51.5, p<0.0001]. Leptin levels were even higher in the eight patients who developed depression after discharge [114.6 (87.6-120.2) v. 7.2 (3.6-13.6) ng/ml, p<0.0001]. CONCLUSIONS: Serum leptin levels at discharge are found to be associated with post-stroke depression and may predict its development during the next month.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Infarction/blood , Cerebral Infarction/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/blood , Leptin/blood , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers/blood , Cerebral Infarction/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Inflammation Mediators/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Statistics as Topic , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
20.
Eur J Neurol ; 16(6): 684-90, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19236459

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Brachial arterial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) reflects endothelium-dependent vasodilation function. FMD is diminished in patients with endothelial dysfunction (ED). Our aim was to investigate the relationship between FMD and outcome for patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: We measured FMD in 120 consecutive patients (58.3% male, median age 73 years) with acute ischemic stroke within the first 48 h of onset of the stroke, using high-resolution ultrasonography. FMD was calculated as the relationship between basal diameter of the brachial artery before (d(1)) and after (d(2)) transient vascular occlusion (300 mmHg for 4 min) was measured using a sphygmomanometer (FMD = d(2) - d(1)/d(1) x 100). Poor outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale at 3 months >2. FMD was categorized according to ROC analysis and we defined ED as FMD < or = 4.5%. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (27.5%) had ED. Median % FMD was 9.12 (7.48). FMD negatively correlated to stroke severity (P = 0.045). Median FMD was significantly lower [4.5 (2.3, 10.3) vs. 9.4 (5.6, 15.1), P = 0.003] for patients with poor outcome (n = 38). The adjusted odds ratio of poor outcome for FMD < or = 4.5% was 3.03 (95% CI, 1.09-27.3). CONCLUSIONS: Impaired FMD in patients with acute ischemic stroke is associated with poor outcome.


Subject(s)
Brachial Artery/diagnostic imaging , Brachial Artery/physiopathology , Brain Ischemia/diagnosis , Brain Ischemia/physiopathology , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/physiopathology , Acute Disease , Aged , Blood Pressure/physiology , Cerebrovascular Circulation , Endothelial Cells/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Regional Blood Flow/physiology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ultrasonography , Vasodilation/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...