Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 46(4): 432-7, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23867322

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the risk of galvanic corrosion in various stent-grafts in current practice, when devices with unmatched alloy compositions are deployed together. METHOD: Five nitinol (NT) and two steel (SS) stent-grafts produced by different companies were used in different combinations to create 21 samples (NT:NT, n = 10; NT:SS, n = 10; SS:SS, n = 1). Electric potential was measured between the metal couplings after immersion in 0.9% NaCl at a temperature of 37 °C. Subsequently, the same samples were incubated for 24 months in 0.9% NaCl at 37-39 °C under hermetic conditions and examined under a scanning electron microscope in order to search for any evidence of corrosion. RESULTS: Electric potentials between different metals alloys were found (means: NT:SS, 181 µV; NT:NT, 101 µV; SS:SS, 160 µV). The mean electrical potential between stainless steel and nitinol samples was significantly higher than between NT:NT couplings (p < .001). During the final scanning electron microscope examination, only one spot of pitting corrosion (>10 µm) on a nitinol surface was found (associated with previous mechanical damage) in an NT:SS sample after 24 months of incubation in vitro and no sign of mechanical failure of the wires was found. CONCLUSION: Direct contact between the stainless steel and the nitinol alloys does indeed create electrical potential but with a minimal risk of galvanic corrosion. No evidence was found for significant galvanic corrosion when two endovascular implants (stent-grafts) made from different metal composition were used in the same procedure.


Subject(s)
Alloys/chemistry , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Stainless Steel/chemistry , Stents , Corrosion , Electric Conductivity , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Failure , Risk Factors , Sodium Chloride/chemistry , Surface Properties , Temperature , Time Factors
2.
Andrologia ; 44(5): 315-29, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22348773

ABSTRACT

The aim of the study was to examine an in vitro effect of the three bacterial strains (Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Bacteroides ureolyticus) on ejaculated spermatozoa with reference to sperm membrane integrity and mitochondrial activity. The study was carried out on swim-up-separated spermatozoa from 12 normozoospermic volunteers. Sperm plasma membrane stability was evaluated by the LIVE/DEAD Sperm Viability Kit and by the merocyanine 540 test. Mitochondrial activity was evaluated using the JC-1 test as well as the NADH-dependent NBT assay. The percentage of dead cells was significantly higher in spermatozoa treated with B. ureolyticus as compared to that of control spermatozoa (P < 0.01). All the bacterial strains applied affected sperm plasma membrane architecture measured by M540 test (P < 0.01). Moreover, the presence of E. coli or B. ureolyticus was connected with significant decrease in both the number of cells with high mitochondrial transmembrane potential (ΔΨm) and the cells with normal oxidoreductive function of mitochondria (P < 0.05 as compared to untreated cells). To conclude, the contact of bacteria with ejaculated spermatozoa can be a reason for severe injury of sperm membrane stability and mitochondrial activity with potential consequences for male fertility.


Subject(s)
Bacteroides Infections/physiopathology , Escherichia coli Infections/physiopathology , Mitochondria/physiology , Spermatozoa/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/physiopathology , Staphylococcus haemolyticus , Adult , Benzimidazoles , Carbocyanines , Cell Membrane/physiology , Cell Survival , Humans , Infertility, Male/microbiology , Male , Pyrimidinones , Spermatozoa/drug effects , Spermatozoa/physiology
3.
Am J Crit Care ; 9(3): 188-91, 2000 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10800604

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The presence of a corneal reflex and the ability to maintain eye closure are instrumental in protecting the cornea. Use of neuromuscular blocking agents or propofol can result in impaired eyelid closure and loss of corneal reflex, leading to corneal exposure. The cornea is then at risk for drying, infection, and scarring, which may lead to permanent visual loss. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether applying artificial tear ointment to the eyes of paralyzed or heavily sedated patients receiving mechanical ventilation decreases the prevalence of exposure keratitis more than does passive closure of the eyelid. METHODS: A prospective, randomized control trial was done. The sample was 50 patients in the intensive care unit receiving either neuromuscular blocking agents or propofol during mechanical ventilation. In each patient, artificial tear ointment was applied to one eye; passive closure of the eyelid was used for the other eye (control eye). RESULTS: Nine patients had evidence of exposure keratitis in the untreated eye, and 2 had corneal abrasions in both the treated and the control eyes. The remaining 39 patients did not have corneal abrasions in either eye. Use of the artificial tear ointment was more effective in preventing corneal exposure than was passive eyelid closure (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Eye care with a lubricating ointment on a regular, set schedule can effectively reduce the prevalence of corneal abrasions in patients who are either paralyzed or heavily sedated and thus can help prevent serious complications such as corneal ulceration, infection, and visual loss.


Subject(s)
Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Keratitis/prevention & control , Neuromuscular Blocking Agents/adverse effects , Ophthalmic Solutions/therapeutic use , Propofol/adverse effects , Adult , Eyelids , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Keratitis/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Respiration, Artificial , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Nurses Staff Dev ; 14(6): 293-6, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9934068

ABSTRACT

Patient death is a stressful experience for the patient, family, and the healthcare team. Nurses-often have only informal resources for coping with the sadness and grief they might experience. Realizing the need for nursing grief support, a group of staff nurses from the intensive care unit formed a grief support group. Using information from the literature and critical incident stress debriefing, the group developed support interventions to aid intensive care unit staff after patient death.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Death , Burnout, Professional/prevention & control , Critical Care/psychology , Grief , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Self-Help Groups/organization & administration , Adaptation, Psychological , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Communication , Humans , Program Development , Social Support
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...