Sex Differences in Health Status and Clinical Outcomes After Nonprimary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Greater insight into sex-based differences in health status can lay the foundation for more equitable health care. This study compares differences in health status of women and men in the CPORT-E trial (Cardiovascular Patient Outcomes Research Team Non-Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) undergoing nonprimary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: We compared Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores at baseline, 6 weeks, and 9 months for 6851 women and 12 016 men undergoing nonprimary percutaneous coronary intervention. RESULTS: Proportions of angina-free patients increased from 26.2% and 29.8% at baseline to 71.6% and 78.7% at 6 weeks to 78.1% and 83.0% at 9 months in women and men, respectively (P<0.001 for all). After adjusting for clinical and procedural characteristics as well as baseline angina, freedom from angina in women was 34% less likely at 6 weeks (odds ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.61-0.71]; P<0.001) and 32% less likely at 9 months (odds ratio, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.62-0.74]; P<0.001) compared with men. CONCLUSIONS: Although health status increased significantly after percutaneous coronary intervention in both women and men, women had poorer health status outcomes than men before and after percutaneous coronary intervention. Additional investigation into therapies that address the causes of poorer health status in women with coronary artery disease is needed. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00549796.

Nonprimary PCI at hospitals without cardiac surgery on-site: Consistent outcomes for all?

BACKGROUND: The CPORT-E trial showed the noninferiority of nonprimary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at hospitals without cardiac surgery on-site (SoS) compared with hospitals with SoS for 6-week mortality and 9-month major adverse cardiac events (MACE). However, target vessel revascularization (TVR) was increased at non-SoS hospitals. Therefore, we aimed to determine the consistency of the CPORT-E trial findings across the spectrum of enrolled patients. METHODS: Post hoc subgroup analyses of 6-week mortality and 9-month MACE, defined as the composite of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or TVR, were performed. Patients with and without 9-month TVR and rates of related outcomes were compared. RESULTS: There was no interaction between SoS status and clinically relevant subgroups for 6-week mortality or 9-month MACE (P for any interaction=.421 and .062, respectively). In addition to increased 9-month rates of TVR and diagnostic catheterization at hospitals without SoS, non-TVR was also increased (2.7% vs 1.9%, P=.002); there was no difference in myocardial infarction-driven TVR, non-TVR, or diagnostic catheterization. Predictors of 9-month TVR included intra-aortic balloon pump use, any index PCI complication, and 3-vessel PCI, whereas predictors of freedom from TVR included SoS, discharge on a P2Y12 inhibitor, and stent implantation. CONCLUSIONS: The noninferiority of nonprimary PCI at non-SoS hospitals was consistent across clinically relevant subgroups. Elective PCI at an SoS hospital conferred a TVR benefit which may be related to a lower rate of referral for diagnostic catheterization for reasons other than myocardial infarction.

Heparin versus bivalirudin for non-primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A post-Hoc analysis of the CPORT-E trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare bivalirudin to heparin during non-primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The optimal anticoagulant to support PCI remains uncertain. METHODS: We performed a propensity score-based analysis comparing clinical outcomes of patients receiving heparin to those receiving bivalirudin during non-primary PCI. RESULTS: Of 18,867 patients in the Cardiovascular Patient Outcomes Research Team Non-Primary PCI (CPORT-E) trial, we selected 7,913 patients undergoing non-staged PCI of whom 57.3% received heparin and 42.7% received bivalirudin. In-hospital myocardial infarction occurred in 4.4% of patients receiving bivalirudin and 3.0% of patients receiving heparin (relative risk [RR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.1, P = 0.022); this difference persisted at 6 weeks (5.0% vs. 3.6%, RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-1.8, P = 0.041). There was no difference in all-cause mortality either in-hospital (0.2% vs. 0.1% for heparin vs. bivalirudin, P = 0.887) or at 6 weeks (0.5% vs. 0.7%, P = 0.567). In-hospital bleeding requiring transfusion occurred in 0.9% of patients receiving bivalirudin and 1.9% of patients receiving heparin (RR 0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.7, P <0.001), but there was no difference at 6 weeks (2.7% for heparin vs. 1.9% for bivalirudin, RR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-1.0, P = 0.062). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing non-primary PCI at hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery, bivalirudin was associated with a decreased risk of in-hospital bleeding requiring transfusion and an increased risk of in-hospital MI compared to heparin. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Outcomes of PCI at hospitals with or without on-site cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Performance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is usually restricted to hospitals with cardiac surgery on site. We conducted a noninferiority trial to compare the outcomes of PCI performed at hospitals without and those with on-site cardiac surgery. METHODS: We randomly assigned participants to undergo PCI at a hospital with or without on-site cardiac surgery. Patients requiring primary PCI were excluded. The trial had two primary end points: 6-week mortality and 9-month incidence of major adverse cardiac events (the composite of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization). Noninferiority margins for the risk difference were 0.4 percentage points for mortality at 6 weeks and 1.8 percentage points for major adverse cardiac events at 9 months. RESULTS: A total of 18,867 patients were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to undergo PCI at a hospital without on-site cardiac surgery (14,149 patients) or with on-site cardiac surgery (4718 patients). The 6-week mortality rate was 0.9% at hospitals without on-site surgery versus 1.0% at those with on-site surgery (difference, -0.04 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.31 to 0.23; P=0.004 for noninferiority). The 9-month rates of major adverse cardiac events were 12.1% and 11.2% at hospitals without and those with on-site surgery, respectively (difference, 0.92 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.04 to 1.80; P=0.05 for noninferiority). The rate of target-vessel revascularization was higher in hospitals without on-site surgery (6.5% vs. 5.4%, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We found that PCI performed at hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery was noninferior to PCI performed at hospitals with on-site cardiac surgery with respect to mortality at 6 weeks and major adverse cardiac events at 9 months. (Funded by the Cardiovascular Patient Outcomes Research Team [C-PORT] participating sites; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00549796.).