Prevention of bone loss with risedronate in breast cancer survivors: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

UNLABELLED: In postmenopausal women with low bone mass and hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer on an aromatase inhibitor, risedronate maintained skeletal health assessed by bone density and turnover markers. Women with the greatest decreases in bone turnover markers at 12 months had the greatest increases in bone density at 24 months. INTRODUCTION: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs), adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, are associated with bone loss and fractures. Our objectives were to determine if (1) oral bisphosphonate therapy can prevent bone loss in women on an AI and (2) early changes in bone turnover markers (BTM) can predict later changes in bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS: We conducted a 2-year double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial in 109 postmenopausal women with low bone mass on an AI (anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane) for hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. Participants were randomized to once weekly risedronate 35 mg or placebo, and all received calcium plus vitamin D. The main outcome measures included BMD, BTM [carboxy-terminal collagen crosslinks (CTX) and N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen (P1NP)], and safety. RESULTS: Eighty-seven percent completed 24 months. BMD increased more in the active treatment group compared to placebo with an adjusted difference at 24 months of 3.9 ± 0.7 percentage points at the spine and 3.2 ± 0.5 percentage points at the hip (both p < 0.05). The adjusted difference between the active treatment and placebo groups were 0.09 ± 0.04 nmol/LBCE for CTX and 23.3 ± 4.8 µg/mL for P1NP (both p < 0.05). Women with greater 12-month decreases in CTX and P1NP in the active treatment group had a greater 24-month increase in spinal BMD (p < 0.05). The oral therapy was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: In postmenopausal women with low bone mass and breast cancer on an AI, the oral bisphosphonate risedronate maintained skeletal health.

The impact of an aromatase inhibitor on body composition and gonadal hormone levels in women with breast cancer.

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have become the standard adjuvant therapy of postmenopausal breast cancer survivors. AIs induce a reduction of bioavailable estrogens by inhibiting aromatase, which would be expected to induce alterations in body composition, more extensive than induced by menopause. The objectives are to examine the impact of AIs on (1) DXA-scan derived body composition and (2) gonadal hormone levels. This is a sub-analysis of a 2-year double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of 82 women with nonmetastatic breast cancer, newly menopausal following chemotherapy, who were randomized to risedronate (35 mg once weekly) versus placebo, and stratified for their usage of AI versus no AI. Outcomes included DXA-scan derived body composition and gonadal hormone levels. As a group, total body mass increased in women over 24 months. Women on AIs gained a significant amount of lean body mass compared to baseline as well as to no-AI users (P < 0.05). Women not on an AI gained total body fat compared to baseline and AI users (P < 0.05). Free testosterone significantly increased and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) significantly decreased in women on AIs compared to no AIs at 24 months (P < 0.01) while total estradiol and testosterone levels remained stable. Independent of AI usage, chemotherapy-induced postmenopausal breast cancer patients demonstrated an increase of total body mass. AI users demonstrated maintenance of total body fat, an increase in lean body mass and free testosterone levels, and a decrease in SHBG levels compared to no-AI users. The mechanisms and implications of these changes need to be studied further.

Centralized medical monitoring in phase III clinical trials: the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) experience.

BACKGROUND: There is a need for data quality assurance procedures in phase III cancer trials. At the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) 'real-time' systems have been developed for quality assurance and study monitoring: (1) manual review and triage of data forms by data managers at the time of submission; (2) computerized edit checking of all submitted data forms; (3) systematic review of eligibility, treatment compliance and toxicity in the first 100 patients of a new protocol; (4) prospective centralized medical review of all reported serious adverse events, treatment failures, second primary cancers and deaths; (5) quarterly review and approval of study summary data files by project statistician; and (6) on-site auditing. PURPOSE: To assess the utility of an additional final comprehensive review of all patient records to confirm eligibility, disease status and vital status prior to manuscript submission. METHODS: Four phase III NSABP studies, which had been monitored using the triage-based quality assurance program described above, were selected for analysis (n = 7972). Charts for 5965 patients were identified that had not been previously medically reviewed for protocol events of recurrence, second primary cancer or death. Submitted source documents and data forms of these 5965 NSABP patient records underwent medical review to verify patient eligibility, disease status and vital status. RESULTS: This final comprehensive review found no additional treatment failures or deaths, identified seven additional cases of ineligibility, was time-intensive requiring enormous use of expensive resources, and was therefore judged not to add significantly to the integrity of the database. LIMITATIONS: Our findings are influenced by the procedures the NSABP employs for quality assurance and study monitoring for Phase III clinical trials and may have limited generalizability to other settings. CONCLUSION: In the presence of multiple quality assurance and data monitoring systems, the rare discrepancies found between the data forms and source documentation does not support the routine use of a final comprehensive chart review for phase III trials at the NSABP Biostatistical Center.

Complete 5-year follow-up of a prospective phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Conclusive evidence supporting the routine use of multimodality therapy in esophageal cancer is lacking. However, since long-term survival after esophagectomy alone is unusual, clinical trials designed to identify effective therapeutic regimens are essential. We report here the 5-year results of a phase II induction chemoradiotherapy trial. METHODS: From August 1991 to January 1995, 44 patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma were treated with a combination of 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and interferon-alpha with concurrent external beam radiotherapy. RESULTS: Forty-one (93%) patients completed chemoradiotherapy, with most toxic events recorded as grade I or II. Curative resection (all gross tumor removed) was achieved in 36 of 37 surgical explorations, with 10 tumors demonstrating complete pathologic response and 23 showing partial pathologic response. Median follow-up for survivors was 75 months (range, 60-100 months). Five-year survival for all patients was 32%, with a median survival of 28 months. Five-year disease-free survival in patients with curative resection was 36% (median, 26 months) and overall survival was 39% (median, 34 months). Five-year survival for patients with curative resection whose disease responded to chemoradiotherapy was 42% (median overall survival, 36 months). Local-regional recurrence alone occurred in 3 patients, distant failure alone in 12 patients, and combined local-regional and distant failure in 2 patients. A Cox proportional hazards model identified both pathologic tumor and nodal stage as independent predictors of disease-free survival. Fourteen patients (32%) were 5-year survivors; 1 of these patients later experienced disease recurrence and died. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy can result in a long-term and durable disease-free state. Only large, multi-institutional phase III trials can determine whether combined modality therapy is superior to resection alone.

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery for locally advanced distal rectal adenocarcinoma: pathologic findings and clinical implications.

PURPOSE: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgical resection has been the preferred treatment for patients presenting with locally advanced distal rectal carcinoma at our institutions. We postulated that chemoradiotherapy-induced pathologic response of the primary tumor would identify which patients would be candidates for local excision as definitive surgical therapy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 60 patients with palpable, locally advanced, distal rectal adenocarcinomas treated from 1995 to 2000 was performed. All patients received preoperative chemoradiotherapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil (325 mg/m(2)) and leucovorin (20 mg/m(2)) by bolus infusion on Days 1 through 5 and 29 through 33 delivered concurrently with at least 45.0 to 50.4 Gy of pelvic radiation, followed six to eight weeks later by radical surgery and then adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Among 60 patients (20 females) there was a mean age of 58.7 (28-84) years. Clinical staging was as follows: Stage II, 14 patients (23 percent); Stage III, 35 patients (58 percent); and Stage IV, 11 patients (18 percent). Pathologic examination revealed that negative margins were obtained in 58 patients (97 percent). Downstaging to T0-2N0 was achieved in 17 patients (28 percent), with five (8 percent) achieving a pathologically complete response. Lymph nodes were positive in 24 patients (40 percent) despite chemoradiotherapy. Pathologic node positivity was found in 0 of 5 pT0 patients, 9 (41 percent) of 22 pT1 or pT2, and 15 (45 percent) of 33 pT3. Clinical stage, tumor size, pathologic stage, and adverse histologic features could not reliably predict pN0 status, except pT0 (5 patients only). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy often downsizes and downstages locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Neither pretreatment clinical characteristics, response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy, or pathologic features reliably predict pN0 status. Therefore, local excision is not recommended as an alternative to radical surgery for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the distal rectum regardless of the response of the primary tumor to preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

UFT/leucovorin vs 5-FU/leucovorin in colon cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to alter the natural history of resected colon cancer. Two regimens (fluorouracil [5-FU] plus leucovorin and 5-FU plus levamisole) have been found to prolong disease-free survival and overall survival in affected patients. Previous comparisons of these two regimens indicate that 5-FU plus leucovorin may offer a small disease-free survival and overall survival advantage. Evidence that UFT (uracil and tegafur) plus oral leucovorin is associated with significant antitumor activity and has an acceptable toxicity profile makes this a logical formulation for the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer. The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol C-06 is a randomized comparison of the relative efficacies of 5-FU plus leucovorin vs UFT plus leucovorin. Preliminary analysis of the toxicity findings among 1,530 evaluable patients indicates that both regimens are well tolerated and have similar toxicity profiles.

Posttransplant adoptive immunotherapy with activated natural killer cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Relapse after high-dose chemotherapy is the main cause of therapeutic failure in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Adoptive immunotherapy with interleukin-2 (IL-2) plus activated natural killer cells may eliminate residual disease without excessive toxicity. The authors sought to determine if immunotherapy immediately after transplantation would affect engraftment and the toxicity associated with transplantation. Fifteen consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer were allocated to three cohorts. Cohort 1 (five patients) received high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTCb) followed by peripheral blood stem cell infusion and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor at 10 micrograms/kg. Cohort 2 (five patients) received in addition rhIL-2 (2 x 10(6) IU/m2/day) for 4 days intravenously via continuous infusion after peripheral blood stem cell infusion. In cohort 3 (five patients), peripheral blood stem cell transplant was followed by infusion of autologous activated NK cells and rhIL-2 (2 x 10(6) IU/m2/day) for 4 days (via continuous intravenous infusion). Generation of activated NK cells was possible in all patients in cohort 3. All patients has successful engraftment. Median time to absolute neutrophil count more than 0.5 x 10(9)/L was 8 days (range, 8 to 11 days) in cohort 1, 9 days (range, 7 to 11 days) in cohort 2, and 9 days (range, 8 to 9 days) in cohort 3. Median time until the platelet count was more than 20 x 10(9)/L was 14 days (range, 9 to 22 days) in cohort 1, 11 days (range, 6 to 14 days) in cohort 2, and 12 days (range, 11 to 21 days) in cohort 3. All patients developed neutropenic fevers, but the overall toxicity associated with the infusion of IL-2 (cohort 2) or IL-2 plus activated NK cells (cohort 3) did not differ from that observed in cohort 1. Complete responses were achieved in one patient in cohort 1, in two patients in cohort 2, and in one patient in cohort 3. In conclusion, post-transplant adoptive immunotherapy with activated NK cells plus IL-2 is feasible, well tolerated, and does not adversely affect engraftment.

A phase II trial of docetaxel (Taxotere) in hormone-refractory prostate cancer: correlation of antitumor effect to phosphorylation of Bcl-2.

Twenty-one patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer were enrolled to receive single-agent docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Collegeville, PA) 75 mg/m2 intravenously every 21 days. Six patients consented to biopsies of the prostate tumor before and following the first cycle of chemotherapy and 11 patients underwent periodic blood collection for isolation of the mononuclear cell fraction. The toxicities of treatment were moderate but included eight episodes of grade III and two episodes of grade IV nonhematologic toxicity as well as seven episodes of grade III and 11 episodes of grade IV hematologic toxicity (primarily neutropenia, including four episodes of febrile neutropenia). An objective response of more than 50% reduction in prostate-specific antigen was observed in seven patients (38%) and more than half of the patients with symptomatic disease at the initiation of therapy had improvements on treatment. Radiographic or scintigraphic evidence of tumor regression was observed in six patients. Nine patients experienced a prolonged period of stable disease on treatment (median, six cycles). Tumor specimens are currently being analyzed for bcl-2 expression and phosphorylation. The current series confirms the substantial single-agent activity of docetaxel in hormone refractory prostate cancer and may help to further elucidate its mechanism of action at the molecular level.

Randomized trial of 3-hour versus 24-hour infusion of high-dose paclitaxel in patients with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-26.

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel is an active drug for the treatment of breast cancer; however, the appropriate duration of administration is unknown. We assessed and compared the response rate, event-free survival, survival, and toxicity of paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2) delivered every 3 weeks as a 3-hour or 24-hour infusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 563 women with stage IV or IIIB breast cancer were randomized into one of two groups: 279 received 3-hour paclitaxel and 284 received 24-hour paclitaxel. Patients were stratified by age, stage of disease, and prior therapy. RESULTS: A significantly higher rate of tumor response occurred in the first four cycles of therapy in patients who received the 24-hour infusion of paclitaxel (51% v 41%, respectively; P =.025). Tumor response over all cycles was also significantly higher in the group that received 24-hour infusion (54% v 44%, respectively; P =.023). There were no significant differences in event-free survival or survival between the two arms of the study (P =.9 and.8, respectively). No treatment by stage or by age interactions were observed. During the first four cycles of therapy, at least one episode of >/= grade 3 toxicity (excluding nadir hematologic values, alopecia, and weight change) occurred in 45% of patients who received the 3-hour paclitaxel infusion and in 50% of those who received the 24-hour paclitaxel infusion. Febrile neutropenia, >/= grade 3 infection, and >/= grade 3 stomatitis were less frequent, and severe neurosensory toxicity was more frequent in those who received the 3-hour paclitaxel infusion. Ten treatment-related deaths occurred in the first four cycles. Age, stage, and prior chemotherapy did not influence the effect of treatment. CONCLUSION: When administered as a continuous 24-hour infusion, high-dose paclitaxel results in a higher tumor response rate than when administered as a 3-hour infusion but does not significantly improve event-free survival or survival. Paclitaxel as a 24-hour infusion results in increased hematologic toxicity and decreased neurosensory toxicity.

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.

PURPOSE: To determine whether combination 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and interferon alfa, an active regimen in advanced esophageal cancer, is efficacious as induction therapy before esophagectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients with potentially resectable esophageal/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma were entered into a phase I/II study of this chemotherapeutic regimen and concurrent external-beam radiotherapy before resection. The initial 16 patients were treated with prolonged-infusion 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m2 on days 1 to 28), cisplatin (20 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5 and 24 to 28), interferon alfa (3 x 10(6) U/m2 intravenously on days 1 to 5 and 24 to 28; subcutaneous injection every other day on days 6 to 23), and radiation (4000 cGy). The subsequent 28 patients were treated over 21 days with two modifications: dose escalation of 5-fluorouracil (250 to 350 mg/m2) and double-fractionated radiotherapy to a total dose of 4500 cGy. RESULTS: Forty-one patients completed chemoradiotherapy and were evaluable for toxicity. Adverse events were substantial but tolerable, and most toxic episodes were hematologic and gastrointestinal. Three patients died, and one patient had progressive disease before resection. Of the 37 patients eligible for curative resection, 36 had all gross tumor removed. Thirty-three (80%) patients had a major pathologic response: 10 (24%) with no residual tumor and 23 with only microscopic residual tumor. Median survival for all patients was 27 months and for responders was 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: This combination regimen is active but yields results similar to those of other chemoradiotherapy phase II trials; therefore, the contribution of interferon alfa to treatment efficacy remains uncertain. The true worth of preoperative chemoradiotherapy is unknown pending results of phase III trials.

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell support followed by post-transplant doxorubicin and taxol as initial therapy for metastatic breast cancer: hematopoietic tolerance and efficacy.

A multistep HDC regimen was designed as first-line chemotherapy for MBC. Twenty-four patients with MBC and no previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease were treated with high-dose cyclophosphamide (5000 mg/m2), and etoposide (1000 mg/m2) (CyVP16), followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) were collected. Subsequently patients received cyclophosphamide (6000 mg/m2), thiotepa (500 mg/m2) and carboplatin (800 mg/m2) (CTCb) with hematopoietic rescue. Upon recovery from hematopoietic and gastrointestinal toxicity three cycles of doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) and taxol (150 mg/m2) were delivered. After CyVP16 42% of patients developed neutropenic fevers. There was one documented episode of bacteremia. Patients received CTCb 32 days after starting CyVP16. After CTCb the median number of days to ANC >5 x 10(9)/l was 10 and to a platelet count >20 x 10(9)/l was 14. Neutropenic fevers developed in 16 patients. There were no hemorrhagic episodes. A total of 69 cycles of doxorubicin and taxol were delivered (87% of planned). The median time from PBSC infusion to the first cycle was 38 days. The median time to the second cycle was 27 days and to the last cycle was 24 days. One patient developed congestive heart failure. Two episodes of neutropenic fevers were observed. No toxicity-related deaths were observed. Grafts are stable at 6 months post transplantation. This multistep regimen is feasible with acceptable toxicity.

Comparable safety and antiemetic efficacy of a brief (30-second bolus) intravenous granisetron infusion and a standard (15-minute) intravenous ondansetron infusion in breast cancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: For patients receiving chemotherapy, optimization of antiemetic therapy in terms of safety of administration, efficacy, cost, and convenience remains a subject of intense clinical research. In this study, we evaluated and compared the safety and antiemetic efficacy of a single 30-second intravenous bolus infusion of granisetron which those of a standard 15-minute intravenous infusion of ondansetron in chemotherapy-naive breast cancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter crossover study of 623 chemotherapy-naive patients (two male, 621 female) receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin, with or without 5-fluorouracil) for breast cancer. Patients were assigned randomly to receive either granisetron or ondansetron in cycle 1 and the other agent in cycle 2. Granisetron (10 micrograms/kg) was administered as a 30-second intravenous bolus infusion within 5 minutes before the start of chemotherapy, and ondansetron (32 mg) was administered as a 15-minute intravenous infusion beginning 30 minutes before the start of chemotherapy. A total of 573 patients received the two planned chemotherapy cycles. Safety assessment was based on the type and frequency of adverse experiences reported by the patient at 24 and 48 hours after chemotherapy began. Efficacy assessments included the occurrence of nausea or emesis and the proportion of patients who achieved total emetic control at 24 and 48 hours after chemotherapy. RESULTS: Similar proportions of patients in both treatment groups remained free of emesis at the 24-hour assessment period (58.6% and 62.7% of granisetron- and ondansetron-treated patients, respectively) and at 48 hours (42.2% and 45.0% for granisetron vs ondansetron) in both cycles. The proportions of granisetron- and ondansetron-treated patients who remained nausea-free for the first 24 hours after treatment in both cycles were 44.0% and 48.5%, respectively, and at 48 hours were 26.7% and 31.0%, respectively. Statistical analysis demonstrated no significant treatment-by-cycle interaction. The 30-second granisetron infusion and the 15-minute ondansetron infusion were well tolerated. However, administration of ondansetron as a 15-minute intravenous infusion produced abnormal vision (6.28%) in significantly more patients than granisetron (0.35%). DISCUSSION: These two intravenous 5-hydroxytryptamine3-receptor antagonist antiemetics were similarly effective in controlling acute nausea and emesis during two cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Granisetron (30 seconds) and the longer infusion of ondansetron (15 minutes) were well tolerated; however, ondansetron was associated with a greater proportion of patients reporting abnormal vision. Granisetron administered as a 30-second bolus infusion allows a considerably shorter waiting time between the end of the antiemetic infusion and the initiation of chemotherapy. This shorter administration time may enhance patient convenience and provider efficiency.

Role of nutrition support during induction chemoradiation therapy in esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) potentially benefits a subgroup of patients with esophageal cancer. The ability to administer aggressive CRT may depend on the initial nutritional status and the ability to sustain nutrition during therapy. Parenteral nutrition support during CRT may lead to complications that limit its usefulness and negate any potential benefit. METHODS: Data were analyzed to evaluate the role of parenteral nutrition support (PNS) in patients receiving CRT. Forty-five consecutive patients with locoregional esophageal cancer, enrolled in a phase I/II trial of induction CRT, were analyzed. On the basis of the nutrition support received, two groups were defined as follows: group I (with PNS, n = 30) and group II (without PNS, n = 15). Results were compared in terms of chemotherapy (CT) dose tolerated, morbidity of CRT, response rates, and surgical outcome in groups with and without PNS. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable for demographic data, stage and site of disease, and performance status. There was no significant difference between the groups in the nutritional parameters (weight and serum albumin) before and after CRT. Group I patients received significantly more (% of total calculated dose) CT compared with group II (5-fluorouracil [5-FU], 86.4% vs 68.8%, p = .02; cisplatin [CDDP], 90.8% vs 78.2%, p = .05; and interferon alpha-2b [IFN-alpha], 95.4% vs 79.8%, p = .05, in groups I and II, respectively). Major (grade III/IV) adverse effects of CT were hematologic (group I, 93.3% vs group II, 86.6%, p = .59) and gastrointestinal (group I, 56.67% vs group II, 33.3%, p = .2). Postsurgical staging revealed complete response in 10 (22%) and a major response in 23 (51%) patients, although the response rates were similar in the two groups (group I, 76.6% vs group II, 66.6%, p = .8). Surgical morbidity (51.8% vs 61.5%, p = .73), mortality (7.4% vs 7.6%, p = 1.00), and hospital stay (22.5 vs 19.6 days, p = .63) were also similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: PNS can be provided to these patients without an increased risk of CRT or resection-related morbidity. Although early and prolonged PNS facilitates administration of complete CRT doses, no benefit is derived from the administration of more CRT in the present regimen. The utility of PNS in this setting is unclear and, until further clarified, should not be applied routinely to this cohort of patients.

Comparison of toxicity and survival following intraperitoneal recombinant interleukin-2 for persistent ovarian cancer after platinum: twenty-four-hour versus 7-day infusion.

PURPOSE: To compare the toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy seen in ovarian cancer patients treated with escalating doses of intraperitoneal (I.P.) interleukin-2 (IL-2) by two different infusion schedules. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients were sequentially entered onto a phase I/II study in groups of four at fixed dosage tiers of 6 x 10(4), 6 x 10(5), 6 x 10(6), and 3 x 10(7) IU/m2/d in either of two schedules: (A) intermittent weekly infusions of 24 hours' duration; or (B) alternating continuous 7-day infusions followed by 7-day intervals without therapy. Eligibility criteria included > or = six courses of prior platinum-based chemotherapy and laparotomy-confirmed persistent or recurrent ovarian cancer. RESULTS: Forty-one eligible patients received I.P. IL-2 and were assessable for toxicity, but six patients were not assessable for response, which left 35 patients assessable for response. Significant locoregional dose-limiting toxicity was seen with the 7-day infusions (including bowel perforation), with 600,000 IU/m2 as the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), but catheter infection was the only significant complication seen with the 24-hour infusions, for which an MTD was not established. Among 35 assessable patients, there were six laparotomy-confirmed complete responses (CRs) and three partial responses, for an overall response rate of 25.7% (nine of 35). The median survival time of the cohort was 13.7 months and the overall 5-year survival probability was 13.9%. For the nine patients who demonstrated responses (six on the 24-hour infusion and three on the 7-day infusion), the median survival time has not been reached (range, 27 to 90+ months). CONCLUSION: I.P. IL-2 is better tolerated as a weekly infusion as compared with a 7-day infusion and demonstrates evidence of possible long-term efficacy in a modest number of patients. A randomized trial is indicated to determine if the prolonged survival seen in this study is a due to I.P. IL-2 therapy or other factors that cannot be controlled for in a single-arm study.

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell support followed by posttransplantation doxorubicin as initial therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

High-dose chemotherapy is associated with a high complete response rate and possibly some survival advantage in patients with metastatic breast cancer. We designed a clinical trial consisting of a two-step high-dose chemotherapy regimen followed by posttransplantation doxorubicin as the first chemotherapy treatment for metastatic disease. Twenty-one patients with metastatic breast cancer and no previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease were treated with high-dose cyclophosphamide (Cy; 5000 mg/m2), followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Peripheral blood stem cells were collected. Subsequently, patients received Cy (6000 mg/m2), thiotepa (500 mg/m2), and carboplatin (800 mg/m2) (CTCb) with hematopoietic rescue. Upon recovery of hematopoietic and gastrointestinal toxicity, three cycles of doxorubicin (Dox; 60 mg/m2) were delivered. After Cy, nine patients (45%) developed neutropenic fevers. There were no episodes of bacteremia. Patients received CTCb 37 days after starting Cy and had a hospital stay of 19 days. After CTCb, the median number of days to an absolute neutrophil count >5 x 10(9)/liter was 8, and the median number of days to a platelet count >20 x 10(9)/liter was 9. Neutropenic fevers occurred in 12 patients. There were no hemorrhagic complications. Fifty-five of the 63 planned courses of Dox were delivered. The median time from peripheral blood stem cell infusion to the first Dox cycle was 38 days. The median time to the second Dox cycle was 28 days, and to the last cycle was 30 days. Three episodes of neutropenic fevers were observed. Two patients developed herpes zoster. This regimen is feasible, with acceptable toxicity.

Efficacy of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and paclitaxel regimen for carcinoma of the esophagus.

Eighteen patients with esophageal carcinoma (16 adenocarcinoma, two squamous cell carcinoma) were treated with two cycles of induction chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) 175 mg/m2 (3-hour infusion), cisplatin 20 mg/m2/d x 4 days, and 5-fluorouracil 1 g/m2/d (continuous infusion x 4 days) separated by a 28-day interval before surgical resection. After resection, patients received two more cycles of the same regimen. A thorough staging evaluation was performed before patients were enrolled in the study. The salient chemotherapy toxicities included grade 3 nausea (two patients), grade 3 vomiting (two patients), grades 3 and 4 diarrhea (one patient each), and grades 3 and 4 neutropenia (two and 10 patients, respectively). No deaths occurred due to toxicity. Surgical resection was attempted in all 18 patients (100%) after two cycles of induction chemotherapy. Esophageal resection was successfully completed in 17 patients. Liver metastases were noted at laparotomy in the one patient who subsequently did not undergo esophageal resection. Surgical complications were minor, and no postoperative deaths occurred. Fifteen patients received two additional cycles of the paclitaxel/5-fluorouracil/cisplatin regimen postoperatively, two received only one cycle, and one refused further therapy. Of 15 patients alive, 14 show no evidence of disease. The 1-year actuarial survival rate of this group of patients is 82%. In conclusion, the paclitaxel/5-fluorouracil/cisplatin combination is well tolerated and is an active regimen in esophageal carcinoma.

High-dose cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, and etoposide with autologous stem cell rescue in patients with breast cancer.

This study was designed to establish the toxicity and response rates o observed with a combination of high-dose cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, and etoposide with stem cell rescue in patients with breast carcinoma. Eligibility criteria included metastatic or locally advanced breast carcinoma ; aged < or equal to 60 years; performance status Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-1; and creatinine clearance > or equal to 65 ml/min. Chemotherapy consisted of cyclophosphamide 25 mg/kg i.v. X 4 days, etoposide 400 mg/m(2) i.v. X 4 days, and carboplatin 375 mg/m(2) X 4 days. Bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells were reinfused 48 h after completion of chemotherapy. Seventeen patients were treated in this study. The major toxicity was gastrointestinal (grades I and II). Fevers associated with neutropenia were observed in all the patients, but no episodes of bacteremia were documented. Hematopoietic toxicities were acceptable. No toxic deaths were observed. Six patients had chemotherapy-sensitive disease at time of transplant, nine had refractory disease, and two were untested. A response rate of 62% with 18% complete response (CR) was achieved. Two patients are free of disease at +7 and +9 months after transplantation. The combination of high-dose cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, and etoposide is well tolerated with a response rate comparable to previously reported high-dose chemotherapy regimens. However, in a poor prognostic risk group, namely patients with chemoinsensitive disease, this therapeutic approach seems to be of no advantage over standard chemotherapy.

Metastases of unknown primary site.

Despite the fact that effective therapy does not currently exist for the majority of patients presenting with metastases of unknown primary site, the last decade has witnessed significant advances in the approach to this heterogeneous disease. The use of modern pathologic techniques that frequently provide better diagnostic precision and the recognition of specific subgroups with a favorable prognosis and responsiveness to treatment has improved the outcome for some patients. Currently the diagnostic strategy should emphasize the rapid identification of patients likely to benefit from available therapy, whereas clinical research should focus on the development of more effective treatments for those patients with unresponsive tumors. In the future, continued improvements in the molecular characterization of these tumors will likely enhance understanding of the metastatic process, allow for more specific definitions of cell lineage, and provide insights for better therapy.

Randomized comparison of vinorelbine and melphalan in anthracycline-refractory advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This prospective multicenter randomized trial was performed to compare the effectiveness and safety of intravenous (i.v.) vinorelbine tartrate (Navelbine [NVB]; Burroughs Wellcome Co, Research Triangle Park, NC) with i.v. melphalan (Alkeran [ALK]; Burroughs Wellcome Co) in a heavily pretreated population of patients with anthracycline-refractory advanced breast cancer (ABC). Efficacy end points included time to disease progression (TDP), time to treatment failure (TTF), survival, tumor response rates, and quality of life (QL) and relief of cancer-related symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 24, 1990, and December 1, 1992, 183 patients were randomized (2:1) to treatment with NVB (30 mg/m2 weekly) or ALK (25 mg/m2 every 4 weeks) i.v. Patients were stratified by measurable or nonmeasurable-assessable disease and by treatment center. RESULTS: Time to disease progression was significantly longer with NVB than with ALK, with a median 12 weeks versus 8 weeks, respectively (P < .001). NVB patients also had significantly longer time to treatment failure than ALK patients, with a median 12 weeks versus 8 weeks, respectively (P < .001). The effect of NVB on survival was also statistically significant (P = .034): 1-year survival rates were 35.7% with NVB and 21.7% with ALK and the median survival rate was 35 weeks and 31 weeks, respectively. In total, 46.5% of NVB patients and 28.2% of ALK patients achieved an objective response or stabilization of disease (P = .06). No intergroup differences were noted in patient-assessed QL and cancer-related symptoms. The most common toxicities were hematologic, including granulocytopenia with NVB and thrombocytopenia and granulocytopenia with ALK. Both drugs were generally well tolerated, and no septic deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: This randomized trial demonstrates a survival benefit in anthracycline-refractory ABC. NVB was well tolerated and demonstrated activity superior to ALK in anthracycline-refractory ABC, without compromising QL. Based on activity of single-agent NVB in this difficult-to-treat patient population, investigations of NVB in combination with other anticancer drugs are warranted.