ABSTRACT
The prevalence, awareness and control of hypertension are important epidemiological research topics worldwide. The screening of hypertension in a workplace has some special aspects. We have screened the employees in a Hungarian salami factory (Pick Salami Factory, Szeged, Hungary) for hypertensives. In a cross-sectional survey, the blood pressure (BP) was measured with an instrument meeting accepted measuring principles (BP-TRU BP) and a questionnaire was filled. In all, 1012 factory workers were screened (600 male and 412 female) and 25.7% of the workers proved to be hypertensives. Of these, 61.5% of the hypertensive employees were aware that their BP is high. Among the treated hypertensives, 21.9% were controlled. These results suggest that the efficacy of the management of hypertension in Hungary cannot be solely responsible for the high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The improvement of the management of hypertension should decrease the cardiovascular risk in the hypertensive population. The worksite screening and follow-up of hypertension seem to be logical health service solutions. This has been proven to be cost-effective.
Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Hypertension/diagnosis , Mass Screening , Occupational Health Services , Adult , Awareness , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Hungary/epidemiology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Male , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: In the past two years the authors examined 28 patients with abdominal complaints and allergic respiratory symptoms. Detailed internal, gastroenterological, allergological examinations were made. METHODS: 1 skin Prick-test (SPT) with inhalative and nutritive panel 2. measuring of food-specific (gliadin, alpha-lactalbumin beta-lactoglobulin, ovalbumin) IgG-antibody level detecting with ELISA method, 3. leukocyte migration inhibition (LMI) test against the same foodstuffs, 4. histological examination of the stomach and the duodenum especially for mucosal mastocytes (MMCs). RESULTS: 1. SPT was positive in 23/28 patients for inhalative, but in the 5 cases we did not identify any inhalative allergen. The SPT for the main foodstuffs were positive in 18 patients while in 3 other patients there was urtica only for the other antigens. 2. The food-specific IgG-antibody level was increased in 18/27 patients against one or more antigens. The SPTs and the antibody determination showed identity in 8/18 cases. 3. The LMI tests were positive against one or more main food-products in 23/27 cases. There was common positivity in respect of antigens (between LMI test and antibody identification) in 17 cases. Pathological immunological reactions were presented against the same main foodstuffs with at least two methods for flour in 11, for egg in 10 and for milk in 12 patients. Endoscopic examinations were performed in 27 cases. The number of the MMCs were increased in 22/27 patients. After a specific elimination diet open-food challenges were performed and they confirmed the results of the in vitro and in vivo examinations. CONCLUSION: It is common that the respiratory allergic symptoms in atopic patients accompanied with food allergy for the main foodstuffs caused not only more severe respiratory symptoms, but abdominal complaints too. In respect to the many positive LMI tests the late-type hypersensitivity have important pathogenetical role in it. This three methods together define well the main food-products, which can be antigens as well. The examination of the MMCs supports the local disturbance in the immunoregulatory system.
