Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 50(6): 2234-6, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16723593

ABSTRACT

We have characterized a new clinical strain of Trichophyton rubrum highly resistant to terbinafine but exhibiting normal susceptibility to drugs with other mechanisms of action. Resistance to terbinafine in this strain is caused by a missense mutation in the squalene epoxidase gene leading to the amino acid substitution F397L.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Fungal/genetics , Naphthalenes/pharmacology , Trichophyton/drug effects , Trichophyton/metabolism , Amino Acid Substitution , Base Sequence , Cloning, Molecular , Colony Count, Microbial , Ergosterol/biosynthesis , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Molecular Sequence Data , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Squalene Monooxygenase/chemistry , Squalene Monooxygenase/metabolism , Terbinafine , Trichophyton/isolation & purification
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 49(7): 2840-4, 2005 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15980358

ABSTRACT

There has only been one clinically confirmed case of terbinafine resistance in dermatophytes, where six sequential Trichophyton rubrum isolates from the same patient were found to be resistant to terbinafine and cross-resistant to other squalene epoxidase (SE) inhibitors. Microsomal SE activity from these resistant isolates was insensitive to terbinafine, suggesting a target-based mechanism of resistance (B. Favre, M. Ghannoum, and N. S. Ryder, Med. Mycol. 42:525-529, 2004). In this study, we have characterized at the molecular level the cause of the resistant phenotype of these clinical isolates. Cloning and sequencing of the SE gene and cDNA from T. rubrum revealed the presence of an intron in the gene and an open reading frame encoding a protein of 489 residues, with an equivalent similarity (57%) to both yeast and mammalian SEs. The nucleotide sequences of SE from two terbinafine-susceptible strains were identical whereas those of terbinafine-resistant strains, serially isolated from the same patient, each contained the same single missense introducing the amino acid substitution L393F. Introduction of the corresponding substitution in the Candida albicans SE gene (L398F) and expression of this gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae conferred a resistant phenotype to the transformants when compared to those expressing the wild-type sequence. Terbinafine resistance in these T. rubrum clinical isolates appears to be due to a single amino acid substitution in SE.


Subject(s)
Amino Acid Substitution , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Fungal/genetics , Naphthalenes/pharmacology , Oxygenases/genetics , Trichophyton/drug effects , Amino Acid Sequence , Cloning, Molecular , Fungal Proteins/genetics , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Molecular Sequence Data , Oxygenases/chemistry , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Squalene Monooxygenase , Terbinafine
3.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 47(1): 82-6, 2003 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12499173

ABSTRACT

The in vitro antifungal susceptibilities of six clinical Trichophyton rubrum isolates obtained sequentially from a single onychomycosis patient who failed oral terbinafine therapy (250 mg/day for 24 weeks) were determined by broth microdilution and macrodilution methodologies. Strain relatedness was examined by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analyses. Data obtained from both broth micro- and macrodilution assays were in agreement and revealed that the six clinical isolates had greatly reduced susceptibilities to terbinafine. The MICs of terbinafine for these strains were >4 microg/ml, whereas they were <0.0002 microg/ml for the susceptible reference strains. Consistent with these findings, the minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) of terbinafine for all six strains were >128 microg/ml, whereas they were 0.0002 microg/ml for the reference strain. The MIC of terbinafine for the baseline strain (cultured at the initial screening visit and before therapy was started) was already 4,000-fold higher than normal, suggesting that this is a case of primary resistance to terbinafine. The results obtained by the broth macrodilution procedure revealed that the terbinafine MICs and MFCs for sequential isolates apparently increased during the course of therapy. RAPD analyses did not reveal any differences between the isolates. The terbinafine-resistant isolates exhibited normal susceptibilities to clinically available antimycotics including itraconazole, fluconazole, and griseofulvin. However, these isolates were fully cross resistant to several other known squalene epoxidase inhibitors, including naftifine, butenafine, tolnaftate, and tolciclate, suggesting a target-specific mechanism of resistance. This is the first confirmed report of terbinafine resistance in dermatophytes.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Naphthalenes/pharmacology , Trichophyton/drug effects , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Terbinafine , Trichophyton/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...