ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Total ankle arthroplasty through the anterior approach (TAR-AA) is an increasingly popular treatment for ankle arthritis, but it carries a known risk for wound complications. Several products have been investigated to mitigate this risk; however, most are either costly or invasive. Noninvasive skin expansion strips (NSESs) were designed to transfer tension away from the incision and induce new skin growth at the edges of the strips. We hypothesize that postoperative application of NSESs will decrease unplanned clinic visits and wound complications after TAR-AA. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of 41 patients at a single institution (3 surgeons) treated with NSESs after undergoing TAR-AA. An additional 41 consecutive historical patients treated without NSESs were retrospectively included as a control group. Patients received application of NSESs in the operating room after routine wound closure and again 2 weeks postoperatively. No other changes were made to the surgeons' wound closure technique, immobilization, follow-up timing, or rehabilitation protocols. Primary outcomes included (1) additional clinic visit required for wound assessment or suture removal, (2) superficial wound complication, and (3) deep infection. RESULTS: Baseline demographics did not differ significantly from our 41 consecutively treated historical controls. Additional clinic visits for suture removal or wound evaluation were significantly lower for patients treated with NSESs (15%, 6 of 41) compared to the control group (49%, 20 of 41) (P = .001). There was also a significant difference in the superficial wound complication rate in the treatment group vs control group, 2% and 12%, respectively (P = .04). There were no deep infections in either group. CONCLUSION: Noninvasive skin expansion strips placed after TAR-AA with an anterior approach have the potential to decrease wound complications and unplanned clinic visits. Further high-volume or randomized studies are needed to clarify their cost effectiveness and effect on long-term outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective cohort study.
