ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Type B insulin resistance syndrome is a rare form of diabetes due to the presence of anti-insulin receptor antibodies [1, 2], which causes glycemic decompensation and antidiabetic therapy failure and instead responds to immunosuppressive therapy. CASE REPORT: A 67-year-old patient was admitted to the hospital due to autoimmune hemolytic anemia and glycemic decompensation. We first prescribed subcutaneous basal-bolus insulin and then intravenous insulin without improvement in blood sugar levels (between 300 and 500 mg/dL). Considering the non-response to therapy and the autoimmune diathesis of the patient (hemolytic anemia and mixed connective tissue disease), we suspected an autoimmune etiopathogenesis of glycemic decompensation; we excluded type 1 diabetes mellitus (specific antibodies were negative), and we considered the anti-insulin-antibodies-(-assayed and negative) and anti-insulin receptor antibodies (not assayed due to the lack of a center specialized in this assay in the area). Therefore, we decided to start Rituximab. After 2 weeks from the infusion, the patient improved glycemic compensation, reducing insulin requirement. Further, 2 months after the first infusion, the patient stopped insulin, returning to oral therapy with Metformin. To date, the patient has completed 3 cycles of Rituximab with the benefit of glycemic control (HbA1c 6.7%). CONCLUSION: The brilliant response to Rituximab supports the hypothesis of an autoimmune pathogenesis. The anti-insulin receptor antibodies (in the type B insulin resistance syndrome) affect mostly middle-aged adults, especially women, in the context of other autoimmune diseases. Hence, it is necessary to consider the diagnosis of this rare disease in order to perform timely and effective treatment.
ABSTRACT
AIM: To evaluate predisposition to eating disorders (ED) or body dissatisfaction in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM); to further investigate any differences in ED predisposition between subjects with T1DM on multiple daily injections (MDI) or insulin pumps (CSII) and in respect to control healthy subjects. METHODS: We conducted a monocentric, cross-sectional, observational study. We enrolled subjects with T1DM, aged ≥ 18 years, and healthy subjects (HS) as control group. All participants completed two questionnaires to detect possible predisposition to ED: 34-items Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) and Eating Disorder Inventory-3 (EDI-3). HS only filled BSQ. For subjects with T1DM data about glycated hemoglobin and duration of disease were also collected. RESULTS: 162 subjects with T1DM (age 41 ± 12 years, 77 [47%] males) and 50 HS (age 38 ± 13 years, 18 (36%) males) were enrolled. 87 subjects with T1DM (54%) were on MDI and 75 (46%) were on CSII. No significant difference in the distribution of BSQ scores between subjects with T1DM and HS was observed (p = 0.551), although 16% of subjects with T1DM scored BSQ class 1 points while 8% of HS scored a BSQ class 1 points. No significant difference in BSQ scores was observed between subjects with T1DM on MDI or CSII. Between these two groups, no differences in EDI-3 scores were observed except for perfectionism score: subjects on MDI present more frequently a predisposition for perfectionism (p < 0.05) and, at a trend level, for bulimia. CONCLUSION: A non -significant higher percentage of BSQ class 1 was detected in subjects T1DM compared to healthy controls. Among subjects with T1DM, no differences between MDI and CSII were observed in ED predisposition. A more perfectionist personality has been detected among subjects on MDI.
