Metacognitive therapy for generalized anxiety disorders in group: A case study.

OBJECTIVES: In Metacognitive therapy (MCT), homework is used, for example, to increase awareness of thoughts and thought processes, to challenge metacognitive beliefs in real-life situations, and to practice new ways of processing thoughts, feelings, and symptoms. All MCT treatment manuals include homework assignments to be given between each session. METHOD: The following study provides a detailed description of the implementation of homework in a group-based MCT treatment for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) at an outpatient clinic in Norway. The treatment described in this case consisted of 10 weekly group sessions (7 patients) lasting two hours. RESULTS: This case study demonstrates that group-based MCT can be used to treat GAD and describes how the use of homework can facilitate therapeutic change. CONCLUSION: Overall, the effectiveness of MCT was found to be high. Homework gives patients the opportunity to take charge of their therapy and develop a sense of responsibility for their own progress, both during and after treatment.

Changes in depression domains as predictors of return to work in common mental disorders.

BACKGROUND: Depression highly impairs function and reduces quality of life. Therefore, both symptomatic and functional recovery are important treatment goals. Depression consists of several cognitive, somatic, and affective symptom factors that differently affect function. However, it is unclear whether changes in these domains predict return to work (RTW) after treatment. METHODS: Data were collected during treatment from patients on full or partial sick leave reporting depression symptoms (N = 300) at an out-patient clinic. Information on work status was assessed pre- and post-treatment and at 6 months follow-up. Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate if residualized changes in symptom factors predicted full RTW, controlling for gender, education level, and age. RESULTS: Changes (as symptom improvement) in the cognitive, somatic, and affective factor scores each significantly predicted full RTW post-treatment and at follow-up for patients on full and partial sick leave, even after controlling for gender, education level, and age. The change in the somatic factor explained the largest proportion of variance for full work post-treatment in patients on full sick-leave, while change in the cognitive factor explained most unique variance for patients on graded sick leave. LIMITATIONS: The sample consisted of a majority of women with a relatively high level of education. This study should be replicated in more heterogeneous samples. CONCLUSION: Changes in depression symptom domains are significant predictors for RTW work post-treatment. The change in the somatic factor explained the largest proportion of variance in patients on full sick leave and thus may particularly influence RTW after treatment.