Doppler-based renal resistance index for the detection of acute kidney injury and the non-invasive evaluation of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

AIMS: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a strong but rather late predictor of mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Early clinically useful markers for the detection of AKI and prediction of outcome are needed in order to control and improve management of periprocedural complications after TAVI. The aim of our study was to assess the predictive value of the Doppler-based renal resistance index (RRI), which correlates inversely with effective renal blood flow and creatinine clearance, for AKI in patients undergoing TAVI and to evaluate its association with paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR). METHODS AND RESULTS: TAVI was performed with the Medtronic CoreValve prosthesis in 132 consecutive high-risk patients (mean logistic EuroSCORE: 30.3±18.2%). RRI, serum creatinine and cystatin C level were determined before, and 4 hrs, 24 hrs, 48 hrs, 72 hrs, and 7 days after TAVI. AKI occurred in 32/132 patients (24.2%). While serum creatinine and cystatin C levels decreased at first after TAVI (also in most patients developing AKI), the RRI increased significantly immediately after the procedure from 0.79±0.09 to 0.87±0.12 in patients developing AKI (p=0.003). A RRI >0.85 predicted post-interventional AKI with a sensitivity of 58% and specificity of 86%, and was superior to the serum creatinine level (p<0.001). In addition, an elevated RRI was significantly related to haemodynamic changes after TAVI and was associated with the occurrence of moderate/severe PAR (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of the Doppler-based RRI predicts risk for AKI and increased mortality rates at an early post-procedural time point and is related to the occurrence of more-than-mild paravalvular aortic regurgitation after TAVI.

Aortic regurgitation index defines severity of peri-prosthetic regurgitation and predicts outcome in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to provide a simple, reproducible, and point-of-care assessment of peri-prosthetic aortic regurgitation (periAR) during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and to decipher the impact of this peri-procedural parameter on outcome. BACKGROUND: Because periAR after TAVI might be associated with adverse outcome, precise quantification of periAR is of paramount importance but remains technically challenging. METHODS: The severity of periAR was prospectively evaluated in 146 patients treated with the Medtronic CoreValve (Minneapolis, Minnesota) prosthesis by echocardiography, angiography, and measurement of the aortic regurgitation (AR) index, which is calculated as ratio of the gradient between diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) to systolic blood pressure (SBP): [(DBP - LVEDP)/SBP] × 100. RESULTS: After TAVI, 53 patients (36.3%) showed no signs of periAR and 71 patients (48.6%) showed only mild periAR, whereas 18 patients (12.3%) and 4 patients (2.7%) suffered from moderate and severe periAR, respectively. The AR index decreased stepwise from 31.7 ± 10.4 in patients without periAR, to 28.0 ± 8.5 with mild periAR, 19.6 ± 7.6 with moderate periAR, and 7.6 ± 2.6 with severe periAR (p < 0.001), respectively. Patients with AR index <25 had a significantly increased 1-year mortality risk compared with patients with AR index ≥25 (46.0% vs. 16.7%; p < 0.001). The AR index provided additional prognostic information beyond the echocardiographically assessed severity of periAR and independently predicted 1-year mortality (hazard ratio: 2.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.3 to 6.4; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of the AR index allows a precise judgment of periAR, independently predicts 1-year mortality after TAVI, and provides additional prognostic information that is complementary to the echocardiographically assessed severity of periAR.