Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a comparative study of pyloric traumamyoplasty and Fredet-Ramstedt pyloromyotomy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of surgical complications (duodenal perforation, postoperative vomiting, wound infection or dehiscence, incisional hernia) between 2 different surgical techniques for the resolution of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in children. METHODS: A clinically controlled, randomized study with follow-up from 24 to 36 months was conducted. One hundred children between 15 days and 2 months old, who underwent surgical resolution of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, were put randomly into 2 groups: I, pyloric traumamyoplasty (n = 43); II, Fredet-Ramstedt pyloromyotomy (n = 57). Both groups were controlled for the main demographic variables. Postoperative follow-up was blind for the surgical team. Statistical analysis was done with simple frequencies, percentages, Student's t test, and chi(2). RESULTS: There was not a single case of duodenal perforation, incomplete pyloromyotomy, wound infection, dehiscence, or incisional hernia in any group (P value, not significant). Postoperative emesis was present in 8 patients, uniformly distributed between groups. The operating room time for traumamyoplasty was 39.3 +/- 16.4 minutes versus 54 +/- 16.4 minutes for pyloromyotomy (P =.0003). CONCLUSIONS: This controlled study proves that traumamyoplasty is a simple procedure, quicker to perform, and as safe as pyloromyotomy for the treatment of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in children. For these reasons, the authors believe it should be considered as an alternative.

Intestinal anastomosis in children: a comparative study between two different techniques.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of surgical complications between two different surgical techniques for intestinal anastomosis in children. METHODS: This was a clinically controlled, randomized study with blind follow-up from 18 to 36 months performed at the Reference Government Hospital in Mexico City. Eighty-six children required intestinal anastomosis, ages ranged between 1 month and 16 years, with emergency or elective surgery. Anastomoses of duodenum, rectum, with enteroplasty or protected with a proximal stoma were excluded. Two randomized groups were formed: (1) anastomosis with one layer of suture (Gambee stitches) and (2) with two layers of suture (first with Connel-Mayo stitches then with Lembert). Both groups were controlled in the principal variables without differences, and the follow-up concerning postoperative recovery was blind for the surgical team. RESULTS: Forty-two cases in group 1 and 44 in group 2 were compared. Intestinal dehiscence was found in 5 of 86 (5.8%), two from group I and three from group II (P value, not significant). Surgical time for anastomosis with one layer was an average of 26 minutes versus 43 minutes with two layers (P<.001). There were no stenoses within the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: This study proves that intestinal anastomosis with one layer of suture is as safe as anastomosis with two layers in children, and the time spent for completion of the procedure is significantly less with one plane of suture. For those reasons, it is the method of choice for intestinal anastomosis in children.