Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: variables related to a good response.

Achalasia is a motor disorder characterized by esophageal aperistalsis and failure of lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. The cardinal symptoms are dysphagia, food regurgitation and weight loss. The most effective treatments are pneumatic dilation (PD) of the cardia and Heller esophageal myotomy with partial fundoplication. There is still controversy regarding which treatments should be initially done. The aims of this study were to evaluate clinical response and the variables related to good results in both treatments. Ninety-two patients with achalasia diagnosed by esophageal manometry were randomized to receive either PD or laparoscopic Heller myotomy with partial fundoplication. After the procedure, patients were followed up clinically and submitted to esophageal manometry and pH monitoring. Three months after treatment, 73% of the patients from PD group and 84% of the surgery group had good results (P = 0.19). After 2 years of follow-up, 54% of the PD group and 60% of the surgery group (P = not significant) were symptom free. Variables related to a good response to PD were a 50% drop in lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) or a LESP <10 mmHg after treatment. Patients over 40 years old with LESP ≤32 mmHg before treatment and a drop in LESP >50% after treatment significantly achieved better responses after surgical treatment when compared with PD. The reflux rate was significantly higher in the PD group (27.7%) compared with the surgery group (4.7%), P = 0.003. We concluded that surgical treatment and PD for achalasia are equally effective even after 2 years of follow-up. The choice of treatment for achalasia should be based on the following parameters: treatment availability, rate of good results, complication rates, variables related to good responses and also the patient's wish.

Esophageal body motility in achalasia and Chagas' disease.

Previous studies have correlated esophageal body motility findings in idiopathic (IdAc) achalasia and achalasia secondary to Chagas' disease (ChAc) with degree of megaesophagus. The aim of this study was to compare esophageal body manometric data in patients with IdAc and achalasia secondary to Chagas' disease and correlate it with the degree of megaesophagus and symptom duration. One hundred nontreated patients with achalasia, 79% IdAc and 21% secondary to ChAc were compared with regards to age of presentation, duration of symptoms, amplitude and duration of simultaneous contractions, frequency of failed contractions, and degree of megaesophagus. Seventy-one percent of patients were classified as nonadvanced megaesophagus (60 [76%] with IdAc and 11 [52%] with ChAc) and 29% as advanced megaesophagus (19 [24%] with IdAc and 10 [48%] with ChAc, P= 0.04). In IdAc but not in ChAc, the symptom duration was significantly longer in advanced megaesophagus (A) compared with nonadvanced megaesophagus (NA) (34.8 ± 6.3 months vs. 95.4 ± 22.2 months, P= 0.001). There was no difference in amplitude and duration of simultaneous contractions in both achalasia groups (P > 0.05). Duration of contractions were longer in IdAc compared with ChAc in (NA) (P < 0.05), but not in (A). In IdAc but not in ChAc the amplitude of simultaneous contractions decreased with increased esophageal dilatation (P < 0.05). In ChAc but not in IdAC, the duration of contractions increased with esophageal dilatation (P < 0.05). Failed contractions were more frequent in ChAc group (28.6%) than in IdAc (10% -P= 0.03). Patients with ChAc have a higher prevalence of advanced megaesophagus compared with IdAc at diagnosis. In IdAc there was a strong correlation between advanced megaesophagus and longer symptom duration, suggesting disease progression over time, not observed in ChAc in which a more extensive denervation occurs earlier in the disease process.

24-h pH monitoring patterns and clinical response after achalasia treatment with pneumatic dilation or laparoscopic Heller myotomy.

BACKGROUND: The most effective treatment for achalasia is pneumatic dilation or myotomy. The best option is still controversial and incidence of complications could help choosing. Gastro-oesophageal reflux (GER) is the most frequent complication after treatment for achalasia. The 24-h pH monitoring (24-h pH) is the best method to evaluate true GER. AIM: To analyse the 24-h pH patterns after treatment, correlating with therapeutic success. METHODS: Untreated patients with achalasia were randomized to pneumatic dilation or laparoscopic Heller myotomy with fundoplication (LHM+Fp) and evaluated with clinical/manometric results and 24-h pH. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were analysed pre-treatment and 85 post-treatment. Clinical success was 73.8% in pneumatic dilation group and 88.3% in LHM+Fp group (P = 0.08). The incidence of GER was 31% in pneumatic dilation, and 4.7% in LHM+Fp (P = 0.001). The occurrence of hypotensive lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) was 53.3% in patients who developed GER and 28.6% in patients with 24-h pH suggesting fermentation (P = 0.019). The rates of dysphagia resolution in patients with 24-h pH of GER and fermentation were respectively 86.7% and 85.7% (P = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: True GER 24-h pH is more frequent after pneumatic dilation for achalasia, and it is associated with a hypotensive LES. A 24-h pH suggestive of fermentation or true GER is not associated with worse clinical/manometric results.

[Differential diagnosis of esophageal motor disorders based in characteristics of dysphagia]. / Diagnóstico diferencial dos distúrbios motores esofagianos pelas características da disfagia.

BACKGROUND: Dysphagia is one of principal symptoms of esophageal disorders and its characterization is important for diagnosis and management of patients. Anamnesis is useful for differentiating organic and functional dysphagia, but data are lacking about dysphagia characterization among different motor disorders. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if it is possible the distinction among esophageal motor disorders according to their manometric diagnosis, based on dysphagia characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Dysphagia characteristics (relation with bolus, frequency and localization) of 133 patients submitted to esophageal manometry were reviewed and analysed. All patients had barium swallow studies and/or endoscopy in order to exclude organic lesions. RESULTS: Esophageal manometry was abnormal in 85% of the patients. Characteristics of dysphagia were compared among groups of patients with achalasia, esophageal spastic disorders, non-specific esophageal motor disorders and with normal test. The precise distinction among groups based solely on characteristics of dysphagia was not possible, however some aspects could point to one or another group. In achalasia patients, dysphagia for both solid food and liquids, constant and felt in substernal area, was more frequent in relation to every other group. Intermittent dysphagia was more frequent in patients with spastic disorders. Characteristics of dysphagia in patients with non-specific esophageal motor disorders were similar to those observed in the group with normal test, frequently referred in the neck. CONCLUSION: Characteristics of dysphagia were ancillary to presume the diagnosis of these motor disturbances, however esophageal manometry is necessary for the correct diagnosis in patients with functional dysphagia.

Lower esophageal sphincter pressure in idiopathic achalasia and Chagas disease-related achalasia.

The most important etiologies of achalasia are idiopathic and related to Chagas' disease. The lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) in idiopathic achalasia (Id Ach) is higher compared with a healthy group, but there are different reports in Chagasic achalasia (Ch Ach). We compared the LESP of patients with both forms of achalasia and a control group. The LESP of 213 achalasia patients without previous treatment and 32 healthy volunteers were assessed. In 126 patients, the etiology could be demonstrated using serologic tests (Id Ach, 94 and Ch Ach, 32). The LESP of 213 patients was 31.86+/-14.18 mmHg and in the control group was 17.92+/-7.03 mmHg (P < 0.0001). The LESP in Id Ach and Ch Ach was 33.28+/-13.63 mmHg and 23.5+/-12.09 mmHg (P < 0.0001), respectively. Only the Id Ach group achieved statistical difference in relation to the control group (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, the LESP of Id Ach patients was higher than in Ch Ach patients and the control group, but there was no LESP difference between the Ch Ach and control groups.

Manometric findings of esophageal motor disorders in 240 Brazilian patients with non-cardiac chest pain.

Two hundred and forty Brazilian patients with chest pain and normal cardiac evaluation were submitted to computerized esophageal manometry. Endoscopic examination and/or swallow barium studies had excluded obstructive lesions. Motor disorders were found in 63% of patients; non-specific motors disorders and hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter were the most common. The finding of nutcracker esophagus in only 6% of the patients is a quite different rate from what has been previously described in the literature. Esophagitis was observed at endoscopy in 13.4% of the patients, hiatus hernia in 19.7% and peptic gastric or duodenal ulcer in 4.9%. It should be emphasized that after excluding pain as being of cardiac origin an abnormal manometry result points to the esophagus as the probable site of origin of the pain; esophageal investigation is important for establishing proper treatment for these patients.

[Nutcracker esophagus: clinical evaluation of 97 patients]. / Esôfago em quebra-nozes - avaliação clínica de 97 pacientes.

Nutcracker esophagus is a manometric abnormality classified as a primary esophageal motor disorder, characterized by high pressure peristaltic waves in distal esophagus and related to non-cardiac chest pain. Further studies observed nutcracker esophagus in dysphagic patients and recently in gastroesophageal reflux disease. However, there is controversy about the meaning of this motor disorder and there are few clinical studies involving a great number of patients. A retrospective study involving 97 patients with manometric criteria of nutcracker esophagus according a control group was undertaken. Most of the patients were female (63.9%), mean age 54.3 years. The chief complaint was chest pain, followed by dysphagia and heartburn. Clinical findings, as a whole were chest pain (53.6%), dysphagia (52.6%), heartburn (52.6%), regurgitation (21.6%), otorhinolaryngologic symptoms (15.4%), dyspepsia (15.4%) and odynophagia (4.1%). The majority of patients had multiple symptoms, however in 28% just a single one was observed. Endoscopic examination observed erosive esophagitis in 8% of the patients, while signs of esophageal motor disorders were showed by esophagogram in 16.4%. Esophageal pH recordings indicated abnormal gastroesophageal reflux in 41.2% of the cases reported. We concluded that there are other symptoms in nutcracker esophagus patients besides chest pain and dysphagia and the use of esophageal pH recordings is helpful to establish its association with acid reflux and guide the appropriate therapy.

[Prolonged esophageal pH monitoring. Evaluation of 170 tests]. / pHmetria esofagiana prolongada--avaliação de 170 exames.

The authors present the experience from a university service of 170 outpatients submitted to 24-hour esophageal pH recording. Indications were: typical symptoms such as heartburn (67 patients), with and without endoscopic esophagitis, chest pain (65 patients; 40% had normal coronariography), a select group with dysphagia (28), besides eight asthmatics, one chronic intractable hiccups, and one esophageal ulcer. There was abnormal reflux in 47% of the total group. pH recording showed abnormal results in 86% of patients presenting heartburn and esophagitis and in 50% of patients without esophagitis. In the chest pain group, 37% had abnormal reflux, but pain with reflux episode could be observed only in 1/5 of them. Twenty percent of dysphagia patients had pathologic reflux and 50% among asthmactics, but the number of patients is small. Authors emphasize the importance of pHmetry as a diagnostic tool and suggest that it is important the knowledge of reflux pattern in healthy Brazilian people.

Diagnóstico de refluxo gastroesofágico por método cintilográfico / The diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux by scintigraphy

Vinte e três pacientes com clínica de refluxo gastroesofágico e diagnóstico endoscápico de esofagite foram submetidos à cintilografia dinâmica com 99mTC para pesquisa de refluxo. 12 individuos saudáveis constituíram o grupo de controle. Observou-se refluxo do material radioativo para o esôfago em 19 (82,6) dos pacientes e em 2 (16,6) dos controles. Em 9 controles e em 10 pacientes, quantificou-se o refluxo por meio da obtençäo do índice de refluxo. Concluiu-se que a cintilografia dinâmica mostra boa sensibilidade na comprovaçäo de refluxo em pacientes com esofagite

[Non-coronary chest pain: esophageal evaluation in 27 patients]. / Dor torácica não-coronariana: avaliação do esôfago em 27 pacientes.

The authors analyse the clinical features of 27 patients with non-coronary chest pain. They applied specific questionnaire and used esophageal function tests. The pain features were very similar to coronary patients, but there was a strict relationship with emotional stress. Esophageal symptoms were found in about 50% of patients. Eighty-five, one percent of the patients, presented with some abnormalities; 33.3% of the total group with esophagitis and 66.6% with motor disorders; some patients presented overlapping pictures. Three patients had duodenal ulcer. The patients were classified as having pain of proved (18.5%), or suspected (66.6%) esophageal origin. Twenty of these patients were followed and those with esophagitis and/or duodenal ulcer had a good response to specific treatment. The author stress the importance of showing the patients the benign nature of this disease. In the present group of patients, the actual diagnosis was more important in obtaining good therapeutic response than classifying the pain as above.

[Dynamic scintigraphy of the esophagus--a method for esophageal dysfunction]. / Cintilografia dinâmica do esôfago--um método para disfunção esofagiana.

The authors present their experience with radionuclide transit in the study of esophageal motility using a very simple and easy technique. They have established a normal pattern and analyse their findings in achalasia and probable diffuse esophageal spasm. They review the literature and submit the method as a very important tool for the diagnosis of esophageal motor disorders.