Focal PSMA-Positive Pleural Lesion in a Patient With Stage II Prostate Carcinoma.

ABSTRACT: A 70-year-old man with histopathologically proven prostate carcinoma (Gleason, 5 + 5; prostate-specific antigen level, 6.2 µg/mL) was referred for an 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT scan. The scan revealed bilateral PSMA uptake in the prostate, representing the primary tumor, but no evidence of PSMA-positive lymph nodes. However, a left-sided ventral pleural thickening showed focal PSMA uptake. Lesion biopsy showed no signs of malignancy, and prostatectomy was performed. The 1-year follow-up CT thorax showed growth of approximately 20% of the pleural lesion. Subsequently, video-assisted thoracic surgery of the lesion was performed. Histopathology showed a solitary fibrous tumor, a rare mesenchymal tumor.

Incidences of Pancreatic Malignancy and Mortality in Patients With Untreated Branch-Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms Undergoing Surveillance: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to pool incidences of increased cyst size, malignant branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs), pancreatic malignancy, and pancreatic malignancy-related death during follow-up (FU) of BD-IPMN patients. METHODS: Searches were performed from January 2010 to April 2016. All hits were checked on inclusion criteria, and outcomes were extracted. Incidences were pooled. Three subgroups were defined: (1) including only BD-IPMN patients, (2) short-interval FU (maximum 6 months), and (3) long-interval FU (>6 months). RESULTS: Thirty-one articles were enrolled, including 8455 patients (mean age, 66.4 years). Twenty-two studies included subgroup 1; 10 and 6 studies included, respectively, subgroups 2 and 3. Incidence of increased cyst size was 17.4%. In subgroups 1, 2, and 3, incidences were, respectively, 20.0%, 17.2%, and 31.7%. Incidence of malignant BD-IPMN was 2.5. In subgroups 1, 2, and 3, incidences were, respectively, 3.0%, 2.4%, and 3.3%. Incidence of pancreatic malignancy was 2.6%. In subgroups 1, 2, and 3, incidences were, respectively, 2.3%, 1.2%, and 4.0%. Incidence of death was 0.5%. In subgroups 1, 2, and 3, incidences were, respectively, 0.4%, 0.04%, and 0.12%. CONCLUSIONS: Although not significant, all incidences on long-interval FU were higher; therefore, short-interval FU seems necessary to find resectable lesions.

Monitoring treatment response in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer by additional diffusion-weighted imaging: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: To determine the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in evaluating response to chemoradiotherapy in patients with uterine cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search was performed in MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 2005 to April 2014 using search terms related to uterine cervical cancer and magnetic resonance imaging. Two reviewers independently checked the studies for inclusion criteria, patient population, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters and analysis, follow-up for treatment response, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, and quality assessment. RESULTS: Nine studies with 231 patients were included. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging varied from Ib1 to IVb and mean age from 42 to 67 years. When baseline and after treatment pooled mean ADC values were compared, complete responders showed higher increase (0.88 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s to 1.50 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s; Δ0.62 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s) compared to partial responders (1.03 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s to 1.42 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s; Δ0.39 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s) and to nonresponders (0.87 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s to 1.18 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s; Δ0.31 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s). Individual studies also showed that an ADC of ≤0.31 was only seen in nonresponders and an increase of ADC of ≥0.62 was only seen in complete responders. The number of datasets for monitoring early response (at 2 or 4 weeks of therapy) were low and comparable increases in pooled mean ADC values between complete responders, partial responders, and nonresponders were seen. Data on quality assessment showed high risk of bias concerning patient selection, DWI evaluation, and flow and timing. CONCLUSION: DWI can be used for monitoring treatment response after treatment, but not for the early response monitoring.