Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the technical errors of intraoral radiographs exposed on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates. METHODS: The intraoral radiographic images exposed on phantoms from preclinical practical exams of dental and dental hygiene students were used. Each exam consisted of 10 designated periapical and bitewing views. A total of 107 film sets and 122 PSP sets were evaluated for technique errors, including placement, elongation, foreshortening, overlapping, cone cut, receptor bending, density, mounting, dot in apical area, and others. Some errors were further subcategorized as minor, major, or remake depending on the severity. The percentages of radiographs with various errors were compared between film and PSP by the Fisher's Exact Test. RESULTS: Compared with film, there was significantly less PSP foreshortening, elongation, and bending errors, but significantly more placement and overlapping errors. Using a wrong sized receptor due to the similarity of the color of the package sleeves is a unique PSP error. CONCLUSIONS: Optimum image quality is attainable with PSP plates as well as film. When switching from film to a PSP digital environment, more emphasis is necessary for placing the PSP plates, especially those with excessive packet edge, and then correcting the corresponding angulation for the beam alignment. Better design for improving intraoral visibility and easy identification of different sized PSP will improve the clinician's technical performance with this receptor.

Comparison of the efficacy and technical accuracy of different rectangular collimators for intraoral radiography.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the operating efficiency and technical accuracy of 3 different rectangular collimators. STUDY DESIGN: A full-mouth intraoral radiographic series excluding central incisor views were taken on training manikins by 2 groups of undergraduate dental and dental hygiene students. Three types of rectangular collimator were used: Type I ("free-hand"), Type II (mechanical interlocking), and Type III (magnetic collimator). Eighteen students exposed one side of the manikin with a Type I collimator and the other side with a Type II. Another 15 students exposed the manikin with Type I and Type III respectively. Type I is currently used for teaching and patient care at our institution and was considered as the control to which both Types II and III were compared. The time necessary to perform the procedure, subjective user friendliness, and the number of technique errors (placement, projection, and cone cut errors) were assessed. The Student t test or signed rank test was used to determine statistical difference (P