Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Prosthodont Res ; 66(2): 326-332, 2022 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34305085

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: High-definition cone-beam computed tomography (HD-CBCT) offers superior image quality at the cost of higher radiation dose compared to low-dose CBCT (LD-CBCT). The aim of this study was to investigate whether peri-implant bone lesions can be accurately quantified using LD-CBCT, even when including the influence of surrounding tissues. METHODS: Twelve titanium implants restored with all-ceramic crowns were placed in bovine bone, and peri-implant lesions were prepared. Radiographic imaging was performed using IR (intraoral radiography), HD-CBCT and LD-CBCT. To simulate the in-vivo situation, the samples were placed inside a dry human mandible, and a second LD-CBCT imaging was performed (LD-CBCT*). The datasets were presented to four observers in random order. Maximum lesion depth and width were measured in a standardized mesiodistal slice in IR, HD-CBCT, LD-CBCT, and LD-CBCT*. Mean lesion depth and width measurements for each sample in HD-CBCT served as reference. RESULTS: Interrater agreement was slight for depth and excellent for width in HD-CBCT and both LD modes. For all observers, measurement deviations from HD-CBCT were below 0.3 mm in the LD protocols (LD-CBCT depth: 0.22 ± 0.17 mm, width: 0.22 ± 0.13 mm; LD-CBCT* depth: 0.24 ± 0.23 mm, width: 0.25 ± 0.21 mm) and at 0.4 mm in IR. CONCLUSION: Absolute differences between LD-CBCT and HD-CBCT are small, although surrounding tissues decrease LD-CBCT image quality. Within the limitations of an in-vitro trial, LD-CBCT may become an adequate imaging modality for monitoring peri-implant lesions at a substantially decreased radiation dose.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss , Dental Implants , Animals , Cattle , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Humans , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Titanium
2.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 32(7): 863-870, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33949012

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the long-term survival of dental implants placed in patients with and without a history of implant failure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Within a retrospective analysis, an experimental group was selected consisting of 59 patients with 137 implants placed after previous failure. The control group included 1,072 patients with 2,664 implants without previous failure. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to describe the group-specific long-term implant survival. Mixed-effects Cox regression models were applied to examine the effects of patient- and site-specific risk factors. To take multiple implants into account, a random intercept model was applied. RESULTS: During the observation period of up to 15 years, 11 implants (8%) failed in the experimental group and 74 implants (2.5%) in the control group (p < .001). Five-year cumulative survival was 96.8% (95% CI 0.96-0.98) in the control group and 91.5% (95% CI 0.86-0.97) in the experimental group. The variables group assignment and simultaneous augmentation had a significant effect on survival, but this effect was lost in the random intercept model. The effect of implant location remained, whereby the risk of failure was five times lower for mandible implants, irrespective of group (p = .013; 95% CI 0.103-0.767; HR: 0.281). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term implant survival was lower in the experimental group than in the control group. The effect of previous failure was negligible. However, a patient-specific "clustering effect" was observed. Irrespective of previous implant failure, the risk of long-term failure is two times higher for maxillary implants than for mandibular implants.


Subject(s)
Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Dental Implants , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported , Dental Restoration Failure , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Dent ; 102: 103458, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32866552

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for the non-invasive detection of caries adjacent to ceramic materials. METHODS: Disks made from five ceramic materials (hybrid ceramic, feldspathic ceramic, zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate, lithium disilicate, and high-translucent zirconia) were ground to the recommended material thickness for single crown restorations and laminated with a 100 µm thick layer of one of three adhesive cements. The disks were fixed to extracted human molars with or without carious lesions of one of three standardized sizes. A total of 240 stacks of cross-sectional scans obtained using an 870-nm SD-OCT with enhanced depth imaging (EDI) were presented to five raters. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by rating the teeth beneath the cemented material as carious or healthy. RESULTS: Carious samples were distinguished from sound teeth with high diagnostic accuracy, even for early stage caries. Sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) pooled over all raters and all materials were 0.9 and 0.97, respectively. When analyzing the effect of the ceramic and cement materials on detection rates, high SE and SP values of >0.96 and >0.91, respectively, were recorded for lithium disilicate, zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate, and high-translucent zirconia irrespective of the cement type. For hybrid and feldspathic ceramics, the cement material was found to have a significant effect on caries detection. CONCLUSIONS: Given its high diagnostic accuracy, 870-nm SD-OCT with EDI might be useful for the detection of caries beneath restorative materials. The effect of the prescribed ceramic and cement material on optical penetration depth is substantial.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Ceramics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dental Caries/diagnostic imaging , Dental Caries Susceptibility , Dental Porcelain , Humans , Materials Testing , Zirconium
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...