Microsatellite instability and expression of MLH1 and MSH2 in normal and malignant endometrial and ovarian epithelium in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer family members.

Mismatch repair deficiency is a characteristic molecular finding in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), and has been demonstrated in both colorectal cancers and benign adenomas. Endometrial and ovarian cancers are common extracolonic tumors in this syndrome; however, few studies have investigated whether genetic changes occur in histologically normal endometrial and ovarian epithelia from HNPCC family members. If early genetic changes exist, they might be used as molecular markers to detect susceptibility to endometrial and ovarian cancers. In this study, we analyzed microsatellite instability (MSI) and MLH1 and MSH2 immunohistochemical expression in 20 histologically normal epithelia (12 endometrial and 8 ovarian) and 8 cancers (4 endometrial and 4 ovarian) obtained from 20 individuals representing 7 unrelated HNPCC families. While MSI was observed in endometrial (75%) and ovarian (100%) cancers, no case was determined to exhibit MSI in histologically normal epithelia of the endometrium or ovary. Similarly, in immunohistochemical expressions for MLH1 and MSH2, histologically normal epithelia had no genetic changes predisposing to malignancy. In cancer cases, a correlation existed between the expression of MLH1 and MSH2, the presence of germline mutations in the hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes, and the presence of tumor MSI. These data suggest that MSI and MLH1 and MSH2 expression are not useful biomarkers for the early detection of endometrial and ovarian malignancy in cancer-unaffected HNPCC germline mutation carriers. Further studies of other genetic changes in normal and premalignant precursor lesions are needed.

Male breast cancer in the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome.

A male member of a large HNPCC kindred, affected by primary malignancies of the breast and colon, was identified. This individual was found to harbor a germline mutation of the MLH1 mismatch repair gene previously shown to segregate with disease in this kindred. The breast tumor exhibited somatic reduction to homozygosity for the MLH1 mutation, and microsatellite instability was evident in the breast tumor. We conclude that hereditary male breast cancer can occur as an integral tumor in the HNPCC syndrome.

Cumulative incidence of colorectal and extracolonic cancers in MLH1 and MSH2 mutation carriers of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

The extracolonic tumor spectrum of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) includes cancer of the endometrium, ovaries, stomach, biliary tract, and urinary tract. This study was designed to determine the penetrance of colorectal and extracolonic tumors in HNPCC mutation carriers. Forty-nine patients (22 females and 27 males) were identified with an MSH2 germline mutation, and 56 patients (28 females and 28 males) were identified with an MLH1 I mutation. Cumulative incidence by age 60 (lifetime risk) and mean age of cancer diagnosis were compared. The lifetime risk of extracolonic cancers in MSH2 and MLH1 carriers was 48% and 11%, respectively (P = 0.016). Extracolonic cancer risk in MSH2 females and males was 69% and 34%, respectively (P = 0.042). Mean age of extracolonic cancer diagnosis was significantly older for MSH2 males than females (55.4 vs. 39.0, P = 0.013). No difference was observed in colorectal cancer risk between MLH1 and MSH2 carriers (84% vs. 71%). Colorectal cancer risk was 96% in MSH2 males compared to 39% in MSH2 females (P = 0.034). No differences in colorectal and extracolonic cancer risks between MLH1 females and males were identified. The risk of extracolonic cancer by age 60 was greater in MSH2 mutation carriers than in MLH1 carriers. Gender differences in colorectal and extracolonic cancer risk were observed for MSH2 carriers only. These phenotypic features of HNPCC genotypes may have clinical significance in the design of genotype-specific screening, surveillance, and follow-up for affected individuals.

What you don't know can hurt you: adverse psychologic effects in members of BRCA1-linked and BRCA2-linked families who decline genetic testing.

PURPOSE: To identify members of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families who are at risk for adverse psychologic effects of genetic testing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study with baseline (preeducation) assessments of predictor variables (ie, sociodemographic factors, cancer history, and cancer-related stress symptoms) was performed. The primary outcome variable (presence of depressive symptoms) was assessed at baseline and at 1- and 6-month follow-up evaluations. Participants were 327 adult male and female members of BRCA1- and BRCA2-linked hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families, who were identified as carriers, noncarriers, or decliners of genetic testing. RESULTS: The presence of cancer-related stress symptoms at baseline was strongly predictive of the onset of depressive symptoms in family members who were invited but declined testing. Among persons who reported high baseline levels of stress, depression rates in decliners increased from 26% at baseline to 47% at 1-month follow-up; depression rates in noncarriers decreased and in carriers showed no change (odds ratio [OR] for decliners v noncarriers=8.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9 to 33.5; P=.0004). These significant differences in depression rates were still evident at the 6-month follow-up evaluation (P=.04). CONCLUSION: In BRCA1/2-linked families, persons with high levels of cancer-related stress who decline genetic testing may be at risk for depression. These family members may benefit from education and counseling, even if they ultimately elect not to be tested, and should be monitored for potential adverse effects.

Colorectal and extracolonic cancer variations in MLH1/MSH2 hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer kindreds and the general population.

PURPOSE: This clinical case review aimed to identify phenotypic variations in colorectal and extracolonic cancer expression between hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families with MLH1 and MSH2 germline mutations and the general population. METHODS: Colorectal cancer onset and site distribution were compared among 67 members of MLH1 kindreds, 45 members of MSH2 kindreds, and 1,189 patients from the general population. Synchronous and metachronous cancer rates, tumor stage, extracolonic cancer incidence, and survival were also compared. RESULTS: Mean ages of colorectal cancer onset were 44, 46, and 69 years for MLH1, MSH2, and the general population, respectively (P < 0.001). More proximal and fewer distal colon cancers were noted in HNPCC than the general population (P < 0.001, P = 0.04). Site distribution showed disparity of rectal cancers (8 percent MLH1 vs. 28 percent MSH2; P = 0.01) based on genotypes. Overall, synchronous colorectal cancer rates were 7.4, 6.7, and 2.4 percent for MLH1, MSH2, and the general population, respectively (P = 0.016). Annual metachronous colorectal cancer rates were 2.1, 1.7, and 0.33 percent for MLH1, MSH2, and the general population, respectively (P = 0.041). Colorectal cancer stage presentation was lower in HNPCC than the general population (P = 0.0028). Extracolonic cancers were noted in 33 percent of MSH2 patients, compared with 12 percent of MLH1 patients and 7.3 percent of the general population with colorectal cancers (P < 0.001). Combined MLH1 and MSH2 ten-year survival was 68.7 percent compared with 47.8 percent for the general population (P = 0.009 stage stratified, hazard ratio 0.57). CONCLUSION: The presence of rectal cancer should not preclude the diagnosis of HNPCC, because the incidence of rectal cancer in MSH2 was comparable with that in the general population. Phenotypic variations, including the preponderance of extracolonic cancers in MSH2 patients, did not result in survival differences between genotypic subgroups. These phenotypic features of HNPCC genotypes may have clinical significance in the design of specific screening, surveillance, and follow-up for affected individuals.

A descriptive study of BRCA1 testing and reactions to disclosure of test results.

BACKGROUND: The identification of the BRCA1 gene is a powerful tool for predicting a patient's lifetime risk for carcinoma of the breast and ovary when she has hereditary breast/ovarian carcinoma (HBOC) syndrome. The process of BRCA1 testing and genetic counseling and participants' reactions to test results, are described. METHODS: Education about the natural history of HBOC syndrome and the pros and cons of genetic testing was provided to 14 HBOC families comprised of 2549 bloodline relatives. Of these, 388 underwent DNA testing. After informed consent was given by participants, formal linkage analysis and gene mutation studies were performed on the families. Qualitative data on intentions and emotional reactions were collected by physicians/counselors during the genetic counseling sessions. RESULTS: Of those tested, 181 received their results after further genetic counseling. Seventy-eight of them were positive and 100 were negative for BRCA1 gene mutation. Three had ambiguous findings. The most common reasons given for seeking DNA testing were concern about risk to children and concern about surveillance and prevention. Prophylactic mastectomy was considered by 35% of women who tested positive, whereas prophylactic oophorectomy was considered an important option by 76%. Twenty-five percent of both BRCA1 positive and negative individuals were concerned about discrimination by insurance companies. Eighty percent of those who tested negative reported emotional relief, whereas over one-third of those who tested positive reported sadness, anger, or guilt. CONCLUSIONS: DNA testing of patients with HBOC syndrome must be performed in the context of genetic counseling. The authors' results demonstrate the many complex clinical and nonclinical issues that are important in this process.

Using data mining to characterize DNA mutations by patient clinical features.

In most hereditary cancer syndromes, finding a correspondence between various genetic mutations within a gene (genotype) and a patient's clinical cancer history (phenotype) is challenging; to date there are few clinically meaningful correlations between specific DNA intragenic mutations and corresponding cancer types. To define possible genotype and phenotype correlations, we evaluated the application of data mining methodology whereby the clinical cancer histories of gene-mutation-positive patients were used to define valid or "true" patterns for a specific DNA intragenic mutation. The clinical histories of patients with their corresponding detailed attributes without the same oncologic intragenic mutation were labeled incorrect or "false" patterns. The results of data mining technology yielded characterizing rules for the true cases that constituted clinical features which predicted the intragenic mutation. Some of the initial results derived correlations already independently known in the literature, adding to the confidence of using this methodological approach.

Etiology, natural history, management and molecular genetics of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndromes): genetic counseling implications.

We estimate that 5-10% of virtually all forms of cancer are due to a primary hereditary etiology. However, a hereditary cancer diagnosis is often missed because the family history of cancer is given short shrift in medical practice. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) certainly fits this estimate, although some studies suggest that a minimum of 2% with a range as high as 10% of the total colorectal cancer burden is due to HNPCC. Mutations in one of the four mismatch repair genes, i.e., hMSH2, hMLH1, hPMS1, and hPMS2, account for about 70% of HNPCC kindreds. Other germ-line mutations are likely to be identified to account for the remainder of HNPCC patients. By far the most common HNPCC mutations involve hMSH2 and hMLH1, with hPMS1 and hPMS2 accounting for only about 3% of such families. Prior to these molecular genetic discoveries, the genetic counselor could only provide the patient with an estimate of a 50% likelihood of manifesting HNPCC based on the counselee having one or more first-degree relatives manifesting syndrome cancers in their direct genetic lineage. Because DNA testing has become available in families with known mutations, we have provided pretest group education in the form of a family information service with intensive education about the natural history, genetic risk, surveillance, and options for management of HNPCC, as well as discussion of the potential for fear, anxiety, apprehension, and insurance or employer discrimination that might impact on this DNA testing. Following informed consent, these relatives were then counseled on a one-to-one basis. Using DNA-based genetic counseling involving hMSH2 or hMLH1, we have provided this service to four extended HNPCC kindreds. Details of this genetic counseling experience on these four kindreds will be discussed.

Automated detection of hereditary syndromes using data mining.

Computer-based data mining methodology applied to family history clinical data can algorithmically create highly accurate, clinically oriented hereditary disease pattern recognizers. For the example of hereditary colon cancer, the data mining's selection of relevant factors to assess for hereditary colon cancer was statistically significant (P < 0.05). All final recognizer-formulated patterns of hereditary colon cancer were independently confirmed by a clinical expert. Applied to previously analyzed family histories, the recognizer identified the definitive hereditary histories, correctly responded negatively to the putative hereditary histories, and correctly responded negatively to empirically elevated colon cancer risk situations. This capability facilitates patient selection for DNA studies in search of gene mutations. When genetic mutations are included as parameters in a patient database for a genetic disease, the process yields an expert system which characterizes variations in clinical disease presentations in terms of genetic mutations. Such information can greatly improve the efficiency of gene testing.

BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. A prospective study of patient decision making and outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To identify predictors of utilization of breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility (BRCA1 gene) testing and to evaluate outcomes of participation in a testing program. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with baseline interview assessment of predictor variables (eg, sociodemographic factors, knowledge about hereditary cancer and genetic testing, perceptions of testing benefits, limitations, and risks). BRCA1 test results were offered after an education and counseling session in a research setting. Outcome variables (including depression, functional health status, and prophylactic surgery plans [follow-up only]) were assessed at baseline and 1-month follow-up interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Adult male and female members (n=279) of families with BRCA1-linked hereditary breast-ovarian cancer (HBOC). RESULTS: Of subjects who completed a baseline interview (n=192), 60% requested BRCA1 test results (43% of all study subjects requested results). Requests for results were more frequent for persons with health insurance (odds ration [OR], 3.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.06-6.80); more first-degree relatives affected with breast cancer (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.16-2.16); more knowledge about BRCA1 testing (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.36-2.50); and indicating that test benefits are important (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.13-1.86). At follow-up, noncarriers of BRCA1 mutations showed statistically significant reductions in depressive symptoms and functional impairment compared with carriers and nontested individuals. Individuals identified as mutation carriers did not exhibit increases in depression and functional impairment. Among unaffected women with no prior prophylactic surgery, 17% of carriers (2/12) intended to have mastectomies and 33% (4/12) to have oophorectomies. CONCLUSIONS: Only a subset of HBOC family members are likely to request BRCA1 testing when available. Rates of test use may be higher in persons of a higher socioeconomic status and those with more relatives affected with breast cancer. For some high-risk individuals who receive test results in a research setting that includes counseling, there may be psychological benefits. More research is needed to assess the generalizability of these results and evaluate the long-term consequences of BRCA1 testing.

Familial pancreatic cancer: a review.

The cause of pancreatic cancer remains elusive. The most consistently identified epidemiological risk factor is cigarette smoking. Genetic factors are known to play a significant role in perhaps 5% of the total pancreatic cancer burden. Recent discoveries in molecular biology, particularly germline mutations in inherited conditions which feature pancreatic cancer as an integral part of the tumor spectrum such as in adenomatosis polyposis and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, provide powerful incentive to search for other "cancer genes" in this heterogeneous disease. Early detection of this dreadful disease is crucial because its mortality rate approximates its incidence; the ability to identify high-risk patients on the basis of genetic analysis would significantly enhance the potential for early diagnosis. This review addresses the genetic epidemiology of pancreatic cancer and updates our views on screening, surgery, chemotherapy, and genetic counseling, all of which must be used to gain value from genetic predictability of risk status.

Impact of silicone implants on the lives of women with breast cancer.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To describe the impact of silicone implants on the lives of women with breast cancer. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of telephone interview data. SAMPLE: 120 women from across the United States who have reported to the Food and Drug Administration problems with breast implants following mastectomies. METHODS: Telephone interviews were used to gather responses to 110 questions. Qualitative analysis of narrative data was linked with quantitative data. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Concerns and feelings about breast implants; potential problems with silicone implants; source of information about problems; how they coped with the silicone implant controversy; problems related to their breast implants; the effect of health problems on day-to-day activities, relationships with significant others, work, and any other important aspects of their lives; and advice they would give other women regarding breast implant surgery. By linking the qualitative analysis of narrative data with quantitative data, the investigators sought to answer the following research question: Do the patterns of responses differ based on specific systemic physical problems, reported localized breast problems, or implant problems? FINDINGS: The women reported poorer quality of life and feelings of worry and anger because of health problems. They perceived they had received incomplete information and often had complaints dismissed by their healthcare providers. Most of them would not recommend silicone implants for patients undergoing mastectomy. The women's levels of satisfaction were directly associated with their feelings of being informed and the type of health problems they experienced. CONCLUSIONS: Women need reconstruction options following mastectomy, however, use of silicone implants can result in additional health problems and decreased quality of life as a result of those problems. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nurses can assume the role of breast health educator, which includes counseling women with breast cancer about breast implants and other reconstructive options. Study results will help health providers care both for those patients considering treatment options and those coping with the problems and concerns related to their breast implants. Women should be told the inherent risks and complications associated with breast implants and also told when "we don't know."

Physicians' attitudes toward mandatory workplace urine drug testing.

BACKGROUND: Workplace drug testing programs are being increasingly implemented in both the public and private sectors, and health care workers are unlikely to be excluded from such testing. METHODS: A survey of attending physicians' attitudes toward mandatory hospital-based urine drug testing was undertaken in a medium-sized, midwestern county. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent (272/368) of the sample responded. Seventy-two percent of the subjects believed physician drug use to be a minor or nonexistent problem, 38% lacked confidence in the testing procedure, and 60% believed that testing infringed on the physician's right to privacy; yet 87% would submit to testing if required by a hospital. Forty-five percent of respondents agreed with the policy of mandatory testing for physicians with hospital privileges, 34% disagreed, and 21% were uncertain. Respondents were more supportive of mandatory testing of other health care and non-health care occupations than for themselves. Support for testing was greatest for illicit drugs. If implemented, physicians preferred mandatory testing to be performed by hospital medical staff independent of hospital administration. CONCLUSIONS: Further education and discussion within the physician community appears to be necessary before widespread mandatory workplace urine drug testing of physicians is implemented.