A holistic review of sodium intake in kidney transplant patients: More questions than answers.

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the best treatment option for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Acute rejection rates have decreased drastically in recent years but chronic kidney allograft disease (CKAD) is still an important cause of allograft failure and return to dialysis. Thus, there is unmet need to identify and reverse the cause of CKAD. Additionally, cardiovascular events after KT are still leading causes of morbidity and mortality. One overlooked potential contributor to CKAD and adverse cardiovascular events is increased sodium/salt intake in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). In general population, the adverse effects of high sodium intake are well known but in KTRs, there is a paucity of evidence despite decades of experience with KT. Limited research showed that sodium intake is high in most KTRs. Moreover, excess sodium intake is associated with elevated blood pressure and albuminuria in some studies involving KTRs. There is also experimental evidence suggesting that increased sodium intake is associated with histologic graft damage. Critical knowledge gaps still remain, including the exact amount of sodium restriction needed in KTRs to optimize outcomes and allograft survival. Additionally, best methods to measure sodium intake and practices to follow-up are not clarified in KTRs. To meet these deficits, prospective long term studies are warranted in KTRs. Moreover, preventive measures must be determined and implemented both at individual and societal levels to achieve sodium restriction in KTRs.

A Case of Hypernatremia in a Newly Diagnosed Patient With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Lessons for Nephrologists.

Arginine vasopressin deficiency (AVP-D), formerly known as central diabetes insipidus, is a disease characterized by polyuria, polydipsia, and hypernatremia. The concomitant diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an underappreciated event that requires prompt recognition and treatment by practicing nephrologists and hematologists. This report highlights this importance by describing the case of a 39-year-old patient newly diagnosed with AML who developed severe hypernatremia. The role of diagnostic testing through desmopressin (DDAVP) challenge and copeptin testing to confirm the diagnosis of AVP-D in this context and the use of DDVAP for treatment are discussed. Practicing nephrologists and primary care providers taking care of patients with similar symptoms will benefit from understanding the pathophysiology of AVP-D, its relationship with AML, and the prognosis in this patient cohort.

Renin angiotensin system-induced muscle wasting: putative mechanisms and implications for clinicians.

Renin angiotensin system (RAS) alters various mechanisms related to muscle wasting. The RAS system consists of classical and non-classical pathways, which mostly function differently. Classical RAS pathway, operates through angiotensin II (AngII) and angiotensin type 1 receptors, is associated with muscle wasting and sarcopenia. On the other hand, the non-classical RAS pathway, which operates through angiotensin 1-7 and Mas receptor, is protective against sarcopenia. The classical RAS pathway might induce muscle wasting by variety of mechanisms. AngII reduces body weight, via reduction in food intake, possibly by decreasing hypothalamic expression of orexin and neuropeptide Y, insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), signaling, AngII increases skeletal muscle proteolysis by forkhead box transcription factors (FOXO), caspase activation and muscle RING-finger protein-1 transcription. Furthermore, AngII infusion in skeletal muscle reduces phospho-Bad (Ser136) expression and induces apoptosis through increased cytochrome c release and DNA fragmentation. Additionally, Renin angiotensin system activation through AT1R and AngII stimulates tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukin-6 which induces muscle wasting, Last but not least classical RAS pathway, induce oxidative stress, disturb mitochondrial energy metabolism, and muscle satellite cells which all lead to muscle wasting and decrease muscle regeneration. On the contrary, the non-classical RAS pathway functions oppositely to mitigate these mechanisms and protects against muscle wasting. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms of RAS-induced muscle wasting and putative implications for clinical practice. We also emphasize the areas of uncertainties and suggest potential research areas.

Sociodemographic disparities in sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor use among US kidney transplant recipients: An observational study of real-world pharmacy records.

BACKGROUND: Recent clinical trials demonstrate benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with chronic kidney disease, but data on use in kidney transplant (KTx) recipients are limited. METHODS: We examined a novel database linking SRTR registry data for KTx recipients (2000-2021) with outpatient fill records from a large pharmaceutical claims warehouse (2015-2021). Adult (≥18 years) KTx recipients treated with SGLT2i were compared to those who received other noninsulin diabetes medications without SGLT2i. Characteristics associated with SGLT2i use were quantified by multivariable logistic regression (adjusted odds ratio, 95%LCLaOR95%UCL). RESULTS: Among 18 988 KTx recipients treated with noninsulin diabetes agents in the study period, 2224 filled an SGLT2i. Mean time from KTx to prescription was 6.7 years for SGLT2i versus 4.7 years for non-SGLT2i medications. SGLT2i use was more common in Asian adults (aOR, 1.091.311.58) and those aged > 30-59 years (compared with 18-30 years) or with BMI > 35 kg/m2 (aOR, 1.191.411.67), and trended higher with self-pay status. SGLT2i use was lower among KTx recipients who were women (aOR, .79.87.96), Black (aOR, .77.881.00) and other (aOR, .52.751.07) race, publicly insured (aOR, .82.921.03), or with less than college education (aOR, .78.87.96), and trended lower in those age 75 years and older. SGLT2i use in KTx patients increased dramatically in 2019-2021 (aOR, 5.015.636.33 vs. prior years). CONCLUSION: SGLT2i use is increasing in KTx recipients but varies with factors including race, education, and insurance. While ongoing study is needed to define risks and benefits of SGLT2i use in KTx patients, attention should also focus on reducing treatment disparities related to sociodemographic traits.

Generating strategies for a national comeback in pancreas transplantation: A Delphi survey and US conference report.

In the United States, potential transplant candidates with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus are inconsistently offered pancreas transplantation (PTx), contributing to a dramatic decline in pancreas allograft utilization over the past 2 decades. The American Society of Transplantation organized a workshop to identify barriers inhibiting PTx and to develop strategies for a national comeback. The 2-day workshop focused on 4 main topics: (1) referral/candidate selection, (2) organ recovery/utilization, (3) program performance/patient outcomes, and (4) enhanced education/research. Topics were explored through expert presentations, patient testimonials, breakout sessions, and strategic planning, including the identification of tasks for immediate focus. Additionally, a modified-Delphi survey was conducted among workshop members to develop and rate the importance of barriers, and the impact and feasibility of workgroup-identified improvement strategies. The panelists identified 16 barriers to progress and 44 strategies for consideration. The steps for a national comeback in PTx involve greater emphasis on efficient referral and candidate selection, better donor pancreas utilization practices, eliminating financial barriers to procurement and transplant, improving collaboration between transplant and diabetes societies and professionals, and increasing focus on PTx training, education, and research. Partnership between national societies, patient advocacy groups, and professionals will be essential to realizing this critical agenda.

Indications, Techniques, and Barriers for Pancreas Transplant Biopsy: A Consensus Perspective From a Survey of US Centers.

BACKGROUND: Pancreas transplant biopsy practices for the diagnosis of rejection or other pathologies are not well described. METHODS: We conducted a survey of staff at US pancreas transplant programs (March 22, 2022, to August 22, 2022) to assess current program practices and perceptions about the utility and challenges in the performance and interpretation of pancreas allograft biopsies. RESULTS: Respondents represented 65% (76/117) of active adult pancreas transplant programs, capturing 66% of recent pancreas transplant volume in the United States. Participants were most often nephrologists (52%), followed by surgeons (46%), and other staff (4%). Pancreas allograft biopsies were performed mostly by interventional radiologists (74%), followed by surgeons (11%), nephrologists (8%), and gastroenterologists (1%). Limitations in the radiologist's or biopsy performer's comfort level or expertise to safely perform a biopsy, or to obtain sufficient/adequate samples were the two most common challenges with pancreas transplant biopsies. Pancreas transplant biopsies were read by local pathologists at a majority (86%) of centers. Challenges reported with pancreas biopsy interpretation included poor reliability, lack of reporting of C4d staining, lack of reporting of rejection grading, and inconclusive interpretation of the biopsy. Staff at a third of responding programs (34%) stated that they rarely or never perform pancreas allograft biopsies and treat presumed rejection empirically. CONCLUSIONS: This national survey identified significant variation in clinical practices related to pancreas allograft biopsies and potential barriers to pancreas transplant utilization across the United States. Consideration of strategies to improve program experience with percutaneous pancreas biopsy and to support optimal management of pancreas allograft rejection informed by histology is warranted.

OPTN/SRTR 2022 Annual Data Report: Kidney.

The year 2022 had continued successes and challenges for the field of kidney transplantation, as the community adapted to ongoing surges of the COVID-19 pandemic and broader geographic organ distribution. The total number of kidney transplants in the United States reached a record count of 26,309, driven by continued growth in deceased donor kidney transplants (DDKTs). The total number of candidates listed for DDKT rose slightly in 2022 but remained below 2019 listing levels, with 12.4% of candidates having been waiting 5 years or longer. Following the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, pretransplant mortality in 2022 declined across age, race and ethnicity, sex, and blood type groups. Pretransplant mortality continued to vary substantially by donation service area. The proportion of deceased donor kidneys recovered but not used for transplant (nonuse rate) rose to a high of 26.7% overall, with greater nonuse of biopsied kidneys (39.8%), kidneys from donors aged 55 years or older (54.7%), and kidneys with a kidney donor profile index (KDPI) of 85% or greater (71.3%). Nonuse of kidneys from donors who are hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody positive rose to 30.2% but only slightly exceeded that of HCV antibody-negative donors. Disparities in access to living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) persist, especially for non-White and publicly insured patients. Delayed graft function continues an upward trend and occurred in 26.3% of adult kidney transplants in 2022. Five-year graft survival after LDKT compared with DDKT was 90.0% versus 81.4% for recipients aged 18-34 years and 80.8% versus 67.8% for recipients aged 65 years or older, respectively. The total number of pediatric kidney transplants performed in 2022 decreased to 705, its lowest point in the past decade; 502 (71.2%) were DDKTs and 203 (28.8%) were LDKTs. Among pediatric recipients, LDKT remains low, with continued racial disparities. The rate of DDKT among pediatric candidates has decreased by almost 25% since 2011. Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract remain the leading primary kidney disease diagnosis among pediatric candidates with a reported diagnosis. Most pediatric deceased donor recipients received a kidney from a donor with a KDPI of less than 35%. The rate of delayed graft function was 5.8% in 2022 and has been stable over the past decade. Long-term graft survival continues to improve, with superior outcomes for living donor transplant recipients.

Risk Factors for Developing Low Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Albuminuria in Living Kidney Donors.

Rationale & Objective: Chronic kidney disease is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in the general population, but little is known about the incidence and risk factors associated with developing low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and moderate-severe albuminuria in living kidney donors following nephrectomy. Study Design: Retrospective, population-based cohort study. Setting & Participants: Kidney donors in Alberta, Canada. Exposure: Donor nephrectomy between May 2001 and December 2017. Outcome: Two eGFR measurements <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 or 2 measurements of moderate or severe albuminuria from 1-year postdonation onwards that were at least 90 days apart. Analytical Approach: Associations between potential risk factors and the primary outcome were assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. Results: Over a median follow-up period of 8.6 years (IQR, 4.7-12.6 years), 47 of 590 donors (8.0%) developed sustained low eGFR or moderate-severe albuminuria with an incidence rate of 9.2 per 1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 6.6-11.8). The median time for development of this outcome beyond the first year after nephrectomy was 2.9 years (IQR, 1.4-8.0 years). Within the first 4 years of follow-up, a 5 mL/min/1.73 m2 lower predonation eGFR increased the hazard of developing postdonation low eGFR or moderate-severe albuminuria by 26% (adjusted HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.10-1.44). Furthermore, donors were at higher risk of developing low eGFR or albuminuria if they had evidence of predonation hypertension (adjusted HR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.28-4.96) or postdonation diabetes (adjusted HR, 4.72; 95% CI, 1.54-14.50). Limitations: We lacked data on certain donor characteristics that may affect long-term kidney function, such as race, smoking history, and transplant-related characteristics. Conclusions: A proportion of kidney donors at an incidence rate of 9.2 per 1,000 person-years will develop low eGFR or albuminuria after donation. Donors with lower predonation eGFR, predonation hypertension, and postdonation diabetes are at increased risk of developing this outcome.

The purpose of this study was to understand the risk of developing kidney disease in living kidney donors after donation. We followed 590 donors in Alberta, Canada for almost 9 years. Approximately 8% of donors developed reduced kidney function (low estimated glomerular filtration rate) or increased protein in the urine (albuminuria). Donors with lower kidney function before donation, hypertension before donation, or diabetes after donation had a higher likelihood of experiencing these kidney outcomes. This research provides important insights to patients and health care providers to better support the long-term kidney health of living kidney donors.

Proton Pump Inhibitors Use in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Population-Based Study.

Background: Kidney transplant recipients are commonly prescribed proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), but due to concern for polypharmacy, chronic use should be limited. Objective: The objective was to describe PPI use in kidney transplant recipients beyond their first year of transplant to better inform and support deprescribing initiatives. Design: We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study using linked health care databases. Setting: This study was conducted in Alberta, Canada. Patients: We included all prevalent adult, kidney-only transplant recipients between April 2008 and December 2017 who received their transplant between May 2002 and December 2017. Measurements: The primary outcome was ongoing or new PPI use and patterns of use, including frequency and duration of therapy, and assessment of indication for PPI use. Methods: We ascertained baseline characteristics, covariate information, and outcome data from the Alberta Kidney Disease Network (AKDN). We compared recipients with evidence of a PPI prescription in the 3 months prior to study entry to those with a histamine-2-receptor antagonist (H2Ra) fill and those with neither. Results: We identified 1823 kidney transplant recipients, of whom 868 (48%) were on a PPI, 215 (12%) were on an H2Ra, and 740 (41%) were on neither at baseline. Over a median follow-up of 5.4 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 2.6-9.3), there were almost 45 000 unique PPI prescriptions dispensed, the majority (80%) of which were filled by initial PPI users. Recipients who were on a PPI at baseline would spend 91% (IQR = 70-98) of their graft survival time on a PPI in follow-up, and nephrologists were the main prescribers. We identified an indication for ongoing PPI use in 54% of recipients with the most common indication being concurrent antiplatelet use (26%). Limitations: Our kidney transplant recipients have access to universal health care coverage which may limit generalizability. We identified common gastrointestinal indications for PPI use but did not include rare conditions due to concerns about the validity of diagnostic codes. In addition, symptoms suggestive of reflux may not be well coded as the focus of follow-up visits is more likely to focus on kidney transplant. Conclusions: Many kidney transplant recipients are prescribed a PPI at, or beyond, the 1-year post-transplant date and are likely to stay on a PPI in follow-up. Almost half of the recipients in our study did not have an identifiable indication for ongoing PPI use. Nephrologists frequently prescribe PPIs to kidney transplant recipients and should be involved in deprescribing initiatives to reduce polypharmacy.

Contexte: On prescrit couramment des inhibiteurs de la pompe à protons (IPP) aux receveurs d'une greffe rénale; une pratique qui devrait cependant être limitée en raison de préoccupations liées à la polypharmacie. Objectif: Décrire l'utilisation des IPP chez les receveurs d'une greffe rénale au-delà de la première année post-greffe, afin de mieux informer et de soutenir les initiatives de déprescription. Type d'étude: Étude de cohorte populationnelle rétrospective réalisée à partir des bases de données couplées du système de santé. Cadre: Alberta, Canada. Sujets: Nous avons recueilli les données d'avril 2008 à décembre 2017 de tous les adultes qui avaient reçu un rein seulement entre mai 2002 et décembre 2017. Mesures: Le principal critère de jugement était la prise continue ­ ou une nouvelle ordonnance ­ d'IPP et les modalités d'utilisation, notamment la fréquence et la durée du traitement, ainsi que l'indication pour la prescription d'IPP. Méthodologie: Nous avons vérifié les caractéristiques initiales, les informations covariées et les données sur les résultats colligées dans l'Alberta Kidney Disease Network (AKDN). Nous avons comparé des receveurs présentant des preuves d'une prescription d'IPP au cours des trois mois précédant l'entrée dans l'étude à des patients avec une ordonnance d'antagonistes des récepteurs de l'histamine-2 (aRH2), ainsi qu'à des patients n'ayant aucune de ces prescriptions. Résultats: Nous avons identifié 1 823 receveurs d'une greffe rénale; 868 (48 %) recevaient un IPP, 215 (12 %) recevaient un aRH2 et 740 (41 %) ne recevaient aucun traitement à l'inclusion. Au cours d'un suivi médian de 5,4 ans (intervalle interquartile [IIQ]: 2,6-9,3), près de 45 000 ordonnances uniques d'IPP ont été délivrées, dont la majorité (80 %) avait été remplie par des utilisateurs initiaux d'IPP. Les receveurs qui prenaient des IPP à l'inclusion avaient passé 91 % (IIQ: 70-98) de leur temps de survie du greffon à prendre un IPP durant la période de suivi, et ces médicaments avaient été majoritairement prescrits par des néphrologues. Une indication justifiant l'utilisation continue d'un IPP était présente chez 54 % des receveurs; la plus courante étant l'utilisation concomitante d'un agent antiplaquettaire (26 %). Limites: Les receveurs inclus dans notre étude ont accès à une couverture médicale universelle, ce qui peut limiter la généralisabilité des résultats. Nous avons repéré des indications gastro-intestinales courantes pour l'utilisation d'IPP, mais nous n'avons pas inclus les affections rares en raison de préoccupations concernant la validité des codes diagnostiques. Aussi, les symptômes évocateurs d'un reflux pourraient ne pas être bien codés, car les visites de suivi sont plus susceptibles de porter sur la transplantation rénale. Conclusion: De nombreux receveurs d'une greffe rénale se voient encore prescrire un IPP dans l'année suivant la transplantation, ou au-delà, et sont susceptibles de continuer d'en prendre pendant le suivi. Près de la moitié des receveurs de notre étude n'avaient pas d'indication clairement identifiable de prendre un IPP en continu. Les néphrologues prescrivent fréquemment des IPP aux receveurs d'une greffe rénale et devraient être impliqués dans les initiatives de déprescription visant à réduire la polypharmacie.

Complexities and outcomes of pulmonary hypertension in kidney transplant patients: a comprehensive review.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is often present in patients presenting for kidney transplant listing. While PH can complicate kidney transplant (KTx), with multidisciplinary management that includes both the transplant center and pulmonary hypertension center or experts both pre- and post-transplant. This review summaries the approach and management of PH in KTx candidates and recipients, along with expected outcomes and controversies surrounding arteriovenous fistula and graft management.

Kidney Transplant Clinicians' Perceptions of Palliative Care for Patients With Failing Allografts in the US: A Mixed Methods Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Kidney transplant patients with failing allografts have a physical and psychological symptom burden as well as high morbidity and mortality. Palliative care is underutilized in this vulnerable population. We described kidney transplant clinicians' perceptions of palliative care to delineate their perceived barriers to and facilitators of providing palliative care to this population. STUDY DESIGN: National explanatory sequential mixed methods study including an online survey and semistructured interviews. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Kidney transplant clinicians in the United States surveyed and interviewed from October 2021 to March 2022. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Descriptive summary of survey responses, thematic analysis of qualitative interviews, and mixed methods integration of data. RESULTS: A total of 149 clinicians completed the survey, and 19 completed the subsequent interviews. Over 90% of respondents agreed that palliative care can be helpful for patients with a failing kidney allograft. However, 46% of respondents disagreed that all patients with failing allografts benefit from palliative care, and two-thirds thought that patients would not want serious illness conversations. More than 90% of clinicians expressed concern that transplant patients and caregivers would feel scared or anxious if offered palliative care. The interviews identified three main themes: (1) transplant clinicians' unique sense of personal and professional responsibility was a barrier to palliative care engagement, (2) clinicians' uncertainty regarding the timing of palliative care collaboration would lead to delayed referral, and (3) clinicians felt challenged by factors related to patients' cultural backgrounds and identities, such as language differences. Many comments reflected an unfamiliarity with the broad scope of palliative care beyond end-of-life care. LIMITATIONS: Potential selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that multiple barriers related to patients, clinicians, health systems, and health policies may pose challenges to the delivery of palliative care for patients with failing kidney transplants. This study illustrates the urgent need for ongoing efforts to optimize palliative care delivery models dedicated to kidney transplant patients, their families, and the clinicians who serve them. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Kidney transplant patients experience physical and psychological suffering in the context of their illnesses that may be amenable to palliative care. However, palliative care is often underutilized in this population. In this mixed-methods study, we surveyed 149 clinicians across the United States, and 19 of them completed semistructured interviews. Our study results demonstrate that several patient, clinician, system, and policy factors need to be addressed to improve palliative care delivery to this vulnerable population.

Outcomes of kidney, liver, and simultaneous liver and kidney transplants from hepatitis c infected donors to hepatitis c naïve recipients: A large single center experience.

BACKGROUND: With the introduction of direct-acting antiviral therapies (DAAs), the non-use rate of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive donor organs (D+) has decreased significantly. We present the donor, recipient, and transplant allograft characteristics, along with recipient outcomes, in one of the largest cohorts of HCV-D+ transplants into HCV-naïve recipients (R-). METHODS: Charts of HCV D+/R- kidney (KT), liver (LT), and simultaneous liver-kidney (SLKT) transplant recipients between January 2019 and July 2022 were reviewed. Primary outcomes of interest included waitlist times and 1-year graft failure. Secondary outcomes included hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, post-transplant complications, effectiveness of DAA therapy, and characteristics of patients who relapsed from initial DAA therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-five HCV D+/R- transplants at our center [42 KT (26 nucleic acid testing positive [NAT+], 16 NAT-), 12 LT (eight NAT+, four NAT-), and one SLKT (NAT+)] had a median waitlist time of 69 days for KT, 87 days for LT, and 15 days for SLKT. There were no graft failures at 1 year. All viremic recipients were treated with a 12-week course of DAAs, of which 100% achieved end of treatment response (EOTR)-85.7% (n = 30) achieved sustained virologic response (SVR) and 14.3% relapsed (n = 5; four KT, one LT). All relapsed recipients were retreated and achieved SVR. The most common post-transplantation complications include BK virus infection (n = 9) for KT and non-allograft infections (n = 4) for LT. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has demonstrated no graft failures or recipient deaths at 1 year, and despite a 14.3% relapse rate, we achieved 100% SVR. Complications rates of D+/R- appeared comparable to national D-/R- complication rates. Further studies comparing D+/R- to D-/R- outcomes are needed.

Differential Impact of the UNOS Simultaneous Liver-kidney Transplant Policy Change Among Patients With Sustained Acute Kidney Injury.

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous liver-kidney transplant (SLK) allocation policy in the United States was revised in August 2017, reducing access for liver transplant candidates with sustained acute kidney injury (sAKI) and potentially adversely impacting vulnerable populations whose true renal function is overestimated by commonly used estimation equations. METHODS: We examined national transplant registry data containing information for all liver transplant recipients from June 2013 to December 2021 to assess the impact of this policy change using instrumental variable estimation based on date of listing. RESULTS: Posttransplant survival was compared for propensity-matched patients with sAKI who were only eligible for liver transplant alone (LTA_post; n = 638) after the policy change but would have been SLK-eligible before August 2017, with similar patients who were previously able to receive an SLK (SLK; n = 319). Overall posttransplant patient survival was similar at 3 y (81% versus 80%; P = 0.9). However, receiving an SLK versus LTA increased survival among African Americans (87% versus 61% at 3 y; P = 0.029). A trend toward survival benefit from SLK versus LTA, especially later in the follow-up period, was observed in recipients ≥ age 60 (3-y survival: 84% versus 76%; P = 0.2) and women (86% versus 80%; P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: The 2017 United Network for Organ Sharing SLK Allocation Policy was associated with reduced survival of African Americans with end-stage liver disease and sAKI and, potentially, older patients and women. Our study suggested the use of race-neutral estimation of renal function would ameliorate racial disparities in the SLK arena; however, further studies are needed to reduce disparity in posttransplant outcomes among patients with liver and kidney failure.

Psychosocial evaluation of living liver donors-State of current practices in the United States.

We surveyed living donor liver transplant programs in the United States to describe practices in the psychosocial evaluation of living donors focused on (1) composition of psychosocial team; (2) domains, workflow, and tools of the psychosocial assessment; (3) absolute and relative mental health-related contraindications to donation; and (4) postdonation psychosocial follow-up. We received 52 unique responses, representing 33 of 50 (66%) of active living donor liver transplant programs. Thirty-one (93.9%) provider teams included social workers, 22 (66.7%) psychiatrists, and 14 (42.4%) psychologists. Validated tools were rarely used, but domains assessed were consistent. Respondents rated active alcohol (93.8%), cocaine (96.8%), and opioid (96.8%) use disorder, as absolute contraindications to donation. Active suicidality (97%), self-injurious behavior (90.9%), eating disorders (87.9%), psychosis (84.8%), nonadherence (71.9%), and inability to cooperate with the evaluation team (78.1%) were absolute contraindications to donation. There were no statistically significant differences in absolute psychosocial contraindications to liver donation between geographical areas or between large and small programs. Programs conduct postdonation psychosocial follow-up (57.6%) or screening (39.4%), but routine follow-up of declined donors is rarely conducted (15.8%). Psychosocial evaluation of donor candidates is a multidisciplinary process. The structure of the psychosocial evaluation of donors is not uniform among programs though the domains assessed are consistent. Psychosocial contraindications to living liver donation vary among the transplant programs. Mental health follow-up of donor candidates is not standardized.

Medical and Surgical Management of the Failed Pancreas Transplant.

Despite the continued improvements in pancreas transplant outcomes in recent decades, a subset of recipients experience graft failure and can experience substantial morbidity and mortality. Here, we summarize what is known about the failed pancreas allograft and what factors are important for consideration of retransplantation. The current definition of pancreas allograft failure and its challenges for the transplant community are explored. The impacts of a failed pancreas allograft are presented, including patient survival and resultant morbidities. The signs, symptoms, and medical and surgical management of a failed pancreas allograft are described, whereas the options and consequences of immunosuppression withdrawal are reviewed. Medical and surgical factors necessary for successful retransplant candidacy are detailed with emphasis on how well-selected patients may achieve excellent retransplant outcomes. To achieve substantial medical mitigation and even pancreas retransplantation, patients with a failed pancreas allograft warrant special attention to their residual renal, cardiovascular, and pulmonary function. Future studies of the failed pancreas allograft will require improved reporting of graft failure from transplant centers and continued investigation from experienced centers.