Sexualized substance use among gbMSM: Their perspectives on their intervention needs and counsellor competencies.

INTRODUCTION: Treatments for problematic substance use by gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM) in sexualized contexts must be adapted to take sociocultural aspects of these sexual practices into account. When treatment programs factor in sexuality, they most commonly address it from a biological perspective (STTBIs, HIV). This article sets out to identify intervention needs related to sexualized substance use (SSU) from the perspective of gbMSM, taking into consideration different dimensions of sexuality to offer more effective support. METHODS: Twenty adult gbMSM, each of whom had previously participated in addiction-related treatment programs, took part in this study. We recruited through medical clinics, community organizations, social media advertising and word of mouth. Through one-on-one semi-structured interviews, participants shared their perspectives on the treatment they had received, how their sexuality had been addressed during treatment, and their perceptions of their treatment-related needs and requirements. The study analyzed and interpreted the data gathered during these interviews using a conceptual framework of sexual health combined with The Competencies, a model for addiction counselling training. RESULTS: When the study asked participants what they would consider beneficial in terms of SSU-related treatment, they identified certain key competencies. These can be broken down into three categories - knowledge, skills and attitudes - that, together, participants perceived as critical to the development of adequate programs and services. While participants reported addiction-related knowledge was important, so too was an understanding of sexuality (e.g., sexual practices, gbMSM communities, sociocultural norms). With regard to attitudes, the study identified respect, non-judgment, acceptance and empathy as themes for most participants. Lastly, the desired skills were those permitting counsellors and other treatment providers to better align programs and services with each individual's singular reality within the context of their substance use. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that, to provide treatment programs adapted to the needs of gbMSM in a context of SSU, knowledge must be consolidated and new skills developed. Furthermore, both knowledge and skills need to be placed within an overarching perspective of cultural humility. Overall, improving these various competencies should improve the continuum of care in addiction treatment.

Loss of treatment benefit when heroin-assisted treatment is stopped after 12 months.

PURPOSE: In 2013, during a recent heroin-assisted treatment trial, participants in heroin-assisted treatment (HAT) decreased significantly more their street heroin use than participants in oral methadone treatment. After the trial, HAT was discontinued. To examine whether the treatment benefits were sustained three months after the trial, the use of street heroin by the participants was analyzed in a follow-up study. RESULTS: At the follow-up assessment, street heroin use increased in the experimental group. The two groups no longer showed a significant difference (p=0.55) in the level of street heroin use. CONCLUSION: A predetermined and forced end of HAT was followed by a significant increase in the level of street level use.

Efficacy of Heroin-assisted Treatment In Belgium: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Heroin-assisted treatment (HAT) can improve the condition of heroin addicts still using street heroin after a methadone treatment. In Belgium, a new trial compared the efficacy of a HAT to existing methadone maintenance treatment. METHODS: In this randomised controlled trial, HAT was limited to 12 months. Participants were assessed every 3 months. They were responders if they showed improvement on the level of street heroin use, health or criminal involvement. RESULTS: 74 participants were randomised in the trial. The experimental group (n = 36) counted 30% of responders more than the control group (n = 38) at each assessment point (p < 0.05), except at 12 months where the difference (11%) was no longer significant (p = 0.35). Still, after 12 months, participants in the experimental group reported significantly greater improvements (p < 0.05) than the control group on the level of street heroin use and on the level of physical and mental health. Both groups reported significantly less criminal acts after 12 months (p < 0.001), but with no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This trial confirms the short-term efficacy of HAT for severe heroin addicts, who already failed methadone treatment.