Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 47(1): 101-11, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17192508

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous busulfan in pediatric patients and provide dosing recommendations. Twenty-four pediatric patients were treated with intravenous busulfan, 1.0 or 0.8 mg/kg for ages < or = 4 years or > 4 years, respectively, 4 times a day for 4 days. Dense PK sampling was performed. Body weight, age, gender, and body surface area were explored for effects on PK, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess different dosing regimens. The PK of intravenous busulfan was described by a 1-compartment model with clearance of 4.04 L/h/20 kg and volume of distribution of 12.8 L/20 kg. Simulations indicated that the mg/kg and mg/m2 regimens were similar and achieved the desired target exposure in approximately 60% of patients. This model suggests that patients < or = 12 kg should be dosed at 1.1 mg/kg and those > 12 kg dosed at 0.8 mg/kg. Therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustment will further improve therapeutic targeting.


Subject(s)
Alkylating Agents/pharmacokinetics , Busulfan/pharmacokinetics , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Models, Biological , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Age Factors , Alkylating Agents/administration & dosage , Alkylating Agents/blood , Alkylating Agents/therapeutic use , Body Surface Area , Body Weight , Busulfan/administration & dosage , Busulfan/blood , Busulfan/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Computer Simulation , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Monte Carlo Method , Neoplasms/therapy , Sex Factors
2.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 8(9): 486-92, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12374453

ABSTRACT

Intravenous busulfan (i.v. BU) has demonstrated safety when administered at 0.8 mg/kg per dose i.v. every 6 hours x 16 doses. We evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of giving the same total daily i.v. BU dose (3.2 mg/kg) either divided as a twice-daily infusion or as a single infusion to patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Twelve patients with hematologic malignant disease were treated; 7 patients had non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, 4 patients had acute myeloid leukemia, and 1 patient had chronic myelogenous leukemia. The first cohort (group A) received, on the basis of actual body weight, i.v. BU at 1.6 mg/kg per dose over 4 hours every 12 hours for 4 days (day -7 to day -4). The second cohort (group B) received 3.2 mg/kg per dose of i.v. BU (same total dose as group A) as a single infusion over 4 hours daily for 4 days. In both groups the i.v. BU was followed by cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg daily for 2 days (day -3 and day -2). Blood specimens were collected on the first, fifth, and seventh doses for group A and on the first and fourth doses for group B to determine the disposition of i.v. BU. Peripheral blood stem cells (autologous in 7 cases and HLA-matched allogeneic in 5 cases) were given 2 days after completion of cyclophosphamide administration (day 0), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 microg/kg was started on the same day. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus plus methotrexate for recipients of allogeneic stem cells. One patient developed presumed fungal pneumonia and died of multisystem organ dysfunction on day +21 before hematologic reconstitution could be evaluated. Another was reported to have sudden death of undetermined cause at home on day 40. The remaining patients had engraftment (absolute neutrophil count >500/microL) at a median of 11 days and sustained platelet counts >20,000/microL at a median of 14 days. Significant regimen-related toxicity (grade III-IV) was limited to hepatic toxicity (2 cases) catheter infection (2 cases), epistaxis (3 cases), diarrhea (1 case), anorexia (1 case), mucositis (1 case), hyperglycemia (1 case), pneumonia (1 case), and sepsis (1). In group B there was 1 case of mild venoocclusive disease, which resolved without sequelae. No central nervous system or pulmonary toxicity was noted. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including clearance, half-life, maximum concentration, and area under the curve, demonstrated that the first dose profile was highly predictive of later dose PK profiles. No accumulation of the drug was noted. The change in dosing schedule did not increase toxicity or end-organ damage despite higher plasma concentration-times. Although further study for long-term efficacy is warranted, i.v. BU can be given safely with reproducible results on a twice-daily divided or single-daily dosing schedule to patients undergoing HSCT.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Busulfan/pharmacokinetics , Busulfan/toxicity , Hematologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Adult , Aged , Busulfan/administration & dosage , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Middle Aged , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Transplantation, Autologous , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...