Fluoride and Oral Health.

The discovery during the first half of the 20th century of the link between natural fluoride, adjusted fluoride levels in drinking water and reduced dental caries prevalence proved to be a stimulus for worldwide on-going research into the role of fluoride in improving oral health. Epidemiological studies of fluoridation programmes have confirmed their safety and their effectiveness in controlling dental caries. Major advances in our knowledge of how fluoride impacts the caries process have led to the development, assessment of effectiveness and promotion of other fluoride vehicles including salt, milk, tablets, toothpaste, gels and varnishes. In 1993, the World Health Organization convened an Expert Committee to provide authoritative information on the role of fluorides in the promotion of oral health throughout the world (WHO TRS 846, 1994). This present publication is a revision of the original 1994 document, again using the expertise of researchers from the extensive fields of knowledge required to successfully implement complex interventions such as the use of fluorides to improve dental and oral health. Financial support for research into the development of these new fluoride strategies has come from many sources including government health departments as well as international and national grant agencies. In addition, the unique role which industry has played in the development, formulation, assessment of effectiveness and promotion of the various fluoride vehicles and strategies is noteworthy. This updated version of 'Fluoride and Oral Health' has adopted an evidence-based approach to its commentary on the different fluoride vehicles and strategies and also to its recommendations. In this regard, full account is taken of the many recent systematic reviews published in peer reviewed literature.

Critique of the review of 'Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries' published by the Cochrane Collaboration in 2015.

The Cochrane Review on water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries was published in 2015 and attracted considerable interest and comment, especially in countries with extensive water fluoridation programmes. The Review had two objectives: (i) to evaluate the effects of water fluoridation (artificial or natural) on the prevention of dental caries, and (ii) to evaluate the effects of water fluoridation (artificial or natural) on dental fluorosis. The authors concluded, inter alia, that there was very little contemporary evidence, meeting the Review's inclusion criteria, that evaluated the effectiveness of water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries. The purpose of this critique is to examine the conduct of the above Review, and to put it into context in the wider body of evidence regarding the effectiveness of water fluoridation. While the overall conclusion that water fluoridation is effective in caries prevention agrees with previous reviews, many important public health questions could not be answered by the Review because of the restrictive criteria used to judge adequacy of study design and risk of bias. The potential benefits of using wider criteria in order to achieve a fuller understanding of the effectiveness of water fluoridation are discussed.

Community-oriented administration of fluoride for the prevention of dental caries: a summary of the current situation in Asia.

Dental caries is the most prevalent chronic disease affecting human populations around the world. It is recognized that fluoride plays a significant role in dental caries reduction. Meanwhile, several low- and middle-income countries of Asia have not yet implemented systematic fluoride programs; contributing factors relate to misconceptions about the mechanisms of fluoride, low priority given to oral health in national health policy and strategic plans, and lack of interest among public health administrators. A workshop on the effective use of fluoride in Asia took place in Phang-Nga, Thailand, in 2011. A series of country presentations addressed some of the topics mentioned above; in addition, speakers from countries of the region provided examples of successful fluoride interventions and discussed program limitations, barriers encountered, and solutions, as well as possibilities for expanding coverage. Participants acknowledged that automatic fluoridation through water, salt, and milk is the most effective and equitable strategy for the prevention of dental caries. Concerns were expressed that government-subsidized community fluoride prevention programs may face privatization. In addition, the use of affordable fluoride-containing toothpastes should be encouraged. The workshop identified: strengths and weaknesses of ongoing community-based fluoride programs, as well as the interest of countries in a particular method; the requirement for World Health Organization (WHO) technical assistance on various aspects, including fluoridation process, feasibility studies, and implementation of effective epidemiological surveillance of the program; exchange of information; and the need for inter-country collaboration. It was acknowledged that program process and evaluation at the local and country levels need further dissemination. The meeting was co-sponsored by the World Health Organization, the International Association for Dental Research, and the World Dental Federation.

The Sheffield outreach teaching programme.

Sheffield's School of Clinical Dentistry has developed a year-round dental outreach teaching programme of 20 weeks for each student in two or three of six already established general practices and five PCT clinics. On the programme, under local supervision, students provide comprehensive care for patients and complete associated projectwork. This paper first describes the development and management of the programme then the learning experiences of recent students.

Students' clinical experience on outreach placements.

UNLABELLED: Primary care outreach placements increasingly feature in UK undergraduate dental curricula. The profile of clinical work undertaken on placement may differ from traditional hospital-based programmes and between outreach settings. An appreciation of any differences could inform curriculum development. OBJECTIVE: To compare the profiles of clinical work experienced on a traditional hospital-based programme and outreach placements in different settings. SETTING: One dental hospital and eight existing primary care block placements in England. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Subjects were four cohorts of senior dental students in one UK dental school. Departmental records provided data on students' clinical experience in different settings and their achievement of placement learning objectives. Descriptive statistics for groups were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Counts of patients encountered and of clinical procedures completed in the following categories: simple plastic restorations, endodontics, cast restorations, dentures, extractions and children's dentistry. (2) Student perceptions of placement learning reported via Likert scales. RESULTS: Outreach students encountered twice as many patients and typically completed about three times as much clinical work as students in the hospital, e.g. 44 cf 16 simple plastic restorations, seven cf two endodontic procedures. There were variations in profiles by setting. For example, amalgam being more likely to be used on outreach especially in the General Dental Service; more children's dentistry in community services and more extractions in Dental Access Centres. Students reported learning outcomes generally being achieved (average 94%) although with some variation by setting. CONCLUSION: Dental outreach training greatly increases the quantity of students' clinical experience in everyday dentistry compared to a hospital-based programme. Placements also increase awareness of service delivery and develop clinical skills. There are appreciable variations between outreach settings possibly reflecting their purposes. Multiple contrasting outreach placements for each student might increase the uniformity of learning experiences.

RCT of the effects of block absence for outreach placements on dental students' finals grades.

UNLABELLED: Undergraduate dental curricula are being supplemented with primary care placements requiring periods away from the dental school. These absences may impact negatively on students' other studies. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of outreach placement and traditional hospital-based training alone on students' final examination scores. Existing primary care placements in northern England about one year from students' qualification. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Analysis of secondary outcomes in a randomised controlled trial with students' final examination marks being compared on qualification. To reduce Type I error only 4 of 24 available scores were considered and multiple testing correction applied. Five-week block outreach placements for 25 of 49 students. Honours awarded and examination scores for children's dentistry, overall clinical work and theory. RESULTS: Groups' final exam scores were similar: children's dentistry - outreach 64.9 (SD 2.1), hospital-based 65.0 (3.0); overall clinical work 58.3 (3.4) cf 60.7 (4.8) and theory 54.6 (3.5) cf 56.5 (4.0). The numbers of students awarded honours (outreach 1, hospital 4) showed no significant difference (Fisher's exact text P = 0.19). CONCLUSION: Dental outreach training involving several weeks' absence from the school had no negative impact on students' finals scores.

A randomised controlled trial of the effect of outreach placement on treatment planning by dental students.

UNLABELLED: Undergraduate dental students' curricula are being supplemented with primary care placements. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of outreach placement and traditional hospital-based training alone on students' treatment planning ability. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial.Setting Four existing primary care placements in England during 2004. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: At follow-up the fourth-year students took a history from a standard 'patient' then recorded a treatment plan. Interview skill was scored. The history and plan were assessed by clinicians blind to the intervention. INTERVENTION: Five-week block outreach placements for 25 of 49 students. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Interviewing skill, quality of dental and social histories, the appropriateness of planned treatments and the consideration of wider issues. RESULTS: The two groups were similar in the scores for interviewing and taking a dental history. The outreach group scored higher for capturing a social history (outreach mean 4.4, SD = 2.1, n = 22 and hospital 2.8, SD = 1.9, n = 23; p = 0.01) and for developing an appropriate treatment plan (5.6 [SD = 2.1] and 3.9 [SD = 2.3]; p = 0.01). There were no differences in scores relating to the wider issues. CONCLUSION: Dental outreach training was significantly more effective than traditional training alone in improving students' ability to capture relevant points of social history from a patient and to consider them when planning treatment.

Student perspectives on their recent dental outreach placement experiences.

BACKGROUND: Dental schools are developing new curricula, with outreach placements enhancing the hospital-based training. OBJECTIVES: To assess the students' experience of outreach as one component of determining the value and feasibility of outreach placements. INTERVENTION: Six-week block placements for 10 undergraduates and 3 weeks for 11 hygiene and hygiene and therapy students in existing primary care clinics, in areas of need, to work supervised by local dentists. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 20 students by staff independent of the course team. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and content analysed before being verified by a second observer. Findings were triangulated against a peer-run focus group and students' clinical records. RESULTS: Students were very positive about their experience and the potential role of outreach training in dental education. They described: gaining greater experience of new types of patients and their communities; learning from broader clinical experience, alternative approaches and practicing or observing dentistry in different settings; the benefits of team working; and, acquiring a more holistic and pragmatic view of health care. Many students reported gaining greater confidence, wider awareness of potential careers in dentistry and a greater sense of realism in their experience. Some reflected on their own training needs. Students also discussed the importance of preparation for the placements and the merits of different styles of supervision. CONCLUSION: Dental outreach training can provide students with valuable learning experience in a range of areas. It requires careful management to ensure those experiences match individuals' needs and the programme's purposes.

Perspectives of staff on student outreach placements.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the perspectives of placement staff on outreach training. INTERVENTION: Block clinical placements in primary care settings for dental undergraduates and hygiene and therapy students. METHOD: After completion of the placements, 32 participating staff across nine primary care locations took part in qualitative interviews and focus groups. The staff provided data on placement organisation, the students' development and their supervision, and any effects on themselves as hosts. RESULTS: The major themes included the learning environment, supervision and communication. The staff saw benefits to students in working in a smaller primary care clinic with nursing support and immediately available supervision by a dental generalist. Other benefits included increased confidence, broader clinical experience and applying theoretical learning to new communities. Effective communication and adequate resourcing were critical success factors. There was some disruption of clinics' normal working, but many unanticipated benefits. Staff supported the outreach placements in primary care settings to enhance students' dental education. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide a planning and evaluation framework for dental educators involved in outreach.

The personal dental service as a setting for an undergraduate clinical programme.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and benefits of placing dental undergraduates into a general dental practice setting for part of their clinical programme. SETTING: Two six-surgery general dental practices in the North West of England operating within the personal dental service of the NHS. METHOD: Six volunteer final year students worked within the practices for one-day-per week for 11 weeks. Evaluation included patients', practitioners' and students' views obtained from questionnaires and/or interviews and an analysis of students' clinical records. RESULTS: The students saw a large positive impact from: working alongside a dental nurse; developing their clinical skills; working in a busy practice environment; and developing interpersonal skills. Patients were very positive with 98% (44/45) being complimentary about the treatment they received, and commenting that they would be willing to participate in future student training programmes. The practice principals would also welcome continuation of the programme. CONCLUSION: The programme was both feasible and educationally beneficial. The financial implications need further research.

The use of school milk as a vehicle for fluoride in Knowsley, UK; an evaluation of effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE: To compare caries in children initially aged 3 to 5 years who had participated for four years in a fluoridated school milk programme with a group of children in a similar community drinking non-fluoridated milk. STUDY DESIGN: A four-year longitudinal study measuring caries experience and caries increment in primary molars and caries experience in permanent molars and incisors. METHOD: 478 children in Knowsley (test group) and 396 in Skelmersdale (comparison group) were examined for caries (dmft/dfs) at baseline in 1997. Of these, 318 in Knowsley and 233 in Skelmersdale were re-examined at follow-up (dmft/dfs and DMFT/DFS) in 2001. RESULTS: The mean ages at baseline of the children from the test and comparison groups were 4.7 and 4.8 years respectively. The baseline dmft/dfs was 1.73/2.51 in the test group and 1.29/2.15 in the comparison group. The 4-year dmft/dfs mean increments were 2.28/4.49 and 1.96/4.12 in test and comparison groups respectively. The DMFT/DFS at age 7-9 years in the test and comparison groups were 0.40/0.45 and 0.40/0.55 respectively. CONCLUSION: The fluoridated school milk scheme, as configured in Knowsley. Merseyside, did not reduce caries within the primary dentition and, at best, had a small clinical impact on the permanent dentition up to 8 years of age.

Recording and understanding social histories by dental undergraduates in a community-based clinical programme.

Although social inequalities are known to account for large differences in dental health, attitudes to dental attendance and the type of treatment received by the patient, the taking of a patient's social history receives little emphasis in dental undergraduate teaching. Social history is defined as recording the social and family circumstances of the patient. An exercise undertaken by undergraduate dental students on clinical placements in the Community Dental Service (CDS) is described. Students write a profile of the community in which the clinic is situated, write case histories for two of their patients and then highlight issues illustrated by the case histories with reference to information on the wider community and published literature on inequalities in health and barriers to care. Students completing the exercise in April 2000 and their tutors were given additional information, including a checklist to help in the completion of the social histories of the two patients. A comparison with the reports submitted in the previous year showed that this significantly improved the recording and understanding of social history. This exercise provides a means whereby dental public health issues can be taught to undergraduates whilst maintaining relevance to the clinical setting.

Reducing patients' state anxiety in general dental practice: a randomized controlled trial.

Anxiety assessment by questionnaire provides information for the dentist and may also confer a psychological benefit on patients. This study tested the hypothesis that informing dentists about patients' dental anxiety prior to commencement of treatment reduces patients' state anxiety. A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving eight General Dental Practitioners in North Wales. Participants included patients attending their first session of dental treatment, and accumulating a score of 19 or above, or scoring 5 on any one question, of the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS). Patients (n = 119) completed Spielberger's state anxiety inventory (STAI-S) pre- and post-treatment and were randomly allocated to intervention (dentist informed of MDAS score) and control (dentist not informed) groups. Intervention patients showed greater reduction in mean change STAI-S scores (F[1,119] = 8.74, P < 0.0001). Providing the dentist with information of the high level of a patient's dental anxiety prior to treatment, and involving the patient in this, reduced the patient's state anxiety.