Family concerns and relationship problems in anxious pregnant women and their associations with postnatal functional disability in Pakistan.

OBJECTIVE: Expanding on existing research suggesting that strategies to reduce prenatal anxiety can decrease functional disability (e.g., difficulties in performing everyday activities and social participation), we examined if this effect varied by type of anxiety-producing problem (i.e., having family concerns and relationship problems versus other problems) reported during pregnancy. Further, we explored if perceived social support mediated this relationship. METHODS: We used longitudinal data on 310 anxious Pakistani women who received any psychosocial intervention sessions as part of a program that was based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. The Psychological Outcome Profiles (PSYCHLOPS) was used to assess whether women had 'family concerns and relationship problems' or 'other problems.' The WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 assessed functional disability at six-weeks after delivery. Lack of support was measured using a 12-item Multi-dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. We employed linear regression to examine associations between types of problems reported during pregnancy and postnatal functional disability. Causal mediation analysis was used to assess whether postnatal social support mediated this relationship. RESULTS: Of anxious pregnant women, 34% reported family concerns or relationship problems as primary problems in pregnancy. They were more likely to report higher functional disability at six-weeks after delivery than women who reported other problems (adjusted B = 2.40, 95% CI: 0.83-3.97). Lack of overall social support (Estimateindirect = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.04-1.38) and lack of support from friends (Estimateindirect = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.01-1.29) significantly mediated the relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that complementing pre- and post-natal care with support programs and services that address family concerns and relationship problems, as well as enhancing social support is important to functional disability.

The physician gender pay gap in Maryland: current state and future directions.

BACKGROUND: Over the last few decades, more attention has been paid to the physician gender pay gap and more interventions have been attempted. This paper discusses the physician gender pay gap between 2017 and 2021 in Maryland. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey was distributed to over 10,000 physicians in the Maryland Medical Society, featuring questions regarding employment characteristics, compensation, impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and educational debt. Using descriptive and regression analyses, we explored cross-sectional associations between gender and employment characteristics. RESULTS: Male physicians reported a significantly higher average 2020 pre-tax income ($333,732 per year) than female physicians ($225,473 per year, p < 0.001), amounting to a nearly 50% difference in raw income, consistent with a previously reported pay gap in 2016. Women physicians earned 31.5% less than their male colleagues in 2020 and were projected to earn 28.7% less in 2021. Female physicians were also more likely to have educational debt (33.6% vs.12.9%, p < 0.001) and also more likely to have a high burden of debt, with 36% owing over $200,000 in education loans, compared to 14.7% of men (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The physician gender pay gap in Maryland has remained relatively stable over four years, including the period of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The physician gender pay gap in Maryland has remained stable over four years, including the period of the COVID-19 pandemic.Female physicians earned over 30% less than male physicians in Maryland in 2020.Female physicians are more likely to have educational debt, and when they do, they have a greater magnitude of debt.

Psychological Climate for Caring and Work Outcomes: A Virtuous Cycle.

The current literature's focus on unidirectional effects of psychological and organizational climates at work on work outcomes fails to capture the full relationship between these factors. This article examines whether a psychological climate for caring contributes to specific work outcomes and investigates whether work outcomes support the climate for caring, creating a feedback loop. Results confirm a bi-directional, temporal association between perceived climate for caring and two of the four explored work outcomes: self-reported productivity and self-reported work quality. The effect of a perceived caring climate on these work outcomes was stronger than the effect in the opposite direction. The perception that the work climate was caring was also found to affect work engagement, but the reverse relationship was not identified. We did not find any evidence for a link between job satisfaction and a climate for caring at work in either direction.

HIV/AIDS health services in Manaus, Brazil: patient perception of quality and its influence on adherence to antiretroviral treatment.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is an important factor for both assessing the quality of healthcare and predicting positive health outcomes. This study assesses the influence of HIV/AIDS patients' perception of the quality of health services on adherence to antiretroviral treatment using the decentralized care model in Manaus, Brazil. METHODS: We conducted a non-randomized, cross-sectional analysis to explore the relationship between patient satisfaction and adherence to antiretroviral treatment (ART) in Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. We also compared patient satisfaction levels at the city's main hospital with those at smaller health units established to decentralize HIV/AIDS healthcare. Using survey responses from 812 patients and health data from 713 patients, we conducted descriptive and regression analyses to identify health center characteristics associated with higher patient satisfaction and higher adherence to treatment. RESULTS: We found a clear and positive relationship between patient satisfaction with the quality of health services and adherence to ART. Patients who had better access to their health center and its services -mainly in the form of convenient location, shorter commute times, and shorter wait times- tended to rate the quality of services higher and were also more likely to adhere to ART. We also found higher levels of patient satisfaction and adherence to ART among patients served at decentralized health units than among patients served at the main hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The study's results emphasize the importance of patients' experience at the health center for improved health outcomes. While many of the factors that play a role in whether a patient adheres to ART or not are beyond the control of the health center, our findings highlight that health centers can importantly contribute to increased ART adherence by improving such experience. The study also showcases the potential benefits of decentralizing HIV care to increase patient satisfaction and, with it, adherence to ART.